Multiple Myeloma and Plasma Cell NeoplasmPhase 3NCT00002599
Combination Chemotherapy and Interferon Alfa With or Without Bone Marrow or Peripheral Stem Cell Transplantation in Treating Patients With Myeloma
A Phase 3 study testing filgrastim, recombinant interferon alfa and sargramostim in people with Multiple Myeloma and Plasma Cell Neoplasm, run by Medical Research Council at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining bone marrow or peripheral stem cell transplantation with chemotherapy may allow the doctor to give higher doses of chemotherapy drugs and kill more cancer cells. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 64 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Multiple Myeloma and Plasma Cell Neoplasm
- What is being tested?
- filgrastim, recombinant interferon alfa and sargramostim
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 750 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Sep 1994to not given
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 64 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Definite myeloma requiring chemotherapy and fulfilling at least 2 of the following criteria: Neoplastic plasma cell infiltrate and/or microplasmacytomas on bone marrow aspiration and/or trephine Paraprotein in blood and/or urine Definite lytic bone lesions (not simply osteoporosis) No equivocal myeloma (such patients should be registered with the Clinical Trial Service Unit, Oxford)
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: Under 65 Performance status: Not specified Hematopoietic: (following rehydration and treatment for infection, if necessary) ANC at least 1,000 Platelets at least 50,000 Hepatic: Not specified Renal: Renal insufficiency does not necessarily exclude (dose reduction may be applicable) Cardiovascular: No severe cardiac disease Past history of ischemic heart disease may exclude at the discretion of the investigator Pulmonary: No severe respiratory illness Other: Ability to tolerate at least 3 liters/day of fluid No life-threatening disease unrelated to myeloma Prior or concurrent psychiatric disorder may exclude at the discretion of the investigator No prior malignancy except: Nonmelanomatous skin tumors In situ carcinomas
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: No prior therapy other than minimal local radiotherapy for relief of bone pain
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site
Leeds Teaching Hospital Trust
Leeds, England, LS1 3EX
About this study
Official title: MYELOMA VII MEDICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL WORKING PARTY ON LEUKEMIA IN ADULTS: MYELOMATOSIS THERAPY TRIAL
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining bone marrow or peripheral stem cell transplantation with chemotherapy may allow the doctor to give higher doses of chemotherapy drugs and kill more cancer cells. Interferon alfa may interfere with the growth of cancer cells. It is not yet known whether a more intensive chemotherapy regimen plus stem cell or bone marrow transplant is more effective than standard chemotherapy in treating patients with myeloma.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of two different regimens of combination chemotherapy plus interferon alfa with or without high dose melphalan or bone marrow or peripheral stem cell transplantation in treating patients with previously untreated myeloma.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES: I. Compare survival of patients under age 65 with myeloma treated with standard ABCM (doxorubicin, carmustine, cyclophosphamide, melphalan) vs. intensive C-VAMP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, methylprednisolone) followed by high-dose melphalan (with or without total-body irradiation) with bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cell support, both with IFN-A maintenance. II. Compare the toxicity profiles of the 2 treatment arms. III. Compare the 2 treatment arms with respect to quality of life and health economics issues. IV. Investigate cellular changes by means of linked morphology, phenotype, and cytogenetics studies before and after treatment and at relapse.
OUTLINE: Randomized study. The following acronyms are used: ABM Autologous Bone Marrow BCNU Carmustine, NSC-409962 CTX Cyclophosphamide, NSC-26271 DOX Doxorubicin, NSC-123127 G-CSF Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor (Amgen), NSC-614629 GM-CSF Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (source not specified) IFN-A Interferon alpha (Hoffmann-La Roche), NSC-367982 L-PAM Melphalan, NSC-8806 MePRDL Methylprednisolone, NSC-19987 PBSC Peripheral Blood Stem Cells PRED Prednisone, NSC-10023 TBI Total-Body Irradiation VCR Vincristine, NSC-67574 ARM I. Induction: 4-Drug Combination Chemotherapy or, as indicated, 2-Drug Combination Chemotherapy. ABCM: DOX; BCNU; CTX; L-PAM; or, if pretreatment ANC and platelets are less than 1,300 and 75,000, CTX; PRED. Maintenance: Biological Response Modifier Therapy. IFN-A. ARM II. Induction: 4-Drug Combination Chemotherapy followed by Hematopoietic Stimulation. C-VAMP: DOX; VCR; MePRDL; CTX; followed by CTX; G-CSF or GM-CSF. Consolidation: 3-Drug Combination Chemoablation with or without Radioablation followed by Hematopoietic Rescue. CTX; L-PAM; MePRDL; with or without TBI using megavoltage equipment (linear accelerator preferred); followed by ABM and/or PBSC. Maintenance: Biological Response Modifier Therapy. IFN-A.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: 750 patients will be accrued.
- Being tested
- filgrastim, recombinant interferon alfa, sargramostim, carmustine, cyclophosphamide
- Keywords
- stage I multiple myeloma, stage II multiple myeloma, stage III multiple myeloma
- Medical subject headings
- Multiple Myeloma, Neoplasms, Plasma Cell
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
filgrastimBiological
recombinant interferon alfaBiological
sargramostimBiological
carmustineDrug
cyclophosphamideDrug
melphalanDrug
prednisoneDrug
low-LET cobalt-60 gamma ray therapyRadiation
low-LET photon therapyRadiation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 May 2004 (estimated)
- Study startSep 1994
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Multiple Myeloma and Plasma Cell NeoplasmStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Enrolment
- 750 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medical Research Council
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Investigators
- J. A. Child, MD, Study chair, Leeds General Infirmary
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00002599
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CDR0000063834
- Other IDs
- MRC-LEUK-MYEL-VII, EU-94030
- Status last verified
- May 2007
- First submitted
- 1 Nov 1999
- Last updated
- 19 Dec 2013
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Dec 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- MYELOMA VII MEDICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL WORKING PARTY ON LEUKEMIA IN ADULTS: MYELOMATOSIS THERAPY TRIAL
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00002599
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CDR0000063834
- Keywords
- stage I multiple myeloma, stage II multiple myeloma, stage III multiple myeloma
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 750 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Medical Research CouncilOther government
- Study start
- Sep 1994
- First posted
- 21 May 2004 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining bone marrow or peripheral stem cell transplantation with chemotherapy may allow the doctor to give higher doses of chemotherapy drugs and kill more cancer cells. Interferon alfa may interfere with the growth of cancer cells. It is not yet known whether a more intensive chemotherapy regimen plus stem cell or bone marrow transplant is more effective than standard chemotherapy in treating patients with myeloma.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of two different regimens of combination chemotherapy plus interferon alfa with or without high dose melphalan or bone marrow or peripheral stem cell transplantation in treating patients with previously untreated myeloma.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES: I. Compare survival of patients under age 65 with myeloma treated with standard ABCM (doxorubicin, carmustine, cyclophosphamide, melphalan) vs. intensive C-VAMP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, methylprednisolone) followed by high-dose melphalan (with or without total-body irradiation) with bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cell support, both with IFN-A maintenance. II. Compare the toxicity profiles of the 2 treatment arms. III. Compare the 2 treatment arms with respect to quality of life and health economics issues. IV. Investigate cellular changes by means of linked morphology, phenotype, and cytogenetics studies before and after treatment and at relapse.
OUTLINE: Randomized study. The following acronyms are used: ABM Autologous Bone Marrow BCNU Carmustine, NSC-409962 CTX Cyclophosphamide, NSC-26271 DOX Doxorubicin, NSC-123127 G-CSF Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor (Amgen), NSC-614629 GM-CSF Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (source not specified) IFN-A Interferon alpha (Hoffmann-La Roche), NSC-367982 L-PAM Melphalan, NSC-8806 MePRDL Methylprednisolone, NSC-19987 PBSC Peripheral Blood Stem Cells PRED Prednisone, NSC-10023 TBI Total-Body Irradiation VCR Vincristine, NSC-67574 ARM I. Induction: 4-Drug Combination Chemotherapy or, as indicated, 2-Drug Combination Chemotherapy. ABCM: DOX; BCNU; CTX; L-PAM; or, if pretreatment ANC and platelets are less than 1,300 and 75,000, CTX; PRED. Maintenance: Biological Response Modifier Therapy. IFN-A. ARM II. Induction: 4-Drug Combination Chemotherapy followed by Hematopoietic Stimulation. C-VAMP: DOX; VCR; MePRDL; CTX; followed by CTX; G-CSF or GM-CSF. Consolidation: 3-Drug Combination Chemoablation with or without Radioablation followed by Hematopoietic Rescue. CTX; L-PAM; MePRDL; with or without TBI using megavoltage equipment (linear accelerator preferred); followed by ABM and/or PBSC. Maintenance: Biological Response Modifier Therapy. IFN-A.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: 750 patients will be accrued.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 64 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| filgrastim | Biological | – |
| recombinant interferon alfa | Biological | – |
| sargramostim | Biological | – |
| carmustine | Drug | – |
| cyclophosphamide | Drug | – |
| doxorubicin hydrochloride | Drug | – |
| melphalan | Drug | – |
| methylprednisolone | Drug | – |
| prednisone | Drug | – |
| vincristine sulfate | Drug | – |
| low-LET cobalt-60 gamma ray therapy | Radiation | – |
| low-LET photon therapy | Radiation | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Dec 2013.
Related trials for Multiple Myeloma and Plasma Cell Neoplasm
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Cemsidomide + Dexamethasone in Participants With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Multiple Myeloma, Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
AZD0305 as Monotherapy or in Combination With Anticancer Agents in Participants With Multiple Myeloma
Multiple Myeloma
RecruitingPhase 1
Study to Assess Safety and Tolerability of OPN-6602 in Subjects With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Relapsed Multiple Myeloma, Refractory Multiple Myeloma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn About the Effects of Cemsidomide in Combination With Elranatamab in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Subjects
Multiple Myeloma (MM)
Active, not recruiting
Real World Treatment Experience of Patients With Breast, Lung, or GI Cancer or Multiple Myeloma Using Remote Symptom Monitoring
Breast Cancer, Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
J. A. Child, MD study chair
Leeds General Infirmary
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing filgrastim, recombinant interferon alfa and sargramostim in people with Multiple Myeloma and Plasma Cell Neoplasm, run by Medical Research Council at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Dec 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Dec 2013.