Esophageal CancerPhase 3NCT00002631
Combination Chemotherapy Plus Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Cancer of the Esophagus
A Phase 3 study testing chemotherapy, cisplatin and fluorouracil in people with Esophageal Cancer, run by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group at 18 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Esophageal Cancer
- What is being tested?
- chemotherapy, cisplatin and fluorouracil
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 298 participants
- Where
- 18 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Jun 1995to Sep 1999
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Biopsy-proven primary squamous cell or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus Clinical Stage T1-4, Nx, M0 disease required Disease entirely confined to the esophagus and periesophageal soft tissue with no tumor extension within 2 cm proximal to the stomach No biopsy-proven invasion of the tracheal-bronchial tree or tracheal-esophageal (TE) fistula Bronchoscopy of tracheal-bronchial tree required for lesions less than 30 cm from the incisors to exclude TE fistula Negative liver biopsy required if liver CT suggestive of metastatic disease Negative biopsy required for enlarged (1.5 cm or greater) retroperitoneal or celiac nodes seen on CT Negative biopsy of clinically or radiographically positive supraclavicular nodes required with cervical primaries No recurrent disease No multiple carcinomas of the esophagus
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: 18 and over Performance status: Karnofsky 60%-100% Hematopoietic: WBC at least 4,000 Platelets at least 150,000 Hb at least 10 g/dL Hepatic: Not specified Renal: Creatinine normal OR Creatinine clearance at least 65 mL/min Nutrition: Recommended oral intake requirements (by mouth or tube feeding): More than 1.5 x Basal Energy Expenditure (BEE) measured by Harris- Benedict equation OR More than 1,000 calories/sqm of body surface area (BSA) Intravenous hyperalimentation (recommended if inadequate oral intake): 1.75-2.25 x BEE OR 1,200-1,600 calories/sqm BSA Upper limits may be waived for hypermetabolic patients Other: No second malignancy within 5 years except: Curable nonmelanomatous skin cancer Cervical cancer in situ No pregnant or nursing women
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: Biologic therapy: No prior or concurrent growth factor administration Chemotherapy: No prior chemotherapy Endocrine therapy: Not specified Radiotherapy: No prior chest irradiation Surgery: No prior resection
Trial locations and contacts
18 sites in 2 countries.
18 sites in 2 countries
United States17 sites
Quain & Ramstad Clinic, P.C.
Bismarck, North Dakota, 58501
CCOP - Cedar Rapids Oncology Project
Cedar Rapids, Iowa, 52403-1206
CCOP - Geisinger Clinical and Medical Center
Danville, Pennsylvania, 17822-2001
CCOP - Iowa Oncology Research Association
Des Moines, Iowa, 10309-1016
CCOP - Duluth
Duluth, Minnesota, 55805
CCOP - Merit Care Hospital
Fargo, North Dakota, 58122
Altru Health Systems
Grand Forks, North Dakota, 58201
CCOP - Illinois Oncology Research Association
Peoria, Illinois, 61602
Rapid City Regional Hospital
Rapid City, South Dakota, 57709
Mayo Clinic Cancer Center
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
CentraCare Clinic
Saint Cloud, Minnesota, 56303
CCOP - Scottsdale Oncology Program
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85259-5404
Siouxland Hematology-Oncology
Sioux City, Iowa, 51101-1733
CCOP - Sioux Community Cancer Consortium
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57105-1080
CCOP - Toledo Community Hospital Oncology Program
Toledo, Ohio, 43623-3456
CCOP - Carle Cancer Center
Urbana, Illinois, 61801
CCOP - Wichita
Wichita, Kansas, 67214-3882
About this study
Official title: A PHASE III INTERGROUP RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY FOR CARCINOMA OF THE ESOPHAGUS: HIGH-DOSE VS CONVENTIONAL-DOSE RADIATION THERAPY
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. It is not known whether high-dose radiation therapy is more effective than standard dose radiation therapy in treating cancer of the esophagus.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy plus high- or standard-dose radiation therapy in treating patients with cancer of the esophagus.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES: I. Compare, using a prospective controlled randomized study design, the survival and failure patterns associated with conventional-dose radiotherapy and fluorouracil/cisplatin (5-FU/CDDP) vs. high-dose radiotherapy and 5-FU/CDDP in patients with esophageal cancer. II. Compare the tolerance and quality of life of patients receiving these therapies.
OUTLINE: Randomized study. Arm I: Radiotherapy plus 2-Drug Combination Chemotherapy/Radiosensitization. Tumor irradiation using megavoltage photons of at least 6 MV (electrons may be used if required to boost supraclavicular fossa dose); plus Cisplatin, CDDP, NSC-119875; Fluorouracil, 5-FU, NSC-19893. High-dose radiotherapy. Arm II: Radiotherapy plus 2-Drug Combination Chemotherapy/Radiosensitization. Tumor irradiation as in Arm I; plus CDDP/5-FU. Conventional-dose radiotherapy.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: Up to 298 patients will be entered over 4 years.
- Conditions
- Esophageal Cancer
- Being tested
- chemotherapy, cisplatin, fluorouracil, low-LET electron therapy, low-LET photon therapy
- Keywords
- stage I esophageal cancer, stage II esophageal cancer, stage III esophageal cancer, squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus, adenocarcinoma of the esophagus
- Medical subject headings
- Esophageal Neoplasms, Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Adenocarcinoma Of Esophagus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
chemotherapyDrug
cisplatinDrug
fluorouracilDrug
low-LET electron therapyRadiation
low-LET photon therapyRadiation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Aug 2004 (estimated)
- Study startJun 1995
- Primary completionSep 1999
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Esophageal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Enrolment
- 298 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, North Central Cancer Treatment Group
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Bruce D. Minsky, MD, Study chair, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterThomas M. Pisansky, MD, Study chair, Mayo ClinicJames A. Martenson, MD, Study chair, Mayo Clinic
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00002631
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RTOG-9405
- Other IDs
- CDR0000064043, E-R9405, NCCTG-914051, INT-0123
- Status last verified
- Nov 2013
- First submitted
- 1 Nov 1999
- Last updated
- 19 Nov 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Thomas CR Jr, Berkey BA, Minsky BD, Gaspar LE, Herskovic A, Rich TA, Gunderson LL. Recursive partitioning analysis of pretreatment variables of 416 patients with locoregional esophageal cancer treated with definitive concomitant chemoradiotherapy on Intergroup and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Apr 1;58(5):1405-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.09.022.
PubMed 15050316Smalley SR, Gunderson L, Tepper J, Martenson JA Jr, Minsky B, Willett C, Rich T. Gastric surgical adjuvant radiotherapy consensus report: rationale and treatment implementation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Feb 1;52(2):283-93. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(01)02646-3.
PubMed 11872272Kachnic LA, Winter K, Wasserman T, Kelsen D, Ginsberg R, Pisansky TM, Martenson J, Komaki R, Okawara G, Rosenthal SA, Willett CG, Minsky BD. Longitudinal Quality-of-Life Analysis of RTOG 94-05 (Int 0123):A Phase III Trial of Definitive Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer. Gastrointest Cancer Res. 2011 Mar;4(2):45-52.
PubMed 21673875Minsky BD, Pajak TF, Ginsberg RJ, Pisansky TM, Martenson J, Komaki R, Okawara G, Rosenthal SA, Kelsen DP. INT 0123 (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 94-05) phase III trial of combined-modality therapy for esophageal cancer: high-dose versus standard-dose radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Mar 1;20(5):1167-74. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.5.1167.
PubMed 11870157Kachnic LA, Scott C, Ginsberg R, et al.: One year follow-up reveals no difference in quality of life between high dose and conventional dose radiation: a quality of life assessment of RTOG 94-05. [Abstract] Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 51 (3 suppl 1): A-172, 97, 2001.
Minsky BD, Berkey B, Kelsen DK, et al.: Preliminary results of Intergroup INT 0123 randomized trial of combined modality therapy (CMT) for esophagel cancer: standard vs high dose radiation therapy. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 19: A927, 2000.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Nov 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A PHASE III INTERGROUP RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY FOR CARCINOMA OF THE ESOPHAGUS: HIGH-DOSE VS CONVENTIONAL-DOSE RADIATION THERAPY
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00002631
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RTOG-9405
- Conditions
- Esophageal Cancer
- Keywords
- stage I esophageal cancer, stage II esophageal cancer, stage III esophageal cancer, squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus, adenocarcinoma of the esophagus
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 298 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Radiation Therapy Oncology GroupResearch network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, North Central Cancer Treatment Group
- Study start
- Jun 1995
- Primary completion
- Sep 1999 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Aug 2004 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. It is not known whether high-dose radiation therapy is more effective than standard dose radiation therapy in treating cancer of the esophagus.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy plus high- or standard-dose radiation therapy in treating patients with cancer of the esophagus.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES: I. Compare, using a prospective controlled randomized study design, the survival and failure patterns associated with conventional-dose radiotherapy and fluorouracil/cisplatin (5-FU/CDDP) vs. high-dose radiotherapy and 5-FU/CDDP in patients with esophageal cancer. II. Compare the tolerance and quality of life of patients receiving these therapies.
OUTLINE: Randomized study. Arm I: Radiotherapy plus 2-Drug Combination Chemotherapy/Radiosensitization. Tumor irradiation using megavoltage photons of at least 6 MV (electrons may be used if required to boost supraclavicular fossa dose); plus Cisplatin, CDDP, NSC-119875; Fluorouracil, 5-FU, NSC-19893. High-dose radiotherapy. Arm II: Radiotherapy plus 2-Drug Combination Chemotherapy/Radiosensitization. Tumor irradiation as in Arm I; plus CDDP/5-FU. Conventional-dose radiotherapy.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: Up to 298 patients will be entered over 4 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| chemotherapy | Drug | – |
| cisplatin | Drug | – |
| fluorouracil | Drug | – |
| low-LET electron therapy | Radiation | – |
| low-LET photon therapy | Radiation | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Nov 2013.
- Background: PubMed 15050316Thomas CR Jr, Berkey BA, Minsky BD, Gaspar LE, Herskovic A, Rich TA, Gunderson LL. Recursive partitioning analysis of pretreatment variables of 416 patients with locoregional esophageal cancer treated with definitive concomitant chemoradiotherapy on Intergroup and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Apr 1;58(5):1405-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.09.022.
- Background: PubMed 11872272Smalley SR, Gunderson L, Tepper J, Martenson JA Jr, Minsky B, Willett C, Rich T. Gastric surgical adjuvant radiotherapy consensus report: rationale and treatment implementation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Feb 1;52(2):283-93. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(01)02646-3.
- Results publication: PubMed 21673875Kachnic LA, Winter K, Wasserman T, Kelsen D, Ginsberg R, Pisansky TM, Martenson J, Komaki R, Okawara G, Rosenthal SA, Willett CG, Minsky BD. Longitudinal Quality-of-Life Analysis of RTOG 94-05 (Int 0123):A Phase III Trial of Definitive Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer. Gastrointest Cancer Res. 2011 Mar;4(2):45-52.
- Results publication: PubMed 11870157Minsky BD, Pajak TF, Ginsberg RJ, Pisansky TM, Martenson J, Komaki R, Okawara G, Rosenthal SA, Kelsen DP. INT 0123 (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 94-05) phase III trial of combined-modality therapy for esophageal cancer: high-dose versus standard-dose radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Mar 1;20(5):1167-74. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.5.1167.
- Results publicationKachnic LA, Scott C, Ginsberg R, et al.: One year follow-up reveals no difference in quality of life between high dose and conventional dose radiation: a quality of life assessment of RTOG 94-05. [Abstract] Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 51 (3 suppl 1): A-172, 97, 2001.
- Results publicationMinsky BD, Berkey B, Kelsen DK, et al.: Preliminary results of Intergroup INT 0123 randomized trial of combined modality therapy (CMT) for esophagel cancer: standard vs high dose radiation therapy. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 19: A927, 2000.
Related trials for Esophageal Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Multicenter Prospective Cohort on Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Superficial Esophageal Cancer, Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-08046876 in People With Advanced Solid Tumors
Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumors, Bladder Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bruce D. Minsky, MD study chair
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Thomas M. Pisansky, MD study chair
Mayo Clinic
James A. Martenson, MD study chair
Mayo Clinic
18 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing chemotherapy, cisplatin and fluorouracil in people with Esophageal Cancer, run by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group at 18 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Nov 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 18 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00002631, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Nov 2013.