LeukemiaPhase 3NCT00002549
Combination Chemotherapy Followed by Bone Marrow or Peripheral Stem Cell Transplantation in Treating Patients With Acute Myelogenous Leukemia
A Phase 3 study testing filgrastim, busulfan and cyclophosphamide in people with Leukemia, run by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC at 75 sites in 11 countries.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining chemotherapy with peripheral stem cell or bone marrow transplantation may allow the doctor to give higher doses of chemotherapy drugs and kill more cancer cells. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 15 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Leukemia
- What is being tested?
- filgrastim, busulfan and cyclophosphamide
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 1,520 participants
- Where
- 75 sitesin 11 countries
- Study dates
- Nov 1993to not given
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 15 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) of any FAB histology (M1-M7) except M3 At least 30% blast cells in bone marrow smears Secondary leukemias eligible, as follows: Following cured malignancies, including Hodgkin's disease Following exposure to alkylating agents or radiotherapy for other reasons The following leukemias are excluded: Blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukemia Leukemia secondary to other myeloproliferative disease Leukemia secondary to myelodysplastic syndrome of more than 6 months' duration No other progressive malignant disease
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: 15 to 60 Performance status: Not specified Hematopoietic: Not applicable Hepatic: Bilirubin no greater than 1.5 x ULN Renal: Creatinine no greater than 1.5 x ULN Cardiovascular: No severe heart failure requiring diuretics or with an LVEF less than 50% Other: No severe concomitant neurologic disease No severe concomitant psychologic disease
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: No prior therapy for AML (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or more than 7 days of corticosteroids)
Trial locations and contacts
75 sites in 11 countries.
75 sites in 11 countries
Italy45 sites
Ospedale Civile Alessandria
Alessandria, I-15100
Ospedale Torrette University Ancona
Ancona, 60020
Ospedale Civile Avellino
Avellino
Universita Degli Studi di Bari Policlinico
Bari, 70124
Ospedale Regionale A. Di Summa
Brindisi, I-72100
Ospedale Oncologico A. Businco
Cagliari, 09124
Ospedale Ferrarotto
Catania, 95124
Ospedale Regionale A. Pugliese
Catanzaro, 88100
Centro Trapianti di Midollo Osseo
Cremona, 26100
Ospedale Santa Croce
Cuneo, 12100
Universita Degli Studi di Firenze - Policlin. di Careggi
Firenze (Florence), 1 (50-134)
Ospedali Riuniti Foggia
Foggia, 71100
Ospedale S. Antonio Abate
Gallarate Varese, 21013
Ospedale San Martino/Cliniche Universitarie Convenzionale
Genoa (Genova), 16132
Ospedale Gen. Provinciale Santa Maria Goretti
Latina, 04100
Ospedale Maggiore Lodi
Lodi, I-20075
Instituto Scientifico H.S. Raffaele
Milano (Milan), 20132
Ospedale Maggiore Ca Granda
Milano (Milan), 20162
Universita di Modena
Modena, 41100
Azienda Ospedaliera "A. Cardarelli"
Naples (Napoli), 80127
Federico II University Medical School
Naples (Napoli), 80131
Ospedale S. Gennora USL 42
Naples (Napoli), 80136
Ospedale Nuovo Pellegrini
Naples (Napoli), 80144
Ospedale Maggiore
Novara, 28100
Ospedale San Francesco
Nuoro, 08100
Azienda Ospedale S. Luigi - Universita Di Torino
Orbassano, (Torino), 10043
Policlinico - Cattedra di Ematologia
Palermo, 90100
Policlinico P. Giaccone - Universita Di Palermo
Palermo, 90127
Ospedale Cervello
Palermo, 90146
Azienda Ospedaliera Di Parma
Parma, 43100
University and I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo
Pavia, 27100
Policlinico Monteluce
Perugia, 06122
Ospedale San Salvatore
Pesaro, I-61100
Ospedale Civile Pescara
Pescara, 65100
Ospedale San Carlo
Potenza, 85100
Ospedali Riuniti
Reggio Calabria, 89100
Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova
Reggio Emilia, 42100
Ospedale San Eugenio
Rome, 00144
Azienda Policlinico Umberto Primo
Rome, 00161
Policlinico A. Gemelli - Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
Rome, 00168
Ospedale Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza
San Giovanni Rotondo, 71013
Istituto di Ematologia Universita - University di Sassari
Sassari, 07100
Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedale E. Mortelli
Sondalo (so), 23037
Ospedal SS Annunziata
Taranto, 74100
Ospedale Molinette
Turin (Torino), 10126
France7 sites
Hopital Edouard Herriot
Lyon, 69437
Centre Antoine Lacassagne
Nice, 06189
Hotel Dieu de Paris
Paris, 75181
Hopital Cochin
Paris, 75674
Hopital Necker
Paris, 75743
Centre Medico-Chirurgical Foch
Suresnes, 92151
Institut Gustave Roussy
Villejuif, F-94805
Belgium6 sites
Algemeen Ziekenhuis Middelheim
Antwerp, 2020
A.Z. St. Jan
Bruges, 8000
Hopital Universitaire Erasme
Brussels, 1070
Institut Jules Bordet
Brussels (Bruxelles), 1000
Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen
Edegem, B-2650
CHU Sart-Tilman
Liège, B-4000
Netherlands6 sites
Groot Ziekengasthuis 's-Hertogenbosch
's-Hertogenbosch, 5211 NL
Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis
Amsterdam, 1091 HA
Medisch Spectrum Twente
Enschede, 7500 KA
Leiden University Medical Center
Leiden, 2300 ZA
University Medical Center Nijmegen
Nijmegen, NL-6252 HB
Sint Joseph Ziekenhuis
Veldhoven, 5500 MB DB
Croatia2 sites
University Hospital Rebro
Zagreb, 41000
Medical School/University of Zagreb
Zagreb (Agram), 41000
Czechia2 sites
University Hospital - Olomouc
Olomouc, 775 20
Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion
Prague, 128 20
Germany2 sites
Staedtische Kliniken Duisburg
Duisburg, D-47055
Klinikum Grosshadern
Munich (Muenchen), D-81377
Portugal2 sites
Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra (HUC)
Coimbra, 3049
Hospital Escolar San Joao
Porto, 4200
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Ibn-i Sina Hospital, Ankara Univeristy
Ankara, 06100
About this study
Official title: RANDOMIZED PHASE III STUDY OF INDUCTION (ICE VS MICE VS DCE) AND INTENSIVE CONSOLIDATION (IDIA VS NOVIA VS DIA) FOLLOWED BY BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION IN ACUTE MYELOGENOUS LEUKEMIA: AML 10 PROTOCOL
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining chemotherapy with peripheral stem cell or bone marrow transplantation may allow the doctor to give higher doses of chemotherapy drugs and kill more cancer cells.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy followed by bone marrow or peripheral stem cell transplantation in treating patients with acute myelogenous leukemia.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES: I. Determine the complete remission (CR) rate following 1 or 2 courses of ICE (idarubicin/cytarabine/etoposide) vs. MICE (mitoxantrone/cytarabine/etoposide) vs. DCE (daunorubicin/cytarabine/etoposide) in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. II. Compare disease-free survival and overall survival achieved with each anthracycline on the above induction regimens and with intermediate-dose cytarabine (IDIA vs. NOVIA vs. DIA) as consolidation therapy. III. Compare disease-free survival, relapse rate, death in first CR, and overall survival in patients who receive peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) vs. autologous bone marrow transplant (AuBMT) vs. allogeneic bone marrow transplant (AlBMT) as rescue from myeloablative therapy following remission consolidation. IV. Assess the time to recovery of normal or acceptable polymorphonuclear leukocyte and platelet counts following each treatment step. V. Determine the incidence and type of grade 4 toxicity and treatment-related mortality. VI. Evaluate the quality of life during each step of treatment using self-administered questionnaires. VII. Compare stem cell mobilization after IDIA vs. NOVIA vs. DIA, each using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as the mobilizing growth factor. VIII. Assess the rate of completion of stem cell transplantation using PBSC vs. AlBMT vs. AuBMT as the last step of therapy. IX. Compare the costs of treatment (e.g., antibiotics and transfusion requirements) and hospitalization duration between the AuBMT vs. PBSC.
OUTLINE: Randomized study. All patients are randomized to Arms I, II, and III for Induction/Consolidation. Patients in CR following Consolidation who have an HLA-identical sibling, are less than 45 or 55 years of age (depending on center policy), and have adequate organ function are nonrandomly assigned to AlBMT on Regimen A; those in CR who are without an available sibling donor and who have adequate organ function proceed to Regimen B, then are randomized to Arms IV and V. The following acronyms are used: AlBMT Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplant ARA-C Cytarabine, NSC-63878 AuBMT Autologous Bone Marrow Transplant BU Busulfan, NSC-750 CTX Cyclophosphamide, NSC-26271 DCE DNR/ARA-C/VP-16 DHAD Mitoxantrone, NSC-301739 DIA DNR/ID ARA-C DNR Daunorubicin, NSC-82151 G-CSF Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (Rhone-Poulenc-Rorer) ICE IDA/ARA-C/VP-16 IDA Idarubicin, NSC-256439 ID Intermediate Dose IDIA IDA/ID ARA-C Mesna Mercaptoethane sulfonate, NSC-113891 MICE DHAD/ARA-C/VP-16 NOVIA DHAD/ID ARA-C PBSC Peripheral Blood Stem Cells TBI Total-Body Irradiation VP-16 Etoposide, NSC-141540 INDUCTION/CONSOLIDATION: Arm I: 3-Drug Combination Chemotherapy followed by 2-Drug Combination Chemotherapy. ICE; followed by IDIA. Arm II: 3-Drug Combination Chemotherapy followed by 2-Drug Combination Chemotherapy. MICE; followed by NOVIA. Arm III: 3-Drug Combination Chemotherapy followed by 2-Drug Combination Chemotherapy. DCE; followed by DIA. POSTCONSOLIDATION THERAPY: Regimen A: Single-Agent Chemoablation plus Radioablation or 2-Drug Chemoablation followed by Hematopoietic Rescue. CTX; plus TBI (equipment unspecified); or CTX/BU; followed by AlBMT. Entry on EORTC study comparing CI IDA with standard CTX/TBI or CTX/BU encouraged. Regimen B: Stem cell Mobilization and Harvest. G-CSF or CTX/G-CSF. Arm IV: Single-Agent Chemoablation plus Radioablation or 2-Drug Chemoablation followed by Hematopoietic Rescue. CTX/TBI or CTX/BU; followed by PBSC. Arm V: Single-Agent Chemoablation plus Radioablation or 2-Drug Chemoablation followed by Hematopoietic Rescue. CTX/TBI or CTX/BU; followed by AuBMT.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: 1,520 patients will be randomized for Induction/Consolidation over about 5 years; if excessive deaths are found at interim analyses, the inferior arm will close. It is expected that 744 patients will be randomized for Postconsolidation therapy, with 345 patients followed until relapse/death.
- Conditions
- Leukemia
- Being tested
- filgrastim, busulfan, cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, daunorubicin hydrochloride
- Keywords
- untreated adult acute myeloid leukemia, adult acute erythroid leukemia (M6), adult acute myeloblastic leukemia without maturation (M1), adult acute myeloblastic leukemia with maturation (M2), adult acute myelomonocytic leukemia (M4), adult acute monoblastic leukemia (M5a), adult acute megakaryoblastic leukemia (M7), secondary acute myeloid leukemia, adult acute monocytic leukemia (M5b)
- Medical subject headings
- Leukemia, Leukemia, Erythroblastic, Acute, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, Leukemia, Myelomonocytic, Acute, Leukemia, Monocytic, Acute, Leukemia, Megakaryoblastic, Acute
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
filgrastimBiological
busulfanDrug
cyclophosphamideDrug
cytarabineDrug
daunorubicin hydrochlorideDrug
etoposideDrug
idarubicinDrug
mesnaDrug
mitoxantrone hydrochlorideDrug
allogeneic bone marrow transplantationProcedure or surgery
autologous bone marrow transplantationProcedure or surgery
peripheral blood stem cell transplantationProcedure or surgery
radiation therapyRadiation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Jul 2004 (estimated)
- Study startNov 1993
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for LeukemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTCThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Enrolment
- 1,520 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Investigators
- Robert A. Zittoun, MD, Study chair, Hotel Dieu de Paris
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00002549
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CDR0000063311
- Other IDs
- EORTC-06931
- Status last verified
- Dec 2009
- First submitted
- 1 Nov 1999
- Last updated
- 23 Dec 2009
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Maurillo L, Buccisano F, Spagnoli A, et al.: In acute myeloid leukemia, the use in induction of standard dose arac is associated with a better quality of response as compared to an induction regimen containing high dose arac. [Abstract] Blood 114 (22): A-1584, 2009.
Oosterveld, M, Suciu S, Muus P, et al.: A new prognostic disease specific model to predict survival after intensive antileukemic treatment for young patients with poor-risk MDS and AML: results of the CRIANT and AML-10 studies conducted by the EORTC/GIMEMA/SAKK/HOVON/EBMT groups. [Abstract] Blood 104 (11): A-2020, 2004.
Mandelli F, Vignetti M, Suciu S, Stasi R, Petti MC, Meloni G, Muus P, Marmont F, Marie JP, Labar B, Thomas X, Di Raimondo F, Willemze R, Liso V, Ferrara F, Baila L, Fazi P, Zittoun R, Amadori S, de Witte T. Daunorubicin versus mitoxantrone versus idarubicin as induction and consolidation chemotherapy for adults with acute myeloid leukemia: the EORTC and GIMEMA Groups Study AML-10. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Nov 10;27(32):5397-403. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.6490. Epub 2009 Oct 13.
PubMed 19826132Baron F, Stevens-Kroef M, Kicinski M, Meloni G, Muus P, Marie JP, Halkes CJM, Thomas X, Vrhovac R, Albano F, Lefrere F Sr, Sica S, Mancini M, Venditti A, Hagemeijer A, Jansen JH, Amadori S, de Witte T, Willemze R, Suciu S. Impact of induction regimen and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation on outcome in younger adults with acute myeloid leukemia with a monosomal karyotype. Haematologica. 2019 Jun;104(6):1168-1175. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2018.204826. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
PubMed 30523055Baron F, Stevens-Kroef M, Kicinski M, Meloni G, Muus P, Marie JP, Halkes CJM, Thomas X, Vrhovac R, Specchia G, Lefrere F Sr, Sica S, Mancini M, Venditti A, Hagemeijer A, Becker H, Jansen JH, Amadori S, de Witte T, Willemze R, Suciu S. Cytogenetic clonal heterogeneity is not an independent prognosis factor in 15-60-year-old AML patients: results on 1291 patients included in the EORTC/GIMEMA AML-10 and AML-12 trials. Ann Hematol. 2018 Oct;97(10):1785-1795. doi: 10.1007/s00277-018-3396-4. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
PubMed 29926156
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Dec 2009. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- RANDOMIZED PHASE III STUDY OF INDUCTION (ICE VS MICE VS DCE) AND INTENSIVE CONSOLIDATION (IDIA VS NOVIA VS DIA) FOLLOWED BY BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION IN ACUTE MYELOGENOUS LEUKEMIA: AML 10 PROTOCOL
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00002549
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CDR0000063311
- Conditions
- Leukemia
- Keywords
- untreated adult acute myeloid leukemia, adult acute erythroid leukemia (M6), adult acute myeloblastic leukemia without maturation (M1), adult acute myeloblastic leukemia with maturation (M2), adult acute myelomonocytic leukemia (M4), adult acute monoblastic leukemia (M5a), adult acute megakaryoblastic leukemia (M7), secondary acute myeloid leukemia
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 1,520 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTCResearch network
- Study start
- Nov 1993
- First posted
- 19 Jul 2004 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining chemotherapy with peripheral stem cell or bone marrow transplantation may allow the doctor to give higher doses of chemotherapy drugs and kill more cancer cells.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy followed by bone marrow or peripheral stem cell transplantation in treating patients with acute myelogenous leukemia.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES: I. Determine the complete remission (CR) rate following 1 or 2 courses of ICE (idarubicin/cytarabine/etoposide) vs. MICE (mitoxantrone/cytarabine/etoposide) vs. DCE (daunorubicin/cytarabine/etoposide) in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. II. Compare disease-free survival and overall survival achieved with each anthracycline on the above induction regimens and with intermediate-dose cytarabine (IDIA vs. NOVIA vs. DIA) as consolidation therapy. III. Compare disease-free survival, relapse rate, death in first CR, and overall survival in patients who receive peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) vs. autologous bone marrow transplant (AuBMT) vs. allogeneic bone marrow transplant (AlBMT) as rescue from myeloablative therapy following remission consolidation. IV. Assess the time to recovery of normal or acceptable polymorphonuclear leukocyte and platelet counts following each treatment step. V. Determine the incidence and type of grade 4 toxicity and treatment-related mortality. VI. Evaluate the quality of life during each step of treatment using self-administered questionnaires. VII. Compare stem cell mobilization after IDIA vs. NOVIA vs. DIA, each using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as the mobilizing growth factor. VIII. Assess the rate of completion of stem cell transplantation using PBSC vs. AlBMT vs. AuBMT as the last step of therapy. IX. Compare the costs of treatment (e.g., antibiotics and transfusion requirements) and hospitalization duration between the AuBMT vs. PBSC.
OUTLINE: Randomized study. All patients are randomized to Arms I, II, and III for Induction/Consolidation. Patients in CR following Consolidation who have an HLA-identical sibling, are less than 45 or 55 years of age (depending on center policy), and have adequate organ function are nonrandomly assigned to AlBMT on Regimen A; those in CR who are without an available sibling donor and who have adequate organ function proceed to Regimen B, then are randomized to Arms IV and V. The following acronyms are used: AlBMT Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplant ARA-C Cytarabine, NSC-63878 AuBMT Autologous Bone Marrow Transplant BU Busulfan, NSC-750 CTX Cyclophosphamide, NSC-26271 DCE DNR/ARA-C/VP-16 DHAD Mitoxantrone, NSC-301739 DIA DNR/ID ARA-C DNR Daunorubicin, NSC-82151 G-CSF Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (Rhone-Poulenc-Rorer) ICE IDA/ARA-C/VP-16 IDA Idarubicin, NSC-256439 ID Intermediate Dose IDIA IDA/ID ARA-C Mesna Mercaptoethane sulfonate, NSC-113891 MICE DHAD/ARA-C/VP-16 NOVIA DHAD/ID ARA-C PBSC Peripheral Blood Stem Cells TBI Total-Body Irradiation VP-16 Etoposide, NSC-141540 INDUCTION/CONSOLIDATION: Arm I: 3-Drug Combination Chemotherapy followed by 2-Drug Combination Chemotherapy. ICE; followed by IDIA. Arm II: 3-Drug Combination Chemotherapy followed by 2-Drug Combination Chemotherapy. MICE; followed by NOVIA. Arm III: 3-Drug Combination Chemotherapy followed by 2-Drug Combination Chemotherapy. DCE; followed by DIA. POSTCONSOLIDATION THERAPY: Regimen A: Single-Agent Chemoablation plus Radioablation or 2-Drug Chemoablation followed by Hematopoietic Rescue. CTX; plus TBI (equipment unspecified); or CTX/BU; followed by AlBMT. Entry on EORTC study comparing CI IDA with standard CTX/TBI or CTX/BU encouraged. Regimen B: Stem cell Mobilization and Harvest. G-CSF or CTX/G-CSF. Arm IV: Single-Agent Chemoablation plus Radioablation or 2-Drug Chemoablation followed by Hematopoietic Rescue. CTX/TBI or CTX/BU; followed by PBSC. Arm V: Single-Agent Chemoablation plus Radioablation or 2-Drug Chemoablation followed by Hematopoietic Rescue. CTX/TBI or CTX/BU; followed by AuBMT.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: 1,520 patients will be randomized for Induction/Consolidation over about 5 years; if excessive deaths are found at interim analyses, the inferior arm will close. It is expected that 744 patients will be randomized for Postconsolidation therapy, with 345 patients followed until relapse/death.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 15 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| filgrastim | Biological | – |
| busulfan | Drug | – |
| cyclophosphamide | Drug | – |
| cytarabine | Drug | – |
| daunorubicin hydrochloride | Drug | – |
| etoposide | Drug | – |
| idarubicin | Drug | – |
| mesna | Drug | – |
| mitoxantrone hydrochloride | Drug | – |
| allogeneic bone marrow transplantation | Procedure or surgery | – |
| autologous bone marrow transplantation | Procedure or surgery | – |
| peripheral blood stem cell transplantation | Procedure or surgery | – |
| radiation therapy | Radiation | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Dec 2009.
- BackgroundMaurillo L, Buccisano F, Spagnoli A, et al.: In acute myeloid leukemia, the use in induction of standard dose arac is associated with a better quality of response as compared to an induction regimen containing high dose arac. [Abstract] Blood 114 (22): A-1584, 2009.
- BackgroundOosterveld, M, Suciu S, Muus P, et al.: A new prognostic disease specific model to predict survival after intensive antileukemic treatment for young patients with poor-risk MDS and AML: results of the CRIANT and AML-10 studies conducted by the EORTC/GIMEMA/SAKK/HOVON/EBMT groups. [Abstract] Blood 104 (11): A-2020, 2004.
- Results publication: PubMed 19826132Mandelli F, Vignetti M, Suciu S, Stasi R, Petti MC, Meloni G, Muus P, Marmont F, Marie JP, Labar B, Thomas X, Di Raimondo F, Willemze R, Liso V, Ferrara F, Baila L, Fazi P, Zittoun R, Amadori S, de Witte T. Daunorubicin versus mitoxantrone versus idarubicin as induction and consolidation chemotherapy for adults with acute myeloid leukemia: the EORTC and GIMEMA Groups Study AML-10. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Nov 10;27(32):5397-403. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.6490. Epub 2009 Oct 13.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30523055Baron F, Stevens-Kroef M, Kicinski M, Meloni G, Muus P, Marie JP, Halkes CJM, Thomas X, Vrhovac R, Albano F, Lefrere F Sr, Sica S, Mancini M, Venditti A, Hagemeijer A, Jansen JH, Amadori S, de Witte T, Willemze R, Suciu S. Impact of induction regimen and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation on outcome in younger adults with acute myeloid leukemia with a monosomal karyotype. Haematologica. 2019 Jun;104(6):1168-1175. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2018.204826. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29926156Baron F, Stevens-Kroef M, Kicinski M, Meloni G, Muus P, Marie JP, Halkes CJM, Thomas X, Vrhovac R, Specchia G, Lefrere F Sr, Sica S, Mancini M, Venditti A, Hagemeijer A, Becker H, Jansen JH, Amadori S, de Witte T, Willemze R, Suciu S. Cytogenetic clonal heterogeneity is not an independent prognosis factor in 15-60-year-old AML patients: results on 1291 patients included in the EORTC/GIMEMA AML-10 and AML-12 trials. Ann Hematol. 2018 Oct;97(10):1785-1795. doi: 10.1007/s00277-018-3396-4. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
Related trials for Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of Sonrotoclax (BGB-11417) in Children With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia and B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
Anti-CRLF2-R/TSLPR Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells (TSLPR-CART) in Participants With Recurrent or Refractory CRLF2-R/TSLPR-Overexpressing B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL)
B-All, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
CD22 CAR T-cells to Extend Remission Following Commercial CD19 CAR T-cells in Children, Adolescents, and Adults With Relapsed/Refractory B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, B-All
RecruitingPhase 1
Autologous T Cells Transduced With Retroviral Vectors Expressing TCRs for Participant-specific Neoantigens in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies
Malignancy, Hematologic, Neoplasms, Hematologic
RecruitingPhase 3
International Study for Treatment of Childhood Relapsed Precursor B-Cell ALL 2020 (IntReALL BCP 2020)
B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Robert A. Zittoun, MD study chair
Hotel Dieu de Paris
75 sites in 11 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing filgrastim, busulfan and cyclophosphamide in people with Leukemia, run by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC at 75 sites in 11 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Dec 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 75 sites in Italy, France, Belgium, Netherlands, Croatia and 6 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00002549, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Dec 2009.