HIV InfectionsPhase 2NCT00001086
A Study of Abacavir Plus Indinavir Sulfate Plus Efavirenz in HIV-Infected Patients
A Phase 2 study testing Indinavir sulfate, Abacavir sulfate and Efavirenz in people with HIV Infections, run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at 56 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
To compare the virologic response between abacavir (ABC, 1592U89) regimens (drug vs. placebo) and between the 2 dosing regimens (BID vs. TID) with respect to the proportion of patients with plasma HIV RNA levels below the limit of detection [AS PER AMENDMENT 8/27/97: < 500 copies/ml at week 16]. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- HIV Infections
- What is being tested?
- Indinavir sulfate, Abacavir sulfate and Efavirenz
- How many people
- 300 participants
- Where
- 56 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Start not givento Sep 1999
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Concurrent Medication:
- Allowed:
- Chemoprophylaxis for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia is required for all patients who have a CD4 cell count <= 200 cells/mm3.
- Topical and/or oral antifungal agents are permitted except for oral ketoconazole.
- Treatment, maintenance or chemoprophylaxis with approved agents for opportunistic infections as clinically indicated, except for rifabutin.
- All antibiotics as clinically indicated.
Show all 24Show fewer
- Systemic corticosteroid use for <= 21 days for acute problems is permitted as medically indicated; chronic systemic corticosteroid use is not permitted, unless it is within physiologic replacement levels.
- Recombinant erythropoietin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor are permitted as medically indicated.
- Regularly prescribed medications such as antipyretics, analgesics, allergy medications (except for terfenadine (Seldane) and astemizole (Hismanal)), antidepressants, sleep medications, oral contraceptives, megestrol acetate, testosterone or any other medications are permitted as medically indicated.
- NOTE:
- Due to the possibility that EFV or ABC may alter the effectiveness of oral contraceptives or depo-progesterone, oral contraceptives or depo-progesterone must not be used as the sole form of birth control. [AS PER AMENDMENT 8/7/98: adequate birth control is hormonal plus barrier method or two barrier methods].
- Alternative therapies such as vitamins, acupuncture, and visualization techniques will be permitted. Herbal medications should be avoided. Patients should report the use of these therapies; alternative therapies will be recorded. [AS PER AMENDMENT 8/7/98: Due to the likelihood of IDV increasing the concentrations of sildenafil (Viagra) when coadministered, it is suggested that subjects who use viagra take the lowest dose (25 mg, i.e., half the typical dose).]
- Both NIAID ACTG 320 participants and non-ACTG 320 patients must have:
- Documented HIV-1 infection.
- Written informed consent from parent or legal guardian for those patients < 18 years old.
- Non-ACTG 320 patients must have:
- Documented CD4 cell count <= 200 cells/mm3 at the time of initiation of ZDV (or d4T) plus 3TC therapy [AS PER AMENDMENT 12/17/97:
- Documented CD4 cell count <= 250 cells/mm3 within 3 months of initiation of ZDV (or d4T) plus 3TC therapy].
- Prior Medication:
- Required:
- For ACTG 320 patients:
- Patients must have participated in ACTG 320 with original randomization to the double-nucleoside combination arm, and maintenance of that treatment (on-study/on-treatment in ACTG 320) until enrollment into ACTG 368.
- For non-ACTG 320 patients:
- Greater than or equal to 3 months [2 months AS PER AMENDMENT 12/17/97] of therapy with ZDV (or d4T) + 3TC and receiving ZDV (or d4T) + 3TC at the time of entry.
Who cannot join
- Co-existing Condition:
- Non-ACTG 320 patients with the following symptoms and conditions are excluded:
- Malignancy that requires systemic therapy other than minimal Kaposi's sarcoma.
- NOTE:
- Minimal Kaposi's sarcoma, defined as <= 5 cutaneous lesions and no visceral disease or tumor-associated edema, allowed, provided systemic therapy not required.
- Non-ACTG 320 patients with the following prior conditions or symptoms are excluded:
Show all 27Show fewer
- Unexplained temperature > 38.5 degrees C for 7 consecutive days.
- Chronic diarrhea defined as > 3 liquid stools per day persisting for 15 days, within 30 days prior to entry.
- Proven or suspected acute hepatitis within 30 days prior to entry, even if AST (SGOT) and ALT (SGPT) are <= 5 X ULN.
- Concurrent Medication: Excluded:
- All antiretroviral therapies other then study medications.
- Rifabutin and rifampin.
- Investigational drugs without specific approval from the protocol chair.
- Systemic cytotoxic chemotherapy.
- Oral ketoconazole (Nizoral), terfenadine (Seldane), astemizole (Hismanal), cisapride (Propulsid), triazolam (Halcion), and midazolam (Versed).
- Caution should be taken in the consumption of alcoholic beverages with study medications.
- Itraconazole.
- Prior Medication: Excluded: For ACTG 320 patients:
- Those who opted to receive open-label IDV while on ACTG 320, or if they switched to open label IDV during the study.
- For non-ACTG 320 patients:
- Acute therapy for an infection or other medical illness within 14 days prior to entry.
- Prior protease inhibitor therapy.
- Prior NNRTI therapy (approved or experimental).
- Erythropoietin, G-CSF or GM-CSF within 30 days prior to entry.
- Interferons, interleukins or HIV vaccines within 30 days prior to entry.
- Any experimental therapy within 30 days prior to entry.
- Rifampin or rifabutin within 14 days prior to entry.
Trial locations and contacts
56 sites in 2 countries.
56 sites in 2 countries
United States55 sites
State of MD Div of Corrections / Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp
Baltimore, Maryland, 212052196
Johns Hopkins Hosp
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287
Harvard (Massachusetts Gen Hosp)
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Boston Med Ctr
Boston, Massachusetts, 02118
Beth Israel Deaconess - West Campus
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
SUNY / Erie County Med Ctr at Buffalo
Buffalo, New York, 14215
Univ of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 275997215
Northwestern Univ Med School
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Rush Presbyterian - Saint Luke's Med Ctr
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
Louis A Weiss Memorial Hosp
Chicago, Illinois, 60640
Univ of Cincinnati
Cincinnati, Ohio, 452670405
Univ of Kentucky Lexington
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267
Case Western Reserve Univ
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
Ohio State Univ Hosp Clinic
Columbus, Ohio, 432101228
Univ of Colorado Health Sciences Ctr
Denver, Colorado, 80262
Duke Univ Med Ctr
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
Univ of Texas Galveston
Galveston, Texas, 775550435
Moses H Cone Memorial Hosp
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27401
Milton S Hershey Med Ctr
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 170330850
Queens Med Ctr
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96816
Univ of Hawaii
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96816
Indiana Univ Hosp
Indianapolis, Indiana, 462025250
Division of Inf Diseases/ Indiana Univ Hosp
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
Univ of Iowa Hosp and Clinic
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242
Univ of Tennessee / E Tennessee Comprehensive Hemophilia Ctr
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37920
Univ of Southern California / LA County USC Med Ctr
Los Angeles, California, 900331079
UCLA CARE Ctr
Los Angeles, California, 90095
Univ of Miami School of Medicine
Miami, Florida, 331361013
Hennepin County Med Clinic
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55415
Univ of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455
Vanderbilt Univ Med Ctr
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
Charity Hosp / Tulane Univ Med School
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112
Tulane Med Ctr Hosp
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112
Tulane Univ School of Medicine
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112
Beth Israel Med Ctr
New York, New York, 10003
Bellevue Hosp / New York Univ Med Ctr
New York, New York, 10016
Saint Clare's Hosp and Health Ctr
New York, New York, 10019
Cornell Univ Med Ctr
New York, New York, 10021
St Vincent's Hosp / Mem Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr
New York, New York, 10021
Mount Sinai Med Ctr
New York, New York, 10029
Univ of Nebraska Med Ctr
Omaha, Nebraska, 681985130
Univ of Pennsylvania at Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Central Prison/Women's Prison in Raleigh / NC
Raleigh, North Carolina, 276260540
Univ of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, New York, 14642
St Paul Ramsey Med Ctr
Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55101
San Francisco Gen Hosp
San Francisco, California, 941102859
Stanford at Kaiser / Kaiser Permanente Med Ctr
San Francisco, California, 94115
Univ of Washington
Seattle, Washington, 981224304
St Louis Regional Hosp / St Louis Regional Med Ctr
St Louis, Missouri, 63112
Stanford Univ Med Ctr
Stanford, California, 943055107
Georgetown Univ Hosp
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20037
Howard Univ
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20059
Great Lakes Hemophilia Foundation
Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, 532130127
Julio Arroyo
West Columbia, South Carolina, 29169
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Phase II, Placebo Controlled Trial of Abacavir (ABC, 1592U89) in Combination With Open-Label Indinavir Sulfate (IDV) and Efavirenz (EFV, DMP-266) in HIV-Infected Subjects With Nucleoside Analog Experience: A Rollover Study for ACTG 320
To compare the virologic response between abacavir (ABC, 1592U89) regimens (drug vs. placebo) and between the 2 dosing regimens (BID vs. TID) with respect to the proportion of patients with plasma HIV RNA levels below the limit of detection [AS PER AMENDMENT 8/27/97: < 500 copies/ml at week 16]. To evaluate the safety and tolerance of the study arms. [AS PER AMENDMENT 3/10/99: During the extension period, compare the time to detectable viremia (2 consecutive plasma HIV RNA levels greater than or equal to 500 copies/ml) between ABC and placebo.] Therapeutically, there is a need to explore potent alternative therapy for patients who have received, or are currently receiving, a double nucleoside analog combination including lamivudine (3TC), a regimen that was proven to be clinically inferior to indinavir (IDV) when combined with zidovudine/3TC in study ACTG 320. In order to produce and maintain a maximal antiviral response, all patients in this study will receive 2 or 3 potent, new agents; ABC, a nucleoside analog, EFV, a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), and IDV, a protease inhibitor. Virologically, the major question this protocol seeks to answer is how prior 3TC exposure in a dual nucleoside regimen influences the response to subsequent treatment. It is unclear whether it is best to add a protease inhibitor either 1) an NNRTI at 1 of 2 doses, or 2) an NNRTI at 1 of 2 doses plus a new nucleoside analog to achieve plasma HIV RNA levels that are below the limits of detection.
Read the detailed description
Therapeutically, there is a need to explore potent alternative therapy for patients who have received, or are currently receiving, a double nucleoside analog combination including lamivudine (3TC), a regimen that was proven to be clinically inferior to indinavir (IDV) when combined with zidovudine/3TC in study ACTG 320. In order to produce and maintain a maximal antiviral response, all patients in this study will receive 2 or 3 potent, new agents; ABC, a nucleoside analog, EFV, a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), and IDV, a protease inhibitor. Virologically, the major question this protocol seeks to answer is how prior 3TC exposure in a dual nucleoside regimen influences the response to subsequent treatment. It is unclear whether it is best to add a protease inhibitor either 1) an NNRTI at 1 of 2 doses, or 2) an NNRTI at 1 of 2 doses plus a new nucleoside analog to achieve plasma HIV RNA levels that are below the limits of detection.
Prior to randomization, patients are stratified by CD4 cell count (cells/mm3): less than or equal to 50 versus greater than 50 and by ACTG 320 participation: enrolled versus not enrolled. Patients with greater than 50 CD4 cells/mm3 are randomized to 1 of 4 treatment arms (Arms I, II, III, or IV) and patients with less than or equal to 50 CD4 cells/mm3 are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms (Arms I and II). All patients will be followed for 48 weeks beyond the enrollment of the last patient. The regimens for the treatment arms are as follows: Arm I - indinavir (IDV) plus EFV plus ABC placebo bid, Arm II - IDV (higher dose) plus EFV (lower dose) plus ABC, Arm III - IDV plus EFV plus ABC placebo, and Arm IV - IDV (higher dose) plus EFV (lower dose) plus ABC. If 15 week data indicates this is a reasonable dosing regimen, the sample size in Arms III and IV will be expanded to include additional patients with a CD4 count greater than 50 cells/mm3 and allow for equal enrollment across all 4 treatment arms. Those patients who roll over from ACTG 320 will be assigned to receive open-label treatment on Arm II and evaluated independently of the 4 treatment arms listed above.
[AS PER AMENDMENT 8/27/97: Patients with 2 consecutive HIV RNA measurements at least 500 copies/ml at week 16 or anytime thereafter are given the option to receive open-label treatment with IDV plus EFV plus ABC, or to seek the best available therapy outside of the study. NOTE: Patients who choose the open-label combination may take other prescribed nucleoside analogs provided outside the study.] [AS PER AMENDMENT 12/17/97: It is strongly recommended that patients who reach a confirmed endpoint and elect to receive open-label therapy consider adding additional approved (and novel, if possible) antiretroviral agents to their open-label regimen.] [AS PER AMENDMENT 1/12/98: Patients who choose the open-label combination may receive other approved antiretrovirals obtained outside the study provided the ACTG 368 team approves the combination.] [AS PER AMENDMENT 8/7/98: Subjects will take study medications for a maximum of 96 weeks, depending on their time of study enrollment.] [AS PER AMENDMENT 3/10/99: A 24-week extension, which will end July 30, 1999, has been added to the study. The extension applies to subjects currently on blinded Step 1 treatment, on open-labeled Step 2, or on study but off treatment. Subjects are to be unblinded in their study treatment and followed for the remainder of the extension. Subjects continue on their current study drug schedule. Subjects on blinded IDV plus EFV who, upon unblinding (not failure) decide to add prescription ABC to their regimen, will be considered off study treatment and will be followed for the duration of the extension; those already registered on Step 2 will continue their Step 2 therapy. Any subject who does not wish to continue on the study extension will be unblinded to their original randomized regimen. Subjects who experience virologic failure during the extension should seek best available treatment following current recommendations to use as many approved, novel antiretroviral agents as possible. The new drug regimen may incorporate any or all of the study drugs.]
- Conditions
- HIV Infections
- Being tested
- Indinavir sulfate, Abacavir sulfate, Efavirenz
- Keywords
- Placebos, HIV-1, Drug Therapy, Combination, HIV Protease Inhibitors, Indinavir, RNA, Viral, Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors, Anti-HIV Agents, Viral Load, efavirenz
- Medical subject headings
- HIV Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Indinavir sulfateDrug
Abacavir sulfateDrug
EfavirenzDrug
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Aug 2001 (estimated)
- Study completionSep 1999
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HIV InfectionsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 300 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- US National Institutes of Health
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Squires KE, Study chairHammer SM, Study chairFischl MA, Study chair
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00001086
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ACTG 368
- Other IDs
- 11331
- Status last verified
- Oct 2021
- First submitted
- 2 Nov 1999
- Last updated
- 1 Nov 2021
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Squires K, Hammer S, Degruttola V, Fischl M, Grimes J, Demeter L, Morse G. Randomized trial of abacavir (ABC) in combination with indinavir (IDV) and efavirenz (EFV) in HIV-infected patients (pts) with nucleoside analog experience (NRTI exp). Conf Retroviruses Opportunistic Infect. 1999 Jan 31-Feb 4;6th:207 (abstract no LB15)
Dicenzo R, Forrest A, Smith P, Squires K, Hammer S, Fischl M, Degruttola V, Morse G. Comparing intensive and sparse sampling for estimating the population pharmacokinetics (PK) of indinavir (IDV) in efavirenz (EFV)containing regimens. 8th Conf Retro and Opportun Infect. 2001 Feb 4-8 (abstract no 751)
Landay AL, Bettendorf D, Chan E, Spritzler J, Schmitz JL, Bucy RP, Gonzalez CJ, Schnizlein-Bick CT, Evans T, Squires KE, Phair JP. Evidence of immune reconstitution in antiretroviral drug-experienced patients with advanced HIV disease. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2002 Jan 20;18(2):95-102. doi: 10.1089/08892220252779638.
PubMed 11839142Demeter LM, DeGruttola V, Lustgarten S, Bettendorf D, Fischl M, Eshleman S, Spreen W, Nguyen BY, Koval CE, Eron JJ, Hammer S, Squires K. Association of efavirenz hypersusceptibility with virologic response in ACTG 368, a randomized trial of abacavir (ABC) in combination with efavirenz (EFV) and indinavir (IDV) in HIV-infected subjects with prior nucleoside analog experience. HIV Clin Trials. 2008 Jan-Feb;9(1):11-25. doi: 10.1310/hct0901-11.
PubMed 18215978
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Nov 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Phase II, Placebo Controlled Trial of Abacavir (ABC, 1592U89) in Combination With Open-Label Indinavir Sulfate (IDV) and Efavirenz (EFV, DMP-266) in HIV-Infected Subjects With Nucleoside Analog Experience: A Rollover Study for ACTG 320
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00001086
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ACTG 368
- Conditions
- HIV Infections
- Keywords
- Placebos, HIV-1, Drug Therapy, Combination, HIV Protease Inhibitors, Indinavir, RNA, Viral, Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors, Anti-HIV Agents
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 300 participants
- Lead sponsor
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)US National Institutes of Health
- Study completion
- Sep 1999 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Aug 2001 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To compare the virologic response between abacavir (ABC, 1592U89) regimens (drug vs. placebo) and between the 2 dosing regimens (BID vs. TID) with respect to the proportion of patients with plasma HIV RNA levels below the limit of detection [AS PER AMENDMENT 8/27/97: < 500 copies/ml at week 16]. To evaluate the safety and tolerance of the study arms. [AS PER AMENDMENT 3/10/99: During the extension period, compare the time to detectable viremia (2 consecutive plasma HIV RNA levels greater than or equal to 500 copies/ml) between ABC and placebo.] Therapeutically, there is a need to explore potent alternative therapy for patients who have received, or are currently receiving, a double nucleoside analog combination including lamivudine (3TC), a regimen that was proven to be clinically inferior to indinavir (IDV) when combined with zidovudine/3TC in study ACTG 320. In order to produce and maintain a maximal antiviral response, all patients in this study will receive 2 or 3 potent, new agents; ABC, a nucleoside analog, EFV, a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), and IDV, a protease inhibitor. Virologically, the major question this protocol seeks to answer is how prior 3TC exposure in a dual nucleoside regimen influences the response to subsequent treatment. It is unclear whether it is best to add a protease inhibitor either 1) an NNRTI at 1 of 2 doses, or 2) an NNRTI at 1 of 2 doses plus a new nucleoside analog to achieve plasma HIV RNA levels that are below the limits of detection.
Detailed description
Therapeutically, there is a need to explore potent alternative therapy for patients who have received, or are currently receiving, a double nucleoside analog combination including lamivudine (3TC), a regimen that was proven to be clinically inferior to indinavir (IDV) when combined with zidovudine/3TC in study ACTG 320. In order to produce and maintain a maximal antiviral response, all patients in this study will receive 2 or 3 potent, new agents; ABC, a nucleoside analog, EFV, a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), and IDV, a protease inhibitor. Virologically, the major question this protocol seeks to answer is how prior 3TC exposure in a dual nucleoside regimen influences the response to subsequent treatment. It is unclear whether it is best to add a protease inhibitor either 1) an NNRTI at 1 of 2 doses, or 2) an NNRTI at 1 of 2 doses plus a new nucleoside analog to achieve plasma HIV RNA levels that are below the limits of detection.
Prior to randomization, patients are stratified by CD4 cell count (cells/mm3): less than or equal to 50 versus greater than 50 and by ACTG 320 participation: enrolled versus not enrolled. Patients with greater than 50 CD4 cells/mm3 are randomized to 1 of 4 treatment arms (Arms I, II, III, or IV) and patients with less than or equal to 50 CD4 cells/mm3 are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms (Arms I and II). All patients will be followed for 48 weeks beyond the enrollment of the last patient. The regimens for the treatment arms are as follows: Arm I - indinavir (IDV) plus EFV plus ABC placebo bid, Arm II - IDV (higher dose) plus EFV (lower dose) plus ABC, Arm III - IDV plus EFV plus ABC placebo, and Arm IV - IDV (higher dose) plus EFV (lower dose) plus ABC. If 15 week data indicates this is a reasonable dosing regimen, the sample size in Arms III and IV will be expanded to include additional patients with a CD4 count greater than 50 cells/mm3 and allow for equal enrollment across all 4 treatment arms. Those patients who roll over from ACTG 320 will be assigned to receive open-label treatment on Arm II and evaluated independently of the 4 treatment arms listed above.
[AS PER AMENDMENT 8/27/97: Patients with 2 consecutive HIV RNA measurements at least 500 copies/ml at week 16 or anytime thereafter are given the option to receive open-label treatment with IDV plus EFV plus ABC, or to seek the best available therapy outside of the study. NOTE: Patients who choose the open-label combination may take other prescribed nucleoside analogs provided outside the study.] [AS PER AMENDMENT 12/17/97: It is strongly recommended that patients who reach a confirmed endpoint and elect to receive open-label therapy consider adding additional approved (and novel, if possible) antiretroviral agents to their open-label regimen.] [AS PER AMENDMENT 1/12/98: Patients who choose the open-label combination may receive other approved antiretrovirals obtained outside the study provided the ACTG 368 team approves the combination.] [AS PER AMENDMENT 8/7/98: Subjects will take study medications for a maximum of 96 weeks, depending on their time of study enrollment.] [AS PER AMENDMENT 3/10/99: A 24-week extension, which will end July 30, 1999, has been added to the study. The extension applies to subjects currently on blinded Step 1 treatment, on open-labeled Step 2, or on study but off treatment. Subjects are to be unblinded in their study treatment and followed for the remainder of the extension. Subjects continue on their current study drug schedule. Subjects on blinded IDV plus EFV who, upon unblinding (not failure) decide to add prescription ABC to their regimen, will be considered off study treatment and will be followed for the duration of the extension; those already registered on Step 2 will continue their Step 2 therapy. Any subject who does not wish to continue on the study extension will be unblinded to their original randomized regimen. Subjects who experience virologic failure during the extension should seek best available treatment following current recommendations to use as many approved, novel antiretroviral agents as possible. The new drug regimen may incorporate any or all of the study drugs.]
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (24 listed)
- Chemoprophylaxis for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia is required for all patients who have a CD4 cell count <= 200 cells/mm3.
- Topical and/or oral antifungal agents are permitted except for oral ketoconazole.
- Treatment, maintenance or chemoprophylaxis with approved agents for opportunistic infections as clinically indicated, except for rifabutin.
- All antibiotics as clinically indicated.
- Systemic corticosteroid use for <= 21 days for acute problems is permitted as medically indicated; chronic systemic corticosteroid use is not permitted, unless it is within physiologic replacement levels.
Key exclusion criteria (27 listed)
- Malignancy that requires systemic therapy other than minimal Kaposi's sarcoma.
- Minimal Kaposi's sarcoma, defined as <= 5 cutaneous lesions and no visceral disease or tumor-associated edema, allowed, provided systemic therapy not required.
- Unexplained temperature > 38.5 degrees C for 7 consecutive days.
- Chronic diarrhea defined as > 3 liquid stools per day persisting for 15 days, within 30 days prior to entry.
- Proven or suspected acute hepatitis within 30 days prior to entry, even if AST (SGOT) and ALT (SGPT) are <= 5 X ULN.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Indinavir sulfate | Drug | – |
| Abacavir sulfate | Drug | – |
| Efavirenz | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Nov 2021.
- BackgroundSquires K, Hammer S, Degruttola V, Fischl M, Grimes J, Demeter L, Morse G. Randomized trial of abacavir (ABC) in combination with indinavir (IDV) and efavirenz (EFV) in HIV-infected patients (pts) with nucleoside analog experience (NRTI exp). Conf Retroviruses Opportunistic Infect. 1999 Jan 31-Feb 4;6th:207 (abstract no LB15)
- BackgroundDicenzo R, Forrest A, Smith P, Squires K, Hammer S, Fischl M, Degruttola V, Morse G. Comparing intensive and sparse sampling for estimating the population pharmacokinetics (PK) of indinavir (IDV) in efavirenz (EFV)containing regimens. 8th Conf Retro and Opportun Infect. 2001 Feb 4-8 (abstract no 751)
- Background: PubMed 11839142Landay AL, Bettendorf D, Chan E, Spritzler J, Schmitz JL, Bucy RP, Gonzalez CJ, Schnizlein-Bick CT, Evans T, Squires KE, Phair JP. Evidence of immune reconstitution in antiretroviral drug-experienced patients with advanced HIV disease. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2002 Jan 20;18(2):95-102. doi: 10.1089/08892220252779638.
- Results publication: PubMed 18215978Demeter LM, DeGruttola V, Lustgarten S, Bettendorf D, Fischl M, Eshleman S, Spreen W, Nguyen BY, Koval CE, Eron JJ, Hammer S, Squires K. Association of efavirenz hypersusceptibility with virologic response in ACTG 368, a randomized trial of abacavir (ABC) in combination with efavirenz (EFV) and indinavir (IDV) in HIV-infected subjects with prior nucleoside analog experience. HIV Clin Trials. 2008 Jan-Feb;9(1):11-25. doi: 10.1310/hct0901-11.
Related trials for HIV Infections
Not yet recruiting
HealthMpowerment Korea: Pilot Testing the Cultural Adaptation of a Digital HIV Intervention for Men Who Have Sex With Men in South Korea
HIV Infections, HIV Prevention and Care
Not yet recruiting
Prescribe to Prevent HIV: A Hybrid Trial Helping Addiction Clinics Prevent HIV & Infections Through Safer Drug Use Support
People Who Use Opioids/People With Opioid Use Disorder (OUD)
Recruiting
Evaluating the Impact of Using the B-OK Bottles for HIV and ART Literacy in South Africa
HIV, HIV Treatment
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
RecruitingObservational study
Olfactory Function and Model-Based Behavior in People Living With HIV and SUD
HIV, Substance Use Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Squires KE study chair
Hammer SM study chair
Fischl MA study chair
56 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Indinavir sulfate, Abacavir sulfate and Efavirenz in people with HIV Infections, run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at 56 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 24 inclusion and 27 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 56 sites in United States, Puerto Rico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00001086, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Nov 2021.