SarcomaPhase 3NCT00002546
Radiation Therapy Compared With Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Cancer of the Uterus
A Phase 3 study testing cisplatin, ifosfamide and adjuvant therapy in people with Sarcoma, run by Gynecologic Oncology Group at 65 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 to 120 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Sarcoma
- What is being tested?
- cisplatin, ifosfamide and adjuvant therapy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 216 participants
- Where
- 65 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Dec 1993to Sep 2007
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 to 120 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Histologically confirmed primary homologous or heterologous carcinosarcoma of the uterus (corpus and cervix)
- Surgical stage I-IV disease, including positive adnexa, tumor invading the serosa, positive pelvic and/or para-aortic nodes, involvement of the mucosa of the bowel, bladder, or rectum, intra-abdominal metastases, positive pelvic washings, or vaginal involvement within planned radiation port
- Prior total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and maximum tumor resection of all gross intra-abdominal/pelvic disease, including grossly involved pelvic and para-aortic nodes within 8 weeks before study
- No greater than 1 cm residual disease
- Cervical sarcomas also allowed
- No metastasis beyond the abdominal cavity at diagnosis, including the following:
- Parenchymal liver metastasis
- Lung metastasis
- Positive inguinal lymph nodes
- Positive scalene nodes
- Radiographic or pathologic evidence of bone or brain metastasis
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Age:
- 21 and over
Performance status:
- GOG 0-2
Hematopoietic:
- WBC at least 3,000/mm3
- Granulocyte count at least 1,500/mm3
- Platelet count at least 100,000/mm3
Hepatic:
- Bilirubin no greater than 1.5 times normal
- SGOT no greater than 3 times normal
- Albumin at least 3 g/dL
- No acute hepatitis
Renal:
- Creatinine no greater than 1.5 mg/dL OR
- Creatinine clearance at least 50 mL/min
Other:
- No septicemia
- No severe infection
- No severe gastrointestinal bleeding
- No prior invasive or concurrent malignancy within the past 5 years except nonmelanoma skin cancer
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Biologic therapy:
- Not specified
Chemotherapy:
- No prior chemotherapy
Endocrine therapy:
- Prior hormonal therapy allowed
Radiotherapy:
- See Disease Characteristics
- No prior radiotherapy
Surgery:
- See Disease Characteristics
Other:
- No prior therapy that would preclude study therapy
Trial locations and contacts
65 sites in 2 countries.
65 sites in 2 countries
United States64 sites
Abington Memorial Hospital
Abington, Pennsylvania, 19001-3788
MBCCOP - University of New Mexico HSC
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87131
CCOP - Michigan Cancer Research Consortium
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48106
University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294-3300
Cancer Center at Tufts - New England Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02111
Fletcher Allen Health Care - Medical Center Hospital of Vermont Campus
Burlington, Vermont, 05401
Cancer Institute of New Jersey at the Cooper University Hospital
Camden, New Jersey, 08103-1489
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599-7570
Cancer Center at the University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612-3824
MBCCOP - University of Illinois at Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
University of Chicago Cancer Research Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60637-1470
Charles M. Barrett Cancer Center at University Hospital
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267-0526
MetroHealth's Cancer Care Center at MetroHealth Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
Ellis Fischel Cancer Center at University of Missouri - Columbia
Columbia, Missouri, 65203
Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute at Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43210-1240
CCOP - Geisinger Clinic and Medical Center
Danville, Pennsylvania, 17822-2001
CCOP - Central Illinois
Decatur, Illinois, 62794-9640
University of Colorado Cancer Center at University of Colorado Health Sciences Center
Denver, Colorado, 80010
Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
Duke Comprehensive Cancer Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
CCOP - Evanston
Evanston, Illinois, 60201
University of Texas Medical Branch
Galveston, Texas, 77555-0587
CCOP - Grand Rapids
Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49503
Gynecologic Oncology Network
Greenville, North Carolina, 27858
Penn State Cancer Institute at Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033-0850
Study site
Hinsdale, Illinois, 60521
Indiana University Cancer Center
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202-5289
Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242-1002
University of Mississippi Medical Center
Jackson, Mississippi, 39216-4505
CCOP - Kalamazoo
Kalamazoo, Michigan, 49007-3731
CCOP - Kansas City
Kansas City, Missouri, 64131
Keesler Medical Center - Keesler Air Force Base
Keesler Air Force Base, Mississippi, 39534-2576
Southeast Gynecologic Oncology Associates
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37917
CCOP - Southern Nevada Cancer Research Foundation
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89106
Norris Cotton Cancer Center at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756-0002
Women's Cancer Center - Los Gatos
Los Gatos, California, 95032
University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center
Miami, Florida, 33136
University of Minnesota Cancer Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center at Vanderbilt Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232-2516
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10021
CCOP - Christiana Care Health Services
Newark, Delaware, 19713
University of Oklahoma College of Medicine
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104
CCOP - Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium
Omaha, Nebraska, 68106
Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of California Irvine Cancer Center
Orange, California, 92868
Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University - Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
Fox Chase Cancer Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19111-2497
CCOP - Western Regional, Arizona
Phoenix, Arizona, 85006-2726
UPMC Cancer Center at Magee-Womens Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213-3180
CCOP - Columbia River Oncology Program
Portland, Oregon, 97225
CCOP - Metro-Minnesota
Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, 55416
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Seattle, Washington, 98109-1024
CCOP - Northern Indiana CR Consortium
South Bend, Indiana, 46601
Saint Joseph Regional Medical Center
South Bend, Indiana, 46617
CCOP - Cancer Research for the Ozarks
Springfield, Missouri, 65807
Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Long Island Cancer Center at Stony Brook University Hospital
Stony Brook, New York, 11790-7775
MultiCare Regional Cancer Center at Tacoma General Hospital
Tacoma, Washington, 98405
CCOP - Scott and White Hospital
Temple, Texas, 76508
CCOP - Carle Cancer Center
Urbana, Illinois, 61801
Walter Reed Army Medical Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20307-5001
Comprehensive Cancer Center at Wake Forest University
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157-1065
UMASS Memorial Cancer Center - University Campus
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01605-2982
About this study
Official title: A Phase III Randomized Study of Accelerated Hyperfractionated Whole Abdominal Radiotherapy (AHWAR) Versus Combination Ifosfamide-Mesna With Cisplatin in Optimally Debulked Stage I, II, III, or IV Carcinosarcoma (CS) of The Uterus
RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. It is not yet known whether radiation therapy is more effective than combination chemotherapy in treating patients with cancer of the uterus.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying radiation therapy to see how well it works compared to combination chemotherapy in treating patients with cancer of the uterus.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- Compare the survival, progression-free interval, and failure patterns in patients with optimally debulked stage I-IV carcinosarcoma of the uterus treated with whole abdominal radiotherapy vs ifosfamide and cisplatin.
- Compare the incidence and type of acute and late adverse events observed with these treatment regimens in this patient population.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive whole abdominal radiotherapy 5 days a week for 4 weeks, followed by radiotherapy boost to the pelvis 5 days a week for 2.2 weeks.
- Arm II: Patients receive cisplatin IV followed by ifosfamide IV over 1 hour on days 1-4. Treatment continues every 3 weeks for 3 courses.
Patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 216 patients will be accrued for this study within 6 years.
- Conditions
- Sarcoma
- Being tested
- cisplatin, ifosfamide, adjuvant therapy, radiation therapy
- Keywords
- stage I uterine sarcoma, stage II uterine sarcoma, stage III uterine sarcoma, stage IV uterine sarcoma, uterine carcinosarcoma
- Medical subject headings
- Sarcoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
cisplatinDrug
ifosfamideDrug
adjuvant therapyProcedure or surgery
radiation therapyRadiation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jan 2003 (estimated)
- Study startDec 1993
- Primary completionSep 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for SarcomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Enrolment
- 216 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Gynecologic Oncology Group
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
- Investigators
- Aaron H. Wolfson, MD, Study chair, University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer CenterHiginia R. Cardenes, MD, PhD, Study chair, Indiana University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00002546
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GOG-0150
- Other IDs
- CDR0000063303, ECOG-G150, NCI-2012-02226
- Status last verified
- Feb 2016
- First submitted
- 1 Nov 1999
- Last updated
- 11 Feb 2016
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Wolfson AH, Brady MF, Rocereto T, Mannel RS, Lee YC, Futoran RJ, Cohn DE, Ioffe OB. A gynecologic oncology group randomized phase III trial of whole abdominal irradiation (WAI) vs. cisplatin-ifosfamide and mesna (CIM) as post-surgical therapy in stage I-IV carcinosarcoma (CS) of the uterus. Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Nov;107(2):177-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.07.070. Epub 2007 Sep 5.
PubMed 17822748
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Feb 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase III Randomized Study of Accelerated Hyperfractionated Whole Abdominal Radiotherapy (AHWAR) Versus Combination Ifosfamide-Mesna With Cisplatin in Optimally Debulked Stage I, II, III, or IV Carcinosarcoma (CS) of The Uterus
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00002546
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GOG-0150
- Conditions
- Sarcoma
- Keywords
- stage I uterine sarcoma, stage II uterine sarcoma, stage III uterine sarcoma, stage IV uterine sarcoma, uterine carcinosarcoma
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 216 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Gynecologic Oncology GroupResearch network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
- Study start
- Dec 1993
- Primary completion
- Sep 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jan 2003 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. It is not yet known whether radiation therapy is more effective than combination chemotherapy in treating patients with cancer of the uterus.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying radiation therapy to see how well it works compared to combination chemotherapy in treating patients with cancer of the uterus.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- Compare the survival, progression-free interval, and failure patterns in patients with optimally debulked stage I-IV carcinosarcoma of the uterus treated with whole abdominal radiotherapy vs ifosfamide and cisplatin.
- Compare the incidence and type of acute and late adverse events observed with these treatment regimens in this patient population.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive whole abdominal radiotherapy 5 days a week for 4 weeks, followed by radiotherapy boost to the pelvis 5 days a week for 2.2 weeks.
- Arm II: Patients receive cisplatin IV followed by ifosfamide IV over 1 hour on days 1-4. Treatment continues every 3 weeks for 3 courses.
Patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 216 patients will be accrued for this study within 6 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 to 120 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| cisplatin | Drug | – |
| ifosfamide | Drug | – |
| adjuvant therapy | Procedure or surgery | – |
| radiation therapy | Radiation | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Feb 2016.
- Results publication: PubMed 17822748Wolfson AH, Brady MF, Rocereto T, Mannel RS, Lee YC, Futoran RJ, Cohn DE, Ioffe OB. A gynecologic oncology group randomized phase III trial of whole abdominal irradiation (WAI) vs. cisplatin-ifosfamide and mesna (CIM) as post-surgical therapy in stage I-IV carcinosarcoma (CS) of the uterus. Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Nov;107(2):177-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.07.070. Epub 2007 Sep 5.
Related trials for Sarcoma
RecruitingPhase 2
A Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial Evaluating 68Ga-HX01 Injection for PET/CT Imaging
Soft Tissue Sarcoma
RecruitingPhase 3
Measuring if Immunotherapy Plus Chemotherapy is Better Than Chemotherapy Alone for Patients With Aggressive Poorly Differentiated Sarcomas
Metastatic Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma, Metastatic Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Dose Escalation and Dose Expansion Study of MDX2003 in Patients With Different Types of Lymphoma
Lymphoma, Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (WM)
Enrolling by invitationPhase 1
Evaluation of the I-phase Clinical Trial of 177Lu-HX02 Injection in Patients With Advanced Malignant Solid Tumors
Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Aaron H. Wolfson, MD study chair
University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center
Higinia R. Cardenes, MD, PhD study chair
Indiana University
65 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing cisplatin, ifosfamide and adjuvant therapy in people with Sarcoma, run by Gynecologic Oncology Group at 65 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Feb 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 65 sites in United States, South Africa. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00002546, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Feb 2016.