Breast CancerPhase 3NCT00003032
High Dose Chemotherapy Plus Peripheral Stem Cell Transplantation Compared With Standard Therapy in Treating Women With Metastatic or Recurrent Breast Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing filgrastim, cisplatin and cyclophosphamide in people with Breast Cancer, run by NCIC Clinical Trials Group at 25 sites in Canada.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining chemotherapy with peripheral stem cell transplantation may allow the doctor to give higher doses of chemotherapy drugs and kill more tumor cells. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 to 60 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- filgrastim, cisplatin and cyclophosphamide
- How many people
- 224 participants
- Where
- 25 sitesCanada
- Study dates
- 25 Apr 1997to 15 Dec 2008
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 to 60 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Histologically or cytologically confirmed breast cancer Metastatic disease and/or axillary node or chest wall recurrence following mastectomy diagnosed at least 3 months since prior adjuvant chemotherapy Radiologic scans required No inflammatory carcinoma of the breast without metastases (i.e. T4d M0) No previously untreated inflammatory carcinoma of the breast (T4d) No recurrent breast cancer diagnosed less than 3 months since prior adjuvant chemotherapy No history or evidence of CNS (brain or leptomeningeal) metastases Hormone receptor status: Not specified
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: 16 to 60 Sex: Female Performance status: ECOG 0-2 Menopausal status: Not specified Life expectancy: Not specified Hematopoietic: Hemoglobin at least 100 g/L Granulocyte count at least 1500/mm3 Platelet count at least 100,000/mm3 Hepatic: AST and/or ALT no greater than 3 times upper limit of normal OR AST and/or ALT no greater than 5 times upper limit of normal, if liver metastases Bilirubin no greater than 1.5 times upper limit of normal Renal: Serum creatinine no greater than 2 times upper limit of normal Cardiovascular: No history of congestive heart failure OR At least 1 year since prior myocardial infarction LVEF at least 45% or normal (ECHO or MUGA are acceptable) Other: No prior or concurrent malignancies allowed, except adequately treated squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin or in situ carcinoma of the cervix, or cancer treated more than 5 years ago and presumed cured Not HIV positive No clinical evidence of AIDS Not pregnant or nursing Effective contraception required of fertile patients No major medical illness precluding safe administration of planned treatment or required follow-up
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: Biologic therapy: No concurrent biologic response modifier therapy Chemotherapy: No prior chemotherapy for metastatic or recurrent breast cancer Induction chemotherapy required Endocrine therapy: Prior hormonal therapy allowed No concurrent hormonal therapy Radiotherapy: Concurrent radiotherapy allowed for pain control or to solitary bone or soft tissue sites Surgery: Prior oophorectomy allowed See Disease Characteristics
Trial locations and contacts
25 sites in 1 country.
25 sites in 1 country
Canada25 sites
William Osler Health Centre
Brampton, Ontario, L6W 2Z8
Tom Baker Cancer Center - Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N2
Queen Elizabeth Hospital, PEI
Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, C1A 8T5
Northeastern Ontario Regional Cancer Centre, Sudbury
Greater Sudbury, Ontario, P3E 5J1
Nova Scotia Cancer Centre
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 1V7
Cancer Care Ontario-Hamilton Regional Cancer Centre
Hamilton, Ontario, L8V 5C2
L'Hotel Dieu de Levis
Lévis, Quebec, G6V 3Z1
Cancer Care Ontario-London Regional Cancer Centre
London, Ontario, N6A 4L6
Moncton Hospital
Moncton, New Brunswick, E1C 6ZB
Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal
Montreal, Quebec, H2L-4M1
McGill University Department of Oncology
Montreal, Quebec, H2W 1S6
Hotel Dieu de Montreal
Montreal, Quebec, H2W 1T8
Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre - General Campus
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 1C4
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Quebec, Pavillion de Quebec
Québec, Quebec, G1R 2J6
Saint John Regional Hospital
Saint John, New Brunswick, E2L 4L2
Hotel Dieu Hospital - St. Catharines
St. Catharines, Ontario, L2R 5K3
Newfoundland Cancer Treatment and Research Foundation
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, A1B 3V6
Northwestern Ontario Regional Cancer Centre, Thunder Bay
Thunder Bay, Ontario, P7A 7T1
Toronto Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5
Toronto General Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4
Princess Margaret Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9
BC Cancer Agency
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 4E6
Humber River Regional Hospital
Weston, Ontario, M9N 1N8
Cancer Care Ontario - Windsor Regional Cancer Centre
Windsor, Ontario, N8W 2X3
CancerCare Manitoba
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 0V9
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Trial of High-Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Stem Cell Therapy Versus Standard Therapy in Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer Who Have Responded to Anthracycline or Taxane-Based Induction Chemotherapy
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining chemotherapy with peripheral stem cell transplantation may allow the doctor to give higher doses of chemotherapy drugs and kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known whether standard therapy is more effective than high dose chemotherapy for breast cancer.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of high dose chemotherapy plus peripheral stem cell transplantation with that of standard therapy in treating women with metastatic or recurrent breast cancer that has responded to previous chemotherapy.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES: I. Compare the overall survival of women with metastatic breast cancer receiving either high dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell therapy or standard therapy following response to anthracycline or taxane based chemotherapy. II. Evaluate the final response rates between the two treatment arms. III. Compare the two treatment arms with respect to toxic effects. IV. Assess health related quality of life in both groups of patients.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter, nonblinded, randomized study. Patients are stratified by type of induction chemotherapy, response status, presence of visceral disease, receptor status and tamoxifen therapy (ER negative; ER positive, no prior tamoxifen; ER positive, failed tamoxifen; receptor status unknown). A quality of life questionnaire is given to each patient before and during treatment, then every 3 months thereafter. Patients are assessed following 4 courses of induction chemotherapy. Those achieving complete remission, partial remission, or who have no evaluable disease are randomized to either treatment arm I or arm II. For treatment arm I, stem cells are mobilized by chemotherapy (courses 5 and 6) plus filgrastim (G-CSF) or with G-CSF alone. Following course 6, patients receive daily doses of IV cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, and carboplatin on days -6 to -3, followed by stem cell infusion on day 0 and G-CSF from day 5. In arm II, patients receive two further courses of standard induction chemotherapy, followed by maintenance chemotherapy at the discretion of the treating physician. All patients with positive receptor status or unknown receptor status who have not previously failed tamoxifen therapy, receive tamoxifen at the completion of post peripheral stem cell transplant (arm I) or induction chemotherapy (arm II). Following hematologic recovery from high dose chemotherapy patients in arm I with limited disease receive consolidated radiation and may also receive surgical treatment for limited disease. In arm II, patients who completed courses 5 and 6 of induction chemotherapy receive involved field radiation at the physician's discretion. Patients from arm II may also receive surgical treatment following protocol therapy at the physician's discretion. Patients are followed every 3 months until death.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: This study will accrue approximately 50 patients per year for a total of 192 patients in 3.8 years.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- filgrastim, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone hydrochloride, tamoxifen citrate
- Keywords
- stage IV breast cancer, recurrent breast cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
filgrastimBiological
cisplatinDrug
cyclophosphamideDrug
mitoxantrone hydrochlorideDrug
tamoxifen citrateDrug
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Apr 2004 (estimated)
- Study start25 Apr 1997
- Primary completion12 Apr 2001
- Study completion15 Dec 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 224 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- NCIC Clinical Trials Group
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Michael R. Crump, MD, FRCPC, Study chair, Princess Margaret Hospital, Canada
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00003032
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MA16
- Other IDs
- CAN-NCIC-MA16, CDR0000065634
- Status last verified
- Mar 2020
- First submitted
- 1 Nov 1999
- Last updated
- 1 Apr 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Crump M, Gluck S, Tu D, Stewart D, Levine M, Kirkbride P, Dancey J, O'Reilly S, Shore T, Couban S, Girouard C, Marlin S, Shepherd L, Pritchard KI. Randomized trial of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous peripheral-blood stem-cell support compared with standard-dose chemotherapy in women with metastatic breast cancer: NCIC MA.16. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jan 1;26(1):37-43. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.8851. Epub 2007 Nov 19.
PubMed 18025439Dancey J, Crump M, Gluck S, et al.: Quality of life (QOL) analysis of a randomized trial of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with peripheral stem cell transplant (PSCT) versus standard chemotherapy (SCT) in women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC): National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group study (NCIC CTG) MA-16 . [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 22: A-3010, 749, 2003.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Apr 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Trial of High-Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Stem Cell Therapy Versus Standard Therapy in Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer Who Have Responded to Anthracycline or Taxane-Based Induction Chemotherapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00003032
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MA16
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Keywords
- stage IV breast cancer, recurrent breast cancer
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 224 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- NCIC Clinical Trials GroupResearch network
- Study start
- 25 Apr 1997 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 12 Apr 2001 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Dec 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Apr 2004 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining chemotherapy with peripheral stem cell transplantation may allow the doctor to give higher doses of chemotherapy drugs and kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known whether standard therapy is more effective than high dose chemotherapy for breast cancer.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of high dose chemotherapy plus peripheral stem cell transplantation with that of standard therapy in treating women with metastatic or recurrent breast cancer that has responded to previous chemotherapy.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES: I. Compare the overall survival of women with metastatic breast cancer receiving either high dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell therapy or standard therapy following response to anthracycline or taxane based chemotherapy. II. Evaluate the final response rates between the two treatment arms. III. Compare the two treatment arms with respect to toxic effects. IV. Assess health related quality of life in both groups of patients.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter, nonblinded, randomized study. Patients are stratified by type of induction chemotherapy, response status, presence of visceral disease, receptor status and tamoxifen therapy (ER negative; ER positive, no prior tamoxifen; ER positive, failed tamoxifen; receptor status unknown). A quality of life questionnaire is given to each patient before and during treatment, then every 3 months thereafter. Patients are assessed following 4 courses of induction chemotherapy. Those achieving complete remission, partial remission, or who have no evaluable disease are randomized to either treatment arm I or arm II. For treatment arm I, stem cells are mobilized by chemotherapy (courses 5 and 6) plus filgrastim (G-CSF) or with G-CSF alone. Following course 6, patients receive daily doses of IV cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, and carboplatin on days -6 to -3, followed by stem cell infusion on day 0 and G-CSF from day 5. In arm II, patients receive two further courses of standard induction chemotherapy, followed by maintenance chemotherapy at the discretion of the treating physician. All patients with positive receptor status or unknown receptor status who have not previously failed tamoxifen therapy, receive tamoxifen at the completion of post peripheral stem cell transplant (arm I) or induction chemotherapy (arm II). Following hematologic recovery from high dose chemotherapy patients in arm I with limited disease receive consolidated radiation and may also receive surgical treatment for limited disease. In arm II, patients who completed courses 5 and 6 of induction chemotherapy receive involved field radiation at the physician's discretion. Patients from arm II may also receive surgical treatment following protocol therapy at the physician's discretion. Patients are followed every 3 months until death.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: This study will accrue approximately 50 patients per year for a total of 192 patients in 3.8 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 to 60 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| filgrastim | Biological | – |
| cisplatin | Drug | – |
| cyclophosphamide | Drug | – |
| mitoxantrone hydrochloride | Drug | – |
| tamoxifen citrate | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Apr 2020.
- Results publication: PubMed 18025439Crump M, Gluck S, Tu D, Stewart D, Levine M, Kirkbride P, Dancey J, O'Reilly S, Shore T, Couban S, Girouard C, Marlin S, Shepherd L, Pritchard KI. Randomized trial of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous peripheral-blood stem-cell support compared with standard-dose chemotherapy in women with metastatic breast cancer: NCIC MA.16. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jan 1;26(1):37-43. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.8851. Epub 2007 Nov 19.
- Results publicationDancey J, Crump M, Gluck S, et al.: Quality of life (QOL) analysis of a randomized trial of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with peripheral stem cell transplant (PSCT) versus standard chemotherapy (SCT) in women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC): National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group study (NCIC CTG) MA-16 . [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 22: A-3010, 749, 2003.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Breast Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Collection of CSF Samples From Participants With Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) and HER2+ Breast Cancer With no Prior History Nor Active Radiographically Detectable Brain Metastases
Breast Cancer, Breast Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
Avera Cancer Sequencing and Analytics Protocol (ASAP)
Cancer, Cancer Diagnosis
RecruitingPhase 3
Internal Mammary Lymph Nodes Irradiation in High-risk Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study to Test the Safety and Tolerability of PF-07220060 in Participants With Advance Solid Tumors
Liposarcoma, Prostate Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Opportunistic Breast Cancer Screening Using Non-Contrast Chest CT
Breast Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Michael R. Crump, MD, FRCPC study chair
Princess Margaret Hospital, Canada
25 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing filgrastim, cisplatin and cyclophosphamide in people with Breast Cancer, run by NCIC Clinical Trials Group at 25 sites in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Apr 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 25 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00003032, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Apr 2020.