AzTrials
AzTrials

Cardiovascular DiseasesPhase 3NCT00000463

Post Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Study

A Phase 3 study testing lovastatin, cholestyramine and warfarin in people with Cardiovascular Diseases and Coronary Disease, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To determine the relative effectiveness of moderate versus more aggressive lipid lowering, and of low dose anticoagulation versus placebo, in delaying saphenous vein coronary bypass graft atherosclerosis and preventing occlusion of saphenous grafts of patients with saphenous vein coronary bypass grafts placed 1 to 11… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
What is being tested?
lovastatin, cholestyramine and warfarin
How many people
Not given
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Apr 1987to Dec 1998
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Men and women between 1 and 11 years post-CABG. Patients had two completely independent saphenous vein grafts that were patent. Patients had an LDL-cholesterol between 130 and 175 with plasma triglycerides below 300 mg/dl.

About this study

To determine the relative effectiveness of moderate versus more aggressive lipid lowering, and of low dose anticoagulation versus placebo, in delaying saphenous vein coronary bypass graft atherosclerosis and preventing occlusion of saphenous grafts of patients with saphenous vein coronary bypass grafts placed 1 to 11 years previously.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND:

A large number of studies have reported that following CABG, the vessels proximal to the grafts demonstrate accelerated atherosclerosis and the grafts themselves may show progressive obstruction due to thrombosis, fibrosis, and graft atheroma. Pathological and clinical studies have documented that graft obstruction during the perioperative period and the first year is usually due to technical problems at surgery or thrombosis and occurs in about 15 to 20 percent of saphenous vein grafts. Antiplatelet drugs such as aspirin have been shown to reduce these early graft occlusions by about 50 percent. In addition to thrombosis, during the first year, most saphenous vein grafts undergo diffuse fibrosis and some distortion. However, the significance of these changes is not known.

After the first year, lipid deposition and changes histologically similar to atherosclerosis have been documented both in experimental studies and in human saphenous vein grafts patent at one year completely occlude and an additional 30 percent narrow over a period of ten years. These angiographic changes in the saphenous vein grafts correlate with high LDL-cholesterol, low HDL-cholesterol and high apolipoprotein B levels. In experimental animals, cholesterol deposition in the grafts has been substantially increased or decreased by increasing or decreasing the saturated fats and cholesterol in the animal's diets. In contrast to changes in the saphenous vein grafts, internal mammary artery grafts have shown substantially lower rates of obstruction. The native vessels (both ungrafted vessels and grafted vessels at distal or proximal sites), however, show evidence of progressive atherosclerosis. The long-term follow-up of grafts also demonstrates thrombotic material and even occlusive thrombus as part of acute events.

Progression of atherosclerotic lesions in grafts and native vessels lead to recurrent angina, unaltered long-term survival and reduced efficacy of repeat CABG surgery. Johnson in an 11 year follow-up of 3,105 post-CABG patients, reported that about 15 percent of patients with preoperative angina have recurrent angina at 1 year; with a further 6 percent developing angina every subsequent year. In this study, patients with recurrent angina had twice the mortality compared to those who were angina-free. Long-term follow-up of the VA Cooperative Trial of CABG shows that the survival of the surgical group appears to be initially superior compared to the medical group but this benefit is diminished by about ten years. This may relate to graft obstruction and progression of native coronary atherosclerosis. Re-operation in these patients carries a higher operative mortality risk and the results are less impressive. It had been estimated that approximately 5 percent of all CABG surgery in 1984 were re-operations and that this percentage would double over the next decade. Therefore, measures to prevent graft occlusion and progression of atherosclerosis in native vessels, if successful, could have substantial clinical and economic importance by reducing mortality, morbidity and the numbers of patients undergoing re-operations.

Apart from trials of aspirin and dipyridamole in post-CABG patients that demonstrated a significant reduction in graft closure within the first year after surgery, there were no large systematic studies of interventions in these patients. Graft occlusion has been shown to correlate with high LDL-cholesterol and low HDL-cholesterol, and the severity of atherosclerosis has been additionally shown to be related to cigarette smoking and increased levels of coagulation factor. Therefore, lowering the LDL cholesterol (by diet and drugs), and anti-thrombotic therapy with warfarin were logical choices for intervention.

Several studies suggested that CABG surgery relieved angina and improved overall quality of life. However, in the available studies, CABG did not consistently appear to be associated with an improvement in employment status, physical recreational activity, or life style. The reasons for these results were not entirely clear and there was a need to identify the biobehavioral and psychosocial factors that predicted successful adjustment after CABG.

The initiative was proposed by Institute staff and approved by the September 1985 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Advisory Council. The Request for Proposals was released in September 1985 and awards made in April 1987.

DESIGN NARRATIVE:

Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. All prospective participants received active warfarin treatment for a month prior to randomization. Only participants demonstrating a minimal reaction to warfarin and consuming over 90 percent of the prescribed medication were randomized. Dietary modification to lower serum cholesterol, an exercise program, and a smoking cessation program were implemented. Patients were randomly assigned in a 2 X 2 factorial design in four treatment groups: aggressive LDL-C lowering with lovastatin 40 to 80 mg/d and, as necessary cholestyramine 8 mg/d to achieve and LDL-C of 60 to 85 mg/dl; moderate LDL-C lowering with lovastatin 2.5 to 5 mg/d, with cholestyramin as needed, to achieve a LDL-C of 130 to 140 mg/dl; warfarin 1 to 4 mg/d to achieve an INR of 1.8 to 2.0; and warfarin-placebo. All participants were followed for five years, at the end of which selective coronary and graft angiography was performed. The primary angiography endpoint was the proportion of major SVG per patient that showed substantial reduction (0.06 mm or greater) in lumen diameter. Biobehavioral studies were conducted in 750 participants.

Planning for the study began in April 1987 and a final protocol was developed by August 1988. Patient recruitment has been completed. Follow-up ended on September 1, 1995 and data analysis continues through December 1998 under contract N01-HC-75076. .

The Post CABG Biobehavioral Study examined a cohort of 759 coronary artery bypass patients (269 women and 490 men) who were enrolled at five clinical centers. Sociodemographic and medical data were obtained by interview and from medical charts. Health-related quality of life and psychosocial data were ascertained preoperatively by interview and questionnaire for those patients whose condition allowed preoperative assessment and was compared among patients from hospitals enrolling both male and female patients.

Being tested
lovastatin, cholestyramine, warfarin
Medical subject headings
Cardiovascular Diseases, Coronary Disease, Heart Diseases, Myocardial Ischemia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • lovastatinDrug

  • cholestyramineDrug

  • warfarinDrug

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Oct 1999 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 1987
  3. Study completionDec 1998

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Masking
Double blind
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00000463
Sponsor's protocol ID
52
Status last verified
Aug 2004
First submitted
27 Oct 1999
Last updated
14 Apr 2016
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Healy B, Campeau L, Gray R, Herd JA, Hoogwerf B, Hunninghake D, Knatterud G, Stewart W, White C. Conflict-of-interest guidelines for a multicenter clinical trial of treatment after coronary-artery bypass-graft surgery. N Engl J Med. 1989 Apr 6;320(14):949-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198904063201432. No abstract available.

    PubMed 2784541
  • Fox NL, LoPresti F, Hoogwerf B, Knatterud G, Linquist R, Czajkowski S. Self-administered quality of life forms: experience from the Post Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Studies. Controlled Clin Trials 1993;14:402.

  • Shenberger DM, Helgren RJ, Peters JR, Quiter E, Johnston EA, Hunninghake DB. Intense dietary counseling lowers LDL cholesterol in the recruitment phase of a clinical trial of men who had coronary artery bypass grafts. J Am Diet Assoc. 1992 Apr;92(4):441-5.

    PubMed 1556345
  • Campeau L, Knatterud GL, White C, Domanski M, Geller N, Robernsberg Y and the Post CABG Studies Principal Investigators. The NHLBI Post Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Clinical Trial (Post CABG): Angiographic outcomes. Proceedings of the colloquium "Progression and Regression of Coronary Atherosclerosis: Observations from Lipid Intervention Studies," In Press

  • Post Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Trial Investigators. The effect of aggressive lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and low-dose anticoagulation on obstructive changes in saphenous-vein coronary-artery bypass grafts. N Engl J Med. 1997 Jan 16;336(3):153-62. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199701163360301.

    PubMed 8992351
  • Fuster V, Vorchheimer DA. Prevention of atherosclerosis in coronary-artery bypass grafts. N Engl J Med. 1997 Jan 16;336(3):212-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199701163360309. No abstract available.

    PubMed 8988902
  • Czajkowski SM, Terrin M, Lindquist R, Hoogwerf B, Dupuis G, Shumaker SA, Gray JR, Herd JA, Treat-Jacobson D, Zyzanski S, Knatterud GL. Comparison of preoperative characteristics of men and women undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (the Post Coronary Artery Bypass Graft [CABG] Biobehavioral Study). Am J Cardiol. 1997 Apr 15;79(8):1017-24. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)00040-4.

    PubMed 9114757
  • Canner PL, Thompson B, Knatterud GL, Geller N, Campeau L, Zucker D. An application of the Zucker-Wittes modified ratio estimate statistic in the Post Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) clinical trial. Control Clin Trials. 1997 Aug;18(4):318-27. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(96)00232-2.

    PubMed 9257071
  • Hoogwerf BJ, Waness A, Cressman M, Canner J, Campeau L, Domanski M, Geller N, Herd A, Hickey A, Hunninghake DB, Knatterud GL, White C. Effects of aggressive cholesterol lowering and low-dose anticoagulation on clinical and angiographic outcomes in patients with diabetes: the Post Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Trial. Diabetes. 1999 Jun;48(6):1289-94. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.48.6.1289.

    PubMed 10342818
  • Gobel FL, Stewart WJ, Campeau L, Hickey A, Herd JA, Forman S, White CW, Rosenberg Y. Safety of coronary arteriography in clinically stable patients following coronary bypass surgery. Post CABG Clinical Trial Investigators. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1998 Dec;45(4):376-81. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0304(199812)45:43.0.co;2-x.

    PubMed 9863740
  • Hunninghake DB. Is aggressive cholesterol control justified? Review of the post-coronary artery bypass graft trial. Am J Cardiol. 1998 Nov 26;82(10B):45T-48T. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00725-5.

    PubMed 9860374
  • Knatterud GL, Rosenberg Y, Campeau L, Geller NL, Hunninghake DB, Forman SA, Forrester JS, Gobel FL, Herd JA, Hickey A, Hoogwerf BJ, Terrin ML, White C. Long-term effects on clinical outcomes of aggressive lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and low-dose anticoagulation in the post coronary artery bypass graft trial. Post CABG Investigators. Circulation. 2000 Jul 11;102(2):157-65. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.102.2.157.

    PubMed 10889125
  • Domanski MJ, Borkowf CB, Campeau L, Knatterud GL, White C, Hoogwerf B, Rosenberg Y, Geller NL. Prognostic factors for atherosclerosis progression in saphenous vein grafts: the postcoronary artery bypass graft (Post-CABG) trial. Post-CABG Trial Investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Nov 15;36(6):1877-83. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00973-6.

    PubMed 11092659
  • Campeau L, Hunninghake DB, Knatterud GL, White CW, Domanski M, Forman SA, Forrester JS, Geller NL, Gobel FL, Herd JA, Hoogwerf BJ, Rosenberg Y. Aggressive cholesterol lowering delays saphenous vein graft atherosclerosis in women, the elderly, and patients with associated risk factors. NHLBI post coronary artery bypass graft clinical trial. Post CABG Trial Investigators. Circulation. 1999 Jun 29;99(25):3241-7. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.99.25.3241.

    PubMed 10385497
  • Alaupovic P, Fesmire JD, Hunnighake D, Domanski M, Forman S, Knatterud GL, Forrester J, Herd JA, Hoogwerf B, Campeau L, Gobel FL. The effect of aggressive and moderate lowering of LDL-cholesterol and low dose anticoagulation on plasma lipids, apolipoproteins and lipoprotein families in post coronary artery bypass graft trial. Atherosclerosis. 1999 Oct;146(2):369-79. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9150(99)00151-3.

    PubMed 10532693

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing lovastatin, cholestyramine and warfarin in people with Cardiovascular Diseases and Coronary Disease, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Apr 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00000463, which also lists 21 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Apr 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in