AzTrials
AzTrials

Diabetic RetinopathyPhase 3NCT00000160

Diabetic Retinopathy Study (DRS)

A Phase 3 study testing Xenon Photocoagulation, Argon Photocoagulation and Photocoagulation in people with Diabetic Retinopathy and Blindness, run by National Eye Institute (NEI).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To determine whether photocoagulation helps prevent severe visual loss from proliferative diabetic retinopathy. To determine whether a difference exists in the efficacy and safety of argon versus xenon photocoagulation for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Diabetic Retinopathy, Blindness
What is being tested?
Xenon Photocoagulation, Argon Photocoagulation and Photocoagulation
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
Not given
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jan 1972to not given
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Patients were eligible if they had best corrected visual acuity of 20/100 or better in each eye and the presence of proliferative diabetic retinopathy in at least one eye or severe nonproliferative retinopathy in both eyes. They could not have had prior treatment with photocoagulation or pituitary ablation, and both eyes had to be suitable for photocoagulation. All eligible patients were younger than 70 years, and the examining physician assessed the outlook for survival and availability for 5 years of followup to be good.

About this study

To determine whether photocoagulation helps prevent severe visual loss from proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

To determine whether a difference exists in the efficacy and safety of argon versus xenon photocoagulation for proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

Read the detailed description

By the 1950s, diabetic retinopathy had become a leading cause of blindness and visual disability in the United States. The use of photocoagulation to treat proliferative retinopathy gained widespread use in ophthalmic practice following its introduction in 1959. However, only a few studies of photocoagulation incorporated any of the basic principles of controlled clinical trials, and these involved inadequate numbers of patients. Consequently, there has been inadequate evidence of the actual value of the procedure. Because of the clinical importance of diabetic retinopathy and the increasing use of photocoagulation in its management, the Diabetic Retinopathy Study (DRS) was begun in 1971. This randomized, controlled clinical trial involved more than 1,700 patients enrolled at 15 medical centers.

One eye of each patient was randomly assigned to immediate photocoagulation and the other to followup without treatment, regardless of the course followed by either eye. The eye chosen for photocoagulation was randomly assigned to either of two treatment techniques, one using an argon laser and the other a xenon arc photocoagulator. Patients were followed at 4-month intervals according to a protocol that provided for measurement of best corrected visual acuity.

Treatment was usually completed in one or two sittings and included scatter (panretinal) photocoagulation extending to or beyond the vortex vein ampulae. The argon treatment technique specified 800 to 1,600, 500-micron scatter burns of 0.1 second duration and direct treatment of new vessels whether on or within one disc diameter of the optic disc (NVD) or outside this area (NVE). Focal treatment was also applied to microaneurysms or other lesions thought to be causing macular edema. Followup treatment was applied as needed at 4-month intervals. The xenon technique was similar, but scatter burns were fewer in number, generally of longer duration, and stronger, and direct treatment was applied only to NVE on the surface of the retina.

Being tested
Xenon Photocoagulation, Argon Photocoagulation, Photocoagulation
Keywords
Vision Loss
Medical subject headings
Diabetic Retinopathy, Blindness, Vision Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Xenon PhotocoagulationProcedure or surgery

  • Argon PhotocoagulationProcedure or surgery

  • PhotocoagulationProcedure or surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Sep 1999 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 1972

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00000160
Sponsor's protocol ID
NEI-62
Status last verified
Oct 2003
First submitted
23 Sep 1999
Last updated
2 Jun 2006
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Diabetic retinopathy study. Report Number 6. Design, methods, and baseline results. Report Number 7. A modification of the Airlie House classification of diabetic retinopathy. Prepared by the Diabetic Retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1981 Jul;21(1 Pt 2):1-226. No abstract available.

    PubMed 7195893

  • Four risk factors for severe visual loss in diabetic retinopathy. The third report from the Diabetic Retinopathy Study. The Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1979 Apr;97(4):654-5. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1979.01020010310003.

    PubMed 426679

  • The Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group; Photocoagulation treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy: A short report of long range results., Diabetic Retinopathy Study (DRS) Report Number 4. Proceedings of the 10th Congress of the International Diabetes Federation 1979

  • Photocoagulation treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy: relationship of adverse treatment effects to retinopathy severity. Diabetic retinopathy study report no. 5. Dev Ophthalmol. 1981;2:248-61.

    PubMed 7262408

  • Photocoagulation treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Clinical application of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (DRS) findings, DRS Report Number 8. The Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Ophthalmology. 1981 Jul;88(7):583-600.

    PubMed 7196564

  • Ederer F, Podgor MJ. Assessing possible late treatment effects in stopping a clinical trial early: a case study. Diabetic Retinopathy Study report No. 9. Control Clin Trials. 1984 Dec;5(4):373-81. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(84)80016-1.

    PubMed 6394209

  • Rand LI, Prud'homme GJ, Ederer F, Canner PL. Factors influencing the development of visual loss in advanced diabetic retinopathy. Diabetic Retinopathy Study (DRS) Report No. 10. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1985 Jul;26(7):983-91.

    PubMed 2409053

  • Preliminary report on effects of photocoagulation therapy. The Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Am J Ophthalmol. 1976 Apr;81(4):383-96. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(76)90292-0.

    PubMed 944535

  • Ferris FL 3rd, Podgor MJ, Davis MD. Macular edema in Diabetic Retinopathy Study patients. Diabetic Retinopathy Study Report Number 12. Ophthalmology. 1987 Jul;94(7):754-60. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(87)33526-2.

    PubMed 3658347

  • Kaufman SC, Ferris FL 3rd, Swartz M. Intraocular pressure following panretinal photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy. Diabetic Retinopathy Report No. 11. Arch Ophthalmol. 1987 Jun;105(6):807-9. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1987.01060060093040.

    PubMed 3555429

  • Kaufman SC, Ferris FL 3rd, Seigel DG, Davis MD, DeMets DL. Factors associated with visual outcome after photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy. Diabetic Retinopathy Study Report #13. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1989 Jan;30(1):23-8.

    PubMed 2912911

  • Indications for photocoagulation treatment of diabetic retinopathy: Diabetic Retinopathy Study Report no. 14. The Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1987 Winter;27(4):239-53. doi: 10.1097/00004397-198702740-00004. No abstract available.

    PubMed 2447027

  • Photocoagulation treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy: the second report of diabetic retinopathy study findings. Ophthalmology. 1978 Jan;85(1):82-106. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(78)35693-1.

    PubMed 345173

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Xenon Photocoagulation, Argon Photocoagulation and Photocoagulation in people with Diabetic Retinopathy and Blindness, run by National Eye Institute (NEI).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jun 2006. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00000160, which also lists 13 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jun 2006.

AzTrials uses cookies for analytics and advertising. You can accept or reject them; the site works either way. Privacy Policy.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in