Prostate CancerPhase 3NCT00002651
SWOG-9346, Hormone Therapy in Treating Men With Stage IV Prostate Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing bicalutamide, goserelin acetate and clinical observation in people with Prostate Cancer, run by SWOG Cancer Research Network at 14 sites in Canada.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Testosterone can stimulate the growth of prostate cancer cells. Hormone therapy may be effective treatment for prostate cancer. It is not yet known which regimen of hormone therapy is most effective for stage IV prostate cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Prostate Cancer
- What is being tested?
- bicalutamide, goserelin acetate and clinical observation
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 3,040 participants
- Where
- 14 sitesCanada
- Study dates
- May 1995to Jun 2013
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate
- Metastatic stage IV (stage D2)
- Any number of bone metastases by bone scan allowed
- Unequivocal visceral organ metastases (liver, brain, or lung) allowed
- No suspected second primary tumors unless metastases are histologically confirmed, including special stains (e.g., prostate specific antigen [PSA] and prostatic alkaline phosphatase [PAP])
- For entry into late induction therapy:
- No more than 1 month from the beginning of antiandrogen therapy to the beginning of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist therapy
- No more than 6 months since initiation of current combined androgen-deprivation therapy (LHRH agonist and antiandrogen)
- The effectiveness of the current depot LHRH agonist would not extend beyond 8 months after initiation of combined androgen therapy
- PSA at least 5 ng/mL
- No acute spinal cord compression
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Age:
- Adult
Performance status:
- SWOG 0-2
Hematopoietic:
- Not specified
Hepatic:
- Not specified
Renal:
- Not specified
Other:
- Recovered from any major infection
- No active medical illness that would preclude study or limit survival
- No other malignancy within the past 5 years except:
- Adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer
- Adequately treated carcinoma in situ of the bladder
- Adequately treated other superficial cancer
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Biologic therapy:
- No concurrent biological response modifier therapy
Chemotherapy:
- No concurrent chemotherapy
Endocrine therapy:
- See Disease Characteristics
- More than 1 year since any prior neoadjuvant or adjuvant hormonal therapy for a duration of no more than 4 months
- Single or combination therapy allowed
- More than 1 year since prior finasteride for prostate cancer for a duration of no more than 9 months (less than 6 months for benign prostatic hypertrophy)
- Prior or concurrent megestrol for hot flashes allowed
- No other concurrent hormonal therapy
Radiotherapy:
- No concurrent radiotherapy other than palliation of painful bone metastases
Surgery:
- No prior bilateral orchiectomy
- Recovered from any prior major surgery
Trial locations and contacts
14 sites in 1 country.
14 sites in 1 country
Canada14 sites
Tom Baker Cancer Centre - Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N2
Cross Cancer Institute at University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2
Nova Scotia Cancer Centre
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 1V7
Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario at Kingston General Hospital
Kingston, Ontario, K7L 5P9
London Regional Cancer Program at London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, N6A 4L6
Hopital Notre-Dame du CHUM
Montreal, Quebec, H2L 4M1
McGill Cancer Centre at McGill University
Montreal, Quebec, H2W 1S6
Ottawa Hospital Regional Cancer Centre - General Campus
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Quebec
Québec, Quebec, G1R 2J6
Saskatoon Cancer Centre at the University of Saskatchewan
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 4H4
CHUS-Hopital Fleurimont
Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1H 5N4
Odette Cancer Centre at Sunnybrook
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5
Princess Margaret Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9
University of British Columbia
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9
About this study
Official title: Intermittent Androgen Deprivation in Patients With Stage D2 Prostate Cancer, Phase III
RATIONALE: Testosterone can stimulate the growth of prostate cancer cells. Hormone therapy may be effective treatment for prostate cancer. It is not yet known which regimen of hormone therapy is most effective for stage IV prostate cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying two different regimens of hormone therapy and comparing how well they work in treating men with stage IV prostate cancer.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- Compare the survival of patients with metastatic stage IV prostate cancer responsive to combined androgen-deprivation therapy (CAD) treated with intermittent vs continuous CAD.
- Compare the effects of these treatment regimens on impotence, libido, and vitality/fatigue as well as the physical and emotional well-being of these patients.
Secondary
- Compare general symptoms, role functioning, global perception of quality of life, and social functioning of patients treated with these regimens.
- Assess prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels after continuous CAD administered before randomization and evaluate PSA changes throughout randomized treatment of these patients.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to SWOG performance status (0-1 vs 2), severity of disease (minimal vs extensive), and prior hormonal therapy (neoadjuvant hormonal therapy vs finasteride vs neither).
- Induction therapy: Patients receive combined androgen-deprivation (CAD) therapy comprising goserelin subcutaneously once a month and oral bicalutamide once daily for 8 courses (7 months).
- Consolidation therapy: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 consolidation regimens.
- Arm I (continuous CAD therapy): Patients continue CAD therapy as in induction therapy. Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression.
- Arm II (intermittent CAD therapy): Patients undergo observation in the absence of rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) or clinical symptoms of progressive disease. Patients with rising PSA or progressive disease begin CAD therapy as in induction therapy. Patients whose PSA normalizes after 8 courses return to observation. Patients whose PSA does not normalize after 8 courses continue CAD therapy.
Quality of life is assessed before induction therapy, at 3 months (before consolidation therapy), and then at 9 and 15 months.
Patients are followed every 6-12 months for at least 10 years.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: Approximately 1,500 patients will be accrued for this study.
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Being tested
- bicalutamide, goserelin acetate, clinical observation
- Keywords
- adenocarcinoma of the prostate, stage IV prostate cancer, recurrent prostate cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
bicalutamideDrug
Given orally
goserelin acetateDrug
Given subcutaneously
clinical observationOther
Patients undergo observation in the absence of rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) or clinical symptoms of progressive disease.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Consolidation arm I | Active comparator | Patients continue CAD therapy comprising goserelin subcutaneously once a month and oral bicalutamide once daily. Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression. Receives: Drug: bicalutamide; Drug: goserelin acetate |
| Consolidation arm II | Experimental | Patients undergo observation in the absence of rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) or clinical symptoms of progressive disease. Patients with rising PSA or progressive disease begin CAD therapy as in consolidation arm I. Patients whose PSA normalizes after 8 courses return to observation. Patients whose PSA does not normalize after 8 courses continue CAD therapy. Receives: Drug: bicalutamide; Drug: goserelin acetate; Other: clinical observation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall Survival
Non-inferiority test to determine if intermittent combined androgen deprivation (CAD) overall survival is not substantially worse than continuous CAD overall survival. Specifically, the trial is designed for a one-sided test of the hypothesis that the hazard ratio of intermittent CAD to continuous CAD is 1.2. The assumptions used to compute the trial size are an overall type I error rate of 0.05 and a type II error of 0.10 (power = 0.9).
Measured: Up to 15 years
Physical Functioning as Measured by the SF-36
This outcome was scored on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better functioning. Change from Baseline in SF-36 Score at 3 Months
Measured: 3 months
Emotional Functioning as Measured by the SF-36 Mental Health Inventory
This outcome was scored on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better functioning. Change from Baseline in SF-36 Score at 3 Months
Measured: 3 months
Erectile Dysfunction
This outcome was assessed by having patients report whether they had erectile dysfunction (a score of 1) or no erectile dysfunction (a score of 0). This analysis looks at change from Baseline to 3 Months.
Measured: 3 months
High Libido
This outcome was assessed by having patients report whether their interest in sexual activities was very high, high, or moderate (a score of 1) or low or very low (a score of 0). This outcome measure is reporting a change from baseline in the percentage of participants with High Libido at 3 months. "High Libido" is defined as very high, high or moderate interest in sexual activities.
Measured: 3 months
Vitality
This outcome was scored on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better functioning. This analysis looks at mean change from Baseline score to 3 Months.
Measured: 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jan 2003 (estimated)
- Study startMay 1995
- Primary completionJun 2013
- Study completionJun 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Prostate CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by SWOG Cancer Research NetworkThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 3,040 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- SWOG Cancer Research Network
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI), NCIC Clinical Trials Group, Cancer and Leukemia Group B, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Maha Hadi A. Hussain, MD, Study chair, University of Michigan Rogel Cancer CenterBryan J. Donnelly, MD, FRCSC, MSC, Study chair, Tom Baker Cancer Centre - CalgaryEric J. Small, MD, Study chair, University of California, San FranciscoGeorge Wilding, MD, Study chair, University of Wisconsin, MadisonAtif Akdas, MD, Study chair, Marmara University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00002651
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CDR0000064184
- Other IDs
- SWOG-9346, CAN-NCIC-PR8, CALGB-9594, ECOG-S9346, EORTC-30985, CAN-NCIC-JPR8, INT-0162
- Status last verified
- Mar 2017
- First submitted
- 1 Nov 1999
- Last updated
- 17 Apr 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Tangen CM, Hussain MH, Higano CS, Eisenberger MA, Small EJ, Wilding G, Donnelly BJ, Schelhammer PF, Crawford ED, Vogelzang NJ, Powell IJ, Thompson IM Jr. Improved overall survival trends of men with newly diagnosed M1 prostate cancer: a SWOG phase III trial experience (S8494, S8894 and S9346). J Urol. 2012 Oct;188(4):1164-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.06.046. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
PubMed 22921015Hussain M, Tangen CM, Higano CS, et al.: Improved overall survival (OS) of patients (pts) with new metastatic prostate cancer (pca): better efficacy or stage migration? Data from SWOG: S9346 and 8894. [Abstract] 2010 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium, March 5-7, 2010, San Francisco, California. A-30, 2010.
Hussain M, Goldman B, Tangen C, Higano CS, Petrylak DP, Wilding G, Akdas AM, Small EJ, Donnelly BJ, Sundram SK, Burch PA, Dipaola RS, Crawford ED. Prostate-specific antigen progression predicts overall survival in patients with metastatic prostate cancer: data from Southwest Oncology Group Trials 9346 (Intergroup Study 0162) and 9916. J Clin Oncol. 2009 May 20;27(15):2450-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.9810. Epub 2009 Apr 20.
PubMed 19380444Goldman B, Hussain M, Tangen C, et al.: Prostate-specific antigen progression (PSA-P) as a predictor of overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) with metastatic prostate cancer (PC): data from S9346 and S9916. [Abstract] American Society of Clinical Oncology 2008 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium, Feb 14-16, 2008, San Francisco, CA. A-165, 2008.
Hussain MH, Goldman B, Tangen CM, et al.: Use of prostate-specific antigen progression (PSA-P) to predict overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) with metastatic prostate cancer (PC): data from S9346 and S9916. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 26 (Suppl 15): A-5015, 2008.
Hussain M, Tangen CM, Higano CS, et al.: Intermittent (IAD) versus continuous androgen deprivation (CAD) in hormone sensitive metastatic prostate cancer (HSM1PC) patients (pts): results of S9346 (INT-0162), an international phase III trial. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 30 (Suppl 15): A-4, 2012.
Moinpour C, Berry DL, Ely B, et al.: Preliminary quality-of-life outcomes for SWOG-9346: Intermittent androgen deprivation in patients with hormone-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer (HSM1PC)-phase III. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 30 (Suppl 15): A-4571, 2012.
Hussain M, Tangen CM, Higano C, Schelhammer PF, Faulkner J, Crawford ED, Wilding G, Akdas A, Small EJ, Donnelly B, MacVicar G, Raghavan D; Southwest Oncology Group Trial 9346 (INT-0162). Absolute prostate-specific antigen value after androgen deprivation is a strong independent predictor of survival in new metastatic prostate cancer: data from Southwest Oncology Group Trial 9346 (INT-0162). J Clin Oncol. 2006 Aug 20;24(24):3984-90. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.4246.
PubMed 16921051Tangen CM, Hussain M, Wilding G, et al.: Determinants of prostate specific antigen (PSA) normalization in prostate cancer (PCa) patients (pts) treated with androgen deprivation (AD) on Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) study 9346 (INT-0162). [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 22: A-1591, 2003.
Hershman DL, Unger JM, Wright JD, Ramsey S, Till C, Tangen CM, Barlow WE, Blanke C, Thompson IM, Hussain M. Adverse Health Events Following Intermittent and Continuous Androgen Deprivation in Patients With Metastatic Prostate Cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2016 Apr;2(4):453-61. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.4655.
PubMed 26720308Eggener S. Commentary on "Intermittent versus continuous androgen deprivation in prostate cancer." Hussain M, Tangen CM, Berry DL, Higano CS, Crawford ED, Liu G, Wilding G, Prescott S, Kanaga Sundaram S, Small EJ, Dawson NA, Donnelly BJ, Venner PM, Vaishampayan UN, Schellhammer PF, Quinn DI, Raghavan D, Ely B, Moinpour CM, Vogelzang NJ, Thompson IM Jr, University of Michigan, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Ann Arbor, MI. N Engl J Med 2013; 368(14):1314-25. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1212299. Urol Oncol. 2014 Aug;32(6):936-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.01.009.
PubMed 25087673Hussain M, Tangen CM, Berry DL, Higano CS, Crawford ED, Liu G, Wilding G, Prescott S, Kanaga Sundaram S, Small EJ, Dawson NA, Donnelly BJ, Venner PM, Vaishampayan UN, Schellhammer PF, Quinn DI, Raghavan D, Ely B, Moinpour CM, Vogelzang NJ, Thompson IM Jr. Intermittent versus continuous androgen deprivation in prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013 Apr 4;368(14):1314-25. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1212299.
PubMed 23550669
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Apr 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Intermittent Androgen Deprivation in Patients With Stage D2 Prostate Cancer, Phase III
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00002651
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CDR0000064184
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Keywords
- adenocarcinoma of the prostate, stage IV prostate cancer, recurrent prostate cancer
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 3,040 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- SWOG Cancer Research NetworkResearch network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI), NCIC Clinical Trials Group, Cancer and Leukemia Group B, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC
- Study start
- May 1995
- Primary completion
- Jun 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jan 2003 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 17 Apr 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Testosterone can stimulate the growth of prostate cancer cells. Hormone therapy may be effective treatment for prostate cancer. It is not yet known which regimen of hormone therapy is most effective for stage IV prostate cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying two different regimens of hormone therapy and comparing how well they work in treating men with stage IV prostate cancer.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- Compare the survival of patients with metastatic stage IV prostate cancer responsive to combined androgen-deprivation therapy (CAD) treated with intermittent vs continuous CAD.
- Compare the effects of these treatment regimens on impotence, libido, and vitality/fatigue as well as the physical and emotional well-being of these patients.
Secondary
- Compare general symptoms, role functioning, global perception of quality of life, and social functioning of patients treated with these regimens.
- Assess prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels after continuous CAD administered before randomization and evaluate PSA changes throughout randomized treatment of these patients.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to SWOG performance status (0-1 vs 2), severity of disease (minimal vs extensive), and prior hormonal therapy (neoadjuvant hormonal therapy vs finasteride vs neither).
- Induction therapy: Patients receive combined androgen-deprivation (CAD) therapy comprising goserelin subcutaneously once a month and oral bicalutamide once daily for 8 courses (7 months).
- Consolidation therapy: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 consolidation regimens.
- Arm I (continuous CAD therapy): Patients continue CAD therapy as in induction therapy. Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression.
- Arm II (intermittent CAD therapy): Patients undergo observation in the absence of rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) or clinical symptoms of progressive disease. Patients with rising PSA or progressive disease begin CAD therapy as in induction therapy. Patients whose PSA normalizes after 8 courses return to observation. Patients whose PSA does not normalize after 8 courses continue CAD therapy.
Quality of life is assessed before induction therapy, at 3 months (before consolidation therapy), and then at 9 and 15 months.
Patients are followed every 6-12 months for at least 10 years.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: Approximately 1,500 patients will be accrued for this study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Consolidation arm I | Active comparator | Drug: bicalutamide, Drug: goserelin acetatePatients continue CAD therapy comprising goserelin subcutaneously once a month and oral bicalutamide once daily. Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression. |
| Consolidation arm II | Experimental | Drug: bicalutamide, Drug: goserelin acetate, Other: clinical observationPatients undergo observation in the absence of rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) or clinical symptoms of progressive disease. Patients with rising PSA or progressive disease begin CAD therapy as in consolidation arm I. Patients whose PSA normalizes after 8 courses return to observation. Patients whose PSA does not normalize after 8 courses continue CAD therapy. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| bicalutamideGiven orally | Drug | Consolidation arm I, Consolidation arm II |
| goserelin acetateGiven subcutaneously | Drug | Consolidation arm I, Consolidation arm II |
| clinical observationPatients undergo observation in the absence of rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) or clinical symptoms of progressive disease. | Other | Consolidation arm II |
Primary outcome
Overall Survival
Time frame: Up to 15 years
Non-inferiority test to determine if intermittent combined androgen deprivation (CAD) overall survival is not substantially worse than continuous CAD overall survival. Specifically, the trial is designed for a one-sided test of the hypothesis that the hazard ratio of intermittent CAD to continuous CAD is 1.2. The assumptions used to compute the trial size are an overall type I error rate of 0.05 and a type II error of 0.10 (power = 0.9).
Physical Functioning as Measured by the SF-36
Time frame: 3 months
This outcome was scored on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better functioning. Change from Baseline in SF-36 Score at 3 Months
Emotional Functioning as Measured by the SF-36 Mental Health Inventory
Time frame: 3 months
This outcome was scored on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better functioning. Change from Baseline in SF-36 Score at 3 Months
Erectile Dysfunction
Time frame: 3 months
This outcome was assessed by having patients report whether they had erectile dysfunction (a score of 1) or no erectile dysfunction (a score of 0). This analysis looks at change from Baseline to 3 Months.
High Libido
Time frame: 3 months
This outcome was assessed by having patients report whether their interest in sexual activities was very high, high, or moderate (a score of 1) or low or very low (a score of 0). This outcome measure is reporting a change from baseline in the percentage of participants with High Libido at 3 months. "High Libido" is defined as very high, high or moderate interest in sexual activities.
Vitality
Time frame: 3 months
This outcome was scored on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better functioning. This analysis looks at mean change from Baseline score to 3 Months.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Apr 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 22921015Tangen CM, Hussain MH, Higano CS, Eisenberger MA, Small EJ, Wilding G, Donnelly BJ, Schelhammer PF, Crawford ED, Vogelzang NJ, Powell IJ, Thompson IM Jr. Improved overall survival trends of men with newly diagnosed M1 prostate cancer: a SWOG phase III trial experience (S8494, S8894 and S9346). J Urol. 2012 Oct;188(4):1164-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.06.046. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
- BackgroundHussain M, Tangen CM, Higano CS, et al.: Improved overall survival (OS) of patients (pts) with new metastatic prostate cancer (pca): better efficacy or stage migration? Data from SWOG: S9346 and 8894. [Abstract] 2010 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium, March 5-7, 2010, San Francisco, California. A-30, 2010.
- Background: PubMed 19380444Hussain M, Goldman B, Tangen C, Higano CS, Petrylak DP, Wilding G, Akdas AM, Small EJ, Donnelly BJ, Sundram SK, Burch PA, Dipaola RS, Crawford ED. Prostate-specific antigen progression predicts overall survival in patients with metastatic prostate cancer: data from Southwest Oncology Group Trials 9346 (Intergroup Study 0162) and 9916. J Clin Oncol. 2009 May 20;27(15):2450-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.9810. Epub 2009 Apr 20.
- BackgroundGoldman B, Hussain M, Tangen C, et al.: Prostate-specific antigen progression (PSA-P) as a predictor of overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) with metastatic prostate cancer (PC): data from S9346 and S9916. [Abstract] American Society of Clinical Oncology 2008 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium, Feb 14-16, 2008, San Francisco, CA. A-165, 2008.
- BackgroundHussain MH, Goldman B, Tangen CM, et al.: Use of prostate-specific antigen progression (PSA-P) to predict overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) with metastatic prostate cancer (PC): data from S9346 and S9916. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 26 (Suppl 15): A-5015, 2008.
- Results publicationHussain M, Tangen CM, Higano CS, et al.: Intermittent (IAD) versus continuous androgen deprivation (CAD) in hormone sensitive metastatic prostate cancer (HSM1PC) patients (pts): results of S9346 (INT-0162), an international phase III trial. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 30 (Suppl 15): A-4, 2012.
- Results publicationMoinpour C, Berry DL, Ely B, et al.: Preliminary quality-of-life outcomes for SWOG-9346: Intermittent androgen deprivation in patients with hormone-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer (HSM1PC)-phase III. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 30 (Suppl 15): A-4571, 2012.
- Results publication: PubMed 16921051Hussain M, Tangen CM, Higano C, Schelhammer PF, Faulkner J, Crawford ED, Wilding G, Akdas A, Small EJ, Donnelly B, MacVicar G, Raghavan D; Southwest Oncology Group Trial 9346 (INT-0162). Absolute prostate-specific antigen value after androgen deprivation is a strong independent predictor of survival in new metastatic prostate cancer: data from Southwest Oncology Group Trial 9346 (INT-0162). J Clin Oncol. 2006 Aug 20;24(24):3984-90. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.4246.
- Results publicationTangen CM, Hussain M, Wilding G, et al.: Determinants of prostate specific antigen (PSA) normalization in prostate cancer (PCa) patients (pts) treated with androgen deprivation (AD) on Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) study 9346 (INT-0162). [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 22: A-1591, 2003.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26720308Hershman DL, Unger JM, Wright JD, Ramsey S, Till C, Tangen CM, Barlow WE, Blanke C, Thompson IM, Hussain M. Adverse Health Events Following Intermittent and Continuous Androgen Deprivation in Patients With Metastatic Prostate Cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2016 Apr;2(4):453-61. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.4655.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25087673Eggener S. Commentary on "Intermittent versus continuous androgen deprivation in prostate cancer." Hussain M, Tangen CM, Berry DL, Higano CS, Crawford ED, Liu G, Wilding G, Prescott S, Kanaga Sundaram S, Small EJ, Dawson NA, Donnelly BJ, Venner PM, Vaishampayan UN, Schellhammer PF, Quinn DI, Raghavan D, Ely B, Moinpour CM, Vogelzang NJ, Thompson IM Jr, University of Michigan, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Ann Arbor, MI. N Engl J Med 2013; 368(14):1314-25. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1212299. Urol Oncol. 2014 Aug;32(6):936-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.01.009.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23550669Hussain M, Tangen CM, Berry DL, Higano CS, Crawford ED, Liu G, Wilding G, Prescott S, Kanaga Sundaram S, Small EJ, Dawson NA, Donnelly BJ, Venner PM, Vaishampayan UN, Schellhammer PF, Quinn DI, Raghavan D, Ely B, Moinpour CM, Vogelzang NJ, Thompson IM Jr. Intermittent versus continuous androgen deprivation in prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013 Apr 4;368(14):1314-25. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1212299.
Related trials for Prostate Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Docetaxel and SX-682 in Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Salivary Gland Carcinoma, and Advanced Prostate Cancer
Head and Neck Cancer, Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Active, not recruiting
Daily Adaptive Post-Prostatectomy With Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy in Patients With Prostate Cancer
Malignant Prostate Neoplasm
Enrolling by invitation
Use of Tracking Devices to Locate Abnormalities During Invasive Procedures
Adenocarcinoma, Prostate Neoplasms
RecruitingObservational study
Imaging Studies to Check the Local Response of Prostate Cancer to Radiation Therapy
Prostatic Neoplasms, Prostate Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of LY4257496 in Participants With Cancer (OMNIRAY)
Breast Neoplasms, Colorectal Neoplasms
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Maha Hadi A. Hussain, MD study chair
University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center
Bryan J. Donnelly, MD, FRCSC, MSC study chair
Tom Baker Cancer Centre - Calgary
Eric J. Small, MD study chair
University of California, San Francisco
14 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing bicalutamide, goserelin acetate and clinical observation in people with Prostate Cancer, run by SWOG Cancer Research Network at 14 sites in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Apr 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 14 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Apr 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall Survival (time frame: Up to 15 years). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00002651, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Apr 2017.