HIV InfectionsPhase 2NCT00000712
A Multicenter, Double Blind, Comparative Study of Zidovudine Alone Versus Zidovudine and Acyclovir as Treatment for HIV-Infected Patients With CD4+ Counts Less Than 200 Cells/mm3
A Phase 2 study testing Zidovudine and Acyclovir in people with HIV Infections, run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at 8 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Original design: The study's purpose is to compare the effects of zidovudine (AZT) alone to the combination of AZT and acyclovir (ACV) to determine if AZT/ACV is associated with a lower death rate and fewer AIDS related opportunistic infections compared to AZT alone, and to investigate the effect of these treatment… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 13 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- HIV Infections
- What is being tested?
- Zidovudine and Acyclovir
- How many people
- 400 participants
- Where
- 8 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Start not givento Nov 1994
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 13 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Concurrent Medication:
- Allowed:
- Methadone maintenance. Therapies available through expanded access or treatment IND programs unless specifically excluded.
- Allowed within 30 days of study entry:
- Systemic steroids only if given for treatment of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia.
- Recommended:
Show all 17Show fewer
- PCP prophylaxis.
- Patient must have:
- Recovered from first episode of histologically proven Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) or microbiologically proven AIDS-defining opportunistic infection as defined in Centers for Disease Control HIV classification group IV.
- C-1.
- Study entry must be within 120 days of AIDS-defining diagnosis.
- Written documentation of positive antibody to HIV by any federally licensed ELISA test kit. This test should be confirmed by another method, for example, Western blot, radioimmunoassay (RIA), HIV culture.
- Patients cannot be transfusion dependent (requiring blood transfusion more than once per month). The last transfusion must be > 2 weeks before entry.
- AMENDED 90-08-27 to include HIV positive patients with CD4+ count < 200 cells/mm3.
- Prior Medication:
- Allowed:
- Zidovudine (AZT) for < 365 days prior to study entry.
Who cannot join
- Co-existing Condition:
- Patients with the following are excluded:
- Symptomatic visceral or progressive Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) (defined by > 10 new lesions in the 30 days prior to entry).
- Other concurrent neoplasms other than basal cell carcinoma of skin (patients who have been in complete remission for 1 year for a malignancy may be enrolled).
- Malabsorption as defined by persistent diarrhea > 6 stools/day for > 4 weeks. Patients whose sole AIDS-defining condition is constitutional disease as defined in CDC's HIV group IV-A or neurologic disease as defined in CDC's HIV group IV-B or AIDS-associated malignancies as defined in CDC's HIV group IV-C.
- Concurrent Medication:
Show all 38Show fewer
- Excluded:
- Acyclovir (ACV) prophylaxis or frequent (> once per month) repeated courses of ACV therapy for herpes simplex virus infection.
- Any concomitant medicine unless required.
- Systemic therapy/prophylaxis/maintenance for AIDS-defining opportunistic infection other than prophylaxis for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP).
- Acetaminophen for > 72 hours. Cimetidine.
- Flurazepam.
- Indomethacin.
- Ranitidine.
- Probenecid (if receiving AZT).
- Rifampin.
- Rifampin-related drugs.
- Patients with the following are excluded:
- Active opportunistic infections.
- Symptomatic visceral or progressive Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) (defined by > 10 new lesions in the 30 days prior to entry).
- Other concurrent neoplasms other than basal cell carcinoma of skin (patients who have been in complete remission for 1 year for a malignancy may be enrolled).
- Malabsorption as defined by persistent diarrhea > 6 stools/day for > 4 weeks.
- Patients whose sole AIDS-defining condition is constitutional disease as defined in CDC's HIV group IV-A or neurologic disease as defined in CDC's HIV group IV-B or AIDS-associated malignancies as defined in CDC's HIV group IV-C.
- Prior Medication:
- Excluded:
- Zidovudine (AZT) for > 365 days prior to study entry.
- Excluded within 14 days of study entry:
- Systemic acyclovir (ACV) therapy.
- Excluded within 30 days of study entry:
- Antiretroviral therapy (other than AZT per above).
- Immunomodulating agents.
- Biologic response modifiers.
- Excluded within 60 days of study entry:
- Ribavirin.
- Prior Treatment:
- Excluded within 30 days of study entry:
- Cytotoxic chemotherapy or radiation therapy for Kaposi's sarcoma.
- Active substance abuse that would impair compliance with study procedure.
Trial locations and contacts
8 sites in 1 country.
8 sites in 1 country
United States8 sites
Bmc Actg Crs
Boston, Massachusetts, 02118
Beth Israel Deaconess - East Campus A0102 CRS
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Beth Israel Deaconess Med. Ctr., ACTG CRS
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Unc Aids Crs
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599
Regional Center for Infectious Disease, Wendover Medical Center CRS
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27401
University of Minnesota, ACTU
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455
University of Washington AIDS CRS
Seattle, Washington, 98122
Massachusetts General Hospital ACTG CRS
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01655
About this study
Original design: The study's purpose is to compare the effects of zidovudine (AZT) alone to the combination of AZT and acyclovir (ACV) to determine if AZT/ACV is associated with a lower death rate and fewer AIDS related opportunistic infections compared to AZT alone, and to investigate the effect of these treatment plans on cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infections. The study evaluates two doses of AZT used alone versus two doses of AZT combined with ACV. Per 12/11/92 amendment: Another antiretroviral agent may be substituted for AZT.
AZT has been shown to increase the life span of patients with AIDS or advanced AIDS related complex and patients being treated for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. Drugs that increase the effectiveness of AZT against HIV may also decrease the need for high doses of AZT. This might reduce some of the negative effects of AZT while not reducing the positive effects.
Read the detailed description
AZT has been shown to increase the life span of patients with AIDS or advanced AIDS related complex and patients being treated for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. Drugs that increase the effectiveness of AZT against HIV may also decrease the need for high doses of AZT. This might reduce some of the negative effects of AZT while not reducing the positive effects.
AMENDED: Patients are randomly assigned to one of two treatment regimens. They receive AZT (or other antiretroviral agent) with or without ACV. Treatment Plan 1: AZT along with placebo at the same time. Treatment Plan 2: AZT and ACV. Therapy is for 104 weeks with an optional extension of 24 weeks or until the end of the study whichever comes first. The maximum duration of therapy for any patient will be 128 weeks. Medication is dispensed on a biweekly basis for the first 4 weeks, then every other month for the remainder of the study. Original design: Patients are randomly assigned to one of four treatment plans to receive AZT alone or AZT and ACV. Medications are given every 4 hours (q4h) orally (PO) while awake (WA). A total of 5 doses/day are given. The per dose schedule for the four plans are: Treatment plan 1: AZT plus placebo (an inactive medication) substituting for ACV. Treatment plan 2: AZT and AZT placebo along with an ACV placebo. Treatment plan 3: AZT and ACV. Treatment plan 4: AZT and AZT placebo and ACV.
- Conditions
- HIV Infections
- Being tested
- Zidovudine, Acyclovir
- Keywords
- AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections, Herpesviridae Infections, Drug Evaluation, Drug Therapy, Combination, Herpesvirus 4, Human, Cytomegalovirus Infections, Acyclovir, Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Antiviral Agents, Zidovudine
- Medical subject headings
- HIV Infections, AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections, Herpesviridae Infections, Epstein-Barr Virus Infections, Cytomegalovirus Infections, Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ZidovudineDrug
AcyclovirDrug
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Aug 2001 (estimated)
- Study completionNov 1994
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HIV InfectionsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Enrolment
- 400 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- US National Institutes of Health
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Collier AC, Study chairHirsch M, Study chairCorey L, Study chair
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00000712
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ACTG 063
- Other IDs
- 11037
- Status last verified
- Oct 2021
- First submitted
- 2 Nov 1999
- Last updated
- 4 Nov 2021
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Collier AC, Schoenfeld DA, Bourland D, Hirsch M, Davis LG, Corey L. Prospective comparative study of acyclovir (ACV) and zidovudine (ZDV) versus ZDV alone in patients with AIDS. Natl Conf Hum Retroviruses Relat Infect (2nd). 1995 Jan 29-Feb 2;125
Ioannidis JP, Collier AC, Cooper DA, Corey L, Fiddian AP, Gazzard BG, Griffiths PD, Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG, Lau J, Pavia AT, Saag MS, Spruance SL, Youle MS. Clinical efficacy of high-dose acyclovir in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection: a meta-analysis of randomized individual patient data. J Infect Dis. 1998 Aug;178(2):349-59. doi: 10.1086/515621.
PubMed 9697714
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Nov 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multicenter, Double Blind, Comparative Study of Zidovudine Alone Versus Zidovudine and Acyclovir as Treatment for HIV-Infected Patients With CD4+ Counts Less Than 200 Cells/mm3
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00000712
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ACTG 063
- Conditions
- HIV Infections
- Keywords
- AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections, Herpesviridae Infections, Drug Evaluation, Drug Therapy, Combination, Herpesvirus 4, Human, Cytomegalovirus Infections, Acyclovir, Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 400 participants
- Lead sponsor
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)US National Institutes of Health
- Study completion
- Nov 1994 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Aug 2001 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Original design: The study's purpose is to compare the effects of zidovudine (AZT) alone to the combination of AZT and acyclovir (ACV) to determine if AZT/ACV is associated with a lower death rate and fewer AIDS related opportunistic infections compared to AZT alone, and to investigate the effect of these treatment plans on cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infections. The study evaluates two doses of AZT used alone versus two doses of AZT combined with ACV. Per 12/11/92 amendment: Another antiretroviral agent may be substituted for AZT.
AZT has been shown to increase the life span of patients with AIDS or advanced AIDS related complex and patients being treated for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. Drugs that increase the effectiveness of AZT against HIV may also decrease the need for high doses of AZT. This might reduce some of the negative effects of AZT while not reducing the positive effects.
Detailed description
AZT has been shown to increase the life span of patients with AIDS or advanced AIDS related complex and patients being treated for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. Drugs that increase the effectiveness of AZT against HIV may also decrease the need for high doses of AZT. This might reduce some of the negative effects of AZT while not reducing the positive effects.
AMENDED: Patients are randomly assigned to one of two treatment regimens. They receive AZT (or other antiretroviral agent) with or without ACV. Treatment Plan 1: AZT along with placebo at the same time. Treatment Plan 2: AZT and ACV. Therapy is for 104 weeks with an optional extension of 24 weeks or until the end of the study whichever comes first. The maximum duration of therapy for any patient will be 128 weeks. Medication is dispensed on a biweekly basis for the first 4 weeks, then every other month for the remainder of the study. Original design: Patients are randomly assigned to one of four treatment plans to receive AZT alone or AZT and ACV. Medications are given every 4 hours (q4h) orally (PO) while awake (WA). A total of 5 doses/day are given. The per dose schedule for the four plans are: Treatment plan 1: AZT plus placebo (an inactive medication) substituting for ACV. Treatment plan 2: AZT and AZT placebo along with an ACV placebo. Treatment plan 3: AZT and ACV. Treatment plan 4: AZT and AZT placebo and ACV.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 13 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Methadone maintenance. Therapies available through expanded access or treatment IND programs unless specifically excluded.
- Allowed within 30 days of study entry:
- Systemic steroids only if given for treatment of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia.
- Recommended:
- PCP prophylaxis.
Key exclusion criteria (38 listed)
- Symptomatic visceral or progressive Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) (defined by > 10 new lesions in the 30 days prior to entry).
- Other concurrent neoplasms other than basal cell carcinoma of skin (patients who have been in complete remission for 1 year for a malignancy may be enrolled).
- Malabsorption as defined by persistent diarrhea > 6 stools/day for > 4 weeks. Patients whose sole AIDS-defining condition is constitutional disease as defined in CDC's HIV group IV-A or neurologic disease as defined in CDC's HIV group IV-B or AIDS-associated malignancies as defined in CDC's HIV group IV-C.
- Acyclovir (ACV) prophylaxis or frequent (> once per month) repeated courses of ACV therapy for herpes simplex virus infection.
- Any concomitant medicine unless required.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Zidovudine | Drug | – |
| Acyclovir | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Nov 2021.
- BackgroundCollier AC, Schoenfeld DA, Bourland D, Hirsch M, Davis LG, Corey L. Prospective comparative study of acyclovir (ACV) and zidovudine (ZDV) versus ZDV alone in patients with AIDS. Natl Conf Hum Retroviruses Relat Infect (2nd). 1995 Jan 29-Feb 2;125
- Background: PubMed 9697714Ioannidis JP, Collier AC, Cooper DA, Corey L, Fiddian AP, Gazzard BG, Griffiths PD, Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG, Lau J, Pavia AT, Saag MS, Spruance SL, Youle MS. Clinical efficacy of high-dose acyclovir in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection: a meta-analysis of randomized individual patient data. J Infect Dis. 1998 Aug;178(2):349-59. doi: 10.1086/515621.
Related trials for HIV Infections
Not yet recruiting
HealthMpowerment Korea: Pilot Testing the Cultural Adaptation of a Digital HIV Intervention for Men Who Have Sex With Men in South Korea
HIV Infections, HIV Prevention and Care
Not yet recruiting
Prescribe to Prevent HIV: A Hybrid Trial Helping Addiction Clinics Prevent HIV & Infections Through Safer Drug Use Support
People Who Use Opioids/People With Opioid Use Disorder (OUD)
Recruiting
Evaluating the Impact of Using the B-OK Bottles for HIV and ART Literacy in South Africa
HIV, HIV Treatment
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
RecruitingObservational study
Olfactory Function and Model-Based Behavior in People Living With HIV and SUD
HIV, Substance Use Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Collier AC study chair
Hirsch M study chair
Corey L study chair
8 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Zidovudine and Acyclovir in people with HIV Infections, run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at 8 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 17 inclusion and 38 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 8 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00000712, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Nov 2021.