AzTrials
AzTrials

LeukemiaPhase 3NCT00002744

Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Children With Newly Diagnosed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

A Phase 3 study testing asparaginase, cyclophosphamide and cytarabine in people with Leukemia, run by Children's Oncology Group at 34 sites in 3 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug and giving them in different ways may kill more cancer cells. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 1 year to 9 years
Conditions the study is for
Leukemia
What is being tested?
asparaginase, cyclophosphamide and cytarabine
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,970 participants
Where
34 sitesin 3 countries
Study dates
May 1996to Mar 2007
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 1 year to 9 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) obtained by bone marrow aspirate or bone marrow biopsy No greater than 25% L3 blasts Initial white blood cell count less than 50,000/mm3 (performed at CCG institution) Massive lymphadenopathy, massive splenomegaly, and/or large mediastinal mass allowed CNS or testicular leukemia allowed Allogeneic bone marrow transplant should be considered (if donor available) for patients with Philadelphia chromosome (t[9;22][q34;q11]) or translocation (4;11)(q21;q23)

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: 1 through 9 Performance status: Not specified Hematopoietic: See Disease Characteristics Hepatic: Not specified Renal: Not specified

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: No prior treatment for ALL Biologic therapy: Not specified Chemotherapy: Intrathecal cytarabine (IT ARA-C) may begin prior to registration provided systemic chemotherapy initiated within 72 hours after IT ARA-C Endocrine therapy: See Radiotherapy At least 1 month since prior systemic steroids Steroids given for less than 48 hours allowed Inhaled corticosteroids allowed at any time Radiotherapy: Radiotherapy or dexamethasone for mediastinal mass causing superior mediastinal syndrome allowed prior to registration, if indicated Surgery: Not specified

Trial locations and contacts

34 sites in 3 countries.

34 sites in 3 countries

United States31 sites
  • University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-0752

  • Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, UNC

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599-7295

  • University of Chicago Cancer Research Center

    Chicago, Illinois, 60637

  • Children's Hospital Medical Center - Cincinnati

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229-3039

  • Ireland Cancer Center

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44106-5065

  • Children's Hospital of Columbus

    Columbus, Ohio, 43205-2696

  • Children's Hospital of Denver

    Denver, Colorado, 80218

  • University of Texas - MD Anderson Cancer Center

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • Indiana University Cancer Center

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202-5265

  • University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics

    Iowa City, Iowa, 52242

  • Children's Mercy Hospital - Kansas City

    Kansas City, Missouri, 64108

  • Long Beach Memorial Medical Center

    Long Beach, California, 90806

  • Children's Hospital Los Angeles

    Los Angeles, California, 90027-0700

  • Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCLA

    Los Angeles, California, 90095-1781

  • University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center

    Madison, Wisconsin, 53792

  • University of Minnesota Cancer Center

    Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455

  • Vanderbilt Cancer Center

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37232-6838

  • Kaplan Cancer Center

    New York, New York, 10016

  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

    New York, New York, 10021

  • Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center

    New York, New York, 10032

  • University of Nebraska Medical Center

    Omaha, Nebraska, 68198-3330

  • Children's Hospital of Orange County

    Orange, California, 92668

  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

  • Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213

  • Doernbecher Children's Hospital

    Portland, Oregon, 97201-3098

  • Mayo Clinic Cancer Center

    Rochester, Minnesota, 55905

  • Huntsman Cancer Institute

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132

  • UCSF Cancer Center and Cancer Research Institute

    San Francisco, California, 94115-0128

  • Children's Hospital and Medical Center - Seattle

    Seattle, Washington, 98105

  • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

    Seattle, Washington, 98109

  • Children's National Medical Center

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010-2970

Other trials in United States

Canada2 sites
  • IWK Grace Health Centre

    Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3J 3G9

  • British Columbia Children's Hospital

    Vancouver, British Columbia, V6H 3V4

Other trials in Canada

Australia1 site
  • Princess Margaret Hospital for Children

    Perth, Western Australia, 6001

Other trials in Australia

About this study

Official title: Randomized Comparisons of Oral Mercaptopurine vs Oral Thioguanine and IT Methotrexate vs ITT for Standard Risk Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug and giving them in different ways may kill more cancer cells. It is not yet known which regimen of combination chemotherapy is more effective for acute lymphoblastic leukemia

PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare different regimens of combination chemotherapy in treating children who have newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Read the detailed description

OBJECTIVES: I. Identify response related factors predictive of relapse among children with previously untreated standard risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). II. Determine the prognostic significance of residual leukemic blasts at specific times during induction therapy: M3 marrow status (greater than 25% blasts) at day 7; M2 status (5%-25% blasts) at day 14; and residual circulating leukemic blasts at days 7 and 14. III. Determine the prognostic significance of residual leukemic burden, as measured by fluorescence activated cell sorting/leukemic progenitor cell assay, on marrow aspirates acquired at the end of induction therapy, at the beginning of maintenance therapy, and at the completion of all therapy in patients with B precursor ALL. IV. Determine the prognostic significance of residual t(1;19) detected in marrow aspirates by PCR-based analyses of the fusion transcript E2A-PBX1 at the end of induction therapy, at the beginning of maintenance therapy, and at the completion of all therapy. V. Examine the interrelationships among these response-related prognostic factors and their correlation with ploidy, karyotype, and immunophenotype. VI. Determine, in a randomized study, whether substitution of oral thioguanine (TG) for oral mercaptopurine (MP) during consolidation, interim maintenance, and maintenance therapy improves event-free survival for patients with standard-risk ALL. VII. Study and compare the cellular pharmacokinetics of oral MP and oral TG during interim maintenance and maintenance therapy in selected patients. VIII. Compare the concentrations of MP and TG red blood cell metabolites (i.e., nucleotides, nucleosides, free bases, and methylated metabolites) during interim maintenance and maintenance therapy, and determine whether low levels of metabolites predict relapse in selected patients. IX. Determine the activities of thiopurine methyltransferase and hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyl transferase several times during interim maintenance and maintenance treatment, and compare the activities between the two thiopurine treatment groups in selected patients. X. Compare the incidence of central nervous system (CNS) relapse and event-free survival in patients receiving intrathecal methotrexate (MTX) vs. triple intrathecal chemotherapy (MTX/cytarabine/hydrocortisone) for presymptomatic CNS treatment. XI. Determine whether cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT) positivity predicts for CNS or marrow relapse by measuring TdT activity on CSF cytospins in cases with low white blood cell count (less than 5 cells per cubic millimeter) and suspected or questionable "blasts" during maintenance therapy. XII. Determine event-free survival in patients with standard-risk ALL and M3 marrow at day 14 when treated with intensive therapy designed for higher-risk ALL.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized study. Patients are stratified according to participating institution. The following acronyms are used: ARA-C Cytarabine, NSC-63878 ASP Asparaginase (E. coli), NSC-109229 CTX Cyclophosphamide, NSC-26271 DM Dexamethasone, NSC-34521 DNR Daunorubicin, NSC-82151 DOX Doxorubicin, NSC-123127 HC Hydrocortisone, NSC-10483 MP Mercaptopurine, NSC-755 MTX Methotrexate, NSC-740 PEG-ASP Pegaspargase, NSC-624239 PRED Prednisone, NSC-10023 TG Thioguanine, NSC-752 TIT Triple Intrathecal Therapy (IT MTX/IT ARA-C/IT HC) VCR Vincristine, NSC-67574 Induction: All patients receive oral PRED on days 0-27, VCR IV on days 0, 7, 14, and 21, and ASP IM 3 times a week for 3 weeks beginning on day 2-4. ARA-C IT is administered on day 0, and MTX IT is administered on days 7 and 28 (days 7, 14, 21, and 28 if CNS disease at diagnosis). Following Induction, patients who achieve remission are randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatment arms. Arm I: Consolidation (begins day 28 of Induction): PRED is tapered from Induction over 10 days. Patients receive VCR IV on day 0, oral MP on days 1-27, and MTX IT on days 7, 14, and 21 (only day 7 if CNS disease at diagnosis). Interim Maintenance 1 (begins day 28 of Consolidation): Patients receive oral PRED on days 0-4 and 28-32, VCR IV days 0 and 28, oral MTX on days 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, and 49, and oral MP on days 0-49. Delayed Intensification 1 (begins day 56 of Interim Maintenance 1): Patients receive oral DM on days 0-6 and 14-20, VCR IV on days 0, 7, and 14, DOX IV over 15-120 min on days 0, 7, and 14, ASP IM twice a week for 2 weeks beginning day 2-4, CTX IV over 20-30 min on day 28, oral TG on days 28-41, ARA-C IV or SC on days 29-32 and 36-39, and MTX IT on days 0, 28, and 35. Interim Maintenance 2 (begins day 56 of Delayed Intensification 1): Patients receive PRED/VCR/MTX/MP as in Interim Maintenance 1. Delayed Intensification 2 (begins day 56 of Interim Maintenance 2): Patients receive DM/VCR/DOX/ASP, CTX/TG/ARA-C, and MTX IT as in Delayed Intensification 1. Maintenance (begins day 56 of Delayed Intensification 2): Patients receive oral PRED on days 0-4, 28-32, and 56-60, VCR IV on days 0, 28, and 56, oral MP on days 0-83, oral MTX on days 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, 56, 63, 70, and 77 (omitted during wk of IT therapy), and MTX IT on day 0. Treatment continues every 84 days for 2 years (girls) or 3 years (boys) from the beginning of Interim Maintenance 1. Arm II: Patients receive treatment as in arm I, except TIT is TIT substituted for MTX IT. Arm III: Patients receive treatment as in arm I with oral TG substituted for oral MTX in Consolidation, Interim Maintenance 1 and 2, and Maintenance. If secondary veno-occlusive disease occurs, MP is substituted for TG during Maintenance. Arm IV: Patients receive treatment as in arm III with TIT substituted for MTX IT. If secondary veno-occlusive disease occurs, MP is substituted for TG during Maintenance. Patients with M3 marrow after 2 weeks or M2 marrow after 4 weeks of Induction, or with Philadelphia chromosome (t[9;22][q34;q11]), t(4;11)(q21;q23), or hypodiploidy, proceed to the following more intensive treatment regimen for further therapy: Induction (begins day 14 to day 19 of initial Induction): Patients receive oral PRED on days 14-27, VCR IV on days 14 and 21 (day 14 dose omitted if day 14 dose from original Induction already given), DNR IV continuously on days 14-16 (48 hours total), ASP IM three times a week for 9 total doses (including those received on original Induction), MTX IT on days 28 and 35 (days 21, 28, and 35 if CNS disease at diagnosis). Patients with M1/M2 bone marrow after day 35 proceed to Consolidation. Consolidation (begins day 28 or 35 of Induction in this regimen, depending on timing of entry on this regimen): PRED is tapered from Induction over 10 days. Patients receive CTX IV 20-30 minutes on days 0 and 28, oral MP on days 0-13 and 28-41, ARA-C IV or SC on days 1-4, 8-11, 29-32, and 36-39, VCR IV on days 14, 21, 42, and 49, PEG-ASP IM on days 14 and 42, and MTX IT on days 7, 14, and 21 (only day 7 if CNS disease at diagnosis). Patients with M1 or M2 marrow and no extramedullary leukemia after day 63 proceed to Interim Maintenance 1. Interim Maintenance 1 (begins day 63 of Consolidation): Patients receive VCR IV on days 0, 10, 20, 30, and 40, MTX IV on days 0, 10, 20, 30, and 40, and PEG-ASP IM on days 1 and 21. Patients with M1 bone marrow after day 56 proceed to Delayed Intensification I. Delayed Intensification 1 (begins day 56 of Interim Maintenance 1): Patients receive oral DM on days 0-6 and 14-20, VCR IV on days 0, 7, 14, 42, and 49, DOX IV over 15-120 minutes on days 0, 7, and 14, PEG-ASP IM on days 3 and 42, CTX IV over 20-30 minutes on day 28, oral TG on days 28-41, ARA-C IV or SC on days 29-32 and 36-39, and MTX IT on days 28 and 35. Interim Maintenance 2 (begins day 56 of Delayed Intensification 1): Patients receive VCR/MTX/PEG-ASP as in Interim Maintenance 1, and MTX IT on days 0, 20, and 40. Delayed Intensification 2 (begins day 56 of Interim Maintenance 2): Patients receive DM/VCR/DOX/PEG-ASP, CTX/TG/ARA-C, and MTX IT as in Delayed Intensification 1. Maintenance (begins day 56 of Delayed Intensification 2): Patients receive PRED/VCR/MP/MTX, and MTX IT as in arm I Maintenance. Patients with CNS or testicular involvement at diagnosis receive appropriate radiotherapy concurrent with Consolidation. Radiotherapy begins within 4 days of initiation of Consolidation. Craniospinal irradiation is given 5 days a week. Testicular irradiation is given to both testes 5 days a week over 2-3 weeks. Patients are followed every 6-8 weeks during year 1, every 3 months during year 2, every 6 months during year 3, and then annually thereafter.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 1970 patients will be accrued for this study within 3.5 years.

Conditions
Leukemia
Being tested
asparaginase, cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, daunorubicin hydrochloride, dexamethasone
Keywords
untreated childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia, L1 childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia, L2 childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Medical subject headings
Leukemia, Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • asparaginaseDrug

    Also called L-Asparaginase - Erwinia, NSC-106977

  • cyclophosphamideDrug

    Also called Cytoxan, NSC-26271.

  • cytarabineDrug

    Also called Cytosine Arabinoside, Ara-C, Cytosar-U

  • daunorubicin hydrochlorideDrug

    Also called NSC-82151

  • dexamethasoneDrug

    Also called Decadron, NSC-34521

  • doxorubicin hydrochlorideDrug

    Also called Adriamycin, NSC-123127

  • mercaptopurineDrug

    Also called 6-MP, Purinethol

  • methotrexateDrug

    Also called NSC-740

  • pegaspargaseDrug

    Also called PEG Asparaginase, Oncaspar®

  • prednisoneDrug

    Also called NSC-10023

  • therapeutic hydrocortisoneDrug

  • thioguanineDrug

    Also called 6-TG, NSC-752

  • vincristine sulfateDrug

    Also called Oncovin, NSC-67574

  • low-LET cobalt-60 gamma ray therapyRadiation

  • low-LET photon therapyRadiation

Study groups in NCT00002744
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm IExperimentalTherapy defined in description.
Receives: Drug: asparaginase; Drug: cyclophosphamide; Drug: cytarabine; Drug: daunorubicin hydrochloride; Drug: dexamethasone; Drug: doxorubicin hydrochloride; Drug: mercaptopurine; Drug: methotrexate; Drug: pegaspargase; Drug: prednisone; Drug: therapeutic hydrocortisone; Drug: thioguanine; Drug: vincristine sulfate; Radiation: low-LET cobalt-60 gamma ray therapy; Radiation: low-LET photon therapy
Arm 2ExperimentalTherapy defined in description.
Receives: Drug: asparaginase; Drug: cyclophosphamide; Drug: cytarabine; Drug: daunorubicin hydrochloride; Drug: dexamethasone; Drug: doxorubicin hydrochloride; Drug: mercaptopurine; Drug: methotrexate; Drug: pegaspargase; Drug: prednisone; Drug: therapeutic hydrocortisone; Drug: thioguanine; Drug: vincristine sulfate; Radiation: low-LET cobalt-60 gamma ray therapy; Radiation: low-LET photon therapy
Arm 3ExperimentalTherapy defined in description.
Receives: Drug: asparaginase; Drug: cyclophosphamide; Drug: cytarabine; Drug: daunorubicin hydrochloride; Drug: dexamethasone; Drug: doxorubicin hydrochloride; Drug: mercaptopurine; Drug: methotrexate; Drug: pegaspargase; Drug: prednisone; Drug: therapeutic hydrocortisone; Drug: thioguanine; Drug: vincristine sulfate; Radiation: low-LET cobalt-60 gamma ray therapy; Radiation: low-LET photon therapy
Arm 4ExperimentalTherapy defined in description.
Receives: Drug: asparaginase; Drug: cyclophosphamide; Drug: cytarabine; Drug: daunorubicin hydrochloride; Drug: dexamethasone; Drug: doxorubicin hydrochloride; Drug: mercaptopurine; Drug: methotrexate; Drug: pegaspargase; Drug: prednisone; Drug: therapeutic hydrocortisone; Drug: thioguanine; Drug: vincristine sulfate; Radiation: low-LET cobalt-60 gamma ray therapy; Radiation: low-LET photon therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Event Free Survival

    Primary outcome index used in examining the randomized treatment groups will be event-free survival (EFS) from the time of randomization (i.e., end of Induction), where the life table events will consist of the first occurrence of leukemic relapse at any site, death, or occurrence of a second malignancy.

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Comparisons of CNS relapse incidence rates

    Comparisons of CNS relapse incidence rates for the IT MTX versus ITT groups is also planned as an important endpoint.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Sep 2004 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 1996
  3. Primary completionMar 2007
  4. Study completionMar 2007

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Single blind
Enrolment
1,970 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00002744
Sponsor's protocol ID
1952
Other IDs
CCG-1952, CDR0000064665
Status last verified
Jul 2014
First submitted
1 Nov 1999
Last updated
9 Feb 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Nguyen K, Devidas M, Cheng SC, La M, Raetz EA, Carroll WL, Winick NJ, Hunger SP, Gaynon PS, Loh ML; Children's Oncology Group. Factors influencing survival after relapse from acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Children's Oncology Group study. Leukemia. 2008 Dec;22(12):2142-50. doi: 10.1038/leu.2008.251. Epub 2008 Sep 25.

    PubMed 18818707
  • Matloub Y, Asselin BL, Stork LC, et al.: Outcome of children with T-Cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) and standard risk (SR) features: results of CCG-1952, CCG-1991 and POG 9404. [Abstract] Blood 104 (11): A-680, 195a, 2004.

  • Stork LC, Matloub Y, Broxson E, La M, Yanofsky R, Sather H, Hutchinson R, Heerema NA, Sorrell AD, Masterson M, Bleyer A, Gaynon PS. Oral 6-mercaptopurine versus oral 6-thioguanine and veno-occlusive disease in children with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: report of the Children's Oncology Group CCG-1952 clinical trial. Blood. 2010 Apr 8;115(14):2740-8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-07-230656. Epub 2010 Feb 1.

    PubMed 20124218
  • Kadan-Lottick NS, Brouwers P, Breiger D, Kaleita T, Dziura J, Northrup V, Chen L, Nicoletti M, Bostrom B, Stork L, Neglia JP. Comparison of neurocognitive functioning in children previously randomly assigned to intrathecal methotrexate compared with triple intrathecal therapy for the treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Dec 10;27(35):5986-92. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.5408. Epub 2009 Nov 2.

    PubMed 19884541
  • Malempati S, Gaynon PS, Sather H, La MK, Stork LC; Children's Oncology Group. Outcome after relapse among children with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Children's Oncology Group study CCG-1952. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Dec 20;25(36):5800-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.10.7508.

    PubMed 18089878
  • Matloub Y, Lindemulder S, Gaynon PS, Sather H, La M, Broxson E, Yanofsky R, Hutchinson R, Heerema NA, Nachman J, Blake M, Wells LM, Sorrell AD, Masterson M, Kelleher JF, Stork LC; Children's Oncology Group. Intrathecal triple therapy decreases central nervous system relapse but fails to improve event-free survival when compared with intrathecal methotrexate: results of the Children's Cancer Group (CCG) 1952 study for standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia, reported by the Children's Oncology Group. Blood. 2006 Aug 15;108(4):1165-73. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-12-011809. Epub 2006 Apr 11.

    PubMed 16609069
  • Bassal M, La MK, Whitlock JA, Sather HN, Heerema NA, Gaynon PS, Stork LC. Lymphoblast biology and outcome among children with Down syndrome and ALL treated on CCG-1952. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2005 Jan;44(1):21-8. doi: 10.1002/pbc.20193.

    PubMed 15368546
  • Malempati S, Gaynon PS, Sather H, et al.: Outcome after relapse among children with standard risk (SR) ALL treated on CCG-1952. [Abstract] Blood 104 (11): A-520, 2004.

  • Stork LC, Sather H, Hutchinson RJ, et al.: Comparison of mercaptopurine (MP) with thioguanine (TG) and IT methotrexate (ITM) with IT "triples" (ITT) in children with SR-ALL: results of CCG-1952. [Abstract] Blood 100 (11 Pt 1): A-585, 156a, 2002.

  • Stork LC, Sather H, Yanofsky R, et al.: Hyperdiploidy with trisomy 10 and TEL-AML1 expression among children with standard risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (SR-ALL): a CCG-1952 report. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 20: A-1476, 2001.

  • Gaynon PS, Stork L, Sather H, et al.: Leukemic progenitor cell content of pre- and post-induction chemotherapy bone marrow specimens from children with newly diagnosed or relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 18: A-2187, 567a, 1999.

  • Stork LC, Erdmann G, Adamson P, et al.: Oral 6-thioguanine causes relatively mild and reversible hepatic veno-occlusive disease(VOD). J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 20: 400a, 1998.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing asparaginase, cyclophosphamide and cytarabine in people with Leukemia, run by Children's Oncology Group at 34 sites in 3 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Feb 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 34 sites in United States, Canada, Australia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Event Free Survival. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00002744, which also lists 12 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Feb 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in