AzTrials
AzTrials

HIV InfectionsPhase 1NCT00000746

A Phase I, Multicenter, Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of a Recombinant Vaccinia-HIV Envelope Vaccine (HIVAC-1e) in Combination With a Panel of Subunit Recombinant HIV Envelope Vaccines

A Phase 1 study testing rgp120/HIV-1 SF-2, Env 2-3 and HIVAC-1e in people with HIV Infections, run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Primary: To determine in healthy volunteers whether priming with a vaccinia HIV-1 gp160 envelope gene recombinant vaccine (HIVAC-1e) followed by boosting with one of two subunit recombinant HIV-1 envelope vaccines (Env 2-3 and gp120) provides enhanced immunogenicity compared to vaccination with the gp120 subunit… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
HIV Infections
What is being tested?
rgp120/HIV-1 SF-2, Env 2-3 and HIVAC-1e
Type of treatment
Vaccines
How many people
56 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Start not givento Jul 1994
Phase
Phase 1
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subjects must have:
  • Normal history and physical exam.
  • Negative HIV screening by ELISA, Western blot, and p24 antigen (PBMC HIV culture or HIV-specific PCR can be substituted for Western blot and p24 antigen).
  • History of smallpox vaccination more than 5 years prior to enrollment.
  • Normal urinalysis.
  • Absolute CD4 count = or > 500 cells/mm3.
  • Prior Medication: Required:
  • Vaccinia (smallpox) vaccination more than 5 years prior to study enrollment. Identifiable high-risk behavior for HIV infection as determined by screening questionnaire/interview.

Who cannot join

  • Co-existing Condition:
  • Subjects with the following symptoms or conditions are excluded:
  • Household contacts who are pregnant, < 12 months of age, have eczema, or have immunodeficiency disease or who use immunosuppressive medications.
  • Hepatitis B surface antigenemia.
  • Medical or psychiatric condition or occupational responsibilities that preclude compliance.
  • Subjects with the following prior conditions are excluded:
Show all 16Show fewer
  • History of immunodeficiency or chronic illness.
  • Eczema within the past year.
  • Prior Medication:
  • Excluded:
  • Prior experimental HIV vaccine.
  • Immunoglobulin administration or use of experimental agent within the past 2 months.
  • History of immunosuppressive medications.
  • Prior Treatment:
  • Excluded:
  • Blood or blood product transfusion within the previous 6 months.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • JHU AVEG

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Other trials in United States

About this study

Primary: To determine in healthy volunteers whether priming with a vaccinia HIV-1 gp160 envelope gene recombinant vaccine (HIVAC-1e) followed by boosting with one of two subunit recombinant HIV-1 envelope vaccines (Env 2-3 and gp120) provides enhanced immunogenicity compared to vaccination with the gp120 subunit vaccine alone. (Per 10/01/92 amendment, boosts with VaxSyn (gp160) were eliminated.) To evaluate the immunogenicity of one versus two priming doses of HIVAC-1e prior to a boost with gp120. To compare the relative immunogenicity of the three subunit vaccines when administered as boosters.

Secondary: To examine the safety of administering the individual subunit vaccines in combination with HIVAC-1e and the safety of administering the gp120 subunit vaccine alone.

In a previous study of candidate HIV vaccines, the evidence suggested that administration of a booster vaccination with a different vaccine preparation may produce a better immune response than administration of HIVAC-1e vaccine alone.

Read the detailed description

In a previous study of candidate HIV vaccines, the evidence suggested that administration of a booster vaccination with a different vaccine preparation may produce a better immune response than administration of HIVAC-1e vaccine alone.

Seventy healthy volunteers are randomized to one of four groups. Groups A and D receive one initial immunization with HIVAC-1e followed by two boosts with subunit gp120 and Env 2-3, respectively, at months 8 and 12. Group B receives two immunizations with HIVAC-1e at months 0 and 8 followed by a single boost with subunit gp120 at month 12. Group C receives three doses of subunit gp120 only at months 0, 8 and 12. (Per 10/01/92 amendment, boosts with VaxSyn (gp160) have been eliminated.) Subjects are followed for 18 months.

Conditions
HIV Infections
Being tested
rgp120/HIV-1 SF-2, Env 2-3, HIVAC-1e, gp160 Vaccine (MicroGeneSys)
Keywords
Vaccines, Synthetic, Vaccinia Virus, Viral Vaccines, HIV-1, HIV Envelope Protein gp160, HIV Envelope Protein gp120, AIDS Vaccines, HIV Seronegativity, HIV Preventive Vaccine
Medical subject headings
HIV Infections, Vaccinia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • rgp120/HIV-1 SF-2Biological

  • Env 2-3Biological

  • HIVAC-1eBiological

  • gp160 Vaccine (MicroGeneSys)Biological

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Aug 2001 (estimated)
  2. Study completionJul 1994

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Prevention
Enrolment
56 participants
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00000746
Sponsor's protocol ID
AVEG 008
Other IDs
AVEG Protocol 008, 10553
Status last verified
Oct 2021
First submitted
2 Nov 1999
Last updated
4 Nov 2021
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Clements ML, Corey L, Weinhold K, Schwartz D, Siliciano R, Matthews T, Hsieh R, Graham B, Keefer M, Gorse G, Zolla-Pazner S, Mascola J, Duliege A, Excler J, Tartaglia J, Paoletti E, Hu SL. HIV immunity induced by priming with canarypox or vaccinia-gp160 recombinants and boosting with rgp120. Inst of Hum Virol Annu Meet. 1996 Sept 7-13

  • Graham BS, Belshe RB, Clements ML, Dolin R, Corey L, Wright PF, Gorse GJ, Midthun K, Keefer MC, Roberts NJ Jr, et al. Vaccination of vaccinia-naive adults with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp160 recombinant vaccinia virus in a blinded, controlled, randomized clinical trial. The AIDS Vaccine Clinical Trials Network. J Infect Dis. 1992 Aug;166(2):244-52. doi: 10.1093/infdis/166.2.244.

    PubMed 1353102

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1 study testing rgp120/HIV-1 SF-2, Env 2-3 and HIVAC-1e in people with HIV Infections, run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00000746, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Nov 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in