Major Depressive DisorderPhase 4NCT00000375
Continuation Electroconvulsive Therapy Vs Medication to Prevent Relapses in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder
A Phase 4 study testing Nortriptyline-lithium (NOR-Li), Bilateral electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and Continuation therapy in people with Major Depressive Disorder, run by National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of two treatments to prevent relapses in seriously ill patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) who have responded to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Major Depressive Disorder
- What is being tested?
- Nortriptyline-lithium (NOR-Li), Bilateral electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and Continuation therapy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- How many people
- Not given
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Feb 1997to not given
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- -
- Patients must have:
- Major depressive disorder that is responsive to acute phase ECT.
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Continuation ECT Vs Pharmacotherapy--Efficacy And Safety
The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of two treatments to prevent relapses in seriously ill patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) who have responded to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Patients will either continue to receive ECT (continuation electroconvulsive therapy [C-ECT]), or they will be treated with antidepressant medications.
ECT is a highly effective treatment for MDD; however, relapses are a major concern. To prevent relapse in patients who have responded to ECT, the common treatment is antidepressants as continuation therapy (following the initial therapy in order to continue treating the disorder). Relapses, however, can still occur even after antidepressant continuation therapy. This study will evaluate a potent antidepressant combination in order to prevent relapse. C-ECT is another option that needs to be tested.
Read more
If the patient responds to the first round of ECT, he/she will be assigned randomly (like tossing a coin) to either continue receiving ECT or to receive an antidepressant combination of nortriptyline plus lithium (NOR-Li) for 6 months. The patient will have psychological tests before, shortly after, and 3 months after the first round of ECT, and at the end of the 6-month continuation trial. Patients will be monitored for symptoms and side effects. All patients will have urine tests to test for drug abuse.
An individual may be eligible for this study if he/she:
Has major depressive disorder and responds positively to ECT treatment and is 18 to 80 years old.
Read the detailed description
To define the role of continuation electroconvulsive therapy (C-ECT) in relapse-prevention of seriously ill patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). To determine the relative efficacy and safety of C-ECT in comparison to the traditional approach of continuation pharmacotherapy (C-PHARM) to prevent relapses of MDD.
Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a highly effective treatment for MDD that is helpful for patients with the most severe forms of affective illness; however, relapse after successful acute phase ECT or pharmacotherapy remains a major public health problem. To prevent relapse in patients with MDD who have responded to ECT, the common practice is to prescribe an antidepressant (e.g., a tricyclic [TCA], a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor [SSRI], or lithium) as continuation therapy. Recent studies show an alarmingly high relapse rate after ECT despite conventional continuation pharmacotherapy (C-PHARM). Continuation ECT (C-ECT) is also in widespread clinical use; however, its efficacy and safety have never been rigorously tested.
Investigators at four sites (Mayo Clinic, UMDNJ-New Jersey Medical School, Zucker Hillside Hospital, and University of Texas SW Medical Center, Dallas) randomize patients to receive either C-ECT or an aggressive pharmacological strategy (nortriptyline and lithium in combination, [NOR-Li]) for 6 months following response to acute phase ECT. Raters at each site evaluate symptoms and side effects. On the basis of edited videotapes obtained at regular intervals, a site-independent, blinded evaluator also assesses symptoms. A neuropsychological battery is administered prior to acute phase ECT, shortly after the ECT course, 3 months after the end of the acute phase treatment, and at the end of the 6-month continuation trial. These continuation therapies are compared in their effects on relapse, cognitive performance, global functioning, side effects, and perceived health status. NOR and Li levels are optimized by blood level monitoring. Bilateral ECT, at progressively increasing intervals, are used for C-ECT. Methods are included to ensure the integrity of clinical diagnoses, symptom severity assessment, data collection and entry, and treatment delivery. In all patients, surreptitious use of prescription or recreational drugs is monitored by urine testing.
- Conditions
- Major Depressive Disorder
- Being tested
- Nortriptyline-lithium (NOR-Li), Bilateral electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), Continuation therapy, Continuation ECT
- Keywords
- Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Depressive Disorder, Electroconvulsive Therapy, Female, Human, Lithium, Male, Nortriptyline, Serotonin Uptake Inhibitors, Antidepressive Agents -- *therapeutic use, Antidepressive Agents -- adverse effects, Lithium -- *therapeutic use, Lithium -- adverse effects, Nortriptyline -- *therapeutic use, Nortriptyline -- adverse effects
- Medical subject headings
- Depressive Disorder, Major, Depressive Disorder
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Nortriptyline-lithium (NOR-Li)Drug
Bilateral electroconvulsive therapy (ECT)Procedure or surgery
Continuation therapyDrug
Continuation ECTBehavioural
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Nov 1999 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 1997
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Major Depressive DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Masking
- Single blind
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
- Sponsor type
- US National Institutes of Health
- Investigators
- Charles Kellner, MD, Study chairMustafa Husain, MD, Principal investigatorTeresa Rummans, MD, Principal investigatorGeorge Petrides, Principal investigator
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00000375
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MH55495
- Status last verified
- Dec 2005
- First submitted
- 2 Nov 1999
- Last updated
- 20 Dec 2005
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Husain MM, McClintock SM, Rush AJ, Knapp RG, Fink M, Rummans TA, Rasmussen K, Claassen C, Petrides G, Biggs MM, Mueller M, Sampson S, Bailine SH, Lisanby SH, Kellner CH. The efficacy of acute electroconvulsive therapy in atypical depression. J Clin Psychiatry. 2008 Mar;69(3):406-11. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v69n0310.
PubMed 18278988
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Dec 2005. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Continuation ECT Vs Pharmacotherapy--Efficacy And Safety
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00000375
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MH55495
- Conditions
- Major Depressive Disorder
- Keywords
- Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Depressive Disorder, Electroconvulsive Therapy, Female, Human, Lithium, Male
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Lead sponsor
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)US National Institutes of Health
- Study start
- Feb 1997
- First posted
- 3 Nov 1999 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of two treatments to prevent relapses in seriously ill patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) who have responded to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Patients will either continue to receive ECT (continuation electroconvulsive therapy [C-ECT]), or they will be treated with antidepressant medications.
ECT is a highly effective treatment for MDD; however, relapses are a major concern. To prevent relapse in patients who have responded to ECT, the common treatment is antidepressants as continuation therapy (following the initial therapy in order to continue treating the disorder). Relapses, however, can still occur even after antidepressant continuation therapy. This study will evaluate a potent antidepressant combination in order to prevent relapse. C-ECT is another option that needs to be tested.
If the patient responds to the first round of ECT, he/she will be assigned randomly (like tossing a coin) to either continue receiving ECT or to receive an antidepressant combination of nortriptyline plus lithium (NOR-Li) for 6 months. The patient will have psychological tests before, shortly after, and 3 months after the first round of ECT, and at the end of the 6-month continuation trial. Patients will be monitored for symptoms and side effects. All patients will have urine tests to test for drug abuse.
An individual may be eligible for this study if he/she:
Has major depressive disorder and responds positively to ECT treatment and is 18 to 80 years old.
Detailed description
To define the role of continuation electroconvulsive therapy (C-ECT) in relapse-prevention of seriously ill patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). To determine the relative efficacy and safety of C-ECT in comparison to the traditional approach of continuation pharmacotherapy (C-PHARM) to prevent relapses of MDD.
Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a highly effective treatment for MDD that is helpful for patients with the most severe forms of affective illness; however, relapse after successful acute phase ECT or pharmacotherapy remains a major public health problem. To prevent relapse in patients with MDD who have responded to ECT, the common practice is to prescribe an antidepressant (e.g., a tricyclic [TCA], a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor [SSRI], or lithium) as continuation therapy. Recent studies show an alarmingly high relapse rate after ECT despite conventional continuation pharmacotherapy (C-PHARM). Continuation ECT (C-ECT) is also in widespread clinical use; however, its efficacy and safety have never been rigorously tested.
Investigators at four sites (Mayo Clinic, UMDNJ-New Jersey Medical School, Zucker Hillside Hospital, and University of Texas SW Medical Center, Dallas) randomize patients to receive either C-ECT or an aggressive pharmacological strategy (nortriptyline and lithium in combination, [NOR-Li]) for 6 months following response to acute phase ECT. Raters at each site evaluate symptoms and side effects. On the basis of edited videotapes obtained at regular intervals, a site-independent, blinded evaluator also assesses symptoms. A neuropsychological battery is administered prior to acute phase ECT, shortly after the ECT course, 3 months after the end of the acute phase treatment, and at the end of the 6-month continuation trial. These continuation therapies are compared in their effects on relapse, cognitive performance, global functioning, side effects, and perceived health status. NOR and Li levels are optimized by blood level monitoring. Bilateral ECT, at progressively increasing intervals, are used for C-ECT. Methods are included to ensure the integrity of clinical diagnoses, symptom severity assessment, data collection and entry, and treatment delivery. In all patients, surreptitious use of prescription or recreational drugs is monitored by urine testing.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Masking
- Single blind
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- -
- Major depressive disorder that is responsive to acute phase ECT.
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Nortriptyline-lithium (NOR-Li) | Drug | – |
| Bilateral electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) | Procedure or surgery | – |
| Continuation therapy | Drug | – |
| Continuation ECT | Behavioural | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Dec 2005.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 18278988Husain MM, McClintock SM, Rush AJ, Knapp RG, Fink M, Rummans TA, Rasmussen K, Claassen C, Petrides G, Biggs MM, Mueller M, Sampson S, Bailine SH, Lisanby SH, Kellner CH. The efficacy of acute electroconvulsive therapy in atypical depression. J Clin Psychiatry. 2008 Mar;69(3):406-11. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v69n0310.
Related trials for Major Depressive Disorder
RecruitingPhase 1
Mechanism of Action Underlying Ketamine's Antidepressant Effects: The AMPA Throughput Theory in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Major Depression
Depression, Major Depressive Disorder
Recruiting
Impact of Psychomotor Therapy on the Quality of Life in Depression
Major Depressive Disorder
RecruitingPhase 1
Open-Label Psilocybin Study in Transdiagnostic Population
Transdiagnostic, Depression - Major Depressive Disorder
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of a Deuterated Psilocin Analog (CYB003) in Humans With Major Depressive Disorder
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), Depression in Adults
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Synaptic Mechanisms of Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation for Major Depressive Disorder
Major Depression, Healthy Participants
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Charles Kellner, MD study chair
Mustafa Husain, MD principal investigator
Teresa Rummans, MD principal investigator
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Nortriptyline-lithium (NOR-Li), Bilateral electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and Continuation therapy in people with Major Depressive Disorder, run by National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Dec 2005. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00000375, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Dec 2005; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 1 Nov 2026.