HIV InfectionsNCT00002052
Prospective Comparison of Ampicillin / Amoxicillin Versus Ceftriaxone for the Treatment of Salmonella Infections in AIDS Patients
A study testing Ceftriaxone sodium, Ampicillin sodium and Amoxicillin trihydrate in people with HIV Infections and Salmonella Infections, run by University of Southern California at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
To compare the effectiveness of standard treatment with parenteral ampicillin and oral amoxicillin compared to initial daily therapy with ceftriaxone followed by 3 times weekly suppressive treatment for salmonella infections in AIDS patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- HIV Infections, Salmonella Infections
- What is being tested?
- Ceftriaxone sodium, Ampicillin sodium and Amoxicillin trihydrate
- How many people
- Not given
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Start not givento not given
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
None listed.
Who cannot join
- Co-existing Condition:
- Patients with the following are excluded:
- Type I hypersensitivity to beta-lactam antibiotics.
- Not expected to survive 12 weeks.
- In a coma or with other central nervous system (CNS) impairment.
- Patients with the following are excluded:
Show all 14Show fewer
- Type I hypersensitivity to beta-lactam antibiotics.
- Not expected to survive 12 weeks.
- In a coma or with other central nervous system (CNS) impairment.
- Prior Medication:
- Excluded within 48 hours of study entry:
- Treatment with an antibiotic active in vitro against Salmonella.
- HIV infection, AIDS, or AIDS related complex (ARC).
- Salmonella bacteremia or positive stool culture in patient with 3 or more stools per day.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Los Angeles County - USC Med Ctr
Los Angeles, California, 90033
About this study
To compare the effectiveness of standard treatment with parenteral ampicillin and oral amoxicillin compared to initial daily therapy with ceftriaxone followed by 3 times weekly suppressive treatment for salmonella infections in AIDS patients.
- Conditions
- HIV Infections, Salmonella Infections
- Being tested
- Ceftriaxone sodium, Ampicillin sodium, Amoxicillin trihydrate
- Keywords
- Salmonella Infections, AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections, Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Amoxicillin, Ceftriaxone
- Medical subject headings
- HIV Infections, Salmonella Infections, AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections, Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ceftriaxone sodiumDrug
Ampicillin sodiumDrug
Amoxicillin trihydrateDrug
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Aug 2001 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for HIV InfectionsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Southern CaliforniaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Southern California
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00002052
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 019A
- Status last verified
- Aug 1989
- First submitted
- 2 Nov 1999
- Last updated
- 24 Jun 2005
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Jun 2005. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective Comparison of Ampicillin / Amoxicillin Versus Ceftriaxone for the Treatment of Salmonella Infections in AIDS Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00002052
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 019A
- Conditions
- HIV Infections, Salmonella Infections
- Keywords
- Salmonella Infections, AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections, Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Amoxicillin, Ceftriaxone
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Lead sponsor
- University of Southern CaliforniaUniversity, hospital or other
- First posted
- 31 Aug 2001 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To compare the effectiveness of standard treatment with parenteral ampicillin and oral amoxicillin compared to initial daily therapy with ceftriaxone followed by 3 times weekly suppressive treatment for salmonella infections in AIDS patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (0 listed)
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Type I hypersensitivity to beta-lactam antibiotics.
- Not expected to survive 12 weeks.
- In a coma or with other central nervous system (CNS) impairment.
- Type I hypersensitivity to beta-lactam antibiotics.
- Not expected to survive 12 weeks.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ceftriaxone sodium | Drug | – |
| Ampicillin sodium | Drug | – |
| Amoxicillin trihydrate | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Jun 2005.
Related trials for HIV Infections
Not yet recruiting
HealthMpowerment Korea: Pilot Testing the Cultural Adaptation of a Digital HIV Intervention for Men Who Have Sex With Men in South Korea
HIV Infections, HIV Prevention and Care
Not yet recruiting
Prescribe to Prevent HIV: A Hybrid Trial Helping Addiction Clinics Prevent HIV & Infections Through Safer Drug Use Support
People Who Use Opioids/People With Opioid Use Disorder (OUD)
Recruiting
Evaluating the Impact of Using the B-OK Bottles for HIV and ART Literacy in South Africa
HIV, HIV Treatment
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
RecruitingObservational study
Olfactory Function and Model-Based Behavior in People Living With HIV and SUD
HIV, Substance Use Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Ceftriaxone sodium, Ampicillin sodium and Amoxicillin trihydrate in people with HIV Infections and Salmonella Infections, run by University of Southern California at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jun 2005. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jun 2005.