Bronchopulmonary DysplasiaPhase 3NCT00000567
High Frequency Ventilation in Premature Infants (HIFI)
A Phase 3 study testing high-frequency ventilation in people with Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia and Lung Diseases, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).
Trial summary
To compare the efficacy and safety of high frequency ventilation (HFV) with that of standard, mechanical ventilation in premature infants of less than 2000 grams. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 1 year
- Conditions the study is for
- Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia, Lung Diseases, Respiratory Distress Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- high-frequency ventilation
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- Not given
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Aug 1984to not given
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 1 year
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Boy and girl infants weighing less than 2000 g. who required mechanical ventilation within 24 hours of birth and had been treated for less than 12 hours with conventional mechanical ventilation before randomization.
About this study
To compare the efficacy and safety of high frequency ventilation (HFV) with that of standard, mechanical ventilation in premature infants of less than 2000 grams.
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND:
In the early 1980s, there was increasing concern that the dramatic improvement in the survival of immature infants had been accompanied by an increase in incidence of pulmonary complications, some seriously crippling and eventually fatal. Both barotrauma and oxygen toxicity had been considered in the pathogenesis of these disorders; circulatory disorders as a result of failure of closure of the ductus arteriosus or fluid overload had also been proposed as contributory factors. Reports of successful application of the principles of high frequency ventilation (HFV) in the treatment of infants with RDS and particularly those with severe interstitial emphysema raised hopes that this technique might prevent barotrauma to the lungs and stimulated physicians and engineers to develop new equipment useful in ventilating small infants.
Although HFV had not been evaluated either with regard to efficacy or safety and although results of fundamental studies had not provided a good understanding of how gas exchange occurred during HFV, there was considerable interest in introducing this type of ventilatory support in neonatal intensive care. HFV involves the use of small tidal volumes, delivered at respiratory frequencies ranging from 1 to 40 Hz with the aid of, for example, a piston pump or a high speed jet of gas. Compared to conventional mechanical ventilation, HFV offers several potential advantages, including reduced intrapulmonary pressure swings and fluctuation in alveolar pressures and the possibility of lowered levels of inspired oxygen. At that time, theories suggested that HFV produced a pattern of flow that enhanced gas mixing and 'homogenized' the distribution of ventilation. Experimental observations in adult animals (cats, dogs and rabbits) or healthy newborn lambs had shown HFV to be effective in promoting gas exchange without apparent adverse effects. Studies in prematurely delivered subhuman primates, that develop RDS and subsequently bronchopulmonary dysplasia indistinguishable from that of human infants, supported the notion the HFV could provide better oxygenation and lower C02 levels than conventional mechanical ventilation at similar mean airway pressure. The HIFI trial provided badly needed controlled data on the safety and efficacy of HFV in premature infants.
Phase I, the Planning Phase, was initiated in August 1984. Recruitment and intervention began in February 1986 and ended in March 1987. Follow-up studies continued thru September 1988.
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
Subjects were randomized to either standard mechanical ventilation or high frequency ventilation. The principal endpoint was the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia defined as: the need for supplemental oxygen on the 28th postnatal day and for more than 21 of the first 28 days after birth; and abnormal chest radiographic findings that persisted until the 28th day of age. Other endpoints included the need for ventilatory support, the incidence of crossover from one form of ventilatory support to the other, and mortality rate before the 28th day of postnatal age. Adverse effects considered were pulmonary air leaks, severe intracranial hemorrhage, and periventricular leukomalacia.
- Being tested
- high-frequency ventilation
- Medical subject headings
- Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia, Lung Diseases, Respiratory Distress Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
high-frequency ventilationProcedure or surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Oct 1999 (estimated)
- Study startAug 1984
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Bronchopulmonary DysplasiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- US National Institutes of Health
- Collaborators
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
- Investigators
- Kenneth Poole, RTI International
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00000567
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 205
- Status last verified
- Dec 2005
- First submitted
- 27 Oct 1999
- Last updated
- 14 Apr 2016
- Results posted
- No
Publications
HIFI Study Group. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation compared with conventional mechanical ventilation in the treatment of respiratory failure in preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 1989 Jan 12;320(2):88-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198901123200204.
PubMed 2643039High-frequency oscillatory ventilation compared with conventional mechanical ventilation in the treatment of respiratory failure in preterm infants: assessment of pulmonary function at 9 months of corrected age. HiFi Study Group. J Pediatr. 1990 Jun;116(6):933-41. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)80657-2.
PubMed 2112188
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Apr 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- High Frequency Ventilation in Premature Infants (HIFI)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00000567
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 205
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Lead sponsor
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)US National Institutes of Health
- Collaborators
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
- Study start
- Aug 1984
- First posted
- 28 Oct 1999 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To compare the efficacy and safety of high frequency ventilation (HFV) with that of standard, mechanical ventilation in premature infants of less than 2000 grams.
Detailed description
BACKGROUND:
In the early 1980s, there was increasing concern that the dramatic improvement in the survival of immature infants had been accompanied by an increase in incidence of pulmonary complications, some seriously crippling and eventually fatal. Both barotrauma and oxygen toxicity had been considered in the pathogenesis of these disorders; circulatory disorders as a result of failure of closure of the ductus arteriosus or fluid overload had also been proposed as contributory factors. Reports of successful application of the principles of high frequency ventilation (HFV) in the treatment of infants with RDS and particularly those with severe interstitial emphysema raised hopes that this technique might prevent barotrauma to the lungs and stimulated physicians and engineers to develop new equipment useful in ventilating small infants.
Although HFV had not been evaluated either with regard to efficacy or safety and although results of fundamental studies had not provided a good understanding of how gas exchange occurred during HFV, there was considerable interest in introducing this type of ventilatory support in neonatal intensive care. HFV involves the use of small tidal volumes, delivered at respiratory frequencies ranging from 1 to 40 Hz with the aid of, for example, a piston pump or a high speed jet of gas. Compared to conventional mechanical ventilation, HFV offers several potential advantages, including reduced intrapulmonary pressure swings and fluctuation in alveolar pressures and the possibility of lowered levels of inspired oxygen. At that time, theories suggested that HFV produced a pattern of flow that enhanced gas mixing and 'homogenized' the distribution of ventilation. Experimental observations in adult animals (cats, dogs and rabbits) or healthy newborn lambs had shown HFV to be effective in promoting gas exchange without apparent adverse effects. Studies in prematurely delivered subhuman primates, that develop RDS and subsequently bronchopulmonary dysplasia indistinguishable from that of human infants, supported the notion the HFV could provide better oxygenation and lower C02 levels than conventional mechanical ventilation at similar mean airway pressure. The HIFI trial provided badly needed controlled data on the safety and efficacy of HFV in premature infants.
Phase I, the Planning Phase, was initiated in August 1984. Recruitment and intervention began in February 1986 and ended in March 1987. Follow-up studies continued thru September 1988.
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
Subjects were randomized to either standard mechanical ventilation or high frequency ventilation. The principal endpoint was the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia defined as: the need for supplemental oxygen on the 28th postnatal day and for more than 21 of the first 28 days after birth; and abnormal chest radiographic findings that persisted until the 28th day of age. Other endpoints included the need for ventilatory support, the incidence of crossover from one form of ventilatory support to the other, and mortality rate before the 28th day of postnatal age. Adverse effects considered were pulmonary air leaks, severe intracranial hemorrhage, and periventricular leukomalacia.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 1 year
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| high-frequency ventilation | Procedure or surgery | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Apr 2016.
- Background: PubMed 2643039HIFI Study Group. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation compared with conventional mechanical ventilation in the treatment of respiratory failure in preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 1989 Jan 12;320(2):88-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198901123200204.
- Background: PubMed 2112188High-frequency oscillatory ventilation compared with conventional mechanical ventilation in the treatment of respiratory failure in preterm infants: assessment of pulmonary function at 9 months of corrected age. HiFi Study Group. J Pediatr. 1990 Jun;116(6):933-41. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)80657-2.
Related trials for Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia
Recruiting
Controlled Remote Monitoring and Optimization of Oxygen Therapy in Preterm Infants
BPD - Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia, Pulmonary Hypertension
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
Little Lungs Study
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation, Severe Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Not yet recruiting
Strap To Reduce Apnea in Preterm Infants: A Randomized Crossover Trial
Apnea of Prematurity, Intermittent Hypoxemia
Recruiting
Ventilator Pressure and Optimization of Compliance and Hemodynamics
Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia, Pulmonary Hypertension Due to Lung Diseases and Hypoxia
RecruitingPhase 4
Impact of Higher Zinc Supplementation on Neonatal Weight Velocity
Extreme Prematurity,Extremely Low Birthweight, BPD - Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kenneth Poole
RTI International
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing high-frequency ventilation in people with Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia and Lung Diseases, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Apr 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00000567, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Apr 2016.