Ovarian CancerPhase 3NCT00003322
Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Primary Peritoneal or Stage III Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing cisplatin, paclitaxel and quality-of-life assessment in people with Ovarian Cancer and Primary Peritoneal Cavity Cancer, run by Gynecologic Oncology Group at 67 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug and giving drugs in different ways may kill more tumor cells. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Ovarian Cancer, Primary Peritoneal Cavity Cancer
- What is being tested?
- cisplatin, paclitaxel and quality-of-life assessment
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 384 participants
- Where
- 67 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Mar 1998to Jan 2006
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Histologically proven primary peritoneal carcinoma or optimal (no greater than 1 cm residual disease) stage III epithelial ovarian carcinoma with the following epithelial cell types: Serous adenocarcinoma Endometrioid adenocarcinoma Mucinous adenocarcinoma Undifferentiated carcinoma Clear cell adenocarcinoma Mixed epithelial carcinoma Transitional cell carcinoma Malignant Brenner's Tumor Adenocarcinoma NOS Prior surgery for ovarian/peritoneal carcinoma required No epithelial ovarian carcinoma of low malignant potential (borderline carcinoma)
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: Not specified Performance status: GOG 0-2 Life expectancy: Not specified Hematopoietic: WBC at least 3,000/mm3 Platelet count at least 100,000/mm3 Hepatic: Bilirubin no greater than 1.5 times normal SGOT no greater than 3 times normal Alkaline phosphatase no greater than 3 times normal No acute hepatitis Renal: Creatinine no greater than 2.0 mg/dL Cardiovascular: No unstable angina No myocardial infarction within prior 6 months Patients with abnormal cardiac conduction are eligible if disease stable for at least 6 months Other: No septicemia or severe infection No severe gastrointestinal bleeding No other invasive malignancy within past 5 years except nonmelanoma skin cancer Any previous cancer treatment must not contraindicate this protocol therapy
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: Biologic therapy: Not specified Chemotherapy: No prior chemotherapy Endocrine therapy: Not specified Radiotherapy: No prior radiotherapy Surgery: See Disease Characteristics No more than 6 weeks since prior surgery
Trial locations and contacts
67 sites in 2 countries.
67 sites in 2 countries
United States66 sites
Abington Memorial Hospital
Abington, Pennsylvania, 19001
Cancer Center of Albany Medical Center
Albany, New York, 12208
CCOP - Ann Arbor Regional
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48106
Emory University Hospital - Atlanta
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
CCOP - Atlanta Regional
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342-1701
Johns Hopkins Oncology Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21231
Medicine Branch
Bethesda, Maryland, 20892
Radiation Oncology Branch
Bethesda, Maryland, 20892
CCOP - Montana Cancer Consortium
Billings, Montana, 59101
University of Alabama Comprehensive Cancer Center
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
State University of New York Health Science Center at Brooklyn
Brooklyn, New York, 11203
Cooper Hospital/University Medical Center
Camden, New Jersey, 08103
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, UNC
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599-7295
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425-0721
Cancer Center, University of Virginia HSC
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908
Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
University of Chicago Cancer Research Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
Barrett Cancer Center, The University Hospital
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
Ireland Cancer Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106-5065
Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital - Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Simmons Cancer Center - Dallas
Dallas, Texas, 75235-9154
CCOP - Central Illinois
Decatur, Illinois, 62526
University of Colorado Cancer Center
Denver, Colorado, 80262
Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
Duke Comprehensive Cancer Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
CCOP - Evanston
Evanston, Illinois, 60201
Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033
MBCCOP - Hawaii
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96813
University of Texas - MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030
Indiana University Cancer Center
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202-5265
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242
University of Mississippi Medical Center
Jackson, Mississippi, 39216-4505
CCOP - Kansas City
Kansas City, Missouri, 64131
CCOP - Southern Nevada Cancer Research Foundation
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89106
Albert B. Chandler Medical Center, University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, 40536-0084
St. Barnabas Medical Center
Livingston, New Jersey, 07039
USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center
Los Angeles, California, 90033-0800
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCLA
Los Angeles, California, 90095-1781
North Shore University Hospital
Manhasset, New York, 11030
CCOP - Baptist Cancer Institute
Memphis, Tennessee, 38117
University of Minnesota Cancer Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455
Morristown Memorial Hospital
Morristown, New Jersey, 07962-1956
Brookview Research, Inc.
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10021
University of Oklahoma College of Medicine
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73190
CCOP - Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium
Omaha, Nebraska, 68131
Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
Orange, California, 92868
Women's Cancer Center
Palo Alto, California, 94304
University of Pennsylvania Cancer Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Kimmel Cancer Center of Thomas Jefferson University - Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
Fox Chase Cancer Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19111
CCOP - Greater Phoenix
Phoenix, Arizona, 85006-2726
CCOP - Columbia River Program
Portland, Oregon, 97213
University of Rochester Cancer Center
Rochester, New York, 14642
University of Washington Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98195-6043
CCOP - Upstate Carolina
Spartanburg, South Carolina, 29303
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
State University of New York Health Sciences Center - Stony Brook
Stony Brook, New York, 11790-7775
Tacoma General Hospital
Tacoma, Washington, 98405
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute
Tampa, Florida, 33612
CCOP - Sooner State
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74136
Lombardi Cancer Center, Georgetown University
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007
Walter Reed Army Medical Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20307-5000
Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157-1082
University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01655
About this study
Official title: A Phase III Randomized Trial of Intravenous Paclitaxel and Cisplatin Versus Intravenous Paclitaxel, Intraperitoneal Cisplatin and Intraperitoneal Paclitaxel in Patients With Optimal Stage III Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma or Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug and giving drugs in different ways may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known whether intravenous two-drug combination chemotherapy is more effective than intravenous and intraperitoneal infusions of three-drug combination chemotherapy for treating primary peritoneal or stage III epithelial ovarian cancer.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of intravenous two-drug combination chemotherapy with intravenous and intraperitoneal three-drug combination chemotherapy in treating patients who have primary peritoneal or stage III epithelial ovarian cancer.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES: I. Compare pathological response, recurrence-free interval, and survival in patients with optimal stage III epithelial ovarian cancer or primary peritoneal carcinoma receiving intravenous (IV) paclitaxel and cisplatin vs IV paclitaxel and intraperitoneal (IP) cisplatin plus IP paclitaxel. II. Compare the toxic effects and complications of these 2 treatment regimens in these patients. III. Determine the frequency and prognostic significance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in these patients. IV. Determine the effect of non-genetic risk factors on the course of disease in BRCA1- and BRCA2-related ovarian cancer or primary peritoneal carcinoma. V. Compare the quality of life of these patients receiving these treatments.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized study. Patients are stratified according to gross residual disease (present vs absent) and whether second-look surgery will be performed at the end of treatment (yes vs no). Blood is drawn for BRCA mutation analysis and DNA extraction before the start of chemotherapy, but after randomization. Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms. Patients in arm I receive IV paclitaxel by 24-hour infusion on day 1 followed by IV cisplatin on day 2. Patients in arm II receive IV paclitaxel by 24-hour infusion on day 1 followed by intraperitoneal (IP) cisplatin on day 2, plus IP paclitaxel on day 8. Treatment for both arms repeats every 3 weeks for a total of 6 treatment courses. Following chemotherapy, second look surgery is performed if selected by the patient. Quality-of-life assessments are performed prior to randomization, prior to course 4, 3-6 weeks after the completion of course 6 and prior to second look surgery if selected, 6 months after treatment is completed, and 12 months after treatment is completed. Patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years, then every 6 months thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: Approximately 384 patients will be accrued for this study within 16 months.
- Conditions
- Ovarian Cancer, Primary Peritoneal Cavity Cancer
- Being tested
- cisplatin, paclitaxel, quality-of-life assessment
- Keywords
- stage III ovarian epithelial cancer, recurrent ovarian epithelial cancer, ovarian undifferentiated adenocarcinoma, ovarian mixed epithelial carcinoma, ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma, ovarian mucinous cystadenocarcinoma, ovarian endometrioid adenocarcinoma, ovarian clear cell cystadenocarcinoma, primary peritoneal cavity cancer, Brenner tumor
- Medical subject headings
- Ovarian Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Brenner Tumor
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
cisplatinDrug
paclitaxelDrug
quality-of-life assessmentProcedure or surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 May 2004 (estimated)
- Study startMar 1998
- Primary completionJan 2006
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (32)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Ovarian CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Enrolment
- 384 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Gynecologic Oncology Group
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Investigators
- Deborah K. Armstrong, MD, Study chair, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00003322
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CDR0000066273
- Other IDs
- GOG-0172
- Status last verified
- Aug 2012
- First submitted
- 1 Nov 1999
- Last updated
- 27 May 2013
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Barlin JN, Dao F, Bou Zgheib N, Ferguson SE, Sabbatini PJ, Hensley ML, Bell-McGuinn KM, Konner J, Tew WP, Aghajanian C, Chi DS. Progression-free and overall survival of a modified outpatient regimen of primary intravenous/intraperitoneal paclitaxel and intraperitoneal cisplatin in ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Jun;125(3):621-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.03.027. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
PubMed 22446622Rubatt JM, Darcy KM, Tian C, Muggia F, Dhir R, Armstrong DK, Bookman MA, Niedernhofer LJ, Deloia J, Birrer M, Krivak TC. Pre-treatment tumor expression of ERCC1 in women with advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer is not predictive of clinical outcomes: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 May;125(2):421-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.01.008. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
PubMed 22261301Tian C, Ambrosone CB, Darcy KM, Krivak TC, Armstrong DK, Bookman MA, Davis W, Zhao H, Moysich K, Gallion H, DeLoia JA. Common variants in ABCB1, ABCC2 and ABCG2 genes and clinical outcomes among women with advanced stage ovarian cancer treated with platinum and taxane-based chemotherapy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Mar;124(3):575-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.11.022. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
PubMed 22112610Hamilton CA, Miller A, Miller C, Krivak TC, Farley JH, Chernofsky MR, Stany MP, Rose GS, Markman M, Ozols RF, Armstrong DK, Maxwell GL. The impact of disease distribution on survival in patients with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer cytoreduced to microscopic residual: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Sep;122(3):521-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.04.041. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
PubMed 21683993Aletti GD, Nordquist D, Hartmann L, Gallenberg M, Long HJ, Cliby WA. From randomized trial to practice: single institution experience using the GOG 172 i.p. chemotherapy regimen for ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol. 2010 Sep;21(9):1772-1778. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq025. Epub 2010 Feb 5.
PubMed 20139154von Gruenigen VE, Huang HQ, Gil KM, Gibbons HE, Monk BJ, Rose PG, Armstrong DK, Cella D, Wenzel L. A comparison of quality-of-life domains and clinical factors in ovarian cancer patients: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010 May;39(5):839-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.09.022.
PubMed 20471545Darcy KM, Tian C, Ambrosone CB, et al.: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study of associations between polymorphisms in ABC transporter genes (ABCB1, ABCC2, and ABCG2) and outcome in advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer treated with platinum and taxane chemotherapy. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 27 (Suppl 15): A-5567, 2009.
Farley JH, Tian C, Rose GS, Brown CL, Birrer M, Maxwell GL. Race does not impact outcome for advanced ovarian cancer patients treated with cisplatin/paclitaxel: an analysis of Gynecologic Oncology Group trials. Cancer. 2009 Sep 15;115(18):4210-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24482.
PubMed 19536873Zorn KK, Tian C, McGuire WP, Hoskins WJ, Markman M, Muggia FM, Rose PG, Ozols RF, Spriggs D, Armstrong DK. The prognostic value of pretreatment CA 125 in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Cancer. 2009 Mar 1;115(5):1028-35. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24084.
PubMed 19156927Havrilesky LJ, Secord AA, Darcy KM, Armstrong DK, Kulasingam S; Gynecologic Oncology Group. Cost effectiveness of intraperitoneal compared with intravenous chemotherapy for women with optimally resected stage III ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Sep 1;26(25):4144-50. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.1961.
PubMed 18757328Bristow RE, Santillan A, Salani R, Diaz-Montes TP, Giuntoli RL 2nd, Meisner BC, Armstrong DK, Frick KD. Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel versus intravenous carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy for Stage III ovarian cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Sep;106(3):476-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.05.043. Epub 2007 Aug 3.
PubMed 17688927Winter WE 3rd, Maxwell GL, Tian C, Carlson JW, Ozols RF, Rose PG, Markman M, Armstrong DK, Muggia F, McGuire WP; Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Prognostic factors for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Aug 20;25(24):3621-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.2517.
PubMed 17704411Alberts DS, Delforge A. Maximizing the delivery of intraperitoneal therapy while minimizing drug toxicity and maintaining quality of life. Semin Oncol. 2006 Dec;33(6 Suppl 12):S8-17. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2006.11.003.
PubMed 17223445Armstrong DK, Brady MF. Intraperitoneal therapy for ovarian cancer: a treatment ready for prime time. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Oct 1;24(28):4531-3. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.7140. No abstract available.
PubMed 17008690Markman M. Clinical efficacy supporting the role of intraperitoneal drug delivery in the primary chemotherapeutic management of small-volume residual advanced ovarian cancer. Semin Oncol. 2006 Dec;33(6 Suppl 12):S3-7. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2006.11.002.
PubMed 17223444
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 May 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase III Randomized Trial of Intravenous Paclitaxel and Cisplatin Versus Intravenous Paclitaxel, Intraperitoneal Cisplatin and Intraperitoneal Paclitaxel in Patients With Optimal Stage III Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma or Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00003322
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CDR0000066273
- Conditions
- Ovarian Cancer, Primary Peritoneal Cavity Cancer
- Keywords
- stage III ovarian epithelial cancer, recurrent ovarian epithelial cancer, ovarian undifferentiated adenocarcinoma, ovarian mixed epithelial carcinoma, ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma, ovarian mucinous cystadenocarcinoma, ovarian endometrioid adenocarcinoma, ovarian clear cell cystadenocarcinoma
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 384 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Gynecologic Oncology GroupResearch network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Study start
- Mar 1998
- Primary completion
- Jan 2006 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 May 2004 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug and giving drugs in different ways may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known whether intravenous two-drug combination chemotherapy is more effective than intravenous and intraperitoneal infusions of three-drug combination chemotherapy for treating primary peritoneal or stage III epithelial ovarian cancer.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of intravenous two-drug combination chemotherapy with intravenous and intraperitoneal three-drug combination chemotherapy in treating patients who have primary peritoneal or stage III epithelial ovarian cancer.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES: I. Compare pathological response, recurrence-free interval, and survival in patients with optimal stage III epithelial ovarian cancer or primary peritoneal carcinoma receiving intravenous (IV) paclitaxel and cisplatin vs IV paclitaxel and intraperitoneal (IP) cisplatin plus IP paclitaxel. II. Compare the toxic effects and complications of these 2 treatment regimens in these patients. III. Determine the frequency and prognostic significance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in these patients. IV. Determine the effect of non-genetic risk factors on the course of disease in BRCA1- and BRCA2-related ovarian cancer or primary peritoneal carcinoma. V. Compare the quality of life of these patients receiving these treatments.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized study. Patients are stratified according to gross residual disease (present vs absent) and whether second-look surgery will be performed at the end of treatment (yes vs no). Blood is drawn for BRCA mutation analysis and DNA extraction before the start of chemotherapy, but after randomization. Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms. Patients in arm I receive IV paclitaxel by 24-hour infusion on day 1 followed by IV cisplatin on day 2. Patients in arm II receive IV paclitaxel by 24-hour infusion on day 1 followed by intraperitoneal (IP) cisplatin on day 2, plus IP paclitaxel on day 8. Treatment for both arms repeats every 3 weeks for a total of 6 treatment courses. Following chemotherapy, second look surgery is performed if selected by the patient. Quality-of-life assessments are performed prior to randomization, prior to course 4, 3-6 weeks after the completion of course 6 and prior to second look surgery if selected, 6 months after treatment is completed, and 12 months after treatment is completed. Patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years, then every 6 months thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: Approximately 384 patients will be accrued for this study within 16 months.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
Who may qualify
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| cisplatin | Drug | – |
| paclitaxel | Drug | – |
| quality-of-life assessment | Procedure or surgery | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 May 2013.
- Background: PubMed 22446622Barlin JN, Dao F, Bou Zgheib N, Ferguson SE, Sabbatini PJ, Hensley ML, Bell-McGuinn KM, Konner J, Tew WP, Aghajanian C, Chi DS. Progression-free and overall survival of a modified outpatient regimen of primary intravenous/intraperitoneal paclitaxel and intraperitoneal cisplatin in ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Jun;125(3):621-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.03.027. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
- Background: PubMed 22261301Rubatt JM, Darcy KM, Tian C, Muggia F, Dhir R, Armstrong DK, Bookman MA, Niedernhofer LJ, Deloia J, Birrer M, Krivak TC. Pre-treatment tumor expression of ERCC1 in women with advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer is not predictive of clinical outcomes: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 May;125(2):421-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.01.008. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
- Background: PubMed 22112610Tian C, Ambrosone CB, Darcy KM, Krivak TC, Armstrong DK, Bookman MA, Davis W, Zhao H, Moysich K, Gallion H, DeLoia JA. Common variants in ABCB1, ABCC2 and ABCG2 genes and clinical outcomes among women with advanced stage ovarian cancer treated with platinum and taxane-based chemotherapy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Mar;124(3):575-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.11.022. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
- Background: PubMed 21683993Hamilton CA, Miller A, Miller C, Krivak TC, Farley JH, Chernofsky MR, Stany MP, Rose GS, Markman M, Ozols RF, Armstrong DK, Maxwell GL. The impact of disease distribution on survival in patients with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer cytoreduced to microscopic residual: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Sep;122(3):521-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.04.041. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
- Background: PubMed 20139154Aletti GD, Nordquist D, Hartmann L, Gallenberg M, Long HJ, Cliby WA. From randomized trial to practice: single institution experience using the GOG 172 i.p. chemotherapy regimen for ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol. 2010 Sep;21(9):1772-1778. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq025. Epub 2010 Feb 5.
- Background: PubMed 20471545von Gruenigen VE, Huang HQ, Gil KM, Gibbons HE, Monk BJ, Rose PG, Armstrong DK, Cella D, Wenzel L. A comparison of quality-of-life domains and clinical factors in ovarian cancer patients: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010 May;39(5):839-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.09.022.
- BackgroundDarcy KM, Tian C, Ambrosone CB, et al.: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study of associations between polymorphisms in ABC transporter genes (ABCB1, ABCC2, and ABCG2) and outcome in advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer treated with platinum and taxane chemotherapy. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 27 (Suppl 15): A-5567, 2009.
- Background: PubMed 19536873Farley JH, Tian C, Rose GS, Brown CL, Birrer M, Maxwell GL. Race does not impact outcome for advanced ovarian cancer patients treated with cisplatin/paclitaxel: an analysis of Gynecologic Oncology Group trials. Cancer. 2009 Sep 15;115(18):4210-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24482.
- Background: PubMed 19156927Zorn KK, Tian C, McGuire WP, Hoskins WJ, Markman M, Muggia FM, Rose PG, Ozols RF, Spriggs D, Armstrong DK. The prognostic value of pretreatment CA 125 in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Cancer. 2009 Mar 1;115(5):1028-35. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24084.
- Background: PubMed 18757328Havrilesky LJ, Secord AA, Darcy KM, Armstrong DK, Kulasingam S; Gynecologic Oncology Group. Cost effectiveness of intraperitoneal compared with intravenous chemotherapy for women with optimally resected stage III ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Sep 1;26(25):4144-50. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.1961.
- Background: PubMed 17688927Bristow RE, Santillan A, Salani R, Diaz-Montes TP, Giuntoli RL 2nd, Meisner BC, Armstrong DK, Frick KD. Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel versus intravenous carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy for Stage III ovarian cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Sep;106(3):476-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.05.043. Epub 2007 Aug 3.
- Background: PubMed 17704411Winter WE 3rd, Maxwell GL, Tian C, Carlson JW, Ozols RF, Rose PG, Markman M, Armstrong DK, Muggia F, McGuire WP; Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Prognostic factors for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Aug 20;25(24):3621-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.2517.
Related trials for Ovarian Cancer
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
Recruiting
A Study to Compare Two Surgical Procedures in Individuals With BRCA1 Mutations to Assess Reduced Risk of Ovarian Cancer
Ovarian Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Investigation of Ubamatamab Combination Therapy in Adult Participants With Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer
Ovarian Cancer, Fallopian Tube Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Phase I/II Study of the Anti-Programmed Death Ligand-1 Durvalumab Antibody (MEDI4736) in Combination With Olaparib and/or Cediranib for Advanced Solid Tumors and Advanced or Recurrent Ovarian, Triple Negative Breast, Lung, Prostate and Colorectal Can...
Colorectal Neoplasms, Breast Neoplasms
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Deborah K. Armstrong, MD study chair
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
67 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing cisplatin, paclitaxel and quality-of-life assessment in people with Ovarian Cancer and Primary Peritoneal Cavity Cancer, run by Gynecologic Oncology Group at 67 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 May 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 67 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00003322, which also lists 32 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 May 2013.