Esophageal CancerPhase 3NCT00003118
Surgery With or Without Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Cancer of the Esophagus
A Phase 3 study testing cisplatin, fluorouracil and surgical procedure in people with Esophageal Cancer, run by Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology at 38 sites in United States.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. It is not yet known whether surgery is more effective with or without chemotherapy and radiation therapy for cancer of the esophagus. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Esophageal Cancer
- What is being tested?
- cisplatin, fluorouracil and surgical procedure
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 56 participants
- Where
- 38 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Oct 1997to Mar 2000
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
- Patients with histologically documented untreated squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (below 20 cm) or gastro-esophageal junction and with less than 2 cm distal spread into the gastric cardia were eligible.
- No evidence of distant metastatic disease by history and physical examination
- Upper endoscopy with biopsy, computed tomography (CT) of the chest and upper abdomen, and pulmonary function studies are required.
- Bone scan is required for alkaline phosphatase more than 3X the institutional normal value.
- Bronchoscopy is required if the primary tumor was adjacent to the trachea or left main stem bronchus.
- Patients are required to have:
- granulocyte counts ≥1,800/mL
- platelet count ≥ 100,000/mL
- creatinine clearance ≥ 50 mL/min
- Esophageal ultrasound (EUS) and preresection staging by thoracoscopy (ts) and laparoscopy/minilaparotomy (ls), including biopsy of celiac axis and lesser curvature are recommended
- Tumors must be considered surgically resectable (T1-3, NX), including regional thoracic lymph node (N1) metastases.
- Patients with supraclavicular lymph nodes measuring ≤ 1.5 cm by CT (not palpable) are eligible.
- Patients with lymph node metastases to levels 15 to 20 (predominantly celiac axis and paracardial nodes) ≤1.5 cm by CT.
- Patients may not have previously received chemotherapy or radiation therapy for this tumor or any radiation therapy that would overlap the radiation fields required for this malignancy.
- Patients with previous malignancies are eligible if more than 5 years had elapsed from diagnosis without evidence of tumor recurrence.
- There can be no other serious illness that would limit survival to less than 2 years, or psychiatric condition that would prevent compliance with treatment or informed consent. Patients with uncontrolled or severe cardio- vascular disease,pulmonary disease, oractive infections are excluded.
- Pregnant patients are excluded.
- Informed consent is required for all patients.
Trial locations and contacts
38 sites in 1 country.
38 sites in 1 country
United States38 sites
Marlene & Stewart Greenebaum Cancer Center, University of Maryland
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Buffalo, New York, 14263-0001
Vermont Cancer Center
Burlington, Vermont, 05401-3498
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, UNC
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599-7295
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425-0721
University of Illinois at Chicago Health Sciences Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
University of Chicago Cancer Research Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
Ellis Fischel Cancer Center - Columbia
Columbia, Missouri, 65203
Duke Comprehensive Cancer Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242
University of California San Diego Cancer Center
La Jolla, California, 92093-0658
CCOP - Southern Nevada Cancer Research Foundation
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89106
Norris Cotton Cancer Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756
CCOP - North Shore University Hospital
Manhasset, New York, 11030
North Shore University Hospital
Manhasset, New York, 11030
University of Tennessee, Memphis Cancer Center
Memphis, Tennessee, 38103
CCOP - Mount Sinai Medical Center
Miami Beach, Florida, 33140
University of Minnesota Cancer Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455
Fox Chase Cancer Center at Virtua-Memorial Hospital Burlington County
Mount Holly, New Jersey, 08060
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10021
New York Presbyterian Hospital - Cornell Campus
New York, New York, 10021
Mount Sinai Medical Center, NY
New York, New York, 10029
University of Nebraska Medical Center
Omaha, Nebraska, 68198-3330
St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center
Paterson, New Jersey, 07503
Hahnemann University Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19102-1192
Rhode Island Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, 02903
MBCCOP - Massey Cancer Center
Richmond, Virginia, 23298-0037
University of Rochester Cancer Center
Rochester, New York, 14642
UCSF Cancer Center and Cancer Research Institute
San Francisco, California, 94115-0128
Barnes-Jewish Hospital
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
CCOP - Syracuse Hematology-Oncology Associates of Central New York, P.C.
Syracuse, New York, 13210
State University of New York - Upstate Medical University
Syracuse, New York, 13210
Walter Reed Army Medical Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20307-5000
CCOP - Christiana Care Health Services
Wilmington, Delaware, 19899
CCOP - Southeast Cancer Control Consortium
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27104-4241
Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157-1082
University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01655
About this study
Official title: A Prospective Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing Trimodality Therapy (Cisplatin, 5-FU, Radiotherapy, and Surgery) to Surgery Alone for Esophageal Cancer
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. It is not yet known whether surgery is more effective with or without chemotherapy and radiation therapy for cancer of the esophagus.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of surgery with or without combination chemotherapy and radiation therapy in treating patients who have cancer of the esophagus that can be surgically removed.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES: I. Compare overall five-year survival rates and treatment failures in patients receiving neoadjuvant cisplatin (CDDP) plus fluorouracil (5-FU) with concomitant radiotherapy followed by surgical resection versus patients receiving surgery alone. II. Assess and compare the toxicities of each approach. III. Compare the incidence and pattern of local (gastric or esophageal bed or regional lymph nodes) and distant (supraclavicular lymph node, liver, peritoneal carcinomatosis, or lung, brain, etc.) recurrence. IV. Evaluate the prognostic ability of noninvasive and minimally invasive pretreatment staging with regard to survival and recurrence. V. Evaluate the ability of preresection adjuvant chemotherapy with concomitant radiation therapy to render tumors to lower stages. VI. Evaluate the impact of lymph nodes on survival and recurrence.
OUTLINE: This a two arm, randomized study. Patients are stratified by: cell type of cancer (squamous cell vs adenocarcinoma); lymph nodes (positive vs negative); and stage (invasive vs noninvasive). Patients in arm I undergo chemotherapy and radiotherapy within 24 hours of each other. Chemotherapy consists of cisplatin (CDDP) by bolus IV infusion over 30 minutes on day 1 and again on day 29. Fluorouracil (5-FU) is administered by continuous IV infusion for 4 days (on days 1-4 and 29-32) after completion of cisplatin. Radiotherapy is administered on days 1-5, 8-12, 15-19, 22-26, and 29-33, with a boost on days 36-38. If there is no disease progression or unresectable disease, surgery is performed within 3-8 weeks following completion of therapy. Patients in arm II undergo surgery alone no later than 6 weeks postrandomization. Patients are followed at least every 3 months for two years, then every 6 months for the next two years, and annually thereafter.
- Conditions
- Esophageal Cancer
- Being tested
- cisplatin, fluorouracil, surgical procedure, radiation therapy
- Keywords
- stage I esophageal cancer, stage II esophageal cancer, stage III esophageal cancer, squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus, adenocarcinoma of the esophagus
- Medical subject headings
- Esophageal Neoplasms, Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Adenocarcinoma Of Esophagus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
cisplatinDrug
fluorouracilDrug
surgical procedureProcedure or surgery
radiation therapyRadiation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Chemotherapy + Radiation + Surgery | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: cisplatin; Drug: fluorouracil; Procedure: surgical procedure; Radiation: radiation therapy |
| Surgery | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Procedure: surgical procedure |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall survival
Measured: up to 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 May 2004 (estimated)
- Study startOct 1997
- Primary completionMar 2000
- Study completionMar 2000
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Esophageal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Alliance for Clinical Trials in OncologyThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 56 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Mark Krasna, MD, Study chair, Jersey Shore University Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00003118
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CALGB-9781
- Other IDs
- U10CA031946, CLB-C9781, E-C9781, NCCTG-C9781, RTOG-9716, CDR0000065873
- Status last verified
- Jun 2016
- First submitted
- 1 Nov 1999
- Last updated
- 4 Jul 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Tepper J, Krasna MJ, Niedzwiecki D, Hollis D, Reed CE, Goldberg R, Kiel K, Willett C, Sugarbaker D, Mayer R. Phase III trial of trimodality therapy with cisplatin, fluorouracil, radiotherapy, and surgery compared with surgery alone for esophageal cancer: CALGB 9781. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Mar 1;26(7):1086-92. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.9593.
PubMed 18309943Krasna M, Tepper JE, Niedzwiecki D, et al.: Trimodality therapy is superior to surgery alone in esophageal cancer: results of CALGB 9781. [Abstract] American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium, 26-28 January 2006, San Francisco, California. A-4, 2006.
Tepper JE, Krasna M, Niedzwiecki D, et al.: Superiority of trimodality therapy to surgery alone in esophageal cancer: results of CALGB 9781. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 24 (Suppl 18): A-4012, 2006.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Jul 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing Trimodality Therapy (Cisplatin, 5-FU, Radiotherapy, and Surgery) to Surgery Alone for Esophageal Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00003118
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CALGB-9781
- Conditions
- Esophageal Cancer
- Keywords
- stage I esophageal cancer, stage II esophageal cancer, stage III esophageal cancer, squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus, adenocarcinoma of the esophagus
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 56 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Alliance for Clinical Trials in OncologyUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Study start
- Oct 1997
- Primary completion
- Mar 2000 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2000 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 May 2004 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. It is not yet known whether surgery is more effective with or without chemotherapy and radiation therapy for cancer of the esophagus.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of surgery with or without combination chemotherapy and radiation therapy in treating patients who have cancer of the esophagus that can be surgically removed.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES: I. Compare overall five-year survival rates and treatment failures in patients receiving neoadjuvant cisplatin (CDDP) plus fluorouracil (5-FU) with concomitant radiotherapy followed by surgical resection versus patients receiving surgery alone. II. Assess and compare the toxicities of each approach. III. Compare the incidence and pattern of local (gastric or esophageal bed or regional lymph nodes) and distant (supraclavicular lymph node, liver, peritoneal carcinomatosis, or lung, brain, etc.) recurrence. IV. Evaluate the prognostic ability of noninvasive and minimally invasive pretreatment staging with regard to survival and recurrence. V. Evaluate the ability of preresection adjuvant chemotherapy with concomitant radiation therapy to render tumors to lower stages. VI. Evaluate the impact of lymph nodes on survival and recurrence.
OUTLINE: This a two arm, randomized study. Patients are stratified by: cell type of cancer (squamous cell vs adenocarcinoma); lymph nodes (positive vs negative); and stage (invasive vs noninvasive). Patients in arm I undergo chemotherapy and radiotherapy within 24 hours of each other. Chemotherapy consists of cisplatin (CDDP) by bolus IV infusion over 30 minutes on day 1 and again on day 29. Fluorouracil (5-FU) is administered by continuous IV infusion for 4 days (on days 1-4 and 29-32) after completion of cisplatin. Radiotherapy is administered on days 1-5, 8-12, 15-19, 22-26, and 29-33, with a boost on days 36-38. If there is no disease progression or unresectable disease, surgery is performed within 3-8 weeks following completion of therapy. Patients in arm II undergo surgery alone no later than 6 weeks postrandomization. Patients are followed at least every 3 months for two years, then every 6 months for the next two years, and annually thereafter.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Chemotherapy + Radiation + Surgery | Experimental | Drug: cisplatin, Drug: fluorouracil, Procedure: surgical procedure, Radiation: radiation therapy |
| Surgery | Active comparator | Procedure: surgical procedure |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| cisplatin | Drug | Chemotherapy + Radiation + Surgery |
| fluorouracil | Drug | Chemotherapy + Radiation + Surgery |
| surgical procedure | Procedure or surgery | Chemotherapy + Radiation + Surgery, Surgery |
| radiation therapy | Radiation | Chemotherapy + Radiation + Surgery |
Primary outcome
Overall survival
Time frame: up to 5 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Jul 2016.
- Results publication: PubMed 18309943Tepper J, Krasna MJ, Niedzwiecki D, Hollis D, Reed CE, Goldberg R, Kiel K, Willett C, Sugarbaker D, Mayer R. Phase III trial of trimodality therapy with cisplatin, fluorouracil, radiotherapy, and surgery compared with surgery alone for esophageal cancer: CALGB 9781. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Mar 1;26(7):1086-92. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.9593.
- Results publicationKrasna M, Tepper JE, Niedzwiecki D, et al.: Trimodality therapy is superior to surgery alone in esophageal cancer: results of CALGB 9781. [Abstract] American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium, 26-28 January 2006, San Francisco, California. A-4, 2006.
- Results publicationTepper JE, Krasna M, Niedzwiecki D, et al.: Superiority of trimodality therapy to surgery alone in esophageal cancer: results of CALGB 9781. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 24 (Suppl 18): A-4012, 2006.
Related trials for Esophageal Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Multicenter Prospective Cohort on Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Superficial Esophageal Cancer, Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-08046876 in People With Advanced Solid Tumors
Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumors, Bladder Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mark Krasna, MD study chair
Jersey Shore University Medical Center
38 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing cisplatin, fluorouracil and surgical procedure in people with Esophageal Cancer, run by Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology at 38 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jul 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 38 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall survival (time frame: up to 5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00003118, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jul 2016.