Cardiovascular DiseasesPhase 3NCT00000491
Aspirin-Myocardial Infarction Study (AMIS)
A Phase 3 study testing aspirin in people with Cardiovascular Diseases and Coronary Disease, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).
Trial summary
To determine whether the daily administration of 1 gm of aspirin to individuals with a documented myocardial infarction would result in a significant reduction in mortality over a three year period. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 to 69 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Cardiovascular Diseases, Coronary Disease, Heart Diseases
- What is being tested?
- aspirin
- How many people
- Not given
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Oct 1974to Aug 1979
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 to 69 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Men and women, ages 30 to 69. Had a documented myocardial infarction.
About this study
To determine whether the daily administration of 1 gm of aspirin to individuals with a documented myocardial infarction would result in a significant reduction in mortality over a three year period.
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND:
It had been postulated that thrombosis plays a major role in the late stages of coronary artery occlusion. Platelet aggregation is a large component in the formation of arterial thrombi. Theoretically, an agent which prevents the aggregation of platelets would be of value in people with coronary artery disease. Aspirin, in small doses, inhibits platelet aggregation for prolonged periods of time, and therefore might be expected to prevent or retard the occlusion of coronary arteries. This would be reflected in a decrease in the incidence of myocardial infarction and a decrease in mortality due to coronary artery disease.
Several studies had given preliminary evidence that regular administration of aspirin may be of benefit to patients with known coronary artery disease. A National Heart and Lung Institute-sponsored study, the Coronary Drug Project, ran a pilot trial of aspirin and placebo in men with previous myocardial infarctions. Preliminary results from this trial demonstrated its feasibility and led NHLBI to sponsor a more definitive controlled study of the benefit of aspirin in the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease.
An Institute Planning Committee met four times between October 1974 and April 1975 and developed a protocol, manual of operations, and data collection forms. Recruitment of patients began in June 1975, with the first patient randomized on July 2, 1975. Patients who were randomized had been seen at the AMIS Clinical Center for two initial visits and one baseline visit and were free of any reasons for exclusion, such as the current use of anticoagulants and a history of adverse reactions to aspirin. Patients took acetaminophen at times when they would normally take aspirin.
Follow-up was for a minimum of 3 years, with each patient seen at 4-month intervals and monitored for side effects and various nonfatal events, including cardiovascular problems. The primary endpoint was mortality. Annually, a detailed history was obtained and a complete physical examination performed. The study involved 30 clinical centers, a coordinating center, and a central laboratory.
The study completed patient recruitment in the scheduled one year period. A total of 4,524 post-MI patients were enrolled by the 30 clinical centers. Three-year minimum patient follow-up ended in August 1979.
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
Randomized, double-blind, fixed sample. Eligible patients were assigned to a treatment group receiving 1 gm of aspirin daily (the equivalent of three standard aspirin tablets) or to a control group receiving a placebo.
- Conditions
- Cardiovascular Diseases, Coronary Disease, Heart Diseases, Myocardial Infarction, Myocardial Ischemia
- Being tested
- aspirin
- Medical subject headings
- Cardiovascular Diseases, Coronary Disease, Heart Diseases, Myocardial Infarction, Myocardial Ischemia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
aspirinDrug
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Oct 1999 (estimated)
- Study startOct 1974
- Study completionAug 1979
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cardiovascular DiseasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Masking
- Double blind
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- US National Institutes of Health
- Investigators
- Allan Barker, Salt Lake Clinic Research FoundationDavid Berkson, Unity Health TorontoWilliam Berstein, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNemat Borhani, University of California, DavisElmer Cooper, Santa Rosa Medical CenterLeonard Dreifus, Lankenau HospitalNoble Fowler, University of CincinnatiPhillip Frost, USPHS Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00000491
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 10
- Status last verified
- Apr 2012
- First submitted
- 27 Oct 1999
- Last updated
- 25 Mar 2016
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Aspirin Myocardial Infarction Research Group: A Study of Aspirin in Patients with Myocardial Infarction. Prostaglandins in Hematology. Spectrum Publications Inc, New York, l977, 36l-370.
An intervention study-the aspirin myocardial infarction study. Lipids. 1977 Jan;12(1):59-63. doi: 10.1007/BF02532973.
PubMed 319319A randomized, controlled trial of aspirin in persons recovered from myocardial infarction. JAMA. 1980 Feb 15;243(7):661-9.
PubMed 6985998Aspirin Myocardial Infarction Research Group: Aspirin Myocardial Infarction Study: Design, Methods and Baseline Results. DHEW Pub. No. (NIH) 80-2l06, l980.
The aspirin myocardial infarction study: final results. The Aspirin Myocardial Infarction Study research group. Circulation. 1980 Dec;62(6 Pt 2):V79-84.
PubMed 7438383Wasserman AG, Bren GB, Ross AM, Richardson DW, Hutchinson RG, Rios JC. Prognostic implications of diagnostic Q waves after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1982 Jun;65(7):1451-5. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.65.7.1451.
PubMed 7042113Goldstein S, Friedman L, Hutchinson R, Canner P, Romhilt D, Schlant R, Sobrino R, Verter J, Wasserman A. Timing, mechanism and clinical setting of witnessed deaths in postmyocardial infarction patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984 May;3(5):1111-7. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(84)80167-9.
PubMed 6423716Mattson ME, Curb JD, McArdle R. Participation in a clinical trial: the patients' point of view. Control Clin Trials. 1985 Jun;6(2):156-67. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(85)90121-7.
PubMed 4006489Shekelle RB, Gale M, Norusis M. Type A score (Jenkins Activity Survey) and risk of recurrent coronary heart disease in the aspirin myocardial infarction study. Am J Cardiol. 1985 Aug 1;56(4):221-5. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(85)90838-0.
PubMed 3895879Frost PH, Verter J, Miller D. Serum lipids and lipoproteins after myocardial infarction: associations with cardiovascular mortality and experience in the Aspirin Myocardial Infarction Study. Am Heart J. 1987 Jun;113(6):1356-64. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(87)90648-x.
PubMed 3591604Schoenberger JA. Recruitment experience in the Aspirin Myocardial Infarction Study. Control Clin Trials. 1987 Dec;8(4 Suppl):74S-78S. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(87)90009-2.
PubMed 3440392Furberg CD, Friedman LM, MacMahon SW: Women as Participants in Trials of the Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: Part II. Secondary Prevention: The Beta-Blocker Heart Attack Trial and the Aspirin Myocardial Infarction Study, in: Coronary Heart Disease in Women. ED Eaker, B Packard, NK Wenger, TB Carkson, HA Tyroler (Eds). New York, Haymarket Doyma, pp 241-246, 1987.
Howard J, Whittemore AS, Hoover JJ, Panos M. How blind was the patient blind in AMIS? Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1982 Nov;32(5):543-53. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1982.201.
PubMed 7127995
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Mar 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Aspirin-Myocardial Infarction Study (AMIS)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00000491
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 10
- Conditions
- Cardiovascular Diseases, Coronary Disease, Heart Diseases, Myocardial Infarction, Myocardial Ischemia
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Lead sponsor
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)US National Institutes of Health
- Study start
- Oct 1974
- Study completion
- Aug 1979 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Oct 1999 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To determine whether the daily administration of 1 gm of aspirin to individuals with a documented myocardial infarction would result in a significant reduction in mortality over a three year period.
Detailed description
BACKGROUND:
It had been postulated that thrombosis plays a major role in the late stages of coronary artery occlusion. Platelet aggregation is a large component in the formation of arterial thrombi. Theoretically, an agent which prevents the aggregation of platelets would be of value in people with coronary artery disease. Aspirin, in small doses, inhibits platelet aggregation for prolonged periods of time, and therefore might be expected to prevent or retard the occlusion of coronary arteries. This would be reflected in a decrease in the incidence of myocardial infarction and a decrease in mortality due to coronary artery disease.
Several studies had given preliminary evidence that regular administration of aspirin may be of benefit to patients with known coronary artery disease. A National Heart and Lung Institute-sponsored study, the Coronary Drug Project, ran a pilot trial of aspirin and placebo in men with previous myocardial infarctions. Preliminary results from this trial demonstrated its feasibility and led NHLBI to sponsor a more definitive controlled study of the benefit of aspirin in the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease.
An Institute Planning Committee met four times between October 1974 and April 1975 and developed a protocol, manual of operations, and data collection forms. Recruitment of patients began in June 1975, with the first patient randomized on July 2, 1975. Patients who were randomized had been seen at the AMIS Clinical Center for two initial visits and one baseline visit and were free of any reasons for exclusion, such as the current use of anticoagulants and a history of adverse reactions to aspirin. Patients took acetaminophen at times when they would normally take aspirin.
Follow-up was for a minimum of 3 years, with each patient seen at 4-month intervals and monitored for side effects and various nonfatal events, including cardiovascular problems. The primary endpoint was mortality. Annually, a detailed history was obtained and a complete physical examination performed. The study involved 30 clinical centers, a coordinating center, and a central laboratory.
The study completed patient recruitment in the scheduled one year period. A total of 4,524 post-MI patients were enrolled by the 30 clinical centers. Three-year minimum patient follow-up ended in August 1979.
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
Randomized, double-blind, fixed sample. Eligible patients were assigned to a treatment group receiving 1 gm of aspirin daily (the equivalent of three standard aspirin tablets) or to a control group receiving a placebo.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Masking
- Double blind
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 to 69 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| aspirin | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Mar 2016.
- BackgroundAspirin Myocardial Infarction Research Group: A Study of Aspirin in Patients with Myocardial Infarction. Prostaglandins in Hematology. Spectrum Publications Inc, New York, l977, 36l-370.
- Background: PubMed 319319An intervention study-the aspirin myocardial infarction study. Lipids. 1977 Jan;12(1):59-63. doi: 10.1007/BF02532973.
- Background: PubMed 6985998A randomized, controlled trial of aspirin in persons recovered from myocardial infarction. JAMA. 1980 Feb 15;243(7):661-9.
- BackgroundAspirin Myocardial Infarction Research Group: Aspirin Myocardial Infarction Study: Design, Methods and Baseline Results. DHEW Pub. No. (NIH) 80-2l06, l980.
- Background: PubMed 7438383The aspirin myocardial infarction study: final results. The Aspirin Myocardial Infarction Study research group. Circulation. 1980 Dec;62(6 Pt 2):V79-84.
- Background: PubMed 7042113Wasserman AG, Bren GB, Ross AM, Richardson DW, Hutchinson RG, Rios JC. Prognostic implications of diagnostic Q waves after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1982 Jun;65(7):1451-5. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.65.7.1451.
- Background: PubMed 6423716Goldstein S, Friedman L, Hutchinson R, Canner P, Romhilt D, Schlant R, Sobrino R, Verter J, Wasserman A. Timing, mechanism and clinical setting of witnessed deaths in postmyocardial infarction patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984 May;3(5):1111-7. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(84)80167-9.
- Background: PubMed 4006489Mattson ME, Curb JD, McArdle R. Participation in a clinical trial: the patients' point of view. Control Clin Trials. 1985 Jun;6(2):156-67. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(85)90121-7.
- Background: PubMed 3895879Shekelle RB, Gale M, Norusis M. Type A score (Jenkins Activity Survey) and risk of recurrent coronary heart disease in the aspirin myocardial infarction study. Am J Cardiol. 1985 Aug 1;56(4):221-5. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(85)90838-0.
- Background: PubMed 3591604Frost PH, Verter J, Miller D. Serum lipids and lipoproteins after myocardial infarction: associations with cardiovascular mortality and experience in the Aspirin Myocardial Infarction Study. Am Heart J. 1987 Jun;113(6):1356-64. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(87)90648-x.
- Background: PubMed 3440392Schoenberger JA. Recruitment experience in the Aspirin Myocardial Infarction Study. Control Clin Trials. 1987 Dec;8(4 Suppl):74S-78S. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(87)90009-2.
- BackgroundFurberg CD, Friedman LM, MacMahon SW: Women as Participants in Trials of the Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: Part II. Secondary Prevention: The Beta-Blocker Heart Attack Trial and the Aspirin Myocardial Infarction Study, in: Coronary Heart Disease in Women. ED Eaker, B Packard, NK Wenger, TB Carkson, HA Tyroler (Eds). New York, Haymarket Doyma, pp 241-246, 1987.
Related trials for Cardiovascular Diseases
RecruitingObservational study
Genetics of Type 2 Diabetes in West Africans
Hypertension, Diabetes
RecruitingObservational study
Atrial Fibrillation Patients Treated With Catheter Ablation
Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Fibrillation Recurrent
RecruitingPhase 1
Phase 1 Study of 6MW5311 in Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Blood Cancers
AML, Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruiting
Electronic Alert to Improve Testing For Primary Aldosteronism in Patients With Hypertension
Primary Aldosteronism, Resistant Hypertension
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel
Multiple Myeloma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Allan Barker
Salt Lake Clinic Research Foundation
David Berkson
Unity Health Toronto
William Berstein
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing aspirin in people with Cardiovascular Diseases and Coronary Disease, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Mar 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00000491, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Mar 2016.