Lung DiseasesPhase 3NCT00000570
Human Surfactant Treatment of Respiratory Distress Syndrome Bicenter Trial
A Phase 3 study testing pulmonary surfactant in people with Lung Diseases and Respiratory Distress Syndrome, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).
Trial summary
To determine if surfactant administration at birth in infants at high risk for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) modified the clinical course of the syndrome. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 1 year
- Conditions the study is for
- Lung Diseases, Respiratory Distress Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- pulmonary surfactant
- How many people
- Not given
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jan 1986to Jun 1990
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 1 year
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Boy and girl preterm infants 24-29 weeks of gestational age and 500-1400 grams birthweight.
About this study
To determine if surfactant administration at birth in infants at high risk for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) modified the clinical course of the syndrome.
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND:
Respiratory distress syndrome affects more than 40,000 infants annually in the United States. The overall mortality rate exceeds 20 percent and in infants weighing less than 1500 grams at birth, RDS is responsible for or contributes to the 30-70 percent mortality, depending on birthweight. The present customary treatment of RDS with intermittent mandatory ventilation is accompanied by sequelae such as extra-alveolar air leaks, intraventricular hemorrhage, and bronchopulmonary dysplasia in approximately 50 percent of survivors.
The respiratory distress syndrome of the newborn is a disorder in which the pulmonary surfactant is deficient. It has not been possible to completely replace natural components of surfactant with synthetic components and achieve a mixture which functions physiologically like pulmonary surfactant. Therefore, studies of replacement therapy for surfactant deficiency have used complete natural surfactants or derivatives of natural surfactant which contain the defined components of surfactant. The surfactant used in the clinical trial was derived from human amniotic fluid.
Two basic different strategies for surfactant treatment of respiratory distress syndrome have emerged: prophylactic, or preventilatory, treatment at or shortly after birth versus rescue treatment after the initiation of mechanical ventilation in instances of clinically confirmed respiratory distress syndrome. Although treatment at birth has the theoretic advantage of delivering surfactant more uniformly to the airways before mechanical ventilation, it has the disadvantages of delaying physiologic stabilization after birth and resulting in unnecessary treatment, at considerable cost, of 20 percent to 40 percent of infants born at or less than 30 weeks of gestation. Rescue therapy permits early physiologic stabilization and confirmation of respiratory distress syndrome, but with the theoretic disadvantages of early lung injury from mechanical ventilation in the surfactant-deficient lung and less uniform surfactant distribution. Previous comparative trials have been biased by incomplete study enrollment and inclusion of infants in preventilation treatment groups without evidence of surfactant deficiency or immaturity. In addition, outcomes have varied in placebo-treated infants.
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
Randomized, placebo-controlled. Singleton infants were assigned to receive a placebo (air), prophylactic surfactant treatment given intratracheally, or rescue surfactant treatment. Multiple birth infants received either prophylactic or rescue treatment. Of 282 potentially eligible infants, 246 received treatments at birth and 200 had respiratory distress syndrome and received the full course of surfactant therapy. Preterm infants randomly assigned to receive prophylactic treatment received surfactant soon after birth; those assigned to receive rescue surfactant had instillation at a mean age of 220 minutes if the lecithin-sphingomyelin ratio was _ 2.0 and no phosphatidylglycerol was detected in either amniotic fluid or initial airway aspirate, oxygen requirements were a fraction of inspired oxygen of > 0.5 and mean airway pressure was _ 7 cm H20 from 2 to 12 hours after birth. Up to four treatment doses were permitted within 48 hours; approximately 60 percent of surfactant-treated infants required two or more doses. Endpoints included the mortality rate at 28 days of age, the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 28 days after birth and at 38 weeks to adjust for differences in gestational age, the incidence of pulmonary air leaks, and the severity of respiratory distress syndrome as assessed by requirement for supplemental oxygen and mechanical ventilation.
The study completion date listed in this record was obtained from the Query/View/Report (QVR) System.
- Conditions
- Lung Diseases, Respiratory Distress Syndrome
- Being tested
- pulmonary surfactant
- Medical subject headings
- Lung Diseases, Respiratory Distress Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
pulmonary surfactantDrug
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Oct 1999 (estimated)
- Study startJan 1986
- Study completionJun 1990
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Lung DiseasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- US National Institutes of Health
- Investigators
- Thurman Merritt, University of California, San Diego
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00000570
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 208
- Other IDs
- 5R01HL035036
- Status last verified
- Jan 2000
- First submitted
- 27 Oct 1999
- Last updated
- 13 Dec 2013
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Hallman M, Merritt TA, Bry K, Berry C. Association between neonatal care practices and efficacy of exogenous human surfactant: results of a bicenter randomized trial. Pediatrics. 1993 Mar;91(3):552-60.
PubMed 8441558
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Dec 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Human Surfactant Treatment of Respiratory Distress Syndrome Bicenter Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00000570
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 208
- Conditions
- Lung Diseases, Respiratory Distress Syndrome
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Lead sponsor
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)US National Institutes of Health
- Study start
- Jan 1986
- Study completion
- Jun 1990 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Oct 1999 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To determine if surfactant administration at birth in infants at high risk for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) modified the clinical course of the syndrome.
Detailed description
BACKGROUND:
Respiratory distress syndrome affects more than 40,000 infants annually in the United States. The overall mortality rate exceeds 20 percent and in infants weighing less than 1500 grams at birth, RDS is responsible for or contributes to the 30-70 percent mortality, depending on birthweight. The present customary treatment of RDS with intermittent mandatory ventilation is accompanied by sequelae such as extra-alveolar air leaks, intraventricular hemorrhage, and bronchopulmonary dysplasia in approximately 50 percent of survivors.
The respiratory distress syndrome of the newborn is a disorder in which the pulmonary surfactant is deficient. It has not been possible to completely replace natural components of surfactant with synthetic components and achieve a mixture which functions physiologically like pulmonary surfactant. Therefore, studies of replacement therapy for surfactant deficiency have used complete natural surfactants or derivatives of natural surfactant which contain the defined components of surfactant. The surfactant used in the clinical trial was derived from human amniotic fluid.
Two basic different strategies for surfactant treatment of respiratory distress syndrome have emerged: prophylactic, or preventilatory, treatment at or shortly after birth versus rescue treatment after the initiation of mechanical ventilation in instances of clinically confirmed respiratory distress syndrome. Although treatment at birth has the theoretic advantage of delivering surfactant more uniformly to the airways before mechanical ventilation, it has the disadvantages of delaying physiologic stabilization after birth and resulting in unnecessary treatment, at considerable cost, of 20 percent to 40 percent of infants born at or less than 30 weeks of gestation. Rescue therapy permits early physiologic stabilization and confirmation of respiratory distress syndrome, but with the theoretic disadvantages of early lung injury from mechanical ventilation in the surfactant-deficient lung and less uniform surfactant distribution. Previous comparative trials have been biased by incomplete study enrollment and inclusion of infants in preventilation treatment groups without evidence of surfactant deficiency or immaturity. In addition, outcomes have varied in placebo-treated infants.
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
Randomized, placebo-controlled. Singleton infants were assigned to receive a placebo (air), prophylactic surfactant treatment given intratracheally, or rescue surfactant treatment. Multiple birth infants received either prophylactic or rescue treatment. Of 282 potentially eligible infants, 246 received treatments at birth and 200 had respiratory distress syndrome and received the full course of surfactant therapy. Preterm infants randomly assigned to receive prophylactic treatment received surfactant soon after birth; those assigned to receive rescue surfactant had instillation at a mean age of 220 minutes if the lecithin-sphingomyelin ratio was _ 2.0 and no phosphatidylglycerol was detected in either amniotic fluid or initial airway aspirate, oxygen requirements were a fraction of inspired oxygen of > 0.5 and mean airway pressure was _ 7 cm H20 from 2 to 12 hours after birth. Up to four treatment doses were permitted within 48 hours; approximately 60 percent of surfactant-treated infants required two or more doses. Endpoints included the mortality rate at 28 days of age, the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 28 days after birth and at 38 weeks to adjust for differences in gestational age, the incidence of pulmonary air leaks, and the severity of respiratory distress syndrome as assessed by requirement for supplemental oxygen and mechanical ventilation.
The study completion date listed in this record was obtained from the Query/View/Report (QVR) System.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 1 year
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| pulmonary surfactant | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Dec 2013.
- Background: PubMed 8441558Hallman M, Merritt TA, Bry K, Berry C. Association between neonatal care practices and efficacy of exogenous human surfactant: results of a bicenter randomized trial. Pediatrics. 1993 Mar;91(3):552-60.
Related trials for Lung Diseases
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Phase I Open-Label Safety Trial of Pembrolizumab for Neurological Post- Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PD1-PASC I)
Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Thurman Merritt
University of California, San Diego
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing pulmonary surfactant in people with Lung Diseases and Respiratory Distress Syndrome, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Dec 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00000570, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Dec 2013.