OsteopeniaPhase 3NCT00000430
Low-Dose Hormone Replacement Therapy and Alendronate for Osteoporosis
A Phase 3 study testing Alendronate and Estrogen/progestin therapy in people with Osteopenia and Osteoporosis, run by National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Osteoporosis, a condition in which bones are fragile and break easily, is a major health problem for postmenopausal women. Research studies have shown that both estrogen/progestin replacement therapy (hormone replacement therapy, or HRT) and alendronate are effective in preventing and treating osteoporosis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Osteopenia, Osteoporosis
- What is being tested?
- Alendronate and Estrogen/progestin therapy
- How many people
- 240 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Oct 1999to Sep 2004
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 years and older
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Women at least 60 years of age.
- Good general health.
- Willingness to participate in this 3.5 year study.
- Ability to give informed consent.
- Ability to live independently and travel to the research center for visits (we will provide transportation on a limited basis).
- Spine bone mineral density (BMD) (L1-4) T-score between -1.0 and -2.5, or a hip T-score between -1.0 and -2.5. A T-score of -1.0 is equal to a bone mass of one standard deviation below the mean peak bone mass in healthy young adult women.
Who cannot join
- Any history of cancer except the following: (a) superficial basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin which has been completely resected or resolved by a topical chemotherapeutic agent, and (b) other malignancies treated curatively at least 10 years previously, without any evidence of recurrence.
- Abnormal transvaginal ultrasound that has not been investigated and cleared by endometrial biopsy.
- History of low-trauma hip or spine fracture previously diagnosed.
- Serious residuals from cerebral vascular disease.
- Diabetes mellitus, except for easily controlled, non-insulin dependent or insulin dependent diabetes mellitus without significant microvascular or neuropathic disease.
- Serum creatinine >1.9 mg/dl.
Show all 21Show fewer
- Chronic liver disease or alcoholism.
- Treatment with bone active agents such as fluoride or bisphosphonates within the previous 2 years.
- Treatment with calcitonin, estrogen, or a selective estrogen receptor modulator within the previous 6 months.
- Systemic corticosteroid therapy at pharmacologic levels for more than 6 months duration.
- Any corticosteroid therapy within the previous 6 months.
- Treatment with anticonvulsant therapy within the previous year.
- Clinically significant abnormalities on pre-study laboratory or clinical screens.
- Treatment with thyroid hormone is accepted, provided the patient is euthyroid at the time of entry, and the serum TSH by ultrasensitive assay is normal.
- Uncontrolled hypertension.
- Unstable angina.
- Myocardial infarction within 1 year prior to entry.
- Evidence of metabolic bone disease, e.g. hyper- or hypoparathyroidism, Paget's disease, osteomalacia, osteogenesis imperfecta, or others.
- Active rheumatoid arthritis or collagen disease.
- Recent major gastrointestinal disease (within the past year) such as peptic ulcer, malabsorption, chronic ulcerative colitis, regional enteritis, or any significant chronic diarrhea state.
- Tobacco use at a level of more than 10 cigarettes per day.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Creighton University Osteoporosis Research Center
Omaha, Nebraska, 68131
About this study
Official title: Clinical Trial of Continuous Low-Dose Hormone Replacement Therapy Combined With Alendronate in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Density
Osteoporosis, a condition in which bones are fragile and break easily, is a major health problem for postmenopausal women. Research studies have shown that both estrogen/progestin replacement therapy (hormone replacement therapy, or HRT) and alendronate are effective in preventing and treating osteoporosis. However, because these drugs work in somewhat different ways, a combination of the two drugs might protect women from osteoporosis better than either drug alone. In this study we will test whether HRT and alendronate given together for 3.5 years to postmenopausal women with low bone mass will have a greater effect on bone than either HRT or alendronate given alone. We will also give every participant in this study calcium and vitamin D supplements.
Read the detailed description
Clinical trials of estrogen/progestin replacement therapy (HRT) and a bisphosphonate, alendronate (ALN), have demonstrated that both are effective in causing gains in bone mass and preventing bone loss and fractures in postmenopausal women. The FDA has approved both these drugs for prevention and treatment of fractures, and both are widely used in clinical practice. Because both are approved and effective, and they work by different mechanisms, many patients and their physicians ask whether both should be taken in combination, particularly in cases of severe disease. The question is asked frequently because of the high incidence of osteoporosis among women and the need for long-term prevention and treatments that often last decades.
Indeed, physicians are using ALN and HRT together without adequate scientific support for the assumption that the combination is more effective than either given alone.
Clinical trials are now underway to test conventional doses of HRT given as conjugated equine estrogens (CEE), 0.625 mg/day or its equivalent, combined with ALN, 10 mg/day. However, researchers are not studying the bone-sparing effectiveness of the combined administration of ALN and low-dose continuous HRT given as CEE, 0.3 mg/d, along with medroxyprogesterone, 2.5 mg/d (MP). This low-dose continuous HRT regimen is attractive because of better convenience, better patient tolerance, and reduced risk of breast cancer and other safety concerns associated with conventional higher doses. Further, we have recently demonstrated that the bone-sparing effect of this regimen is comparable to that of higher doses.
The long-term objective of this study is to test the hypothesis that the combined therapy shows a greater bone effect than does either treatment given alone. Our specific aim is to conduct a 3.5 year, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of low-dose, continuous HRT combined with alendronate, 10 mg/d (ALN), in three groups (72 people per group) of estrogen-deprived postmenopausal women over age 60. We will give Group 1 low-dose HRT, Group 2 ALN, and Group 3 both low-dose HRT and ALN. We will give calcium and vitamin D supplements to people in all three groups.
The primary outcome measures will be spine bone mineral density (SpBMD) and total hip bone mineral density (HipBMD) measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Secondary outcome measures will be total body bone mineral content and forearm bone mineral content. In addition, we will perform studies to characterize the mechanism of the effects of these regimens. These studies will consist of measurements of urinary bone resorption markers, serum bone formation markers, calcium excretion, calcium absorption, and application of a model developed in our laboratory to estimate and compare the magnitudes of the anabolic effects (if any) of all three interventions on SpBMD and HipBMD.
We have reported data showing that both agents have an anabolic effect on bone in humans, meaning that they cause an increase in bone mass beyond that explained by a remodeling transient brought about by reduction in bone remodeling rates. Further, research has shown that HRT and ALN affect bone by different mechanisms. Thus, this combination may have an additive effect on bone resulting in bone gain beyond that previously seen with other interventions. This project will provide much-needed information to physicians and their patients on the benefits and safety of this combination regimen so that they can make "evidence-based" decisions on the choice of interventions to prevent and treat osteoporosis.
- Conditions
- Osteopenia, Osteoporosis
- Being tested
- Alendronate, Estrogen/progestin therapy
- Keywords
- Osteoporosis, Osteopenia, Postmenopausal women, Hormone replacement therapy, Alendronate
- Medical subject headings
- Bone Diseases, Metabolic, Osteoporosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AlendronateDrug
Estrogen/progestin therapyDrug
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Jan 2000 (estimated)
- Study startOct 1999
- Study completionSep 2004
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for OsteopeniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Enrolment
- 240 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)
- Sponsor type
- US National Institutes of Health
- Investigators
- Robert R. Recker, MD, Principal investigator, Creighton University Osteoporosis Research CenterJoan M. Lappe, PhD, RN, Study director, Creighton University Osteoporosis Research Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00000430
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- N01 AR92237
- Other IDs
- NIAMS-040
- Status last verified
- Feb 2004
- First submitted
- 18 Jan 2000
- Last updated
- 4 Jan 2007
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Jan 2007. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Trial of Continuous Low-Dose Hormone Replacement Therapy Combined With Alendronate in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Density
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00000430
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- N01 AR92237
- Conditions
- Osteopenia, Osteoporosis
- Keywords
- Osteoporosis, Osteopenia, Postmenopausal women, Hormone replacement therapy, Alendronate
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Terminated
- Enrolment
- 240 participants
- Lead sponsor
- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)US National Institutes of Health
- Study start
- Oct 1999
- Study completion
- Sep 2004
- First posted
- 19 Jan 2000 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Osteoporosis, a condition in which bones are fragile and break easily, is a major health problem for postmenopausal women. Research studies have shown that both estrogen/progestin replacement therapy (hormone replacement therapy, or HRT) and alendronate are effective in preventing and treating osteoporosis. However, because these drugs work in somewhat different ways, a combination of the two drugs might protect women from osteoporosis better than either drug alone. In this study we will test whether HRT and alendronate given together for 3.5 years to postmenopausal women with low bone mass will have a greater effect on bone than either HRT or alendronate given alone. We will also give every participant in this study calcium and vitamin D supplements.
Detailed description
Clinical trials of estrogen/progestin replacement therapy (HRT) and a bisphosphonate, alendronate (ALN), have demonstrated that both are effective in causing gains in bone mass and preventing bone loss and fractures in postmenopausal women. The FDA has approved both these drugs for prevention and treatment of fractures, and both are widely used in clinical practice. Because both are approved and effective, and they work by different mechanisms, many patients and their physicians ask whether both should be taken in combination, particularly in cases of severe disease. The question is asked frequently because of the high incidence of osteoporosis among women and the need for long-term prevention and treatments that often last decades.
Indeed, physicians are using ALN and HRT together without adequate scientific support for the assumption that the combination is more effective than either given alone.
Clinical trials are now underway to test conventional doses of HRT given as conjugated equine estrogens (CEE), 0.625 mg/day or its equivalent, combined with ALN, 10 mg/day. However, researchers are not studying the bone-sparing effectiveness of the combined administration of ALN and low-dose continuous HRT given as CEE, 0.3 mg/d, along with medroxyprogesterone, 2.5 mg/d (MP). This low-dose continuous HRT regimen is attractive because of better convenience, better patient tolerance, and reduced risk of breast cancer and other safety concerns associated with conventional higher doses. Further, we have recently demonstrated that the bone-sparing effect of this regimen is comparable to that of higher doses.
The long-term objective of this study is to test the hypothesis that the combined therapy shows a greater bone effect than does either treatment given alone. Our specific aim is to conduct a 3.5 year, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of low-dose, continuous HRT combined with alendronate, 10 mg/d (ALN), in three groups (72 people per group) of estrogen-deprived postmenopausal women over age 60. We will give Group 1 low-dose HRT, Group 2 ALN, and Group 3 both low-dose HRT and ALN. We will give calcium and vitamin D supplements to people in all three groups.
The primary outcome measures will be spine bone mineral density (SpBMD) and total hip bone mineral density (HipBMD) measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Secondary outcome measures will be total body bone mineral content and forearm bone mineral content. In addition, we will perform studies to characterize the mechanism of the effects of these regimens. These studies will consist of measurements of urinary bone resorption markers, serum bone formation markers, calcium excretion, calcium absorption, and application of a model developed in our laboratory to estimate and compare the magnitudes of the anabolic effects (if any) of all three interventions on SpBMD and HipBMD.
We have reported data showing that both agents have an anabolic effect on bone in humans, meaning that they cause an increase in bone mass beyond that explained by a remodeling transient brought about by reduction in bone remodeling rates. Further, research has shown that HRT and ALN affect bone by different mechanisms. Thus, this combination may have an additive effect on bone resulting in bone gain beyond that previously seen with other interventions. This project will provide much-needed information to physicians and their patients on the benefits and safety of this combination regimen so that they can make "evidence-based" decisions on the choice of interventions to prevent and treat osteoporosis.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Women at least 60 years of age.
- Good general health.
- Willingness to participate in this 3.5 year study.
- Ability to give informed consent.
- Ability to live independently and travel to the research center for visits (we will provide transportation on a limited basis).
Key exclusion criteria (21 listed)
- Any history of cancer except the following: (a) superficial basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin which has been completely resected or resolved by a topical chemotherapeutic agent, and (b) other malignancies treated curatively at least 10 years previously, without any evidence of recurrence.
- Abnormal transvaginal ultrasound that has not been investigated and cleared by endometrial biopsy.
- History of low-trauma hip or spine fracture previously diagnosed.
- Serious residuals from cerebral vascular disease.
- Diabetes mellitus, except for easily controlled, non-insulin dependent or insulin dependent diabetes mellitus without significant microvascular or neuropathic disease.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Alendronate | Drug | – |
| Estrogen/progestin therapy | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study was stopped early. Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Jan 2007.
Related trials for Osteopenia
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Melatonin in Posterior Mandible Extraction Socket
Bone Loss
Active, not recruitingObservational study
CFTR Modulator Effects on Bone and Muscle in Adults With Cystic Fibrosis
Cystic Fibrosis, Bone Loss
Active, not recruiting
AI-Supported Mobile High-Impact and Strengthening Exercise Program in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Density
Osteopenia
Active, not recruiting
L-PRF Block vs Composite Graft for Horizontal Ridge Augmentation
Alveolar Ridge Resorption After Extraction, Alveolar Bone Loss
RecruitingObservational study
Observational Study of Bone Complications in People With Post-menopausal Breast Cancer Who Have Stopped Treatment With Denosumab and Aromatase Inhibitors
Breast Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Robert R. Recker, MD principal investigator
Creighton University Osteoporosis Research Center
Joan M. Lappe, PhD, RN study director
Creighton University Osteoporosis Research Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Alendronate and Estrogen/progestin therapy in people with Osteopenia and Osteoporosis, run by National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 21 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jan 2007. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early. Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jan 2007.