LeukemiaPhase 3NCT00002514
Stem Cell Transplantation Compared With Standard Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in First Remission
A Phase 3 study testing sargramostim, asparaginase and cyclophosphamide in people with Leukemia, run by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group at 94 sites in United States.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining chemotherapy with allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplantation may allow the doctor to give higher doses of chemotherapy drugs and kill more cancer cells. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 15 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Leukemia
- What is being tested?
- sargramostim, asparaginase and cyclophosphamide
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,929 participants
- Where
- 94 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 7 May 1993to Dec 2006
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 15 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Histologically confirmed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)
- More than 25% lymphoblasts in bone marrow
- Patients with myeloid antigen expression AND unequivocal lymphoid immunophenotype are eligible
- Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome status determined by cytogenetics, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and/or RNA analysis
- Patients determined to be Ph chromosome negative by cytogenetics, but positive for BCR-ABL by FISH or polymerase chain reaction are considered Ph chromosome positive
- Patients with Ph chromosome-positive disease may be up to age 65
- No myelodysplasia or other antecedent hematologic disorder
- Patients age 50 and under must be HLA typed during induction therapy of study treatment OR provide a written explanation for not undergoing HLA typing
- A and B typing required
- C and DR typing done if feasible
- Allogeneic stem cell transplantation patients must meet the following criteria:
- Appropriate HLA histocompatible donor available
- Ph chromosome-negative patients must have HLA identical sibling
- Ph chromosome-positive patients must have HLA identical, HLA-matched unrelated, or haploidentical related donor
- Postinduction therapy:
- CSF negative for leukemia
- No occult or overt leukemic meningitis
- Documented complete remission
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Age:
- 15 to 65
Performance status:
- Induction therapy:
- Not specified
- Postinduction therapy:
- 0-1
Life expectancy:
- Not specified
Hematopoietic:
- See Disease Characteristics
Hepatic:
- Induction therapy:
- Direct bilirubin ≤ 2.0 mg/dL
- Postinduction therapy:
- Direct bilirubin < 2.0 mg/dL
- SGPT or SGOT < 3 times normal
Renal:
- Induction therapy:
- Creatinine < 2 mg/dL
- Postinduction therapy:
- Creatinine ≤ 2 mg/dL
- Creatinine clearance ≥ 60 mL/min
Cardiovascular:
- Induction and postinduction therapy:
- No significant cardiac disease requiring digoxin and/or diuretics
- No major ventricular dysrhythmia requiring medication
- No ischemic heart disease requiring medication
- Postinduction therapy:
- Cardiac ejection fraction ≥ 50% for patients under consideration for transplantation
Pulmonary:
- Induction therapy:
- Not specified
- Postinduction therapy:
- FEV_1 ≥ 60% of predicted for patients under consideration for transplantation
- DLCO ≥ 50% of predicted for patients under consideration for transplantation
Other:
- Induction and postinduction therapy:
- HIV negative
- No concurrent organ damage or other medical problem (e.g., psychiatric disorder or drug abuse) that would preclude study therapy
- Not pregnant
- Postinduction therapy:
- No persistent infection
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Biologic therapy:
- No concurrent umbilical cord allogeneic transplantation
Chemotherapy:
- Not specified
Endocrine therapy:
- Prior corticosteroids for ALL allowed
Radiotherapy:
- Not specified
Surgery:
- Not specified
Other:
- Induction and postinduction therapy:
- No other prior therapy for ALL
- Postinduction therapy:
- No concurrent antibiotics
Trial locations and contacts
94 sites in 1 country.
94 sites in 1 country
United States94 sites
Saint Joseph Mercy Cancer Center
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48106-0995
CCOP - Michigan Cancer Research Consortium
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48106
Aurora Presbyterian Hospital
Aurora, Colorado, 80012
Rush-Copley Cancer Care Center
Aurora, Illinois, 60507
MeritCare Bemidji
Bemidji, Minnesota, 56601
Tufts-NEMC Cancer Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02111
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Boulder Community Hospital
Boulder, Colorado, 80301-9019
Fairview Ridges Hospital
Burnsville, Minnesota, 55337
Mercy Cancer Center at Mercy Medical Center
Canton, Ohio, 44708
Aultman Cancer Center at Aultman Hospital
Canton, Ohio, 44710-1799
Cedar Rapids Oncology Associates
Cedar Rapids, Iowa, 52403
Jewish Hospital Cancer Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45236
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106-5065
MetroHealth Cancer Care Center at MetroHealth Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44109
Penrose Cancer Center at Penrose Hospital
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80933
Mercy and Unity Cancer Center at Mercy Hospital
Coon Rapids, Minnesota, 55433
Geisinger Medical Center
Danville, Pennsylvania, 17822-0001
Oakwood Cancer Center at Oakwood Hospital and Medical Center
Dearborn, Michigan, 48123-2500
Porter Adventist Hospital
Denver, Colorado, 80210
Presbyterian - St. Luke's Medical Center
Denver, Colorado, 80218
St. Joseph Hospital
Denver, Colorado, 80218
Rose Medical Center
Denver, Colorado, 80220
CCOP - Colorado Cancer Research Program
Denver, Colorado, 80224-2522
Duluth Clinic Cancer Center - Duluth
Duluth, Minnesota, 55805-1983
CCOP - Duluth
Duluth, Minnesota, 55805
Miller - Dwan Medical Center
Duluth, Minnesota, 55805
Fairview Southdale Hospital
Edina, Minnesota, 55435
Swedish Medical Center
Englewood, Colorado, 80110
Evanston Northwestern Healthcare - Evanston Hospital
Evanston, Illinois, 60201-1781
CCOP - MeritCare Hospital
Fargo, North Dakota, 58122
MeritCare Broadway
Fargo, North Dakota, 58122
Carole and Ray Neag Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Connecticut Health Center
Farmington, Connecticut, 06360-2875
Genesys Hurley Cancer Institute
Flint, Michigan, 48503
Hurley Medical Center
Flint, Michigan, 48503
Mercy and Unity Cancer Center at Unity Hospital
Fridley, Minnesota, 55432
St. Mary's Regional Cancer Center at St. Mary's Hospital and Medical Center
Grand Junction, Colorado, 81502
Van Elslander Cancer Center at St. John Hospital and Medical Center
Grosse Pointe Woods, Michigan, 48236
Penn State Cancer Institute at Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033-0850
Hinsdale Hematology Oncology Associates
Hinsdale, Illinois, 60521
Hutchinson Area Health Care
Hutchinson, Minnesota, 55350
Methodist Cancer Center at Methodist Hospital
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
Foote Hospital
Jackson, Michigan, 49201
Joliet Oncology-Hematology Associates, Limited - West
Joliet, Illinois, 60435
Borgess Medical Center
Kalamazoo, Michigan, 49001
West Michigan Cancer Center
Kalamazoo, Michigan, 49007-3731
Bronson Methodist Hospital
Kalamazoo, Michigan, 49007
Gundersen Lutheran Cancer Center at Gundersen Lutheran Medical Center
La Crosse, Wisconsin, 54601
Sparrow Regional Cancer Center
Lansing, Michigan, 48912-1811
St. Rita's Medical Center
Lima, Ohio, 45801
Meeker County Memorial Hospital
Litchfield, Minnesota, 55355
Sky Ridge Medical Center
Lone Tree, Colorado, 80124
Hope Cancer Care Center at Longmont United Hospital
Longmont, Colorado, 80502
Dean Medical Center - Madison
Madison, Wisconsin, 53717
University of Wisconsin Paul P. Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792-6164
HealthEast Cancer Care at St. John's Hospital
Maplewood, Minnesota, 55109
Minnesota Oncology Hematology, PA - Maplewood
Maplewood, Minnesota, 55109
Marshfield Clinic - Marshfield Center
Marshfield, Wisconsin, 54449
Saint Anthony Memorial Health Centers
Michigan City, Indiana, 46360
Froedtert Hospital and Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226-3596
Medical College of Wisconsin Cancer Center
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226
Virginia Piper Cancer Institute at Abbott - Northwestern Hospital
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55407
Hennepin County Medical Center - Minneapolis
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55415
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232-6838
George Bray Cancer Center at the Hospital of Central Connecticut - New Britain Campus
New Britain, Connecticut, 06050
Drexel University College of Medicine - Center City Hahnemann Campus
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19102
Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104-4283
St. Mary - Corwin Regional Medical Center
Pueblo, Colorado, 81004
Marshfield Clinic - Indianhead Center
Rice Lake, Wisconsin, 54868
Hubert H. Humphrey Cancer Center at North Memorial Outpatient Center
Robbinsdale, Minnesota, 55422-2900
Seton Cancer Institute - Saginaw
Saginaw, Michigan, 48601
CCOP - Metro-Minnesota
Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, 55416
Park Nicollet Cancer Center
Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, 55416
Regions Hospital Cancer Care Center
Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55101
HealthEast Cancer Care at St. Joseph's Hospital
Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55102
United Hospital
Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55102
St. Francis Cancer Center at St. Francis Medical Center
Shakopee, Minnesota, 55379
Siouxland Hematology-Oncology Associates, LLP
Sioux City, Iowa, 51101
Mercy Medical Center - Sioux City
Sioux City, Iowa, 51104
St. Luke's Regional Medical Center
Sioux City, Iowa, 51104
Avera Cancer Institute
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57105
Medical X-Ray Center, PC
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57105
Sanford Cancer Center at Sanford USD Medical Center
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57117-5039
Baystate Regional Cancer Program at D'Amour Center for Cancer Care
Springfield, Massachusetts, 01199
Geisinger Medical Group - Scenery Park
State College, Pennsylvania, 16801
North Suburban Medical Center
Thornton, Colorado, 80229
Natalie Warren Bryant Cancer Center at St. Francis Hospital
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74136
Carle Cancer Center at Carle Foundation Hospital
Urbana, Illinois, 61801
CCOP - Carle Cancer Center
Urbana, Illinois, 61801
Ridgeview Medical Center
Waconia, Minnesota, 55387
St. John Macomb Hospital
Warren, Michigan, 48093
Frank M. and Dorothea Henry Cancer Center at Geisinger Wyoming Valley Medical Center
Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, 18711
HealthEast Cancer Care at Woodwinds Health Campus
Woodbury, Minnesota, 55125
Minnesota Oncology Hematology, PA - Woodbury
Woodbury, Minnesota, 55125
About this study
Official title: Phase III Randomized Trial of Autologous and Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Versus Intensive Conventional Chemotherapy in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in First Remission
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining chemotherapy with allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplantation may allow the doctor to give higher doses of chemotherapy drugs and kill more cancer cells. It is not yet known whether stem cell transplantation is more effective than standard chemotherapy in treating acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying how well stem cell transplantation works compared to standard combination chemotherapy in treating patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first remission.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- Compare the duration of complete remission (CR) and survival in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first remission treated with allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) vs conventional consolidation and maintenance chemotherapy.
- Compare the overall treatment outcomes in patients treated with these regimens.
- Determine the effect of imatinib mesylate given after induction therapy in Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome-positive patients in CR.
- Determine the benefit of allogeneic or autologous SCT after imatinib mesylate in Ph chromosome-positive patients.
- Determine the benefit of additional imatinib mesylate administered after allogeneic or autologous SCT in Ph chromosome-positive patients.
- Determine the minimal residual disease in Ph chromosome-positive patients before and after treatment with imatinib mesylate.
- Determine the clinical resistance to imatinib mesylate caused by BCR-ABL gene amplification or mutation in Ph chromosome-positive patients.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to age (50 and under vs over 50), time to achieve complete remission (CR) (4 weeks or less vs more than 4 weeks), and Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome status (positive vs negative).
- First induction therapy: Patients receive daunorubicin (DNR) IV over 15-30 minutes and vincristine (VCR) IV over 3-5 minutes on days 1, 8, 15, and 22; oral prednisone (PRED) once daily on days 1-28; and asparaginase (ASP) IV over 30 minutes or intramuscularly on days 17-28. Patients with CNS leukemia at presentation also receive methotrexate (MTX) intrathecally (IT) via an Ommaya reservoir weekly until the CSF is clear. Patients without CNS leukemia at presentation receive MTX IT on day 23 only.
- Second induction therapy: Beginning immediately after first induction therapy, patients receive cyclophosphamide (CTX) IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 15, and 29; cytarabine (ARA-C) IV over 30 minutes on days 1-4, 8-11, 15-18, and 22-25; and oral mercaptopurine (MP) once daily on days 1-28. Patients with CNS leukemia at presentation also undergo concurrent craniospinal irradiation. Patients without CNS leukemia at presentation receive MTX IT on days 1, 8, 15, and 22. Patients with Ph chromosome-positive status receive oral imatinib mesylate once daily for at least 28 days (days 1-28).
Patients with Ph chromosome-positive status and CR after second induction therapy proceed to group I for autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). Patients with Ph chromosome-negative status and CR after second induction therapy proceed to group II.
- Group I (Ph chromosome-positive patients):
- Autologous SCT: Patients receive high-dose consolidation/mobilization chemotherapy comprising ARA-C IV over 3 hours on days 1-3 and mitoxantrone IV immediately after ARA-C administration on days 1 and 2. Patients also receive filgrastim (G-CSF) subcutaneously (SC) once daily beginning on day 5 and continuing until blood counts recover.
Patients then undergo peripheral blood stem cell collection or bone marrow harvesting.
Patients receive preparative therapy comprising total body irradiation twice daily (5-10 hours apart) on days -6 to -4 and high-dose etoposide (VP-16) IV over 4 hours on day -3. Male patients also undergo radiotherapy boost to the testes on day -6.
Patients undergo autologous SCT on day 0 and receive sargramostim (GM-CSF) SC once daily beginning 6 hours after the completion of SCT and continuing until blood counts recover.
- Allogeneic SCT: Patients receive the preparative regimen as in autologous SCT and then undergo allogeneic SCT on day 0. Patients receive GM-CSF as in autologous SCT.
- Post-SCT imatinib mesylate therapy: After recovery from autologous or allogeneic SCT, patients receive oral imatinib mesylate once daily. Imatinib mesylate therapy continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Group II (Ph chromosome-negative patients):
- Intensification therapy: Beginning 4 weeks after the completion of the second induction therapy, patients receive high-dose MTX IV over 2 hours on days 1, 8, and 22; leucovorin calcium IV every 6 hours for 4 doses and then orally every 6 hours for 12 doses beginning 22-24 hours after each MTX infusion; and ASP IV over 30 minutes on days 2, 9, and 23.
Patients who are ≤ 50 years of age with a histocompatible donor proceed to allogeneic SCT and undergo allogeneic SCT as in group I. Patients who are ≤ 50 years of age without an appropriate donor are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I (conventional consolidation/maintenance therapy):
- Conventional consolidation therapy: During course 1, patients receive ARA-C IV over 30 minutes and VP-16 IV over 1 hour on days 1-5; VCR IV on days 1, 8, 15, and 22; and oral dexamethasone on days 1-28. During course 2 (which begins 4 weeks after initiation of course 1 or when blood counts recover), patients receive ARA-C and VP-16 as in course 1. During course 3 (which begins 4 weeks after initiation of course 2 or when blood counts recover), patients receive DNR IV on days 1, 8, 15, and 22; CTX IV over 30 minutes on day 29; ARA-C IV over 30 minutes on days 31-34 and 38-41; and oral thioguanine on days 29-42. During course 4 (which begins 8 weeks after initiation of course 3 or when blood counts recover), patients receive treatment as in course 2.
- Maintenance therapy: Beginning 4 weeks after initiation of course 4 of consolidation therapy or when blood counts recover, patients receive oral MP daily; MTX orally or IV once weekly; VCR IV once every 12 weeks; and oral PRED for 5 days every 12 weeks. Maintenance therapy continues for 2.5 years after initiation of intensification therapy.
- Arm II (autologous SCT): Patients undergo autologous SCT as in group I with the exception of high-dose consolidation/mobilization chemotherapy.
Patients are followed every 6 months for 2 years.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: Approximately 40 patients per year will be accrued for group I (Philadelphia [Ph] chromosome-positive patients) of this study. Approximately 550 patients will be accrued for group II (Ph chromosome-negative patients) of this study within 5 years.
- Conditions
- Leukemia
- Being tested
- sargramostim, asparaginase, cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, daunorubicin hydrochloride
- Keywords
- adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia in remission
- Medical subject headings
- Leukemia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
sargramostimBiological
asparaginaseDrug
cyclophosphamideDrug
cytarabineDrug
daunorubicin hydrochlorideDrug
dexamethasoneDrug
etoposideDrug
imatinib mesylateDrug
mercaptopurineDrug
methotrexateDrug
prednisoneDrug
thioguanineDrug
allogeneic bone marrow transplantationProcedure or surgery
autologous bone marrow transplantationProcedure or surgery
peripheral blood stem cell transplantationProcedure or surgery
radiation therapyRadiation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Transplant | Experimental | Allogeneic (if donor) or Autologous (if no donor) bone marrow transplant Receives: Biological: sargramostim; Drug: asparaginase; Drug: cyclophosphamide; Drug: cytarabine; Drug: daunorubicin hydrochloride; Drug: etoposide; Drug: imatinib mesylate; Drug: leucovorin calcium; Drug: mercaptopurine; Drug: methotrexate; Drug: prednisone; Drug: vincristine sulfate; Procedure: allogeneic bone marrow transplantation; Procedure: autologous bone marrow transplantation; Procedure: peripheral blood stem cell transplantation |
| Conventional Consolidation/Maintenance | Active comparator | Consolidation/Maintenance Therapy Receives: Drug: asparaginase; Drug: cyclophosphamide; Drug: cytarabine; Drug: daunorubicin hydrochloride; Drug: dexamethasone; Drug: etoposide; Drug: leucovorin calcium; Drug: mercaptopurine; Drug: methotrexate; Drug: prednisone; Drug: thioguanine; Drug: vincristine sulfate; Radiation: radiation therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall Survival
Measured: All patients were followed for 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jan 2003 (estimated)
- Study start7 May 1993
- Primary completionDec 2006
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (35)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for LeukemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,929 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI), Medical Research Council
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jacob M. Rowe, MD, Study chair, Rambam Health Care CampusMark R. Litzow, MD, Principal investigator, Mayo ClinicAntony H. Goldstone, FRCP, Study chair, University College London Hospitals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00002514
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CDR0000078099
- Other IDs
- E2993, MRC-LEUK-UKALL-XII, EST-4491
- Status last verified
- Jun 2023
- First submitted
- 1 Nov 1999
- Last updated
- 18 Jun 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Wang H, Chen XQ, Geng QR, Liu PP, Lin GN, Xia ZJ, Lu Y. Induction therapy using the MRC UKALLXII/ECOG E2993 protocol in Chinese adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Int J Hematol. 2011 Aug;94(2):163-168. doi: 10.1007/s12185-011-0891-y. Epub 2011 Jul 6.
PubMed 21732037Goldstone AH. Transplants in Adult ALL--? Allo for everyone. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009 Jan;15(1 Suppl):7-10. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2008.11.017.
PubMed 19147069Ramanujachar R, Richards S, Hann I, Goldstone A, Mitchell C, Vora A, Rowe J, Webb D. Adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: outcome on UK national paediatric (ALL97) and adult (UKALLXII/E2993) trials. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2007 Mar;48(3):254-61. doi: 10.1002/pbc.20749.
PubMed 16421910Paietta E, Ferrando AA, Neuberg D, Bennett JM, Racevskis J, Lazarus H, Dewald G, Rowe JM, Wiernik PH, Tallman MS, Look AT. Activating FLT3 mutations in CD117/KIT(+) T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemias. Blood. 2004 Jul 15;104(2):558-60. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-01-0168. Epub 2004 Mar 25.
PubMed 15044257Ferrando AA, Neuberg D, Dodge RK, et al.: Adult T-cell ALL patients whose lymphoblasts express the HOX11 oncogene have an excellent prognosis when treated with chemotherapy and are not candidates for allogeneic bone marrow transplantaton in first remission. [Abstract] Blood 100 (11 pt 1): A-578, 2002.
Moorman AV, Schwab C, Ensor HM, Russell LJ, Morrison H, Jones L, Masic D, Patel B, Rowe JM, Tallman M, Goldstone AH, Fielding AK, Harrison CJ. IGH@ translocations, CRLF2 deregulation, and microdeletions in adolescents and adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Sep 1;30(25):3100-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.3907. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
PubMed 22851563Sive JI, Buck G, Fielding A, Lazarus HM, Litzow MR, Luger S, Marks DI, McMillan A, Moorman AV, Richards SM, Rowe JM, Tallman MS, Goldstone AH. Outcomes in older adults with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL): results from the international MRC UKALL XII/ECOG2993 trial. Br J Haematol. 2012 May;157(4):463-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2012.09095.x. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
PubMed 22409379Patel B, Rai L, Buck G, Richards SM, Mortuza Y, Mitchell W, Gerrard G, Moorman AV, Duke V, Hoffbrand AV, Fielding AK, Goldstone AH, Foroni L. Minimal residual disease is a significant predictor of treatment failure in non T-lineage adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: final results of the international trial UKALL XII/ECOG2993. Br J Haematol. 2010 Jan;148(1):80-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07941.x. Epub 2009 Oct 26.
PubMed 19863538Fielding AK, Rowe JM, Richards SM, Buck G, Moorman AV, Durrant IJ, Marks DI, McMillan AK, Litzow MR, Lazarus HM, Foroni L, Dewald G, Franklin IM, Luger SM, Paietta E, Wiernik PH, Tallman MS, Goldstone AH. Prospective outcome data on 267 unselected adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia confirms superiority of allogeneic transplantation over chemotherapy in the pre-imatinib era: results from the International ALL Trial MRC UKALLXII/ECOG2993. Blood. 2009 May 7;113(19):4489-96. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-01-199380. Epub 2009 Feb 24.
PubMed 19244158Mansour MR, Sulis ML, Duke V, Foroni L, Jenkinson S, Koo K, Allen CG, Gale RE, Buck G, Richards S, Paietta E, Rowe JM, Tallman MS, Goldstone AH, Ferrando AA, Linch DC. Prognostic implications of NOTCH1 and FBXW7 mutations in adults with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated on the MRC UKALLXII/ECOG E2993 protocol. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Sep 10;27(26):4352-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.0996. Epub 2009 Jul 27.
PubMed 19635999Marks DI, Paietta EM, Moorman AV, Richards SM, Buck G, DeWald G, Ferrando A, Fielding AK, Goldstone AH, Ketterling RP, Litzow MR, Luger SM, McMillan AK, Mansour MR, Rowe JM, Tallman MS, Lazarus HM. T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults: clinical features, immunophenotype, cytogenetics, and outcome from the large randomized prospective trial (UKALL XII/ECOG 2993). Blood. 2009 Dec 10;114(25):5136-45. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-08-231217.
PubMed 19828704Goldstone AH, Richards SM, Lazarus HM, Tallman MS, Buck G, Fielding AK, Burnett AK, Chopra R, Wiernik PH, Foroni L, Paietta E, Litzow MR, Marks DI, Durrant J, McMillan A, Franklin IM, Luger S, Ciobanu N, Rowe JM. In adults with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia, the greatest benefit is achieved from a matched sibling allogeneic transplantation in first complete remission, and an autologous transplantation is less effective than conventional consolidation/maintenance chemotherapy in all patients: final results of the International ALL Trial (MRC UKALL XII/ECOG E2993). Blood. 2008 Feb 15;111(4):1827-33. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-10-116582. Epub 2007 Nov 29.
PubMed 18048644Paietta E, Li X, Richards S, et al.: Implications for the use of monoclonal antibodies in future adult ALL trials: analysis of antigen expression in 505 B-lineage (B-Lin) ALL patients (pts) on the MRC UKALLXII/ECOG2993 Intergroup trial. [Abstract] Blood 112 (11): A-1907, 2008.
Patel B, Richards SM, Rowe JM, Goldstone AH, Fielding AK. High incidence of avascular necrosis in adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a UKALL XII analysis. Leukemia. 2008 Feb;22(2):308-12. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2405032. Epub 2007 Nov 8.
PubMed 17989709Rowe JM, Buck G, Moorman AV, et al.: Standard consolidation/maintenance chemotherapy is consistently superior to a single autologous transplant for adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results of the international ALL trial (MRC UKALL XII/ECOG E2993). [Abstract] Blood 112 (11): A-3314, 2008.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Jun 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase III Randomized Trial of Autologous and Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Versus Intensive Conventional Chemotherapy in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in First Remission
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00002514
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CDR0000078099
- Conditions
- Leukemia
- Keywords
- adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia in remission
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,929 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology GroupResearch network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI), Medical Research Council
- Study start
- 7 May 1993 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2006 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jan 2003 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining chemotherapy with allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplantation may allow the doctor to give higher doses of chemotherapy drugs and kill more cancer cells. It is not yet known whether stem cell transplantation is more effective than standard chemotherapy in treating acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying how well stem cell transplantation works compared to standard combination chemotherapy in treating patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first remission.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- Compare the duration of complete remission (CR) and survival in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first remission treated with allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) vs conventional consolidation and maintenance chemotherapy.
- Compare the overall treatment outcomes in patients treated with these regimens.
- Determine the effect of imatinib mesylate given after induction therapy in Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome-positive patients in CR.
- Determine the benefit of allogeneic or autologous SCT after imatinib mesylate in Ph chromosome-positive patients.
- Determine the benefit of additional imatinib mesylate administered after allogeneic or autologous SCT in Ph chromosome-positive patients.
- Determine the minimal residual disease in Ph chromosome-positive patients before and after treatment with imatinib mesylate.
- Determine the clinical resistance to imatinib mesylate caused by BCR-ABL gene amplification or mutation in Ph chromosome-positive patients.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to age (50 and under vs over 50), time to achieve complete remission (CR) (4 weeks or less vs more than 4 weeks), and Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome status (positive vs negative).
- First induction therapy: Patients receive daunorubicin (DNR) IV over 15-30 minutes and vincristine (VCR) IV over 3-5 minutes on days 1, 8, 15, and 22; oral prednisone (PRED) once daily on days 1-28; and asparaginase (ASP) IV over 30 minutes or intramuscularly on days 17-28. Patients with CNS leukemia at presentation also receive methotrexate (MTX) intrathecally (IT) via an Ommaya reservoir weekly until the CSF is clear. Patients without CNS leukemia at presentation receive MTX IT on day 23 only.
- Second induction therapy: Beginning immediately after first induction therapy, patients receive cyclophosphamide (CTX) IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 15, and 29; cytarabine (ARA-C) IV over 30 minutes on days 1-4, 8-11, 15-18, and 22-25; and oral mercaptopurine (MP) once daily on days 1-28. Patients with CNS leukemia at presentation also undergo concurrent craniospinal irradiation. Patients without CNS leukemia at presentation receive MTX IT on days 1, 8, 15, and 22. Patients with Ph chromosome-positive status receive oral imatinib mesylate once daily for at least 28 days (days 1-28).
Patients with Ph chromosome-positive status and CR after second induction therapy proceed to group I for autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). Patients with Ph chromosome-negative status and CR after second induction therapy proceed to group II.
- Group I (Ph chromosome-positive patients):
- Autologous SCT: Patients receive high-dose consolidation/mobilization chemotherapy comprising ARA-C IV over 3 hours on days 1-3 and mitoxantrone IV immediately after ARA-C administration on days 1 and 2. Patients also receive filgrastim (G-CSF) subcutaneously (SC) once daily beginning on day 5 and continuing until blood counts recover.
Patients then undergo peripheral blood stem cell collection or bone marrow harvesting.
Patients receive preparative therapy comprising total body irradiation twice daily (5-10 hours apart) on days -6 to -4 and high-dose etoposide (VP-16) IV over 4 hours on day -3. Male patients also undergo radiotherapy boost to the testes on day -6.
Patients undergo autologous SCT on day 0 and receive sargramostim (GM-CSF) SC once daily beginning 6 hours after the completion of SCT and continuing until blood counts recover.
- Allogeneic SCT: Patients receive the preparative regimen as in autologous SCT and then undergo allogeneic SCT on day 0. Patients receive GM-CSF as in autologous SCT.
- Post-SCT imatinib mesylate therapy: After recovery from autologous or allogeneic SCT, patients receive oral imatinib mesylate once daily. Imatinib mesylate therapy continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Group II (Ph chromosome-negative patients):
- Intensification therapy: Beginning 4 weeks after the completion of the second induction therapy, patients receive high-dose MTX IV over 2 hours on days 1, 8, and 22; leucovorin calcium IV every 6 hours for 4 doses and then orally every 6 hours for 12 doses beginning 22-24 hours after each MTX infusion; and ASP IV over 30 minutes on days 2, 9, and 23.
Patients who are ≤ 50 years of age with a histocompatible donor proceed to allogeneic SCT and undergo allogeneic SCT as in group I. Patients who are ≤ 50 years of age without an appropriate donor are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I (conventional consolidation/maintenance therapy):
- Conventional consolidation therapy: During course 1, patients receive ARA-C IV over 30 minutes and VP-16 IV over 1 hour on days 1-5; VCR IV on days 1, 8, 15, and 22; and oral dexamethasone on days 1-28. During course 2 (which begins 4 weeks after initiation of course 1 or when blood counts recover), patients receive ARA-C and VP-16 as in course 1. During course 3 (which begins 4 weeks after initiation of course 2 or when blood counts recover), patients receive DNR IV on days 1, 8, 15, and 22; CTX IV over 30 minutes on day 29; ARA-C IV over 30 minutes on days 31-34 and 38-41; and oral thioguanine on days 29-42. During course 4 (which begins 8 weeks after initiation of course 3 or when blood counts recover), patients receive treatment as in course 2.
- Maintenance therapy: Beginning 4 weeks after initiation of course 4 of consolidation therapy or when blood counts recover, patients receive oral MP daily; MTX orally or IV once weekly; VCR IV once every 12 weeks; and oral PRED for 5 days every 12 weeks. Maintenance therapy continues for 2.5 years after initiation of intensification therapy.
- Arm II (autologous SCT): Patients undergo autologous SCT as in group I with the exception of high-dose consolidation/mobilization chemotherapy.
Patients are followed every 6 months for 2 years.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: Approximately 40 patients per year will be accrued for group I (Philadelphia [Ph] chromosome-positive patients) of this study. Approximately 550 patients will be accrued for group II (Ph chromosome-negative patients) of this study within 5 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Transplant | Experimental | Biological: sargramostim, Drug: asparaginase, Drug: cyclophosphamide, Drug: cytarabine, Drug: daunorubicin hydrochloride, Drug: etoposide, Drug: imatinib mesylate, Drug: leucovorin calcium, Drug: mercaptopurine, Drug: methotrexate, Drug: prednisone, Drug: vincristine sulfate, Procedure: allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, Procedure: autologous bone marrow transplantation, Procedure: peripheral blood stem cell transplantationAllogeneic (if donor) or Autologous (if no donor) bone marrow transplant |
| Conventional Consolidation/Maintenance | Active comparator | Drug: asparaginase, Drug: cyclophosphamide, Drug: cytarabine, Drug: daunorubicin hydrochloride, Drug: dexamethasone, Drug: etoposide, Drug: leucovorin calcium, Drug: mercaptopurine, Drug: methotrexate, Drug: prednisone, Drug: thioguanine, Drug: vincristine sulfate, Radiation: radiation therapyConsolidation/Maintenance Therapy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 15 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| sargramostim | Biological | Transplant |
| asparaginase | Drug | Conventional Consolidation/Maintenance, Transplant |
| cyclophosphamide | Drug | Conventional Consolidation/Maintenance, Transplant |
| cytarabine | Drug | Conventional Consolidation/Maintenance, Transplant |
| daunorubicin hydrochloride | Drug | Conventional Consolidation/Maintenance, Transplant |
| dexamethasone | Drug | Conventional Consolidation/Maintenance |
| etoposide | Drug | Conventional Consolidation/Maintenance, Transplant |
| imatinib mesylate | Drug | Transplant |
| leucovorin calcium | Drug | Conventional Consolidation/Maintenance, Transplant |
| mercaptopurine | Drug | Conventional Consolidation/Maintenance, Transplant |
| methotrexate | Drug | Conventional Consolidation/Maintenance, Transplant |
| prednisone | Drug | Conventional Consolidation/Maintenance, Transplant |
| thioguanine | Drug | Conventional Consolidation/Maintenance |
| vincristine sulfate | Drug | Conventional Consolidation/Maintenance, Transplant |
| allogeneic bone marrow transplantation | Procedure or surgery | Transplant |
| autologous bone marrow transplantation | Procedure or surgery | Transplant |
| peripheral blood stem cell transplantation | Procedure or surgery | Transplant |
| radiation therapy | Radiation | Conventional Consolidation/Maintenance |
Primary outcome
Overall Survival
Time frame: All patients were followed for 2 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Jun 2023.
- Background: PubMed 21732037Wang H, Chen XQ, Geng QR, Liu PP, Lin GN, Xia ZJ, Lu Y. Induction therapy using the MRC UKALLXII/ECOG E2993 protocol in Chinese adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Int J Hematol. 2011 Aug;94(2):163-168. doi: 10.1007/s12185-011-0891-y. Epub 2011 Jul 6.
- Background: PubMed 19147069Goldstone AH. Transplants in Adult ALL--? Allo for everyone. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009 Jan;15(1 Suppl):7-10. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2008.11.017.
- Background: PubMed 16421910Ramanujachar R, Richards S, Hann I, Goldstone A, Mitchell C, Vora A, Rowe J, Webb D. Adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: outcome on UK national paediatric (ALL97) and adult (UKALLXII/E2993) trials. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2007 Mar;48(3):254-61. doi: 10.1002/pbc.20749.
- Background: PubMed 15044257Paietta E, Ferrando AA, Neuberg D, Bennett JM, Racevskis J, Lazarus H, Dewald G, Rowe JM, Wiernik PH, Tallman MS, Look AT. Activating FLT3 mutations in CD117/KIT(+) T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemias. Blood. 2004 Jul 15;104(2):558-60. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-01-0168. Epub 2004 Mar 25.
- BackgroundFerrando AA, Neuberg D, Dodge RK, et al.: Adult T-cell ALL patients whose lymphoblasts express the HOX11 oncogene have an excellent prognosis when treated with chemotherapy and are not candidates for allogeneic bone marrow transplantaton in first remission. [Abstract] Blood 100 (11 pt 1): A-578, 2002.
- Results publication: PubMed 22851563Moorman AV, Schwab C, Ensor HM, Russell LJ, Morrison H, Jones L, Masic D, Patel B, Rowe JM, Tallman M, Goldstone AH, Fielding AK, Harrison CJ. IGH@ translocations, CRLF2 deregulation, and microdeletions in adolescents and adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Sep 1;30(25):3100-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.3907. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
- Results publication: PubMed 22409379Sive JI, Buck G, Fielding A, Lazarus HM, Litzow MR, Luger S, Marks DI, McMillan A, Moorman AV, Richards SM, Rowe JM, Tallman MS, Goldstone AH. Outcomes in older adults with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL): results from the international MRC UKALL XII/ECOG2993 trial. Br J Haematol. 2012 May;157(4):463-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2012.09095.x. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
- Results publication: PubMed 19863538Patel B, Rai L, Buck G, Richards SM, Mortuza Y, Mitchell W, Gerrard G, Moorman AV, Duke V, Hoffbrand AV, Fielding AK, Goldstone AH, Foroni L. Minimal residual disease is a significant predictor of treatment failure in non T-lineage adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: final results of the international trial UKALL XII/ECOG2993. Br J Haematol. 2010 Jan;148(1):80-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07941.x. Epub 2009 Oct 26.
- Results publication: PubMed 19244158Fielding AK, Rowe JM, Richards SM, Buck G, Moorman AV, Durrant IJ, Marks DI, McMillan AK, Litzow MR, Lazarus HM, Foroni L, Dewald G, Franklin IM, Luger SM, Paietta E, Wiernik PH, Tallman MS, Goldstone AH. Prospective outcome data on 267 unselected adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia confirms superiority of allogeneic transplantation over chemotherapy in the pre-imatinib era: results from the International ALL Trial MRC UKALLXII/ECOG2993. Blood. 2009 May 7;113(19):4489-96. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-01-199380. Epub 2009 Feb 24.
- Results publication: PubMed 19635999Mansour MR, Sulis ML, Duke V, Foroni L, Jenkinson S, Koo K, Allen CG, Gale RE, Buck G, Richards S, Paietta E, Rowe JM, Tallman MS, Goldstone AH, Ferrando AA, Linch DC. Prognostic implications of NOTCH1 and FBXW7 mutations in adults with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated on the MRC UKALLXII/ECOG E2993 protocol. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Sep 10;27(26):4352-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.0996. Epub 2009 Jul 27.
- Results publication: PubMed 19828704Marks DI, Paietta EM, Moorman AV, Richards SM, Buck G, DeWald G, Ferrando A, Fielding AK, Goldstone AH, Ketterling RP, Litzow MR, Luger SM, McMillan AK, Mansour MR, Rowe JM, Tallman MS, Lazarus HM. T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults: clinical features, immunophenotype, cytogenetics, and outcome from the large randomized prospective trial (UKALL XII/ECOG 2993). Blood. 2009 Dec 10;114(25):5136-45. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-08-231217.
- Results publication: PubMed 18048644Goldstone AH, Richards SM, Lazarus HM, Tallman MS, Buck G, Fielding AK, Burnett AK, Chopra R, Wiernik PH, Foroni L, Paietta E, Litzow MR, Marks DI, Durrant J, McMillan A, Franklin IM, Luger S, Ciobanu N, Rowe JM. In adults with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia, the greatest benefit is achieved from a matched sibling allogeneic transplantation in first complete remission, and an autologous transplantation is less effective than conventional consolidation/maintenance chemotherapy in all patients: final results of the International ALL Trial (MRC UKALL XII/ECOG E2993). Blood. 2008 Feb 15;111(4):1827-33. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-10-116582. Epub 2007 Nov 29.
Related trials for Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of CHM-029 in Participants With NPM1 Mutated, KMT2A or NUP98 Rearranged AML
AML (Acute Myeloid Leukemia)
RecruitingPhase 1
Vididencel in CML-CP Patients With MRD
CML (Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia)
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing New Therapies for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Newly Diagnosed and Have Not Yet Started Treatment (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jacob M. Rowe, MD study chair
Rambam Health Care Campus
Mark R. Litzow, MD principal investigator
Mayo Clinic
Antony H. Goldstone, FRCP study chair
University College London Hospitals
94 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing sargramostim, asparaginase and cyclophosphamide in people with Leukemia, run by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group at 94 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jun 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 94 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall Survival (time frame: All patients were followed for 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00002514, which also lists 35 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jun 2023.