Endometrial CancerPhase 3NCT00002493
Radiation Therapy Compared With Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Advanced Endometrial Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing cisplatin, doxorubicin hydrochloride and low-LET photon therapy in people with Endometrial Cancer and Psychosocial Effects of Cancer and Its Treatment, run by Gynecologic Oncology Group at 58 sites in United States.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. It is not yet known which treatment regimen is more effective for endometrial cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Endometrial Cancer, Psychosocial Effects of Cancer and Its Treatment
- What is being tested?
- cisplatin, doxorubicin hydrochloride and low-LET photon therapy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- Not given
- Where
- 58 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- May 1992to Apr 2001
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Pathological stage III/IV endometrial carcinoma of any histology (including clear cell and serous papillary carcinomas) The following extent of disease eligible: Positive adnexa Tumor invading the serosa Positive pelvic nodes Positive para-aortic nodes Involvement of the bowel mucosa Intra-abdominal metastases Positive pelvic washings Vaginal involvement within the radiotherapy field Hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) required with residual tumor not greater than 2 cm at any site Selective pelvic and para-aortic lymph node sampling optional for patients with stage III/IV disease by other criteria If para-aortic nodes are positive, scalene nodes must be negative on biopsy and chest CT must be negative for intrathoracic disease The following disease conditions exclude: Parenchymal liver metastasis Lung metastasis Positive inguinal nodes Positive scalene nodes Recurrent disease Protocol therapy must begin within 8 weeks after surgery
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: Not specified Performance status: GOG 0-3 Hematopoietic: WBC at least 3,000/mm3 Absolute granulocyte count at least 1,500/mm3 Platelet count at least 100,000/mm3 Hepatic: Bilirubin no greater than 1.5 times normal AST no greater than 3 times normal Renal: Creatinine no greater than 2.0 mg/dL Cardiovascular: Left ventricular ejection fraction normal Other: No past or concomitant malignancy other than nonmelanomatous skin cancer
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: Biologic therapy: No prior biologic therapy Chemotherapy: No prior chemotherapy Endocrine therapy: Prior progestational agents allowed No other prior endocrine therapy Radiotherapy: No prior pelvic or abdominal radiotherapy Surgery: Hysterectomy and BSO required Pelvic and para-aortic lymph node sampling optional (see Disease Characteristics)
Trial locations and contacts
58 sites in 1 country.
58 sites in 1 country
United States58 sites
Abington Memorial Hospital
Abington, Pennsylvania, 19001
Cancer Center of Albany Medical Center
Albany, New York, 12208
CCOP - Ann Arbor Regional
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48106
Emory University Hospital - Atlanta
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
CCOP - Atlanta Regional
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342-1701
Johns Hopkins Oncology Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287
University of Alabama Comprehensive Cancer Center
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
State University of New York Health Science Center at Brooklyn
Brooklyn, New York, 11203
Cooper Hospital/University Medical Center
Camden, New Jersey, 08103
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, UNC
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599-7295
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425-0721
Cancer Center, University of Virginia HSC
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908
Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
University of Chicago Cancer Research Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
Barrett Cancer Center, The University Hospital
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
Ireland Cancer Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106-5065
Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital - Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Simmons Cancer Center - Dallas
Dallas, Texas, 75235-9154
University of Colorado Cancer Center
Denver, Colorado, 80262
Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
Duke Comprehensive Cancer Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033
MBCCOP - Hawaii
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96813
University of Texas - MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030
Indiana University Cancer Center
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202-5265
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242
University of Mississippi Medical Center
Jackson, Mississippi, 39216-4505
CCOP - Kansas City
Kansas City, Missouri, 64131
CCOP - Southern Nevada Cancer Research Foundation
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89106
Albert B. Chandler Medical Center, University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, 40536-0084
USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center
Los Angeles, California, 90033-0800
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCLA
Los Angeles, California, 90095-1781
CCOP - Baptist Cancer Institute
Memphis, Tennessee, 38117
University of Minnesota Cancer Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10021
University of Oklahoma College of Medicine
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73190
CCOP - Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium
Omaha, Nebraska, 68131
Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
Orange, California, 92868
Women's Cancer Center
Palo Alto, California, 94304
University of Pennsylvania Cancer Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Kimmel Cancer Center of Thomas Jefferson University - Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
Pennsylvania Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
Fox Chase Cancer Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19111
CCOP - Greater Phoenix
Phoenix, Arizona, 85006-2726
University of Rochester Cancer Center
Rochester, New York, 14642
University of Washington Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98195-6043
CCOP - Upstate Carolina
Spartanburg, South Carolina, 29303
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Stanford University Medical Center
Stanford, California, 94305-5408
State University of New York Health Sciences Center - Stony Brook
Stony Brook, New York, 11790-9832
Tacoma General Hospital
Tacoma, Washington, 98405
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute
Tampa, Florida, 33612
Vincent T. Lombardi Cancer Research Center, Georgetown University
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007
Walter Reed Army Medical Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20307-5000
Brookview Research, Inc.
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103
Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157-1082
University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01655
About this study
Official title: WHOLE ABDOMINAL RADIOTHERAPY VERSUS CIRCADIAN-TIMED COMBINATION DOXORUBICIN-CISPLATIN CHEMOTHERAPY IN ADVANCED ENDOMETRIAL CARCINOMA -- PHASE III
RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. It is not yet known which treatment regimen is more effective for endometrial cancer.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare radiation therapy with chemotherapy in treating patients who have advanced endometrial cancer.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES: I. Compare overall survival, progression-free interval, and patterns of failure of maximally debulked patients with stage III/IV endometrial carcinoma treated with whole-abdominal irradiation vs. doxorubicin/cisplatin. II. Compare the incidence and type of acute and late adverse events observed with these two treatment regimens. III. Compare changes in fatigue, elimination, and neurologic impairment that impact on quality of life in patients treated with these two regimens. IV. Assess the difference in short-term versus long-term impact on quality of life between the two treatment groups. V. Compare quality-of-life outcomes over time between these two treatment groups.
OUTLINE: Randomized study. Arm I: Radiotherapy. Whole-abdominal irradiation using equipment with photon energies ranging from 6 to 25 MV. Arm II: 2-Drug Combination Chemotherapy. Doxorubicin, DOX, NSC-123127; Cisplatin, CDDP, NSC-119875.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: It is anticipated that 355 patients will be entered over 7.4 years.
- Being tested
- cisplatin, doxorubicin hydrochloride, low-LET photon therapy
- Keywords
- stage III endometrial carcinoma, stage IV endometrial carcinoma, endometrial adenocarcinoma, endometrial adenosquamous cell carcinoma, endometrial adenoacanthoma, endometrial papillary serous carcinoma, endometrial clear cell carcinoma, psychosocial effects of cancer and its treatment
- Medical subject headings
- Endometrial Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
cisplatinDrug
low-LET photon therapyRadiation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Aug 2004 (estimated)
- Study startMay 1992
- Primary completionApr 2001
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Endometrial CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Gynecologic Oncology Group
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Marcus E. Randall, MD, Study chair, Indiana University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00002493
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GOG-0122
- Other IDs
- CDR0000077572
- Status last verified
- Feb 2014
- First submitted
- 1 Nov 1999
- Last updated
- 14 Feb 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Moore KN, Tian C, McMeekin DS, Thigpen JT, Randall ME, Gallion HH. Does the progression-free interval after primary chemotherapy predict survival after salvage chemotherapy in advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer?: a Gynecologic Oncology Group ancillary data analysis. Cancer. 2010 Dec 1;116(23):5407-14. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25480. Epub 2010 Aug 24.
PubMed 20737572Diavolitsis V, Boyle J, Singh DK, Small W Jr. The role of adjuvant radiation in endometrial cancer. Oncology (Williston Park). 2009 Apr 15;23(4):342-9.
PubMed 19476264Modesitt SC, Tian C, Kryscio R, Thigpen JT, Randall ME, Gallion HH, Fleming GF; Gynecologic Oncology Group. Impact of body mass index on treatment outcomes in endometrial cancer patients receiving doxorubicin and cisplatin: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Apr;105(1):59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.10.045. Epub 2006 Dec 5.
PubMed 17150247Modesitt S, Tian C, Kryscio R, et al.: Impact of body mass index (BMI) on treatment outcomes in advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer patients receiving doxorubicin/cisplatin chemotherapy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. [Abstract] Society of Gynecologic Oncologists, 2006 Annual Meeting on Women's Cancer, March 22-26, 2006, Palm Springs, CA. A-93, 2006.
Tewari KS, Filiaci VL, Spirtos NM, Mannel RS, Thigpen JT, Cibull ML, Monk BJ, Randall ME. Association of number of positive nodes and cervical stroma invasion with outcome of advanced endometrial cancer treated with chemotherapy or whole abdominal irradiation: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Apr;125(1):87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.12.414. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
PubMed 22155678Bruner DW, Barsevick A, Tian C, Randall M, Mannel R, Cohn DE, Sorosky J, Spirtos NM. Randomized trial results of quality of life comparing whole abdominal irradiation and combination chemotherapy in advanced endometrial carcinoma: A gynecologic oncology group study. Qual Life Res. 2007 Feb;16(1):89-100. doi: 10.1007/s11136-006-9003-5. Epub 2006 Oct 11.
PubMed 17033909Randall ME, Filiaci VL, Muss H, Spirtos NM, Mannel RS, Fowler J, Thigpen JT, Benda JA; Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Randomized phase III trial of whole-abdominal irradiation versus doxorubicin and cisplatin chemotherapy in advanced endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jan 1;24(1):36-44. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.00.7617. Epub 2005 Dec 5.
PubMed 16330675Randall ME, Brunetto G, Muss H, et al.: Whole abdominal radiotherapy versus combination doxorubicin-cisplatin chemotherapy in advanced endometrial carcinoma: a randomized phase III trial of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 22: A-3, 2, 2003.
Waltkins-Bruner D, Barsevick A, Tian C, et al.: Quality of life trade-off to incremental gain in survival on Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) Protocol 122: whole abdominal irradiation (WAI) vs. doxorubicin-platinum (AP) chemotherapy in advanced endometrial cancer. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 22: A-1803, 449, 2003.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Feb 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- WHOLE ABDOMINAL RADIOTHERAPY VERSUS CIRCADIAN-TIMED COMBINATION DOXORUBICIN-CISPLATIN CHEMOTHERAPY IN ADVANCED ENDOMETRIAL CARCINOMA -- PHASE III
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00002493
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GOG-0122
- Keywords
- stage III endometrial carcinoma, stage IV endometrial carcinoma, endometrial adenocarcinoma, endometrial adenosquamous cell carcinoma, endometrial adenoacanthoma, endometrial papillary serous carcinoma, endometrial clear cell carcinoma, psychosocial effects of cancer and its treatment
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Lead sponsor
- Gynecologic Oncology GroupResearch network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Study start
- May 1992
- Primary completion
- Apr 2001 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Aug 2004 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. It is not yet known which treatment regimen is more effective for endometrial cancer.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare radiation therapy with chemotherapy in treating patients who have advanced endometrial cancer.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES: I. Compare overall survival, progression-free interval, and patterns of failure of maximally debulked patients with stage III/IV endometrial carcinoma treated with whole-abdominal irradiation vs. doxorubicin/cisplatin. II. Compare the incidence and type of acute and late adverse events observed with these two treatment regimens. III. Compare changes in fatigue, elimination, and neurologic impairment that impact on quality of life in patients treated with these two regimens. IV. Assess the difference in short-term versus long-term impact on quality of life between the two treatment groups. V. Compare quality-of-life outcomes over time between these two treatment groups.
OUTLINE: Randomized study. Arm I: Radiotherapy. Whole-abdominal irradiation using equipment with photon energies ranging from 6 to 25 MV. Arm II: 2-Drug Combination Chemotherapy. Doxorubicin, DOX, NSC-123127; Cisplatin, CDDP, NSC-119875.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: It is anticipated that 355 patients will be entered over 7.4 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Who may qualify
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| cisplatin | Drug | – |
| doxorubicin hydrochloride | Drug | – |
| low-LET photon therapy | Radiation | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Feb 2014.
- Background: PubMed 20737572Moore KN, Tian C, McMeekin DS, Thigpen JT, Randall ME, Gallion HH. Does the progression-free interval after primary chemotherapy predict survival after salvage chemotherapy in advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer?: a Gynecologic Oncology Group ancillary data analysis. Cancer. 2010 Dec 1;116(23):5407-14. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25480. Epub 2010 Aug 24.
- Background: PubMed 19476264Diavolitsis V, Boyle J, Singh DK, Small W Jr. The role of adjuvant radiation in endometrial cancer. Oncology (Williston Park). 2009 Apr 15;23(4):342-9.
- Background: PubMed 17150247Modesitt SC, Tian C, Kryscio R, Thigpen JT, Randall ME, Gallion HH, Fleming GF; Gynecologic Oncology Group. Impact of body mass index on treatment outcomes in endometrial cancer patients receiving doxorubicin and cisplatin: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Apr;105(1):59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.10.045. Epub 2006 Dec 5.
- BackgroundModesitt S, Tian C, Kryscio R, et al.: Impact of body mass index (BMI) on treatment outcomes in advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer patients receiving doxorubicin/cisplatin chemotherapy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. [Abstract] Society of Gynecologic Oncologists, 2006 Annual Meeting on Women's Cancer, March 22-26, 2006, Palm Springs, CA. A-93, 2006.
- Results publication: PubMed 22155678Tewari KS, Filiaci VL, Spirtos NM, Mannel RS, Thigpen JT, Cibull ML, Monk BJ, Randall ME. Association of number of positive nodes and cervical stroma invasion with outcome of advanced endometrial cancer treated with chemotherapy or whole abdominal irradiation: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Apr;125(1):87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.12.414. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
- Results publication: PubMed 17033909Bruner DW, Barsevick A, Tian C, Randall M, Mannel R, Cohn DE, Sorosky J, Spirtos NM. Randomized trial results of quality of life comparing whole abdominal irradiation and combination chemotherapy in advanced endometrial carcinoma: A gynecologic oncology group study. Qual Life Res. 2007 Feb;16(1):89-100. doi: 10.1007/s11136-006-9003-5. Epub 2006 Oct 11.
- Results publication: PubMed 16330675Randall ME, Filiaci VL, Muss H, Spirtos NM, Mannel RS, Fowler J, Thigpen JT, Benda JA; Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Randomized phase III trial of whole-abdominal irradiation versus doxorubicin and cisplatin chemotherapy in advanced endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jan 1;24(1):36-44. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.00.7617. Epub 2005 Dec 5.
- Results publicationRandall ME, Brunetto G, Muss H, et al.: Whole abdominal radiotherapy versus combination doxorubicin-cisplatin chemotherapy in advanced endometrial carcinoma: a randomized phase III trial of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 22: A-3, 2, 2003.
- Results publicationWaltkins-Bruner D, Barsevick A, Tian C, et al.: Quality of life trade-off to incremental gain in survival on Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) Protocol 122: whole abdominal irradiation (WAI) vs. doxorubicin-platinum (AP) chemotherapy in advanced endometrial cancer. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 22: A-1803, 449, 2003.
Related trials for Endometrial Cancer
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Endometrial Cancer Patientes MMR Deficient Comparing Chemotherapy vs Dostarlimab in First Line
Endometrial Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing the Addition of an Antiangiogenic Drug (Bevacizumab) to Chemotherapy (Carboplatin and Paclitaxel) Combined With Immunotherapy (Pembrolizumab) for pMMR, TP53 Mutated Endometrial Cancer
Advanced Endometrial Carcinoma, Recurrent Endometrial Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 3
Impact of Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping on Patient Reported Lower Extremity Limb Dysfunction in Stage I Endometrial Cancer
Stage I Uterine Corpus Carcinoma or Carcinosarcoma AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Marcus E. Randall, MD study chair
Indiana University
58 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing cisplatin, doxorubicin hydrochloride and low-LET photon therapy in people with Endometrial Cancer and Psychosocial Effects of Cancer and Its Treatment, run by Gynecologic Oncology Group at 58 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Feb 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 58 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00002493, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Feb 2014.