LeukemiaPhase 3NCT00002744
Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Children With Newly Diagnosed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
A Phase 3 study testing asparaginase, cyclophosphamide and cytarabine in people with Leukemia, run by Children's Oncology Group at 34 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug and giving them in different ways may kill more cancer cells. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 year to 9 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Leukemia
- What is being tested?
- asparaginase, cyclophosphamide and cytarabine
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,970 participants
- Where
- 34 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- May 1996to Mar 2007
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 year to 9 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) obtained by bone marrow aspirate or bone marrow biopsy No greater than 25% L3 blasts Initial white blood cell count less than 50,000/mm3 (performed at CCG institution) Massive lymphadenopathy, massive splenomegaly, and/or large mediastinal mass allowed CNS or testicular leukemia allowed Allogeneic bone marrow transplant should be considered (if donor available) for patients with Philadelphia chromosome (t[9;22][q34;q11]) or translocation (4;11)(q21;q23)
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: 1 through 9 Performance status: Not specified Hematopoietic: See Disease Characteristics Hepatic: Not specified Renal: Not specified
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: No prior treatment for ALL Biologic therapy: Not specified Chemotherapy: Intrathecal cytarabine (IT ARA-C) may begin prior to registration provided systemic chemotherapy initiated within 72 hours after IT ARA-C Endocrine therapy: See Radiotherapy At least 1 month since prior systemic steroids Steroids given for less than 48 hours allowed Inhaled corticosteroids allowed at any time Radiotherapy: Radiotherapy or dexamethasone for mediastinal mass causing superior mediastinal syndrome allowed prior to registration, if indicated Surgery: Not specified
Trial locations and contacts
34 sites in 3 countries.
34 sites in 3 countries
United States31 sites
University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-0752
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, UNC
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599-7295
University of Chicago Cancer Research Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
Children's Hospital Medical Center - Cincinnati
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229-3039
Ireland Cancer Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106-5065
Children's Hospital of Columbus
Columbus, Ohio, 43205-2696
Children's Hospital of Denver
Denver, Colorado, 80218
University of Texas - MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030
Indiana University Cancer Center
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202-5265
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242
Children's Mercy Hospital - Kansas City
Kansas City, Missouri, 64108
Long Beach Memorial Medical Center
Long Beach, California, 90806
Children's Hospital Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, 90027-0700
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCLA
Los Angeles, California, 90095-1781
University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792
University of Minnesota Cancer Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455
Vanderbilt Cancer Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232-6838
Kaplan Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10016
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10021
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10032
University of Nebraska Medical Center
Omaha, Nebraska, 68198-3330
Children's Hospital of Orange County
Orange, California, 92668
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
Doernbecher Children's Hospital
Portland, Oregon, 97201-3098
Mayo Clinic Cancer Center
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
Huntsman Cancer Institute
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132
UCSF Cancer Center and Cancer Research Institute
San Francisco, California, 94115-0128
Children's Hospital and Medical Center - Seattle
Seattle, Washington, 98105
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Seattle, Washington, 98109
Children's National Medical Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010-2970
Canada2 sites
IWK Grace Health Centre
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3J 3G9
British Columbia Children's Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6H 3V4
Australia1 site
Princess Margaret Hospital for Children
Perth, Western Australia, 6001
About this study
Official title: Randomized Comparisons of Oral Mercaptopurine vs Oral Thioguanine and IT Methotrexate vs ITT for Standard Risk Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug and giving them in different ways may kill more cancer cells. It is not yet known which regimen of combination chemotherapy is more effective for acute lymphoblastic leukemia
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare different regimens of combination chemotherapy in treating children who have newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES: I. Identify response related factors predictive of relapse among children with previously untreated standard risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). II. Determine the prognostic significance of residual leukemic blasts at specific times during induction therapy: M3 marrow status (greater than 25% blasts) at day 7; M2 status (5%-25% blasts) at day 14; and residual circulating leukemic blasts at days 7 and 14. III. Determine the prognostic significance of residual leukemic burden, as measured by fluorescence activated cell sorting/leukemic progenitor cell assay, on marrow aspirates acquired at the end of induction therapy, at the beginning of maintenance therapy, and at the completion of all therapy in patients with B precursor ALL. IV. Determine the prognostic significance of residual t(1;19) detected in marrow aspirates by PCR-based analyses of the fusion transcript E2A-PBX1 at the end of induction therapy, at the beginning of maintenance therapy, and at the completion of all therapy. V. Examine the interrelationships among these response-related prognostic factors and their correlation with ploidy, karyotype, and immunophenotype. VI. Determine, in a randomized study, whether substitution of oral thioguanine (TG) for oral mercaptopurine (MP) during consolidation, interim maintenance, and maintenance therapy improves event-free survival for patients with standard-risk ALL. VII. Study and compare the cellular pharmacokinetics of oral MP and oral TG during interim maintenance and maintenance therapy in selected patients. VIII. Compare the concentrations of MP and TG red blood cell metabolites (i.e., nucleotides, nucleosides, free bases, and methylated metabolites) during interim maintenance and maintenance therapy, and determine whether low levels of metabolites predict relapse in selected patients. IX. Determine the activities of thiopurine methyltransferase and hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyl transferase several times during interim maintenance and maintenance treatment, and compare the activities between the two thiopurine treatment groups in selected patients. X. Compare the incidence of central nervous system (CNS) relapse and event-free survival in patients receiving intrathecal methotrexate (MTX) vs. triple intrathecal chemotherapy (MTX/cytarabine/hydrocortisone) for presymptomatic CNS treatment. XI. Determine whether cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT) positivity predicts for CNS or marrow relapse by measuring TdT activity on CSF cytospins in cases with low white blood cell count (less than 5 cells per cubic millimeter) and suspected or questionable "blasts" during maintenance therapy. XII. Determine event-free survival in patients with standard-risk ALL and M3 marrow at day 14 when treated with intensive therapy designed for higher-risk ALL.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized study. Patients are stratified according to participating institution. The following acronyms are used: ARA-C Cytarabine, NSC-63878 ASP Asparaginase (E. coli), NSC-109229 CTX Cyclophosphamide, NSC-26271 DM Dexamethasone, NSC-34521 DNR Daunorubicin, NSC-82151 DOX Doxorubicin, NSC-123127 HC Hydrocortisone, NSC-10483 MP Mercaptopurine, NSC-755 MTX Methotrexate, NSC-740 PEG-ASP Pegaspargase, NSC-624239 PRED Prednisone, NSC-10023 TG Thioguanine, NSC-752 TIT Triple Intrathecal Therapy (IT MTX/IT ARA-C/IT HC) VCR Vincristine, NSC-67574 Induction: All patients receive oral PRED on days 0-27, VCR IV on days 0, 7, 14, and 21, and ASP IM 3 times a week for 3 weeks beginning on day 2-4. ARA-C IT is administered on day 0, and MTX IT is administered on days 7 and 28 (days 7, 14, 21, and 28 if CNS disease at diagnosis). Following Induction, patients who achieve remission are randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatment arms. Arm I: Consolidation (begins day 28 of Induction): PRED is tapered from Induction over 10 days. Patients receive VCR IV on day 0, oral MP on days 1-27, and MTX IT on days 7, 14, and 21 (only day 7 if CNS disease at diagnosis). Interim Maintenance 1 (begins day 28 of Consolidation): Patients receive oral PRED on days 0-4 and 28-32, VCR IV days 0 and 28, oral MTX on days 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, and 49, and oral MP on days 0-49. Delayed Intensification 1 (begins day 56 of Interim Maintenance 1): Patients receive oral DM on days 0-6 and 14-20, VCR IV on days 0, 7, and 14, DOX IV over 15-120 min on days 0, 7, and 14, ASP IM twice a week for 2 weeks beginning day 2-4, CTX IV over 20-30 min on day 28, oral TG on days 28-41, ARA-C IV or SC on days 29-32 and 36-39, and MTX IT on days 0, 28, and 35. Interim Maintenance 2 (begins day 56 of Delayed Intensification 1): Patients receive PRED/VCR/MTX/MP as in Interim Maintenance 1. Delayed Intensification 2 (begins day 56 of Interim Maintenance 2): Patients receive DM/VCR/DOX/ASP, CTX/TG/ARA-C, and MTX IT as in Delayed Intensification 1. Maintenance (begins day 56 of Delayed Intensification 2): Patients receive oral PRED on days 0-4, 28-32, and 56-60, VCR IV on days 0, 28, and 56, oral MP on days 0-83, oral MTX on days 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, 56, 63, 70, and 77 (omitted during wk of IT therapy), and MTX IT on day 0. Treatment continues every 84 days for 2 years (girls) or 3 years (boys) from the beginning of Interim Maintenance 1. Arm II: Patients receive treatment as in arm I, except TIT is TIT substituted for MTX IT. Arm III: Patients receive treatment as in arm I with oral TG substituted for oral MTX in Consolidation, Interim Maintenance 1 and 2, and Maintenance. If secondary veno-occlusive disease occurs, MP is substituted for TG during Maintenance. Arm IV: Patients receive treatment as in arm III with TIT substituted for MTX IT. If secondary veno-occlusive disease occurs, MP is substituted for TG during Maintenance. Patients with M3 marrow after 2 weeks or M2 marrow after 4 weeks of Induction, or with Philadelphia chromosome (t[9;22][q34;q11]), t(4;11)(q21;q23), or hypodiploidy, proceed to the following more intensive treatment regimen for further therapy: Induction (begins day 14 to day 19 of initial Induction): Patients receive oral PRED on days 14-27, VCR IV on days 14 and 21 (day 14 dose omitted if day 14 dose from original Induction already given), DNR IV continuously on days 14-16 (48 hours total), ASP IM three times a week for 9 total doses (including those received on original Induction), MTX IT on days 28 and 35 (days 21, 28, and 35 if CNS disease at diagnosis). Patients with M1/M2 bone marrow after day 35 proceed to Consolidation. Consolidation (begins day 28 or 35 of Induction in this regimen, depending on timing of entry on this regimen): PRED is tapered from Induction over 10 days. Patients receive CTX IV 20-30 minutes on days 0 and 28, oral MP on days 0-13 and 28-41, ARA-C IV or SC on days 1-4, 8-11, 29-32, and 36-39, VCR IV on days 14, 21, 42, and 49, PEG-ASP IM on days 14 and 42, and MTX IT on days 7, 14, and 21 (only day 7 if CNS disease at diagnosis). Patients with M1 or M2 marrow and no extramedullary leukemia after day 63 proceed to Interim Maintenance 1. Interim Maintenance 1 (begins day 63 of Consolidation): Patients receive VCR IV on days 0, 10, 20, 30, and 40, MTX IV on days 0, 10, 20, 30, and 40, and PEG-ASP IM on days 1 and 21. Patients with M1 bone marrow after day 56 proceed to Delayed Intensification I. Delayed Intensification 1 (begins day 56 of Interim Maintenance 1): Patients receive oral DM on days 0-6 and 14-20, VCR IV on days 0, 7, 14, 42, and 49, DOX IV over 15-120 minutes on days 0, 7, and 14, PEG-ASP IM on days 3 and 42, CTX IV over 20-30 minutes on day 28, oral TG on days 28-41, ARA-C IV or SC on days 29-32 and 36-39, and MTX IT on days 28 and 35. Interim Maintenance 2 (begins day 56 of Delayed Intensification 1): Patients receive VCR/MTX/PEG-ASP as in Interim Maintenance 1, and MTX IT on days 0, 20, and 40. Delayed Intensification 2 (begins day 56 of Interim Maintenance 2): Patients receive DM/VCR/DOX/PEG-ASP, CTX/TG/ARA-C, and MTX IT as in Delayed Intensification 1. Maintenance (begins day 56 of Delayed Intensification 2): Patients receive PRED/VCR/MP/MTX, and MTX IT as in arm I Maintenance. Patients with CNS or testicular involvement at diagnosis receive appropriate radiotherapy concurrent with Consolidation. Radiotherapy begins within 4 days of initiation of Consolidation. Craniospinal irradiation is given 5 days a week. Testicular irradiation is given to both testes 5 days a week over 2-3 weeks. Patients are followed every 6-8 weeks during year 1, every 3 months during year 2, every 6 months during year 3, and then annually thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 1970 patients will be accrued for this study within 3.5 years.
- Conditions
- Leukemia
- Being tested
- asparaginase, cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, daunorubicin hydrochloride, dexamethasone
- Keywords
- untreated childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia, L1 childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia, L2 childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia
- Medical subject headings
- Leukemia, Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
asparaginaseDrug
Also called L-Asparaginase - Erwinia, NSC-106977
cyclophosphamideDrug
Also called Cytoxan, NSC-26271.
cytarabineDrug
Also called Cytosine Arabinoside, Ara-C, Cytosar-U
daunorubicin hydrochlorideDrug
Also called NSC-82151
dexamethasoneDrug
Also called Decadron, NSC-34521
Also called Adriamycin, NSC-123127
mercaptopurineDrug
Also called 6-MP, Purinethol
methotrexateDrug
Also called NSC-740
pegaspargaseDrug
Also called PEG Asparaginase, Oncaspar®
prednisoneDrug
Also called NSC-10023
therapeutic hydrocortisoneDrug
thioguanineDrug
Also called 6-TG, NSC-752
Also called Oncovin, NSC-67574
low-LET cobalt-60 gamma ray therapyRadiation
low-LET photon therapyRadiation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm I | Experimental | Therapy defined in description. Receives: Drug: asparaginase; Drug: cyclophosphamide; Drug: cytarabine; Drug: daunorubicin hydrochloride; Drug: dexamethasone; Drug: doxorubicin hydrochloride; Drug: mercaptopurine; Drug: methotrexate; Drug: pegaspargase; Drug: prednisone; Drug: therapeutic hydrocortisone; Drug: thioguanine; Drug: vincristine sulfate; Radiation: low-LET cobalt-60 gamma ray therapy; Radiation: low-LET photon therapy |
| Arm 2 | Experimental | Therapy defined in description. Receives: Drug: asparaginase; Drug: cyclophosphamide; Drug: cytarabine; Drug: daunorubicin hydrochloride; Drug: dexamethasone; Drug: doxorubicin hydrochloride; Drug: mercaptopurine; Drug: methotrexate; Drug: pegaspargase; Drug: prednisone; Drug: therapeutic hydrocortisone; Drug: thioguanine; Drug: vincristine sulfate; Radiation: low-LET cobalt-60 gamma ray therapy; Radiation: low-LET photon therapy |
| Arm 3 | Experimental | Therapy defined in description. Receives: Drug: asparaginase; Drug: cyclophosphamide; Drug: cytarabine; Drug: daunorubicin hydrochloride; Drug: dexamethasone; Drug: doxorubicin hydrochloride; Drug: mercaptopurine; Drug: methotrexate; Drug: pegaspargase; Drug: prednisone; Drug: therapeutic hydrocortisone; Drug: thioguanine; Drug: vincristine sulfate; Radiation: low-LET cobalt-60 gamma ray therapy; Radiation: low-LET photon therapy |
| Arm 4 | Experimental | Therapy defined in description. Receives: Drug: asparaginase; Drug: cyclophosphamide; Drug: cytarabine; Drug: daunorubicin hydrochloride; Drug: dexamethasone; Drug: doxorubicin hydrochloride; Drug: mercaptopurine; Drug: methotrexate; Drug: pegaspargase; Drug: prednisone; Drug: therapeutic hydrocortisone; Drug: thioguanine; Drug: vincristine sulfate; Radiation: low-LET cobalt-60 gamma ray therapy; Radiation: low-LET photon therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Event Free Survival
Primary outcome index used in examining the randomized treatment groups will be event-free survival (EFS) from the time of randomization (i.e., end of Induction), where the life table events will consist of the first occurrence of leukemic relapse at any site, death, or occurrence of a second malignancy.
Secondary outcomes (1)
Comparisons of CNS relapse incidence rates
Comparisons of CNS relapse incidence rates for the IT MTX versus ITT groups is also planned as an important endpoint.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Sep 2004 (estimated)
- Study startMay 1996
- Primary completionMar 2007
- Study completionMar 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for LeukemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Children's Oncology GroupThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Single blind
- Enrolment
- 1,970 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Children's Oncology Group
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Linda C. Stork, MD, Study chair, Doernbecher Children's Hospital at Oregon Health and Science University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00002744
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1952
- Other IDs
- CCG-1952, CDR0000064665
- Status last verified
- Jul 2014
- First submitted
- 1 Nov 1999
- Last updated
- 9 Feb 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Nguyen K, Devidas M, Cheng SC, La M, Raetz EA, Carroll WL, Winick NJ, Hunger SP, Gaynon PS, Loh ML; Children's Oncology Group. Factors influencing survival after relapse from acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Children's Oncology Group study. Leukemia. 2008 Dec;22(12):2142-50. doi: 10.1038/leu.2008.251. Epub 2008 Sep 25.
PubMed 18818707Matloub Y, Asselin BL, Stork LC, et al.: Outcome of children with T-Cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) and standard risk (SR) features: results of CCG-1952, CCG-1991 and POG 9404. [Abstract] Blood 104 (11): A-680, 195a, 2004.
Stork LC, Matloub Y, Broxson E, La M, Yanofsky R, Sather H, Hutchinson R, Heerema NA, Sorrell AD, Masterson M, Bleyer A, Gaynon PS. Oral 6-mercaptopurine versus oral 6-thioguanine and veno-occlusive disease in children with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: report of the Children's Oncology Group CCG-1952 clinical trial. Blood. 2010 Apr 8;115(14):2740-8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-07-230656. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
PubMed 20124218Kadan-Lottick NS, Brouwers P, Breiger D, Kaleita T, Dziura J, Northrup V, Chen L, Nicoletti M, Bostrom B, Stork L, Neglia JP. Comparison of neurocognitive functioning in children previously randomly assigned to intrathecal methotrexate compared with triple intrathecal therapy for the treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Dec 10;27(35):5986-92. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.5408. Epub 2009 Nov 2.
PubMed 19884541Malempati S, Gaynon PS, Sather H, La MK, Stork LC; Children's Oncology Group. Outcome after relapse among children with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Children's Oncology Group study CCG-1952. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Dec 20;25(36):5800-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.10.7508.
PubMed 18089878Matloub Y, Lindemulder S, Gaynon PS, Sather H, La M, Broxson E, Yanofsky R, Hutchinson R, Heerema NA, Nachman J, Blake M, Wells LM, Sorrell AD, Masterson M, Kelleher JF, Stork LC; Children's Oncology Group. Intrathecal triple therapy decreases central nervous system relapse but fails to improve event-free survival when compared with intrathecal methotrexate: results of the Children's Cancer Group (CCG) 1952 study for standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia, reported by the Children's Oncology Group. Blood. 2006 Aug 15;108(4):1165-73. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-12-011809. Epub 2006 Apr 11.
PubMed 16609069Bassal M, La MK, Whitlock JA, Sather HN, Heerema NA, Gaynon PS, Stork LC. Lymphoblast biology and outcome among children with Down syndrome and ALL treated on CCG-1952. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2005 Jan;44(1):21-8. doi: 10.1002/pbc.20193.
PubMed 15368546Malempati S, Gaynon PS, Sather H, et al.: Outcome after relapse among children with standard risk (SR) ALL treated on CCG-1952. [Abstract] Blood 104 (11): A-520, 2004.
Stork LC, Sather H, Hutchinson RJ, et al.: Comparison of mercaptopurine (MP) with thioguanine (TG) and IT methotrexate (ITM) with IT "triples" (ITT) in children with SR-ALL: results of CCG-1952. [Abstract] Blood 100 (11 Pt 1): A-585, 156a, 2002.
Stork LC, Sather H, Yanofsky R, et al.: Hyperdiploidy with trisomy 10 and TEL-AML1 expression among children with standard risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (SR-ALL): a CCG-1952 report. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 20: A-1476, 2001.
Gaynon PS, Stork L, Sather H, et al.: Leukemic progenitor cell content of pre- and post-induction chemotherapy bone marrow specimens from children with newly diagnosed or relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 18: A-2187, 567a, 1999.
Stork LC, Erdmann G, Adamson P, et al.: Oral 6-thioguanine causes relatively mild and reversible hepatic veno-occlusive disease(VOD). J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 20: 400a, 1998.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Feb 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Comparisons of Oral Mercaptopurine vs Oral Thioguanine and IT Methotrexate vs ITT for Standard Risk Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00002744
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1952
- Conditions
- Leukemia
- Keywords
- untreated childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia, L1 childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia, L2 childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,970 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Children's Oncology GroupResearch network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Study start
- May 1996
- Primary completion
- Mar 2007 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Sep 2004 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug and giving them in different ways may kill more cancer cells. It is not yet known which regimen of combination chemotherapy is more effective for acute lymphoblastic leukemia
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare different regimens of combination chemotherapy in treating children who have newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES: I. Identify response related factors predictive of relapse among children with previously untreated standard risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). II. Determine the prognostic significance of residual leukemic blasts at specific times during induction therapy: M3 marrow status (greater than 25% blasts) at day 7; M2 status (5%-25% blasts) at day 14; and residual circulating leukemic blasts at days 7 and 14. III. Determine the prognostic significance of residual leukemic burden, as measured by fluorescence activated cell sorting/leukemic progenitor cell assay, on marrow aspirates acquired at the end of induction therapy, at the beginning of maintenance therapy, and at the completion of all therapy in patients with B precursor ALL. IV. Determine the prognostic significance of residual t(1;19) detected in marrow aspirates by PCR-based analyses of the fusion transcript E2A-PBX1 at the end of induction therapy, at the beginning of maintenance therapy, and at the completion of all therapy. V. Examine the interrelationships among these response-related prognostic factors and their correlation with ploidy, karyotype, and immunophenotype. VI. Determine, in a randomized study, whether substitution of oral thioguanine (TG) for oral mercaptopurine (MP) during consolidation, interim maintenance, and maintenance therapy improves event-free survival for patients with standard-risk ALL. VII. Study and compare the cellular pharmacokinetics of oral MP and oral TG during interim maintenance and maintenance therapy in selected patients. VIII. Compare the concentrations of MP and TG red blood cell metabolites (i.e., nucleotides, nucleosides, free bases, and methylated metabolites) during interim maintenance and maintenance therapy, and determine whether low levels of metabolites predict relapse in selected patients. IX. Determine the activities of thiopurine methyltransferase and hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyl transferase several times during interim maintenance and maintenance treatment, and compare the activities between the two thiopurine treatment groups in selected patients. X. Compare the incidence of central nervous system (CNS) relapse and event-free survival in patients receiving intrathecal methotrexate (MTX) vs. triple intrathecal chemotherapy (MTX/cytarabine/hydrocortisone) for presymptomatic CNS treatment. XI. Determine whether cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT) positivity predicts for CNS or marrow relapse by measuring TdT activity on CSF cytospins in cases with low white blood cell count (less than 5 cells per cubic millimeter) and suspected or questionable "blasts" during maintenance therapy. XII. Determine event-free survival in patients with standard-risk ALL and M3 marrow at day 14 when treated with intensive therapy designed for higher-risk ALL.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized study. Patients are stratified according to participating institution. The following acronyms are used: ARA-C Cytarabine, NSC-63878 ASP Asparaginase (E. coli), NSC-109229 CTX Cyclophosphamide, NSC-26271 DM Dexamethasone, NSC-34521 DNR Daunorubicin, NSC-82151 DOX Doxorubicin, NSC-123127 HC Hydrocortisone, NSC-10483 MP Mercaptopurine, NSC-755 MTX Methotrexate, NSC-740 PEG-ASP Pegaspargase, NSC-624239 PRED Prednisone, NSC-10023 TG Thioguanine, NSC-752 TIT Triple Intrathecal Therapy (IT MTX/IT ARA-C/IT HC) VCR Vincristine, NSC-67574 Induction: All patients receive oral PRED on days 0-27, VCR IV on days 0, 7, 14, and 21, and ASP IM 3 times a week for 3 weeks beginning on day 2-4. ARA-C IT is administered on day 0, and MTX IT is administered on days 7 and 28 (days 7, 14, 21, and 28 if CNS disease at diagnosis). Following Induction, patients who achieve remission are randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatment arms. Arm I: Consolidation (begins day 28 of Induction): PRED is tapered from Induction over 10 days. Patients receive VCR IV on day 0, oral MP on days 1-27, and MTX IT on days 7, 14, and 21 (only day 7 if CNS disease at diagnosis). Interim Maintenance 1 (begins day 28 of Consolidation): Patients receive oral PRED on days 0-4 and 28-32, VCR IV days 0 and 28, oral MTX on days 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, and 49, and oral MP on days 0-49. Delayed Intensification 1 (begins day 56 of Interim Maintenance 1): Patients receive oral DM on days 0-6 and 14-20, VCR IV on days 0, 7, and 14, DOX IV over 15-120 min on days 0, 7, and 14, ASP IM twice a week for 2 weeks beginning day 2-4, CTX IV over 20-30 min on day 28, oral TG on days 28-41, ARA-C IV or SC on days 29-32 and 36-39, and MTX IT on days 0, 28, and 35. Interim Maintenance 2 (begins day 56 of Delayed Intensification 1): Patients receive PRED/VCR/MTX/MP as in Interim Maintenance 1. Delayed Intensification 2 (begins day 56 of Interim Maintenance 2): Patients receive DM/VCR/DOX/ASP, CTX/TG/ARA-C, and MTX IT as in Delayed Intensification 1. Maintenance (begins day 56 of Delayed Intensification 2): Patients receive oral PRED on days 0-4, 28-32, and 56-60, VCR IV on days 0, 28, and 56, oral MP on days 0-83, oral MTX on days 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, 56, 63, 70, and 77 (omitted during wk of IT therapy), and MTX IT on day 0. Treatment continues every 84 days for 2 years (girls) or 3 years (boys) from the beginning of Interim Maintenance 1. Arm II: Patients receive treatment as in arm I, except TIT is TIT substituted for MTX IT. Arm III: Patients receive treatment as in arm I with oral TG substituted for oral MTX in Consolidation, Interim Maintenance 1 and 2, and Maintenance. If secondary veno-occlusive disease occurs, MP is substituted for TG during Maintenance. Arm IV: Patients receive treatment as in arm III with TIT substituted for MTX IT. If secondary veno-occlusive disease occurs, MP is substituted for TG during Maintenance. Patients with M3 marrow after 2 weeks or M2 marrow after 4 weeks of Induction, or with Philadelphia chromosome (t[9;22][q34;q11]), t(4;11)(q21;q23), or hypodiploidy, proceed to the following more intensive treatment regimen for further therapy: Induction (begins day 14 to day 19 of initial Induction): Patients receive oral PRED on days 14-27, VCR IV on days 14 and 21 (day 14 dose omitted if day 14 dose from original Induction already given), DNR IV continuously on days 14-16 (48 hours total), ASP IM three times a week for 9 total doses (including those received on original Induction), MTX IT on days 28 and 35 (days 21, 28, and 35 if CNS disease at diagnosis). Patients with M1/M2 bone marrow after day 35 proceed to Consolidation. Consolidation (begins day 28 or 35 of Induction in this regimen, depending on timing of entry on this regimen): PRED is tapered from Induction over 10 days. Patients receive CTX IV 20-30 minutes on days 0 and 28, oral MP on days 0-13 and 28-41, ARA-C IV or SC on days 1-4, 8-11, 29-32, and 36-39, VCR IV on days 14, 21, 42, and 49, PEG-ASP IM on days 14 and 42, and MTX IT on days 7, 14, and 21 (only day 7 if CNS disease at diagnosis). Patients with M1 or M2 marrow and no extramedullary leukemia after day 63 proceed to Interim Maintenance 1. Interim Maintenance 1 (begins day 63 of Consolidation): Patients receive VCR IV on days 0, 10, 20, 30, and 40, MTX IV on days 0, 10, 20, 30, and 40, and PEG-ASP IM on days 1 and 21. Patients with M1 bone marrow after day 56 proceed to Delayed Intensification I. Delayed Intensification 1 (begins day 56 of Interim Maintenance 1): Patients receive oral DM on days 0-6 and 14-20, VCR IV on days 0, 7, 14, 42, and 49, DOX IV over 15-120 minutes on days 0, 7, and 14, PEG-ASP IM on days 3 and 42, CTX IV over 20-30 minutes on day 28, oral TG on days 28-41, ARA-C IV or SC on days 29-32 and 36-39, and MTX IT on days 28 and 35. Interim Maintenance 2 (begins day 56 of Delayed Intensification 1): Patients receive VCR/MTX/PEG-ASP as in Interim Maintenance 1, and MTX IT on days 0, 20, and 40. Delayed Intensification 2 (begins day 56 of Interim Maintenance 2): Patients receive DM/VCR/DOX/PEG-ASP, CTX/TG/ARA-C, and MTX IT as in Delayed Intensification 1. Maintenance (begins day 56 of Delayed Intensification 2): Patients receive PRED/VCR/MP/MTX, and MTX IT as in arm I Maintenance. Patients with CNS or testicular involvement at diagnosis receive appropriate radiotherapy concurrent with Consolidation. Radiotherapy begins within 4 days of initiation of Consolidation. Craniospinal irradiation is given 5 days a week. Testicular irradiation is given to both testes 5 days a week over 2-3 weeks. Patients are followed every 6-8 weeks during year 1, every 3 months during year 2, every 6 months during year 3, and then annually thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 1970 patients will be accrued for this study within 3.5 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Single blind
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm I | Experimental | Drug: asparaginase, Drug: cyclophosphamide, Drug: cytarabine, Drug: daunorubicin hydrochloride, Drug: dexamethasone, Drug: doxorubicin hydrochloride, Drug: mercaptopurine, Drug: methotrexate, Drug: pegaspargase, Drug: prednisone, Drug: therapeutic hydrocortisone, Drug: thioguanine, Drug: vincristine sulfate, Radiation: low-LET cobalt-60 gamma ray therapy, Radiation: low-LET photon therapyTherapy defined in description. |
| Arm 2 | Experimental | Drug: asparaginase, Drug: cyclophosphamide, Drug: cytarabine, Drug: daunorubicin hydrochloride, Drug: dexamethasone, Drug: doxorubicin hydrochloride, Drug: mercaptopurine, Drug: methotrexate, Drug: pegaspargase, Drug: prednisone, Drug: therapeutic hydrocortisone, Drug: thioguanine, Drug: vincristine sulfate, Radiation: low-LET cobalt-60 gamma ray therapy, Radiation: low-LET photon therapyTherapy defined in description. |
| Arm 3 | Experimental | Drug: asparaginase, Drug: cyclophosphamide, Drug: cytarabine, Drug: daunorubicin hydrochloride, Drug: dexamethasone, Drug: doxorubicin hydrochloride, Drug: mercaptopurine, Drug: methotrexate, Drug: pegaspargase, Drug: prednisone, Drug: therapeutic hydrocortisone, Drug: thioguanine, Drug: vincristine sulfate, Radiation: low-LET cobalt-60 gamma ray therapy, Radiation: low-LET photon therapyTherapy defined in description. |
| Arm 4 | Experimental | Drug: asparaginase, Drug: cyclophosphamide, Drug: cytarabine, Drug: daunorubicin hydrochloride, Drug: dexamethasone, Drug: doxorubicin hydrochloride, Drug: mercaptopurine, Drug: methotrexate, Drug: pegaspargase, Drug: prednisone, Drug: therapeutic hydrocortisone, Drug: thioguanine, Drug: vincristine sulfate, Radiation: low-LET cobalt-60 gamma ray therapy, Radiation: low-LET photon therapyTherapy defined in description. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 year to 9 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| asparaginaseAlso: L-Asparaginase - Erwinia, NSC-106977 | Drug | Arm 2, Arm 3, Arm 4, Arm I |
| cyclophosphamideAlso: Cytoxan, NSC-26271. | Drug | Arm 2, Arm 3, Arm 4, Arm I |
| cytarabineAlso: Cytosine Arabinoside, Ara-C, Cytosar-U | Drug | Arm 2, Arm 3, Arm 4, Arm I |
| daunorubicin hydrochlorideAlso: NSC-82151 | Drug | Arm 2, Arm 3, Arm 4, Arm I |
| dexamethasoneAlso: Decadron, NSC-34521 | Drug | Arm 2, Arm 3, Arm 4, Arm I |
| doxorubicin hydrochlorideAlso: Adriamycin, NSC-123127 | Drug | Arm 2, Arm 3, Arm 4, Arm I |
| mercaptopurineAlso: 6-MP, Purinethol | Drug | Arm 2, Arm 3, Arm 4, Arm I |
| methotrexateAlso: NSC-740 | Drug | Arm 2, Arm 3, Arm 4, Arm I |
| pegaspargaseAlso: PEG Asparaginase, Oncaspar® | Drug | Arm 2, Arm 3, Arm 4, Arm I |
| prednisoneAlso: NSC-10023 | Drug | Arm 2, Arm 3, Arm 4, Arm I |
| therapeutic hydrocortisone | Drug | Arm 2, Arm 3, Arm 4, Arm I |
| thioguanineAlso: 6-TG, NSC-752 | Drug | Arm 2, Arm 3, Arm 4, Arm I |
| vincristine sulfateAlso: Oncovin, NSC-67574 | Drug | Arm 2, Arm 3, Arm 4, Arm I |
| low-LET cobalt-60 gamma ray therapy | Radiation | Arm 2, Arm 3, Arm 4, Arm I |
| low-LET photon therapy | Radiation | Arm 2, Arm 3, Arm 4, Arm I |
Primary outcome
Event Free Survival
Primary outcome index used in examining the randomized treatment groups will be event-free survival (EFS) from the time of randomization (i.e., end of Induction), where the life table events will consist of the first occurrence of leukemic relapse at any site, death, or occurrence of a second malignancy.
1 secondary outcome
Comparisons of CNS relapse incidence rates
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Feb 2017.
- Background: PubMed 18818707Nguyen K, Devidas M, Cheng SC, La M, Raetz EA, Carroll WL, Winick NJ, Hunger SP, Gaynon PS, Loh ML; Children's Oncology Group. Factors influencing survival after relapse from acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Children's Oncology Group study. Leukemia. 2008 Dec;22(12):2142-50. doi: 10.1038/leu.2008.251. Epub 2008 Sep 25.
- BackgroundMatloub Y, Asselin BL, Stork LC, et al.: Outcome of children with T-Cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) and standard risk (SR) features: results of CCG-1952, CCG-1991 and POG 9404. [Abstract] Blood 104 (11): A-680, 195a, 2004.
- Results publication: PubMed 20124218Stork LC, Matloub Y, Broxson E, La M, Yanofsky R, Sather H, Hutchinson R, Heerema NA, Sorrell AD, Masterson M, Bleyer A, Gaynon PS. Oral 6-mercaptopurine versus oral 6-thioguanine and veno-occlusive disease in children with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: report of the Children's Oncology Group CCG-1952 clinical trial. Blood. 2010 Apr 8;115(14):2740-8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-07-230656. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
- Results publication: PubMed 19884541Kadan-Lottick NS, Brouwers P, Breiger D, Kaleita T, Dziura J, Northrup V, Chen L, Nicoletti M, Bostrom B, Stork L, Neglia JP. Comparison of neurocognitive functioning in children previously randomly assigned to intrathecal methotrexate compared with triple intrathecal therapy for the treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Dec 10;27(35):5986-92. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.5408. Epub 2009 Nov 2.
- Results publication: PubMed 18089878Malempati S, Gaynon PS, Sather H, La MK, Stork LC; Children's Oncology Group. Outcome after relapse among children with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Children's Oncology Group study CCG-1952. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Dec 20;25(36):5800-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.10.7508.
- Results publication: PubMed 16609069Matloub Y, Lindemulder S, Gaynon PS, Sather H, La M, Broxson E, Yanofsky R, Hutchinson R, Heerema NA, Nachman J, Blake M, Wells LM, Sorrell AD, Masterson M, Kelleher JF, Stork LC; Children's Oncology Group. Intrathecal triple therapy decreases central nervous system relapse but fails to improve event-free survival when compared with intrathecal methotrexate: results of the Children's Cancer Group (CCG) 1952 study for standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia, reported by the Children's Oncology Group. Blood. 2006 Aug 15;108(4):1165-73. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-12-011809. Epub 2006 Apr 11.
- Results publication: PubMed 15368546Bassal M, La MK, Whitlock JA, Sather HN, Heerema NA, Gaynon PS, Stork LC. Lymphoblast biology and outcome among children with Down syndrome and ALL treated on CCG-1952. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2005 Jan;44(1):21-8. doi: 10.1002/pbc.20193.
- Results publicationMalempati S, Gaynon PS, Sather H, et al.: Outcome after relapse among children with standard risk (SR) ALL treated on CCG-1952. [Abstract] Blood 104 (11): A-520, 2004.
- Results publicationStork LC, Sather H, Hutchinson RJ, et al.: Comparison of mercaptopurine (MP) with thioguanine (TG) and IT methotrexate (ITM) with IT "triples" (ITT) in children with SR-ALL: results of CCG-1952. [Abstract] Blood 100 (11 Pt 1): A-585, 156a, 2002.
- Results publicationStork LC, Sather H, Yanofsky R, et al.: Hyperdiploidy with trisomy 10 and TEL-AML1 expression among children with standard risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (SR-ALL): a CCG-1952 report. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 20: A-1476, 2001.
- Results publicationGaynon PS, Stork L, Sather H, et al.: Leukemic progenitor cell content of pre- and post-induction chemotherapy bone marrow specimens from children with newly diagnosed or relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 18: A-2187, 567a, 1999.
- Results publicationStork LC, Erdmann G, Adamson P, et al.: Oral 6-thioguanine causes relatively mild and reversible hepatic veno-occlusive disease(VOD). J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 20: 400a, 1998.
Related trials for Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of CHM-029 in Participants With NPM1 Mutated, KMT2A or NUP98 Rearranged AML
AML (Acute Myeloid Leukemia)
RecruitingPhase 1
Vididencel in CML-CP Patients With MRD
CML (Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia)
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing New Therapies for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Newly Diagnosed and Have Not Yet Started Treatment (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Linda C. Stork, MD study chair
Doernbecher Children's Hospital at Oregon Health and Science University
34 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing asparaginase, cyclophosphamide and cytarabine in people with Leukemia, run by Children's Oncology Group at 34 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Feb 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 34 sites in United States, Canada, Australia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Event Free Survival. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00002744, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Feb 2017.