LeukemiaPhase 3NCT00002658
Combination Chemotherapy, Biological Therapy, and Bone Marrow Transplantation in Treating Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia
A Phase 3 study testing filgrastim, amsacrine and cyclophosphamide in people with Leukemia and Neutropenia, run by Medical Research Council at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Biological therapies use different ways to stimulate the immune system and stop cancer cells from growing. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 15 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Leukemia, Neutropenia
- What is being tested?
- filgrastim, amsacrine and cyclophosphamide
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 2,000 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Jan 1994to not given
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 15 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- De novo or secondary acute myeloid leukemia of any morphologic type
- Acute promyelocytic leukemia also entered on MRC ATRA trial
- No blastic transformation of chronic myeloid leukemia
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Age:
- 15 to physiologic 59
- Patients for whom intensive therapy is considered inappropriate may be entered on protocol MRC-LEUK-AML11 or its successor
Performance status:
- Any status
Hematopoietic:
- Not specified
Hepatic:
- Not specified
Renal:
- Not specified
Other:
- No concurrent active malignancy
- Not pregnant or nursing
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Biologic therapy
- Not specified
Chemotherapy
- No prior cytotoxic chemotherapy for leukemia
Endocrine therapy
- Not specified
Radiotherapy
- Not specified
Surgery
- Not specified
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site
University of Wales College of Medicine
Cardiff, Wales, CF14 4XN
About this study
Official title: ACUTE MYELOID LEUKAEMIA TRIAL 12
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Biological therapies use different ways to stimulate the immune system and stop cancer cells from growing. Combining chemotherapy with bone marrow transplantation may allow the doctor to give higher doses of chemotherapy drugs and kill more cancer cells.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of different treatment regimens in treating patients who have acute myeloid leukemia.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- Compare the remission rate, duration of remission, survival, toxicity, and supportive care requirements associated with induction chemotherapy with cytarabine, daunorubicin, and etoposide vs mitoxantrone, cytarabine, and etoposide in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.
- Assess filgrastim (G-CSF) support in the recovery phase after the first induction course with respect to remission rate, reasons for failure, hematologic regeneration, febrile incidents, supportive care requirements, and overall survival in these patients.
- Compare 4 vs 5 courses of total treatment, with either chemotherapy or bone marrow transplantation (BMT) as the final course, with respect to remission duration, relapse rate, disease free mortality, and overall survival in these patients.
- Compare allogeneic or autologous BMT vs conventional chemotherapy with respect to remission duration, relapse rate, disease free mortality, and overall survival in these patients.
- Evaluate the prognostic significance of blood and bone marrow morphology, cytogenetics, molecular genetics, and immunophenotype assessed at diagnosis, at second randomization, and at relapse.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized study. Patients are stratified by center, age (15-29 vs 30-39 vs 40-49 vs 50-59), performance status, and disease status (de novo vs secondary). Patients who are eligible for the second randomization are also stratified by first randomization treatment (arm I vs II) and prognostic risk group (good vs standard).
Original first randomization (closed as of 11/1998): Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 induction treatment arms.
- Arm I: During course 1, patients receive cytarabine IV every 12 hours on days 1-10, daunorubicin IV on days 1, 3, and 5, and etoposide IV over 1 hour on days 1-5. Patients are further randomized to receive either filgrastim (G- CSF) or placebo subcutaneously (SQ) beginning on day 18 and continuing until 2 days after blood counts have recovered (G-CSF randomization closed as of 8/15/2000). During course 2, patients receive daunorubicin and etoposide as in course 1 and cytarabine IV every 12 hours on days 1-8, but no G-CSF or placebo unless peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) are harvested.
- Arm II: During course 1, patients receive mitoxantrone IV on days 1, 3, and 5 and cytarabine, etoposide, and G-CSF or placebo as in course 1 of arm I. During course 2, patients receive mitoxantrone and etoposide as in course 1 of arm II, cytarabine as in course 2 of arm I, but no G-CSF or placebo unless PBSC are harvested.
Patients who have poor prognostic risk after course 1 or fail to achieve complete remission (CR) after course 2 are taken off this study and should be entered in the MRC refractory/relapse study. Patients who achieve CR after course 1 proceed to the harvest phase after completion of course 2. Patients who achieve CR after course 2 proceed to the postinduction chemotherapy phase. New first randomization (opened as of 12/1998): Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 induction treatment arms.
- Arm I: During course 1, patients receive daunorubicin IV on days 1, 3, and 5 and lower dose cytarabine IV every 12 hours and thioguanine IV every 12 hours on days 1-10. During course 2, patients receive treatment as in course 1, but with cytarabine and thioguanine on days 1-8.
- Arm II: During courses 1 and 2, patients receive treatment as in arm I, but with higher dose cytarabine.
Both arms may be further randomized to receive no tretinoin or tretinoin for 60 days. Acute prophylactic subgroups are not randomized and all receive tretinoin.
- Postinduction chemotherapy: Patients receive amsacrine IV over 1 hour, cytarabine IV continuously, and etoposide IV over 1 hour on days 1-5.
- Harvest: Patients who have an HLA matched sibling donor undergo allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT), otherwise autologous BMT is planned. PBSC may also be harvested. Patients who undergo harvest of PBSC also receive G-CSF on days 18-30 of induction and days 13-25 of postinduction.
- Second randomization: Patients are randomized to 1 of 4 consolidation treatment groups. Good risk patients are randomized to arm II or IV. Standard risk patients for whom BMT is considered inappropriate are randomized to arm II or IV and those for whom BMT is considered appropriate are randomized to arm I or III. Patients for whom 4 total courses of therapy are preferred are randomized to arm I or II and those for whom 5 total courses of therapy are preferred are randomized to arm III or IV.
- Arm I: Six to eight weeks following completion of induction, patients receive a fourth course of therapy comprised of cyclophosphamide IV over 1 hour for 2 days, followed 24 hours later by total body irradiation (TBI) for 4 days, and followed 24 hours later by reinfusion of bone marrow. Patients receive cranial irradiation daily for 3-5 days prior to TBI.
- Arm II: Patients receive a fourth course comprised of mitoxantrone IV on days 1-5 and cytarabine IV over 2 hours every 12 hours on days 1-3.
- Arm III: Patients receive a fourth course comprised of idarubicin IV on days 1 and 2, cytarabine as in arm II, and etoposide IV over 1 hour on days 1-3 and then a fifth course comprised of cranial irradiation, TBI, and BMT as in arm I.
- Arm IV: Patients receive a 4th course comprised of idarubicin, cytarabine, and etoposide as in arm III and then a 5th course comprised of mitoxantrone and cytarabine as in arm II.
- PBSC support: Optional PBSC are reinfused after completion of course 4 (arm I or II) or course 5 (arm III or IV) beginning no sooner than 24 hours after completion of BMT.
- CNS therapy: Patients receive cytarabine intrathecally at the time of diagnostic lumbar puncture, then 3 days a week until cerebral spinal fluid clears, and then every 2 weeks until completion of consolidation.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A minimum of 2,000 patients will be accrued for this study over 5 years.
- Conditions
- Leukemia, Neutropenia
- Being tested
- filgrastim, amsacrine, cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, daunorubicin hydrochloride
- Keywords
- untreated adult acute myeloid leukemia, adult acute erythroid leukemia (M6), adult acute myeloblastic leukemia without maturation (M1), adult acute myeloblastic leukemia with maturation (M2), adult acute promyelocytic leukemia (M3), adult acute myelomonocytic leukemia (M4), adult acute monoblastic leukemia (M5a), adult acute megakaryoblastic leukemia (M7), secondary acute myeloid leukemia, adult acute monocytic leukemia (M5b), neutropenia, adult acute minimally differentiated myeloid leukemia (M0)
- Medical subject headings
- Leukemia, Neutropenia, Leukemia, Erythroblastic, Acute, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, Leukemia, Promyelocytic, Acute, Leukemia, Myelomonocytic, Acute, Leukemia, Monocytic, Acute, Leukemia, Megakaryoblastic, Acute
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
filgrastimBiological
amsacrineDrug
cyclophosphamideDrug
cytarabineDrug
daunorubicin hydrochlorideDrug
etoposideDrug
idarubicinDrug
mitoxantrone hydrochlorideDrug
thioguanineDrug
tretinoinDrug
allogeneic bone marrow transplantationProcedure or surgery
autologous bone marrow transplantationProcedure or surgery
peripheral blood stem cell transplantationProcedure or surgery
radiation therapyRadiation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Apr 2003 (estimated)
- Study startJan 1994
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for LeukemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Enrolment
- 2,000 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medical Research Council
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Investigators
- Alan K. Burnett, MD, FRCP, Study chair, University Hospital of Wales
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00002658
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CDR0000064208
- Other IDs
- MRC-LEUK-AML12, EU-95001
- Status last verified
- Oct 2002
- First submitted
- 1 Nov 1999
- Last updated
- 19 Dec 2013
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Grimwade D, Hills RK, Moorman AV, Walker H, Chatters S, Goldstone AH, Wheatley K, Harrison CJ, Burnett AK; National Cancer Research Institute Adult Leukaemia Working Group. Refinement of cytogenetic classification in acute myeloid leukemia: determination of prognostic significance of rare recurring chromosomal abnormalities among 5876 younger adult patients treated in the United Kingdom Medical Research Council trials. Blood. 2010 Jul 22;116(3):354-65. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-11-254441. Epub 2010 Apr 12.
PubMed 20385793Wheatley K, Goldstone AH, Littlewood T, Hunter A, Burnett AK. Randomized placebo-controlled trial of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) as supportive care after induction chemotherapy in adult patients with acute myeloid leukaemia: a study of the United Kingdom Medical Research Council Adult Leukaemia Working Party. Br J Haematol. 2009 Jun;146(1):54-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07710.x. Epub 2009 May 4.
PubMed 19438472Rao A, Hills RK, Stiller C, Gibson BE, de Graaf SS, Hann IM, O'Marcaigh A, Wheatley K, Webb DK. Treatment for myeloid leukaemia of Down syndrome: population-based experience in the UK and results from the Medical Research Council AML 10 and AML 12 trials. Br J Haematol. 2006 Mar;132(5):576-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05906.x.
PubMed 16445830Gale RE, Hills R, Kottaridis PD, Srirangan S, Wheatley K, Burnett AK, Linch DC. No evidence that FLT3 status should be considered as an indicator for transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia (AML): an analysis of 1135 patients, excluding acute promyelocytic leukemia, from the UK MRC AML10 and 12 trials. Blood. 2005 Nov 15;106(10):3658-65. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-03-1323. Epub 2005 Aug 2.
PubMed 16076872Peniket A, Wainscoat J, Side L, Daly S, Kusec R, Buck G, Wheatley K, Walker H, Chatters S, Harrison C, Boultwood J, Goldstone A, Burnett A. Del (9q) AML: clinical and cytological characteristics and prognostic implications. Br J Haematol. 2005 Apr;129(2):210-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05445.x.
PubMed 15813849Burnett AK, Milligan D, Hills RK, et al.: Does all-transretinoic acid (ATRA) have a role in non-APL acute myeloid leukaemia? Results from 1666 patients in three MRC trials. [Abstract] Blood 104 (11): A-1794, 2004.
Wheatley K, Clayton D. Be skeptical about unexpected large apparent treatment effects: the case of an MRC AML12 randomization. Control Clin Trials. 2003 Feb;24(1):66-70. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(02)00273-8.
PubMed 12559643Kottaridis PD, Gale RE, Frew ME, Harrison G, Langabeer SE, Belton AA, Walker H, Wheatley K, Bowen DT, Burnett AK, Goldstone AH, Linch DC. The presence of a FLT3 internal tandem duplication in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) adds important prognostic information to cytogenetic risk group and response to the first cycle of chemotherapy: analysis of 854 patients from the United Kingdom Medical Research Council AML 10 and 12 trials. Blood. 2001 Sep 15;98(6):1752-9. doi: 10.1182/blood.v98.6.1752.
PubMed 11535508Webb DK, Harrison G, Stevens RF, Gibson BG, Hann IM, Wheatley K; MRC Childhood Leukemia Working Party. Relationships between age at diagnosis, clinical features, and outcome of therapy in children treated in the Medical Research Council AML 10 and 12 trials for acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2001 Sep 15;98(6):1714-20. doi: 10.1182/blood.v98.6.1714.
PubMed 11535502Burnett AK, Hills RK, Milligan DW, Goldstone AH, Prentice AG, McMullin MF, Duncombe A, Gibson B, Wheatley K. Attempts to optimize induction and consolidation treatment in acute myeloid leukemia: results of the MRC AML12 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Feb 1;28(4):586-95. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.9088. Epub 2009 Dec 28.
PubMed 20038732
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Dec 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- ACUTE MYELOID LEUKAEMIA TRIAL 12
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00002658
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CDR0000064208
- Conditions
- Leukemia, Neutropenia
- Keywords
- untreated adult acute myeloid leukemia, adult acute erythroid leukemia (M6), adult acute myeloblastic leukemia without maturation (M1), adult acute myeloblastic leukemia with maturation (M2), adult acute promyelocytic leukemia (M3), adult acute myelomonocytic leukemia (M4), adult acute monoblastic leukemia (M5a), adult acute megakaryoblastic leukemia (M7)
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 2,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Medical Research CouncilOther government
- Study start
- Jan 1994
- First posted
- 10 Apr 2003 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Biological therapies use different ways to stimulate the immune system and stop cancer cells from growing. Combining chemotherapy with bone marrow transplantation may allow the doctor to give higher doses of chemotherapy drugs and kill more cancer cells.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of different treatment regimens in treating patients who have acute myeloid leukemia.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- Compare the remission rate, duration of remission, survival, toxicity, and supportive care requirements associated with induction chemotherapy with cytarabine, daunorubicin, and etoposide vs mitoxantrone, cytarabine, and etoposide in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.
- Assess filgrastim (G-CSF) support in the recovery phase after the first induction course with respect to remission rate, reasons for failure, hematologic regeneration, febrile incidents, supportive care requirements, and overall survival in these patients.
- Compare 4 vs 5 courses of total treatment, with either chemotherapy or bone marrow transplantation (BMT) as the final course, with respect to remission duration, relapse rate, disease free mortality, and overall survival in these patients.
- Compare allogeneic or autologous BMT vs conventional chemotherapy with respect to remission duration, relapse rate, disease free mortality, and overall survival in these patients.
- Evaluate the prognostic significance of blood and bone marrow morphology, cytogenetics, molecular genetics, and immunophenotype assessed at diagnosis, at second randomization, and at relapse.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized study. Patients are stratified by center, age (15-29 vs 30-39 vs 40-49 vs 50-59), performance status, and disease status (de novo vs secondary). Patients who are eligible for the second randomization are also stratified by first randomization treatment (arm I vs II) and prognostic risk group (good vs standard).
Original first randomization (closed as of 11/1998): Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 induction treatment arms.
- Arm I: During course 1, patients receive cytarabine IV every 12 hours on days 1-10, daunorubicin IV on days 1, 3, and 5, and etoposide IV over 1 hour on days 1-5. Patients are further randomized to receive either filgrastim (G- CSF) or placebo subcutaneously (SQ) beginning on day 18 and continuing until 2 days after blood counts have recovered (G-CSF randomization closed as of 8/15/2000). During course 2, patients receive daunorubicin and etoposide as in course 1 and cytarabine IV every 12 hours on days 1-8, but no G-CSF or placebo unless peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) are harvested.
- Arm II: During course 1, patients receive mitoxantrone IV on days 1, 3, and 5 and cytarabine, etoposide, and G-CSF or placebo as in course 1 of arm I. During course 2, patients receive mitoxantrone and etoposide as in course 1 of arm II, cytarabine as in course 2 of arm I, but no G-CSF or placebo unless PBSC are harvested.
Patients who have poor prognostic risk after course 1 or fail to achieve complete remission (CR) after course 2 are taken off this study and should be entered in the MRC refractory/relapse study. Patients who achieve CR after course 1 proceed to the harvest phase after completion of course 2. Patients who achieve CR after course 2 proceed to the postinduction chemotherapy phase. New first randomization (opened as of 12/1998): Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 induction treatment arms.
- Arm I: During course 1, patients receive daunorubicin IV on days 1, 3, and 5 and lower dose cytarabine IV every 12 hours and thioguanine IV every 12 hours on days 1-10. During course 2, patients receive treatment as in course 1, but with cytarabine and thioguanine on days 1-8.
- Arm II: During courses 1 and 2, patients receive treatment as in arm I, but with higher dose cytarabine.
Both arms may be further randomized to receive no tretinoin or tretinoin for 60 days. Acute prophylactic subgroups are not randomized and all receive tretinoin.
- Postinduction chemotherapy: Patients receive amsacrine IV over 1 hour, cytarabine IV continuously, and etoposide IV over 1 hour on days 1-5.
- Harvest: Patients who have an HLA matched sibling donor undergo allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT), otherwise autologous BMT is planned. PBSC may also be harvested. Patients who undergo harvest of PBSC also receive G-CSF on days 18-30 of induction and days 13-25 of postinduction.
- Second randomization: Patients are randomized to 1 of 4 consolidation treatment groups. Good risk patients are randomized to arm II or IV. Standard risk patients for whom BMT is considered inappropriate are randomized to arm II or IV and those for whom BMT is considered appropriate are randomized to arm I or III. Patients for whom 4 total courses of therapy are preferred are randomized to arm I or II and those for whom 5 total courses of therapy are preferred are randomized to arm III or IV.
- Arm I: Six to eight weeks following completion of induction, patients receive a fourth course of therapy comprised of cyclophosphamide IV over 1 hour for 2 days, followed 24 hours later by total body irradiation (TBI) for 4 days, and followed 24 hours later by reinfusion of bone marrow. Patients receive cranial irradiation daily for 3-5 days prior to TBI.
- Arm II: Patients receive a fourth course comprised of mitoxantrone IV on days 1-5 and cytarabine IV over 2 hours every 12 hours on days 1-3.
- Arm III: Patients receive a fourth course comprised of idarubicin IV on days 1 and 2, cytarabine as in arm II, and etoposide IV over 1 hour on days 1-3 and then a fifth course comprised of cranial irradiation, TBI, and BMT as in arm I.
- Arm IV: Patients receive a 4th course comprised of idarubicin, cytarabine, and etoposide as in arm III and then a 5th course comprised of mitoxantrone and cytarabine as in arm II.
- PBSC support: Optional PBSC are reinfused after completion of course 4 (arm I or II) or course 5 (arm III or IV) beginning no sooner than 24 hours after completion of BMT.
- CNS therapy: Patients receive cytarabine intrathecally at the time of diagnostic lumbar puncture, then 3 days a week until cerebral spinal fluid clears, and then every 2 weeks until completion of consolidation.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A minimum of 2,000 patients will be accrued for this study over 5 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 15 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| filgrastim | Biological | – |
| amsacrine | Drug | – |
| cyclophosphamide | Drug | – |
| cytarabine | Drug | – |
| daunorubicin hydrochloride | Drug | – |
| etoposide | Drug | – |
| idarubicin | Drug | – |
| mitoxantrone hydrochloride | Drug | – |
| thioguanine | Drug | – |
| tretinoin | Drug | – |
| allogeneic bone marrow transplantation | Procedure or surgery | – |
| autologous bone marrow transplantation | Procedure or surgery | – |
| peripheral blood stem cell transplantation | Procedure or surgery | – |
| radiation therapy | Radiation | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Dec 2013.
- Background: PubMed 20385793Grimwade D, Hills RK, Moorman AV, Walker H, Chatters S, Goldstone AH, Wheatley K, Harrison CJ, Burnett AK; National Cancer Research Institute Adult Leukaemia Working Group. Refinement of cytogenetic classification in acute myeloid leukemia: determination of prognostic significance of rare recurring chromosomal abnormalities among 5876 younger adult patients treated in the United Kingdom Medical Research Council trials. Blood. 2010 Jul 22;116(3):354-65. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-11-254441. Epub 2010 Apr 12.
- Background: PubMed 19438472Wheatley K, Goldstone AH, Littlewood T, Hunter A, Burnett AK. Randomized placebo-controlled trial of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) as supportive care after induction chemotherapy in adult patients with acute myeloid leukaemia: a study of the United Kingdom Medical Research Council Adult Leukaemia Working Party. Br J Haematol. 2009 Jun;146(1):54-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07710.x. Epub 2009 May 4.
- Background: PubMed 16445830Rao A, Hills RK, Stiller C, Gibson BE, de Graaf SS, Hann IM, O'Marcaigh A, Wheatley K, Webb DK. Treatment for myeloid leukaemia of Down syndrome: population-based experience in the UK and results from the Medical Research Council AML 10 and AML 12 trials. Br J Haematol. 2006 Mar;132(5):576-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05906.x.
- Background: PubMed 16076872Gale RE, Hills R, Kottaridis PD, Srirangan S, Wheatley K, Burnett AK, Linch DC. No evidence that FLT3 status should be considered as an indicator for transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia (AML): an analysis of 1135 patients, excluding acute promyelocytic leukemia, from the UK MRC AML10 and 12 trials. Blood. 2005 Nov 15;106(10):3658-65. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-03-1323. Epub 2005 Aug 2.
- Background: PubMed 15813849Peniket A, Wainscoat J, Side L, Daly S, Kusec R, Buck G, Wheatley K, Walker H, Chatters S, Harrison C, Boultwood J, Goldstone A, Burnett A. Del (9q) AML: clinical and cytological characteristics and prognostic implications. Br J Haematol. 2005 Apr;129(2):210-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05445.x.
- BackgroundBurnett AK, Milligan D, Hills RK, et al.: Does all-transretinoic acid (ATRA) have a role in non-APL acute myeloid leukaemia? Results from 1666 patients in three MRC trials. [Abstract] Blood 104 (11): A-1794, 2004.
- Background: PubMed 12559643Wheatley K, Clayton D. Be skeptical about unexpected large apparent treatment effects: the case of an MRC AML12 randomization. Control Clin Trials. 2003 Feb;24(1):66-70. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(02)00273-8.
- Background: PubMed 11535508Kottaridis PD, Gale RE, Frew ME, Harrison G, Langabeer SE, Belton AA, Walker H, Wheatley K, Bowen DT, Burnett AK, Goldstone AH, Linch DC. The presence of a FLT3 internal tandem duplication in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) adds important prognostic information to cytogenetic risk group and response to the first cycle of chemotherapy: analysis of 854 patients from the United Kingdom Medical Research Council AML 10 and 12 trials. Blood. 2001 Sep 15;98(6):1752-9. doi: 10.1182/blood.v98.6.1752.
- Background: PubMed 11535502Webb DK, Harrison G, Stevens RF, Gibson BG, Hann IM, Wheatley K; MRC Childhood Leukemia Working Party. Relationships between age at diagnosis, clinical features, and outcome of therapy in children treated in the Medical Research Council AML 10 and 12 trials for acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2001 Sep 15;98(6):1714-20. doi: 10.1182/blood.v98.6.1714.
- Results publication: PubMed 20038732Burnett AK, Hills RK, Milligan DW, Goldstone AH, Prentice AG, McMullin MF, Duncombe A, Gibson B, Wheatley K. Attempts to optimize induction and consolidation treatment in acute myeloid leukemia: results of the MRC AML12 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Feb 1;28(4):586-95. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.9088. Epub 2009 Dec 28.
Related trials for Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of CHM-029 in Participants With NPM1 Mutated, KMT2A or NUP98 Rearranged AML
AML (Acute Myeloid Leukemia)
RecruitingPhase 1
Vididencel in CML-CP Patients With MRD
CML (Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia)
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing New Therapies for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Newly Diagnosed and Have Not Yet Started Treatment (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alan K. Burnett, MD, FRCP study chair
University Hospital of Wales
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing filgrastim, amsacrine and cyclophosphamide in people with Leukemia and Neutropenia, run by Medical Research Council at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Dec 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00002658, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Dec 2013.