LymphomaPhase 2NCT00002521
Combination Chemotherapy and Bone Marrow and/or Peripheral Stem Cell Transplantation in Treating Patients With Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
A Phase 2 study testing cisplatin, cyclophosphamide and etoposide in people with Lymphoma, run by Temple University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Bone marrow and peripheral stem cell transplantation may allow doctors to give high doses of chemotherapy and kill more tumor cells. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 15 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Lymphoma
- What is being tested?
- cisplatin, cyclophosphamide and etoposide
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- Not given
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Feb 1993to Feb 2000
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 15 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Histologically proven relapsed or refractory, stage I-IV, intermediate- or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
- Eligible subtypes:
- Diffuse small cleaved cell
- Diffuse mixed (small and large cell)
- Diffuse large cell
- Large cell immunoblastic
- Lymphoblastic
- Small noncleaved cell
- High-grade histology patients should first be considered for Protocol TUHSC-1520
- Must have chemosensitive disease, defined by 1 of the following conditions:
- Response to initial chemotherapy without obtaining complete response (CR)(refractory lymphoma)
- Relapse after chemotherapy-induced CR if tumor volume reduced by at least 25% for more than 1 month after completion of 1-3 courses of salvage chemotherapy (chemosensitive relapse)
- No chemoresistant disease, defined by the following conditions:
- Unresponsive or progressive disease during initial chemotherapy
- Relapse after chemotherapy-induced CR if tumor volume not reduced by at least 25% after completion of 1-3 courses salvage chemotherapy (chemoresistant relapse)
- No CNS involvement by lymphoma
- Syngeneic bone marrow transplantation offered to patients with consenting identical twin donor NOTE: A new classification scheme for adult non-Hodgkin's lymphoma has been adopted by PDQ. The terminology of "indolent" or "aggressive" lymphoma will replace the former terminology of "low", "intermediate", or "high" grade lymphoma. However, this protocol uses the former terminology.
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Age:
- 15 to 60 (physically fit patients up to age 70 may be considered)
Performance status:
- ECOG 0-2
Life expectancy:
- Not specified
Hematopoietic:
- Not specified
Hepatic:
- Bilirubin no greater than 2.0 mg/dL
- AST and ALT not persistently greater than 2 times normal
Renal:
- Creatinine less than 1.8 mg/dL
Cardiovascular:
- Cardiac ejection fraction at least 45%
Pulmonary:
- DLCO, FEV_1, and FVC at least 50% predicted
- Resting pO_2 at least 70 mm Hg
Other:
- HIV negative
- No other concurrent disease that would limit life expectancy
- No active infection
- No severe neurologic or emotional disorders
- Not pregnant
- Fertile patients must use effective contraception
- Adequate psychological support available
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Biologic therapy
- Not specified
Chemotherapy
- See Disease Characteristics
Endocrine therapy
- Not specified
Radiotherapy
- Not specified
Surgery
- Not specified
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Fox Chase - Temple Cancer Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19111-2442
About this study
Official title: HIGH-DOSE CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, ETOPOSIDE, AND CISPLATIN (CEP) WITH RESCUE BY AUTOLOGOUS BONE MARROW OR AUTOLOGOUS PERIPHERAL BLOOD STEM CELLS IN PATIENTS WITH RELAPSED OR REFRACTORY NON-HODGKIN'S LYMPHOMA (INTERMEDIATE AND HIGH-GRADE HISTOLOGIES)
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Bone marrow and peripheral stem cell transplantation may allow doctors to give high doses of chemotherapy and kill more tumor cells.
PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, etoposide and cisplatin followed by bone marrow and/or peripheral stem cell transplantation in patients with relapsed or refractory intermediate- or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- Determine the curative potential of high-dose cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin (CEP) with syngeneic or autologous bone marrow and/or autologous peripheral blood stem cell rescue in patients with relapsed or refractory, stage I-IV, intermediate- or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
- Determine the overall response rate and survival of patients treated with this regimen.
- Determine the toxic effects of this regimen in these patients.
- Determine the differences in the rates of engraftment, response, and survival of patients treated with bone marrow vs peripheral blood stem cell transplantation.
- Determine the response rate and survival of patients treated with consolidative radiotherapy after recovery from transplantation.
- Determine the toxic effects of consolidative radiotherapy after recovery from transplantation in these patients.
OUTLINE: Syngeneic or autologous bone marrow and/or autologous peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) are harvested. Syngeneic bone marrow transplantation is preferred for patients with a qualifying identical twin donor. Patients without a syngeneic donor who have a history of lymphomatous involvement of the bone marrow and are profoundly hypocellular undergo harvest of PBSC alone. Patients without a syngeneic donor who have no history of lymphomatous involvement of the bone marrow undergo harvest of autologous bone marrow or PBSC.
Patients receive conditioning comprising cyclophosphamide IV over 1 hour on days -6 to -3 and etoposide IV over 1 hour every 12 hours and cisplatin IV continuously on days -6 to -4. Bone marrow and/or PBSC are infused on day 0. (Patients requiring more than 25 bags of stem cells receive bone marrow transplantation on day 0 and PBSC transplantation on day 1.)
After recovery from transplantation, eligible patients receive consolidative radiotherapy to any site of prior bulk disease (greater than 5 cm) present at any time before transplantation and any site of disease present at the time of transplantation.
Patients are followed at 3, 6, and 12 months and then annually thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A maximum of 30 patients will be accrued for this study.
- Conditions
- Lymphoma
- Being tested
- cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, autologous bone marrow transplantation, bone marrow ablation with stem cell support
- Keywords
- stage I adult diffuse small cleaved cell lymphoma, stage I adult diffuse mixed cell lymphoma, stage I adult diffuse large cell lymphoma, stage I adult immunoblastic large cell lymphoma, stage I adult lymphoblastic lymphoma, stage I adult Burkitt lymphoma, stage III adult diffuse small cleaved cell lymphoma, stage III adult diffuse mixed cell lymphoma, stage III adult diffuse large cell lymphoma, stage III adult immunoblastic large cell lymphoma, stage III adult lymphoblastic lymphoma, stage III adult Burkitt lymphoma, stage IV adult diffuse small cleaved cell lymphoma, stage IV adult diffuse mixed cell lymphoma, stage IV adult diffuse large cell lymphoma, stage IV adult immunoblastic large cell lymphoma, stage IV adult lymphoblastic lymphoma, stage IV adult Burkitt lymphoma, recurrent adult diffuse small cleaved cell lymphoma, recurrent adult diffuse mixed cell lymphoma
- Medical subject headings
- Lymphoma, Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin, Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse, Lymphoma, Large-Cell, Immunoblastic, Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma, Burkitt Lymphoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
cisplatinDrug
cyclophosphamideDrug
etoposideDrug
autologous bone marrow transplantationProcedure or surgery
bone marrow ablation with stem cell supportProcedure or surgery
peripheral blood stem cell transplantationProcedure or surgery
syngeneic bone marrow transplantationProcedure or surgery
radiation therapyRadiation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jan 2003 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 1993
- Primary completionFeb 2000
- Study completionFeb 2000
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for LymphomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Temple University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Kenneth F. Mangan, MD, FACP, Study chair, Fox Chase Cancer Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00002521
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CDR0000078282
- Other IDs
- TUHSC-2161, NCI-V93-0248
- Status last verified
- Sep 2010
- First submitted
- 1 Nov 1999
- Last updated
- 1 Oct 2010
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Oct 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- HIGH-DOSE CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, ETOPOSIDE, AND CISPLATIN (CEP) WITH RESCUE BY AUTOLOGOUS BONE MARROW OR AUTOLOGOUS PERIPHERAL BLOOD STEM CELLS IN PATIENTS WITH RELAPSED OR REFRACTORY NON-HODGKIN'S LYMPHOMA (INTERMEDIATE AND HIGH-GRADE HISTOLOGIES)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00002521
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CDR0000078282
- Conditions
- Lymphoma
- Keywords
- stage I adult diffuse small cleaved cell lymphoma, stage I adult diffuse mixed cell lymphoma, stage I adult diffuse large cell lymphoma, stage I adult immunoblastic large cell lymphoma, stage I adult lymphoblastic lymphoma, stage I adult Burkitt lymphoma, stage III adult diffuse small cleaved cell lymphoma, stage III adult diffuse mixed cell lymphoma
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Lead sponsor
- Temple UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Feb 1993
- Primary completion
- Feb 2000 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2000 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jan 2003 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Bone marrow and peripheral stem cell transplantation may allow doctors to give high doses of chemotherapy and kill more tumor cells.
PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, etoposide and cisplatin followed by bone marrow and/or peripheral stem cell transplantation in patients with relapsed or refractory intermediate- or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- Determine the curative potential of high-dose cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin (CEP) with syngeneic or autologous bone marrow and/or autologous peripheral blood stem cell rescue in patients with relapsed or refractory, stage I-IV, intermediate- or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
- Determine the overall response rate and survival of patients treated with this regimen.
- Determine the toxic effects of this regimen in these patients.
- Determine the differences in the rates of engraftment, response, and survival of patients treated with bone marrow vs peripheral blood stem cell transplantation.
- Determine the response rate and survival of patients treated with consolidative radiotherapy after recovery from transplantation.
- Determine the toxic effects of consolidative radiotherapy after recovery from transplantation in these patients.
OUTLINE: Syngeneic or autologous bone marrow and/or autologous peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) are harvested. Syngeneic bone marrow transplantation is preferred for patients with a qualifying identical twin donor. Patients without a syngeneic donor who have a history of lymphomatous involvement of the bone marrow and are profoundly hypocellular undergo harvest of PBSC alone. Patients without a syngeneic donor who have no history of lymphomatous involvement of the bone marrow undergo harvest of autologous bone marrow or PBSC.
Patients receive conditioning comprising cyclophosphamide IV over 1 hour on days -6 to -3 and etoposide IV over 1 hour every 12 hours and cisplatin IV continuously on days -6 to -4. Bone marrow and/or PBSC are infused on day 0. (Patients requiring more than 25 bags of stem cells receive bone marrow transplantation on day 0 and PBSC transplantation on day 1.)
After recovery from transplantation, eligible patients receive consolidative radiotherapy to any site of prior bulk disease (greater than 5 cm) present at any time before transplantation and any site of disease present at the time of transplantation.
Patients are followed at 3, 6, and 12 months and then annually thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A maximum of 30 patients will be accrued for this study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 15 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| cisplatin | Drug | – |
| cyclophosphamide | Drug | – |
| etoposide | Drug | – |
| autologous bone marrow transplantation | Procedure or surgery | – |
| bone marrow ablation with stem cell support | Procedure or surgery | – |
| peripheral blood stem cell transplantation | Procedure or surgery | – |
| syngeneic bone marrow transplantation | Procedure or surgery | – |
| radiation therapy | Radiation | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Oct 2010.
Related trials for Lymphoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of Sonrotoclax (BGB-11417) in Children With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia and B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
Anti-CRLF2-R/TSLPR Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells (TSLPR-CART) in Participants With Recurrent or Refractory CRLF2-R/TSLPR-Overexpressing B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL)
B-All, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
CD22 CAR T-cells to Extend Remission Following Commercial CD19 CAR T-cells in Children, Adolescents, and Adults With Relapsed/Refractory B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, B-All
RecruitingPhase 1
Testing the Combination of Anti-cancer Drugs Mosunetuzumab, Polatuzumab Vedotin, and Lenalidomide for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Not Otherwise Specified, High Grade B-Cell Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing the Combination of Venetoclax and Rituximab, in Comparison to the Usual Treatment (Ibrutinib Plus Rituximab or Zanubrutinib Alone) for Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia/Lymphoplasmacytic Lymphoma
Lymphoplasmacytic Lymphoma, Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kenneth F. Mangan, MD, FACP study chair
Fox Chase Cancer Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing cisplatin, cyclophosphamide and etoposide in people with Lymphoma, run by Temple University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Oct 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Oct 2010.