Brain and Central Nervous System TumorsPhase 3NCT00003293
SU-101 Compared With Procarbazine in Treating Patients With Glioblastoma Multiforme
A Phase 3 study testing leflunomide and procarbazine hydrochloride in people with Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors, run by Pfizer at 35 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. It is not yet known whether SU-101 is more effective than procarbazine in treating patients with glioblastoma multiforme. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors
- What is being tested?
- leflunomide and procarbazine hydrochloride
- How many people
- Not given
- Where
- 35 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Feb 1998to May 2001
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Histologically proven refractory or recurrent supratentorial glioblastoma multiforme Bidimensionally measurable, enhancing residual disease by T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced MRI required within 15 days prior to treatment Stable dose of corticosteroids required for at least 7 days prior to scan
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: 18 and over Performance status: Karnofsky 60-100% Life expectancy: Not specified Hematopoietic: Absolute neutrophil count at least 1,500/mm3 Platelet count at least 75,000/mm3 Hemoglobin at least 9 g/dL without blood transfusions for 15 days prior to treatment Hepatic: AST/SGOT no greater than 3 times upper limit of normal (ULN) Bilirubin less than 1.5 times ULN Renal: Creatinine no greater than 2 mg/dL OR Creatinine clearance at least 40 mL/min Other: Not allergic to etoposide Effective contraception required of fertile patients Negative serum pregnancy test required of fertile women No other acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: Biologic therapy: Not specified Chemotherapy: No prior leflunomide (SU101) therapy No more than one prior single-agent or combination systemic chemotherapy regimen for initial disease Radiosensitizer(s) concurrent with radiotherapy allowed in addition to chemotherapy for primary disease At least 6 weeks since nitrosourea or mitomycin At least 2 weeks since vincristine No prior single-agent procarbazine At least 4 weeks since other chemotherapy No concurrent chemotherapy agents Endocrine therapy: No concurrent hormone therapy (except medroxyprogesterone acetate for appetite stimulation) Less than 4 weeks of prior hormonal therapy (tamoxifen or retinoids) if failed one prior chemotherapy regimen Radiotherapy: Prior conventional radiotherapy for initial disease required No more than one prior course of radiotherapy At least 8 weeks since radiotherapy No prior interstitial radiotherapy No concurrent radiotherapy Surgery: Maximally feasible resection for initial disease required No more than two resections permitted At least 1 week since surgery and/or biopsy for disease No prior interstitial radiotherapy or implanted BCNU-wafers No concurrent surgery (including resection, stereotactic surgery or interstitial implants) Other: No concurrent investigational agent At least 4 weeks since prior investigational agent At least 1 week since cholestyramine or monoamine oxidase inhibitors
Trial locations and contacts
35 sites in 2 countries.
35 sites in 2 countries
United States32 sites
Cancer Center of Albany Medical Center
Albany, New York, 12208
University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-0752
Medical College of Georgia Hospital and Clinics
Augusta, Georgia, 30912-3620
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, UNC
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599-7295
Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Barrett Cancer Center, The University Hospital
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital - Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Simmons Cancer Center - Dallas
Dallas, Texas, 75235-9154
University of Colorado Cancer Center
Denver, Colorado, 80262
Henry Ford Hospital
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
University of Texas - MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030
Indiana University Cancer Center
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202-5265
University of Iowa College of Medicine
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242
USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center
Los Angeles, California, 90033-0800
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCLA
Los Angeles, California, 90095-1781
Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope
Los Angeles, California, 91010
Mount Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center
Miami Beach, Florida, 33140
Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226
Vanderbilt Cancer Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232-6838
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10021
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10032
University of Nebraska Medical Center
Omaha, Nebraska, 68198-3330
St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center
Phoenix, Arizona, 85001-2071
Western Pennsylvania Cancer Institute
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15224
Rhode Island Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, 02903
St. Francis Hospital
San Francisco, California, 94109
University of Washington Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98195-6043
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute
Tampa, Florida, 33612
Albert Einstein Comprehensive Cancer Center
The Bronx, New York, 10461
Arizona Cancer Center
Tucson, Arizona, 85724
University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01655
Canada3 sites
Cross Cancer Institute
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2
Cancer Care Ontario-London Regional Cancer Centre
London, Ontario, N6A 4L6
Princess Margaret Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9
About this study
Official title: A Phase III Randomized Study of SU101 Versus Procarbazine for Patients With Glioblastoma Multiforme in First Relapse
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. It is not yet known whether SU-101 is more effective than procarbazine in treating patients with glioblastoma multiforme.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of SU-101 with that of procarbazine in treating patients with glioblastoma multiforme that has recurred.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES: I. Compare the median survival of patients with glioblastoma multiforme in first relapse treated with intravenous leflunomide (SU101) administered as a loading dose with weekly maintenance therapy versus oral, single-agent procarbazine administered daily for 28 days every 56 days. II. Compare the median time to progression for these regimens in these patients. III. Assess the objective response of these patients. IV. Assess the safety of SU101 given on this schedule. V. Describe the health-related quality of life of these patients.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, open label, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to performance status (Karnofsky 60-80% vs 90-100%), age (less than 50 vs 50 and over), and time from initial diagnosis to recurrence (6 months or greater vs less than 6 months). Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms. Arm I: Patients receive leflunomide (SU101) IV over 6 hours daily on days 1-4, again 4-8 days later, and weekly thereafter for a total of 4 loading dose infusions and six maintenance infusions in course 1. Patients receive 7 weekly maintenance infusions of SU101 in courses thereafter. Treatment repeats every 8 weeks. Arm II: Patients receive procarbazine orally once or twice daily for 4 weeks. Treatment is repeated every 8 weeks. All patients complete a health-related quality-of-life questionnaire every 8 weeks and at study withdrawal. Treatment courses continue up to a maximum of 1 year in the absence of unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. Patients are followed every 2 months, beginning 30 days after study completion.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A maximum of 380 patients will be accrued for this study.
- Conditions
- Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors
- Being tested
- leflunomide, procarbazine hydrochloride
- Keywords
- recurrent adult brain tumor, adult glioblastoma, adult giant cell glioblastoma, adult gliosarcoma
- Medical subject headings
- Central Nervous System Neoplasms, Brain Neoplasms, Glioblastoma, Gliosarcoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
leflunomideDrug
procarbazine hydrochlorideDrug
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Jun 2004 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 1998
- Primary completionMay 2001
- Study completionMay 2001
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Brain and Central Nervous System TumorsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Alison L. Hannah, MBBS, Study chair, SUGEN
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00003293
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SUGEN-SU101.015
- Other IDs
- CDR0000066226, MSKCC-98020, UCLA-HSPC-980105201
- Status last verified
- Sep 2012
- First submitted
- 1 Nov 1999
- Last updated
- 11 Sep 2012
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Sep 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase III Randomized Study of SU101 Versus Procarbazine for Patients With Glioblastoma Multiforme in First Relapse
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00003293
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SUGEN-SU101.015
- Conditions
- Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors
- Keywords
- recurrent adult brain tumor, adult glioblastoma, adult giant cell glioblastoma, adult gliosarcoma
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Feb 1998
- Primary completion
- May 2001 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2001 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Jun 2004 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. It is not yet known whether SU-101 is more effective than procarbazine in treating patients with glioblastoma multiforme.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of SU-101 with that of procarbazine in treating patients with glioblastoma multiforme that has recurred.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES: I. Compare the median survival of patients with glioblastoma multiforme in first relapse treated with intravenous leflunomide (SU101) administered as a loading dose with weekly maintenance therapy versus oral, single-agent procarbazine administered daily for 28 days every 56 days. II. Compare the median time to progression for these regimens in these patients. III. Assess the objective response of these patients. IV. Assess the safety of SU101 given on this schedule. V. Describe the health-related quality of life of these patients.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, open label, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to performance status (Karnofsky 60-80% vs 90-100%), age (less than 50 vs 50 and over), and time from initial diagnosis to recurrence (6 months or greater vs less than 6 months). Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms. Arm I: Patients receive leflunomide (SU101) IV over 6 hours daily on days 1-4, again 4-8 days later, and weekly thereafter for a total of 4 loading dose infusions and six maintenance infusions in course 1. Patients receive 7 weekly maintenance infusions of SU101 in courses thereafter. Treatment repeats every 8 weeks. Arm II: Patients receive procarbazine orally once or twice daily for 4 weeks. Treatment is repeated every 8 weeks. All patients complete a health-related quality-of-life questionnaire every 8 weeks and at study withdrawal. Treatment courses continue up to a maximum of 1 year in the absence of unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. Patients are followed every 2 months, beginning 30 days after study completion.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A maximum of 380 patients will be accrued for this study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| leflunomide | Drug | – |
| procarbazine hydrochloride | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Sep 2012.
Related trials for Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors
RecruitingPhase 2
BrAin Metastasis in tripLe Negateive Breast Cancer: IvoneScimab and Trop2 ADC
Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC), Brain Metastases
Active, not recruiting
Effects of Whole-body Electrical Muscle Stimulation Exercise on Adults With Neuromuscular Disease
Neuromuscular Diseases (NMD), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Prospective Exploratory Study of FAPi PET/CT With Histopathology Validation in Patients With Various Cancers
Bladder Carcinoma, Cervical Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
PLX038 in Primary Central Nervous System Tumors Containing MYC or MYCN Amplifications
Glioma, Medulloblastoma
Recruiting
Virtual Home-based Exercise Intervention (RISE) to Improve Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment and Gut Microbiome in Adolescent and Young Adult Brain Tumor Survivors
Cancer-related Cognitive Dysfunction, Primary Brain Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alison L. Hannah, MBBS study chair
SUGEN
35 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing leflunomide and procarbazine hydrochloride in people with Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors, run by Pfizer at 35 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Sep 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 35 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Sep 2012.