AzTrials
AzTrials

Lung DiseasesPhase 3NCT00000570

Human Surfactant Treatment of Respiratory Distress Syndrome Bicenter Trial

A Phase 3 study testing pulmonary surfactant in people with Lung Diseases and Respiratory Distress Syndrome, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To determine if surfactant administration at birth in infants at high risk for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) modified the clinical course of the syndrome. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 1 year
Conditions the study is for
Lung Diseases, Respiratory Distress Syndrome
What is being tested?
pulmonary surfactant
How many people
Not given
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jan 1986to Jun 1990
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 1 year
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Boy and girl preterm infants 24-29 weeks of gestational age and 500-1400 grams birthweight.

About this study

To determine if surfactant administration at birth in infants at high risk for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) modified the clinical course of the syndrome.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND:

Respiratory distress syndrome affects more than 40,000 infants annually in the United States. The overall mortality rate exceeds 20 percent and in infants weighing less than 1500 grams at birth, RDS is responsible for or contributes to the 30-70 percent mortality, depending on birthweight. The present customary treatment of RDS with intermittent mandatory ventilation is accompanied by sequelae such as extra-alveolar air leaks, intraventricular hemorrhage, and bronchopulmonary dysplasia in approximately 50 percent of survivors.

The respiratory distress syndrome of the newborn is a disorder in which the pulmonary surfactant is deficient. It has not been possible to completely replace natural components of surfactant with synthetic components and achieve a mixture which functions physiologically like pulmonary surfactant. Therefore, studies of replacement therapy for surfactant deficiency have used complete natural surfactants or derivatives of natural surfactant which contain the defined components of surfactant. The surfactant used in the clinical trial was derived from human amniotic fluid.

Two basic different strategies for surfactant treatment of respiratory distress syndrome have emerged: prophylactic, or preventilatory, treatment at or shortly after birth versus rescue treatment after the initiation of mechanical ventilation in instances of clinically confirmed respiratory distress syndrome. Although treatment at birth has the theoretic advantage of delivering surfactant more uniformly to the airways before mechanical ventilation, it has the disadvantages of delaying physiologic stabilization after birth and resulting in unnecessary treatment, at considerable cost, of 20 percent to 40 percent of infants born at or less than 30 weeks of gestation. Rescue therapy permits early physiologic stabilization and confirmation of respiratory distress syndrome, but with the theoretic disadvantages of early lung injury from mechanical ventilation in the surfactant-deficient lung and less uniform surfactant distribution. Previous comparative trials have been biased by incomplete study enrollment and inclusion of infants in preventilation treatment groups without evidence of surfactant deficiency or immaturity. In addition, outcomes have varied in placebo-treated infants.

DESIGN NARRATIVE:

Randomized, placebo-controlled. Singleton infants were assigned to receive a placebo (air), prophylactic surfactant treatment given intratracheally, or rescue surfactant treatment. Multiple birth infants received either prophylactic or rescue treatment. Of 282 potentially eligible infants, 246 received treatments at birth and 200 had respiratory distress syndrome and received the full course of surfactant therapy. Preterm infants randomly assigned to receive prophylactic treatment received surfactant soon after birth; those assigned to receive rescue surfactant had instillation at a mean age of 220 minutes if the lecithin-sphingomyelin ratio was _ 2.0 and no phosphatidylglycerol was detected in either amniotic fluid or initial airway aspirate, oxygen requirements were a fraction of inspired oxygen of > 0.5 and mean airway pressure was _ 7 cm H20 from 2 to 12 hours after birth. Up to four treatment doses were permitted within 48 hours; approximately 60 percent of surfactant-treated infants required two or more doses. Endpoints included the mortality rate at 28 days of age, the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 28 days after birth and at 38 weeks to adjust for differences in gestational age, the incidence of pulmonary air leaks, and the severity of respiratory distress syndrome as assessed by requirement for supplemental oxygen and mechanical ventilation.

The study completion date listed in this record was obtained from the Query/View/Report (QVR) System.

Being tested
pulmonary surfactant
Medical subject headings
Lung Diseases, Respiratory Distress Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • pulmonary surfactantDrug

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Oct 1999 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 1986
  3. Study completionJun 1990

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00000570
Sponsor's protocol ID
208
Other IDs
5R01HL035036
Status last verified
Jan 2000
First submitted
27 Oct 1999
Last updated
13 Dec 2013
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Hallman M, Merritt TA, Bry K, Berry C. Association between neonatal care practices and efficacy of exogenous human surfactant: results of a bicenter randomized trial. Pediatrics. 1993 Mar;91(3):552-60.

    PubMed 8441558

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing pulmonary surfactant in people with Lung Diseases and Respiratory Distress Syndrome, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Dec 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00000570, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Dec 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in