Lung CancerPhase 3NCT00003299
Cisplatin Plus Etoposide With or Without Paclitaxel in Treating Patients With Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing cisplatin, etoposide and paclitaxel in people with Lung Cancer, run by Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology at 20 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known whether cisplatin, etoposide, and paclitaxel are more effective than cisplatin and etoposide alone in treating patients… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Lung Cancer
- What is being tested?
- cisplatin, etoposide and paclitaxel
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 587 participants
- Where
- 20 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Apr 1998to Jan 2006
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Histologically or cytologically documented extensive stage small cell carcinoma of the bronchus Measurable or evaluable disease No pleural effusions, bone scan abnormalities, or bone marrow biopsies as only evidence of disease
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: 18 and over Performance status: CALGB 0-1 Hematopoietic: Granulocyte count at least 1,500/mm3 Platelet count at least 100,000/mm3 Hepatic: Bilirubin less than 1.5 mg/dL SGOT less than 2 times normal Renal: Serum creatinine no greater than 1.5 mg/dL Cardiovascular: No cardiac disease Pulmonary: No interstitial pneumonia No fibroid lung Other: Not pregnant or nursing Fertile patients must use effective contraception No psychiatric illness No malabsorption disorder No uncontrolled infection No uncontrolled diabetes mellitus No prior or concurrent malignancy within the past 5 years except carcinoma in situ of the cervix or basal cell skin cancer
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: Biologic therapy: Not specified Chemotherapy: No prior chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer No other concurrent chemotherapy Endocrine therapy: No chronic steroid therapy (except steroids for adrenal failure or hormones for non-disease related conditions) Radiotherapy: No prior pelvic or mediastinal radiotherapy Surgery: Not specified Other: No concurrent anticonvulsants
Trial locations and contacts
20 sites in 2 countries.
20 sites in 2 countries
United States19 sites
CCOP - Ann Arbor Regional
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48106
Medcenter One Health System
Bismarck, North Dakota, 58501
CCOP - Cedar Rapids Oncology Project
Cedar Rapids, Iowa, 52403-1206
CCOP - Geisinger Clinic and Medical Center
Danville, Pennsylvania, 17822-2001
CCOP - Iowa Oncology Research Association
Des Moines, Iowa, 50309-1016
CCOP - Duluth
Duluth, Minnesota, 55805
CCOP - Merit Care Hospital
Fargo, North Dakota, 58122
Altru Health Systems
Grand Forks, North Dakota, 58201
CCOP - Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium
Omaha, Nebraska, 68131
CCOP - Illinois Oncology Research Association
Peoria, Illinois, 61602
Rapid City Regional Hospital
Rapid City, South Dakota, 57709
Mayo Clinic Cancer Center
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
CentraCare Clinic
Saint Cloud, Minnesota, 56303
CCOP - Scottsdale Oncology Program
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85259-5404
Siouxland Hematology-Oncology
Sioux City, Iowa, 51101-1733
CCOP - Sioux Community Cancer Consortium
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57105-1080
CCOP - Toledo Community Hospital Oncology Program
Toledo, Ohio, 43623-3456
CCOP - Carle Cancer Center
Urbana, Illinois, 61801
CCOP - Wichita
Wichita, Kansas, 67214-3882
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Phase III Study Comparing Etoposide and Cisplatin With Etoposide, Cisplatin and Paclitaxel in Patients With Extensive Small Cell Lung Cancer
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known whether cisplatin, etoposide, and paclitaxel are more effective than cisplatin and etoposide alone in treating patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of cisplatin plus etoposide with or without paclitaxel in treating patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES: I. Determine whether the addition of paclitaxel to standard chemotherapy treatment comprising etoposide and cisplatin improves the survival of patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer. II. Compare the tumor response rate and failure-free survival of these patients treated with these regimens. III. Describe and compare the toxic effects associated with these regimens in these patients.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized study. Patients are stratified according to performance status and gender. Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms. Arm I: Patients receive cisplatin IV on day 1 and etoposide IV over 1 hour on days 1-3. Arm II: Patients receive paclitaxel IV over 3 hours on day 1 and cisplatin and etoposide as in arm I. Patients then receive filgrastim (G-CSF) subcutaneously on days 4-18. Treatment repeats in both arms every 21 days for up to 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients are followed at least every 2 months for 2 years, every 4 months for 1 year, and then at least every 6 months for 2 years.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: Approximately 670 patients (335 per arm) will be accrued for this study within 16 months.
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer
- Being tested
- cisplatin, etoposide, paclitaxel
- Keywords
- extensive stage small cell lung cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Lung Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
cisplatinDrug
etoposideDrug
paclitaxelDrug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cisplatin + Etoposide | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: cisplatin; Drug: etoposide |
| Cisplatin + Etoposide + Paclitaxel | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: cisplatin; Drug: etoposide; Drug: paclitaxel |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
overall survival
Measured: Up to 5 years
response rate
Measured: Up to 5 years
failure-free survival
Measured: Up to 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Feb 2004 (estimated)
- Study startApr 1998
- Primary completionJun 2005
- Study completionJan 2006
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Lung CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Alliance for Clinical Trials in OncologyThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 587 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI), North Central Cancer Treatment Group, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, SWOG Cancer Research Network
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Harvey B. Niell, MD, Study chair, Veterans Affairs Medical Center - MemphisRandolph S. Marks, MD, Study chair, Mayo ClinicAlan B. Sandler, MD, Study chair, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer CenterKaren Kelly, MD, Study chair, University of Colorado, Denver
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00003299
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CALGB-9732
- Other IDs
- U10CA031946, CLB-9732, E-C9732, NCCTG-C9732, SWOG-C9732, CDR0000066238
- Status last verified
- Jul 2016
- First submitted
- 1 Nov 1999
- Last updated
- 20 Jul 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Blackstock AW, Herndon JE 2nd, Paskett ED, Miller AA, Lathan C, Niell HB, Socinski MA, Vokes EE, Green MR; Cancer and Leukemia Group B. Similar outcomes between African American and non-African American patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung carcinoma: report from the Cancer and Leukemia Group B. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jan 20;24(3):407-12. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.1436. Epub 2005 Dec 19.
PubMed 16365181Niell HB, Herndon JE 2nd, Miller AA, Watson DM, Sandler AB, Kelly K, Marks RS, Perry MC, Ansari RH, Otterson G, Ellerton J, Vokes EE, Green MR; Cancer and Leukemia Group. Randomized phase III intergroup trial of etoposide and cisplatin with or without paclitaxel and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9732. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jun 1;23(16):3752-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.09.071.
PubMed 15923572Niell HB, Herndon JE, Miller AA, et al.: Randomized phase III intergroup trial (CALGB 9732) of etoposide (VP-16) and cisplatin (DDP) with or without paclitaxel (TAX) and G-CSF in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC). [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 21: A-1169, 2002.
Marzano L, Darwich AS, Dan A, Tendler S, Lewensohn R, De Petris L, Raghothama J, Meijer S. Exploring the discrepancies between clinical trials and real-world data: A small-cell lung cancer study. Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Aug;17(8):e13909. doi: 10.1111/cts.13909.
PubMed 39113428Ventz S, Khozin S, Louv B, Sands J, Wen PY, Rahman R, Comment L, Alexander BM, Trippa L. The design and evaluation of hybrid controlled trials that leverage external data and randomization. Nat Commun. 2022 Oct 2;13(1):5783. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33192-1.
PubMed 36184621
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Jul 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Phase III Study Comparing Etoposide and Cisplatin With Etoposide, Cisplatin and Paclitaxel in Patients With Extensive Small Cell Lung Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00003299
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CALGB-9732
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer
- Keywords
- extensive stage small cell lung cancer
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 587 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Alliance for Clinical Trials in OncologyUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI), North Central Cancer Treatment Group, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, SWOG Cancer Research Network
- Study start
- Apr 1998
- Primary completion
- Jun 2005 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2006 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Feb 2004 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known whether cisplatin, etoposide, and paclitaxel are more effective than cisplatin and etoposide alone in treating patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of cisplatin plus etoposide with or without paclitaxel in treating patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES: I. Determine whether the addition of paclitaxel to standard chemotherapy treatment comprising etoposide and cisplatin improves the survival of patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer. II. Compare the tumor response rate and failure-free survival of these patients treated with these regimens. III. Describe and compare the toxic effects associated with these regimens in these patients.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized study. Patients are stratified according to performance status and gender. Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms. Arm I: Patients receive cisplatin IV on day 1 and etoposide IV over 1 hour on days 1-3. Arm II: Patients receive paclitaxel IV over 3 hours on day 1 and cisplatin and etoposide as in arm I. Patients then receive filgrastim (G-CSF) subcutaneously on days 4-18. Treatment repeats in both arms every 21 days for up to 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients are followed at least every 2 months for 2 years, every 4 months for 1 year, and then at least every 6 months for 2 years.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: Approximately 670 patients (335 per arm) will be accrued for this study within 16 months.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cisplatin + Etoposide | Active comparator | Drug: cisplatin, Drug: etoposide |
| Cisplatin + Etoposide + Paclitaxel | Experimental | Drug: cisplatin, Drug: etoposide, Drug: paclitaxel |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| cisplatin | Drug | Cisplatin + Etoposide, Cisplatin + Etoposide + Paclitaxel |
| etoposide | Drug | Cisplatin + Etoposide, Cisplatin + Etoposide + Paclitaxel |
| paclitaxel | Drug | Cisplatin + Etoposide + Paclitaxel |
Primary outcome
overall survival
Time frame: Up to 5 years
response rate
Time frame: Up to 5 years
failure-free survival
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Jul 2016.
- Background: PubMed 16365181Blackstock AW, Herndon JE 2nd, Paskett ED, Miller AA, Lathan C, Niell HB, Socinski MA, Vokes EE, Green MR; Cancer and Leukemia Group B. Similar outcomes between African American and non-African American patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung carcinoma: report from the Cancer and Leukemia Group B. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jan 20;24(3):407-12. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.1436. Epub 2005 Dec 19.
- Results publication: PubMed 15923572Niell HB, Herndon JE 2nd, Miller AA, Watson DM, Sandler AB, Kelly K, Marks RS, Perry MC, Ansari RH, Otterson G, Ellerton J, Vokes EE, Green MR; Cancer and Leukemia Group. Randomized phase III intergroup trial of etoposide and cisplatin with or without paclitaxel and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9732. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jun 1;23(16):3752-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.09.071.
- Results publicationNiell HB, Herndon JE, Miller AA, et al.: Randomized phase III intergroup trial (CALGB 9732) of etoposide (VP-16) and cisplatin (DDP) with or without paclitaxel (TAX) and G-CSF in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC). [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 21: A-1169, 2002.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39113428Marzano L, Darwich AS, Dan A, Tendler S, Lewensohn R, De Petris L, Raghothama J, Meijer S. Exploring the discrepancies between clinical trials and real-world data: A small-cell lung cancer study. Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Aug;17(8):e13909. doi: 10.1111/cts.13909.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36184621Ventz S, Khozin S, Louv B, Sands J, Wen PY, Rahman R, Comment L, Alexander BM, Trippa L. The design and evaluation of hybrid controlled trials that leverage external data and randomization. Nat Commun. 2022 Oct 2;13(1):5783. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33192-1.
Related trials for Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Harvey B. Niell, MD study chair
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Memphis
Randolph S. Marks, MD study chair
Mayo Clinic
Alan B. Sandler, MD study chair
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center
20 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing cisplatin, etoposide and paclitaxel in people with Lung Cancer, run by Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology at 20 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jul 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 20 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
overall survival (time frame: Up to 5 years). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00003299, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jul 2016.