Colorectal CancerPhase 3NCT00002893
Palliative Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing fluorouracil, leucovorin calcium and raltitrexed in people with Colorectal Cancer, run by Medical Research Council at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Palliative chemotherapy may help patients with advanced colorectal cancer live longer and more comfortably. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of and quality of life following three different palliative chemotherapy regimens in treating patients with advanced metastatic or… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Colorectal Cancer
- What is being tested?
- fluorouracil, leucovorin calcium and raltitrexed
- How many people
- 900 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Jun 1995to not given
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum in one of the following categories: Locally advanced, metastatic, or recurrent disease suitable only for palliative chemotherapy Evaluable disease outside prior radiotherapy field Patients with disease confined to the liver are referred to protocol MRC-CR05
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: Not specified Performance status: WHO 0-2 Life expectancy: Greater than 3 months Hematopoietic: WBC at least 4,000 ANC at least 2,000 Platelets at least 100,000 Hepatic: Not specified Renal: Creatinine no greater than 1.25 times normal OR Creatinine clearance greater than 65 mL/min Cardiovascular: No uncontrolled heart failure No uncontrolled angina Other: No uncontrolled medical illness (including infection) Able and willing to complete quality-of-life questionnaires No prior or concurrent malignancy likely to interfere with protocol treatment or evaluation
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: No prior systemic chemotherapy except fluorouracil-based adjuvant regimen (e.g., QUASAR) At least 6 months since chemotherapy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: CHEMOTHERAPY CHOICES IN ADVANCED COLORECTAL CANCER: A RANDOMISED TRIAL COMPARING 2 DURATIONS AND 3 SYSTEMIC CHEMOTHERAPY REGIMENS IN THE PALLIATIVE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED COLORECTAL CANCER
RATIONALE: Palliative chemotherapy may help patients with advanced colorectal cancer live longer and more comfortably.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of and quality of life following three different palliative chemotherapy regimens in treating patients with advanced metastatic or recurrent colorectal cancer.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES: I. Compare the survival and quality of life of patients with metastatic or recurrent colorectal cancer receiving palliative therapy with leucovorin/fluorouracil vs. continuous-infusion fluorouracil vs. ICI D1694. II. Compare the survival and quality of life of patients with stable or responding disease after 12 weeks of initial treatment randomized to receive 12 additional weeks of chemotherapy vs. no further treatment.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized study. Patients are stratified by participating institution. Patients are randomized to one of three treatment regimens. The first group receives leucovorin followed by fluorouracil every 14 days for a total of 6 courses. The second group receives continuous-infusion fluorouracil for 12 weeks. The third group receive ICI D1694 every 21 days for a total of 4 courses. Patients without progressive disease or excessive toxicity after 12 weeks of treatment are then randomized to receive continuing chemotherapy in 12 weekly cycles of their assigned chemotherapy or to proceed to observation with no further therapy, until evidence of disease progression. Patients are followed every 6 weeks.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 900 patients will be entered.
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer
- Being tested
- fluorouracil, leucovorin calcium, raltitrexed
- Keywords
- stage III colon cancer, stage IV colon cancer, stage III rectal cancer, stage IV rectal cancer, recurrent colon cancer, recurrent rectal cancer, adenocarcinoma of the colon, adenocarcinoma of the rectum
- Medical subject headings
- Colorectal Neoplasms, Colonic Neoplasms, Rectal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
fluorouracilDrug
raltitrexedDrug
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 May 2004 (estimated)
- Study startJun 1995
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Colorectal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Enrolment
- 900 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medical Research Council
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Investigators
- Timothy Maughan, MD, Study chair, Velindre NHS Trust
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00002893
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CDR0000065216
- Other IDs
- MRC-CR06, EU-96049
- Status last verified
- May 2007
- First submitted
- 1 Nov 1999
- Last updated
- 19 Dec 2013
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Hale JP, Cohen DR, Maughan TS, Stephens RJ. Costs and consequences of different chemotherapy regimens in metastatic colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2002 Jun 5;86(11):1684-90. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600273.
PubMed 12087450Hale JP, Cohen DR, Maughan TS, et al.: Comparative total societal costs of 3 alternative chemotherapy treatments for patients with advanced colorectal cancer. [Abstract] Br J Cancer 80 (suppl 2): A-P111, 56, 1999.
Maughan TS, James RD, Kerr DJ, Ledermann JA, McArdle C, Seymour MT, Cohen D, Hopwood P, Johnston C, Stephens RJ; British MRC Colorectal Cancer Working Party. Comparison of survival, palliation, and quality of life with three chemotherapy regimens in metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. 2002 May 4;359(9317):1555-63. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)08514-8.
PubMed 12047964Maughan T: Continous versus intermittent chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer: preliminary results of the MRC CR06b randomised trial. [Abstract] Br J Cancer 85 (suppl 1): A-CT1, 1, 2001.
Maughan TS, James RD, Kerr DJ, et al.: Continous vs intermittant chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer: preliminary results of the MRC Cr06b randomised trial. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 20: A-498, 2001.
Maughan TS, James RJ, Kerr DJ, et al.: Continous versus intermittent chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer: preliminary results of the MRC CR06B randomised trial. [Abstract] Eur J Cancer 37 (suppl 6): A-1001, s271, 2001.
Maughan T, James R, Kerr D, et al.: Excess treatment related deaths and impaired quality of life show raltitrexed is inferior to infusional 5FU regimens in the palliative chemotherapy of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC): final analysis of the MRC CR06. [Abstract] Ann Oncol 11 (suppl 4): A-185o, 43, 2000.
Lederman JA, Maughan TS, James RD, et al.: Preliminary results of a multicentre randomised trial comparing 3 chemotherapy regimens (de Gramont, Lokich and Raltitrexed) in metastatic colorectal cancer. [Abstract] Br J Cancer 80 (suppl 2): A-4.10, 20, 1999.
Maughan TS, James RD, Kerr D, et al.: Preliminary results of a multicentre randomised trial comparing three chemotherapy regimens in metastatic colorectal cancer. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 18: A1007, 1999.
Maughan TS, Robbe IJ, Parsons C: Outcomes regarding patient needs in comparing infusional 5FU regimens versus raltitrexed in a MRC multicenter randomised trial of advanced colorectal cancer. [Abstract] Br J Cancer 80 (suppl 2): A-P112, 56, 1999.
Maughan TS, Stephens RJ, Hopwood P, et al.: The value of quality of life outcomes in comparing 3 chemotherapy regimens (de Gramont. Lokich and Raltitrexed) in a multicentre randomised trial of metastatic colorectal cancer. [Abstract] Br J Cancer 80 (suppl 2): A-P113, 57, 1999.
Maughan TS, Stephens RJ, Hopwood T, et al.: The value of quality of life in comparing 3 chemotherapy regimens (de Gramont, Lokich & Raltitrexed) in a multicentre randomised trial of metastatic colorectal cancer. [Abstract] Br J Cancer 80 (suppl 2): A-P113, 57, 1999.
Stephens RJ, Hopwood P, Johnston C, et al.: The value of quality of life (QL) outcomes in comparing 3 chemotherapy regimens (de Gramont, Lokich, and Raltitrexed) in a multicentre randomised trial of metastatic colorectal cancer. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 18: A2220, 1999.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Dec 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- CHEMOTHERAPY CHOICES IN ADVANCED COLORECTAL CANCER: A RANDOMISED TRIAL COMPARING 2 DURATIONS AND 3 SYSTEMIC CHEMOTHERAPY REGIMENS IN THE PALLIATIVE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED COLORECTAL CANCER
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00002893
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CDR0000065216
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer
- Keywords
- stage III colon cancer, stage IV colon cancer, stage III rectal cancer, stage IV rectal cancer, recurrent colon cancer, recurrent rectal cancer, adenocarcinoma of the colon, adenocarcinoma of the rectum
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 900 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Medical Research CouncilOther government
- Study start
- Jun 1995
- First posted
- 13 May 2004 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Palliative chemotherapy may help patients with advanced colorectal cancer live longer and more comfortably.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of and quality of life following three different palliative chemotherapy regimens in treating patients with advanced metastatic or recurrent colorectal cancer.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES: I. Compare the survival and quality of life of patients with metastatic or recurrent colorectal cancer receiving palliative therapy with leucovorin/fluorouracil vs. continuous-infusion fluorouracil vs. ICI D1694. II. Compare the survival and quality of life of patients with stable or responding disease after 12 weeks of initial treatment randomized to receive 12 additional weeks of chemotherapy vs. no further treatment.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized study. Patients are stratified by participating institution. Patients are randomized to one of three treatment regimens. The first group receives leucovorin followed by fluorouracil every 14 days for a total of 6 courses. The second group receives continuous-infusion fluorouracil for 12 weeks. The third group receive ICI D1694 every 21 days for a total of 4 courses. Patients without progressive disease or excessive toxicity after 12 weeks of treatment are then randomized to receive continuing chemotherapy in 12 weekly cycles of their assigned chemotherapy or to proceed to observation with no further therapy, until evidence of disease progression. Patients are followed every 6 weeks.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 900 patients will be entered.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| fluorouracil | Drug | – |
| leucovorin calcium | Drug | – |
| raltitrexed | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Dec 2013.
- Background: PubMed 12087450Hale JP, Cohen DR, Maughan TS, Stephens RJ. Costs and consequences of different chemotherapy regimens in metastatic colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2002 Jun 5;86(11):1684-90. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600273.
- BackgroundHale JP, Cohen DR, Maughan TS, et al.: Comparative total societal costs of 3 alternative chemotherapy treatments for patients with advanced colorectal cancer. [Abstract] Br J Cancer 80 (suppl 2): A-P111, 56, 1999.
- Results publication: PubMed 12047964Maughan TS, James RD, Kerr DJ, Ledermann JA, McArdle C, Seymour MT, Cohen D, Hopwood P, Johnston C, Stephens RJ; British MRC Colorectal Cancer Working Party. Comparison of survival, palliation, and quality of life with three chemotherapy regimens in metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. 2002 May 4;359(9317):1555-63. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)08514-8.
- Results publicationMaughan T: Continous versus intermittent chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer: preliminary results of the MRC CR06b randomised trial. [Abstract] Br J Cancer 85 (suppl 1): A-CT1, 1, 2001.
- Results publicationMaughan TS, James RD, Kerr DJ, et al.: Continous vs intermittant chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer: preliminary results of the MRC Cr06b randomised trial. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 20: A-498, 2001.
- Results publicationMaughan TS, James RJ, Kerr DJ, et al.: Continous versus intermittent chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer: preliminary results of the MRC CR06B randomised trial. [Abstract] Eur J Cancer 37 (suppl 6): A-1001, s271, 2001.
- Results publicationMaughan T, James R, Kerr D, et al.: Excess treatment related deaths and impaired quality of life show raltitrexed is inferior to infusional 5FU regimens in the palliative chemotherapy of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC): final analysis of the MRC CR06. [Abstract] Ann Oncol 11 (suppl 4): A-185o, 43, 2000.
- Results publicationLederman JA, Maughan TS, James RD, et al.: Preliminary results of a multicentre randomised trial comparing 3 chemotherapy regimens (de Gramont, Lokich and Raltitrexed) in metastatic colorectal cancer. [Abstract] Br J Cancer 80 (suppl 2): A-4.10, 20, 1999.
- Results publicationMaughan TS, James RD, Kerr D, et al.: Preliminary results of a multicentre randomised trial comparing three chemotherapy regimens in metastatic colorectal cancer. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 18: A1007, 1999.
- Results publicationMaughan TS, Robbe IJ, Parsons C: Outcomes regarding patient needs in comparing infusional 5FU regimens versus raltitrexed in a MRC multicenter randomised trial of advanced colorectal cancer. [Abstract] Br J Cancer 80 (suppl 2): A-P112, 56, 1999.
- Results publicationMaughan TS, Stephens RJ, Hopwood P, et al.: The value of quality of life outcomes in comparing 3 chemotherapy regimens (de Gramont. Lokich and Raltitrexed) in a multicentre randomised trial of metastatic colorectal cancer. [Abstract] Br J Cancer 80 (suppl 2): A-P113, 57, 1999.
- Results publicationMaughan TS, Stephens RJ, Hopwood T, et al.: The value of quality of life in comparing 3 chemotherapy regimens (de Gramont, Lokich & Raltitrexed) in a multicentre randomised trial of metastatic colorectal cancer. [Abstract] Br J Cancer 80 (suppl 2): A-P113, 57, 1999.
Related trials for Colorectal Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingObservational study
Pre- and On-treatment Multi-omics Profiling of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Rectal Neoplasms
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tislelizumab in People With Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Timothy Maughan, MD study chair
Velindre NHS Trust
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing fluorouracil, leucovorin calcium and raltitrexed in people with Colorectal Cancer, run by Medical Research Council at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Dec 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00002893, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Dec 2013.