AzTrials
AzTrials

LymphomaPhase 3NCT00003578

High Dose Chemotherapy With or Without Bone Marrow Transplantation in Treating Patients With Intermediate- or High-Grade Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

A Phase 3 study testing CHOP regimen, carmustine and cyclophosphamide in people with Lymphoma, run by Lymphoma Trials Office at 72 sites in 4 countries.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Bone marrow transplantation may allow doctors to give higher doses of chemotherapy drugs and kill more cancer cells. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Lymphoma
What is being tested?
CHOP regimen, carmustine and cyclophosphamide
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
500 participants
Where
72 sitesin 4 countries
Study dates
Jan 1993to not given
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Histologically confirmed intermediate or high grade adult non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: Follicular large cell lymphoma Diffuse mixed cell lymphoma Diffuse large cell lymphoma Diffuse immunoblastic lymphoma Poor prognostic features defined as the presence of 2 or 3 of the following: Stage III/IV Lactase dehydrogenase greater than normal ECOG performance status 2-4 A new classification scheme for adult non-Hodgkin's lymphoma has been adopted by PDQ. The terminology of "indolent" or "aggressive" lymphoma will replace the former terminology of "low", "intermediate", or "high" grade lymphoma. However, this protocol uses the former terminology.

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: 16 to 65 Performance status: See Disease Characteristics Life expectancy: Not specified Hematopoietic: Not specified Hepatic: See Disease Characteristics Renal: Not specified Other: No other medical condition prohibiting intensive therapy

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: At least 5 years since prior systemic therapy for cancer

Trial locations and contacts

72 sites in 4 countries.

72 sites in 4 countries

United Kingdom66 sites
  • Stoke Mandeville Hospital

    Aylesbury-Buckinghamshire, England, HP21 8AL

  • Ysbyty Gwynedd

    Bangor, Wales, LL57 2PW

  • Royal United Hospital

    Bath, England, BA1 3NG

  • Belfast City Hospital Trust

    Belfast, Northern Ireland, BT9 7AB

  • City Hospital - Birmingham

    Birmingham, England, B18 7QH

  • Birmingham Heartlands and Solihull NHS Trust (Teaching)

    Birmingham, England, B9 5SS

  • Royal Bournemouth Hospital

    Bournemouth, BH7 7DW

  • Southmead Hospital

    Bristol, England, BS10 5NB

  • Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre

    Bristol, England, BS2 8ED

  • Queen's Hospital, Burton

    Burton-on-Trent, England, DE14 3QH

  • Kent and Canterbury Hospital

    Canterbury, England, CT2 7NR

  • Law Hospital

    Carluke UK, ML8 5ER

  • Cheltenham General Hospital

    Cheltenham, England, GL53 7AN

  • Countess of Chester Hospital

    Chester, England, CH2 1UL

  • Saint Richards Hospital

    Chichester, P019 4SE

  • Derbyshire Royal Infirmary

    Derby, England, DE1 2QY

  • Chase Farm Hospital

    Enfield, NG31 8DG

  • Epsom General Hospital

    Epsom Surrey, KT19 7EG

  • Grantham and District Hospital

    Grantham, NG31 8DG

  • Royal Free Hospital

    Hampstead, London, England, NW3 2QG

  • Northwick Park Hospital

    Harrow, England, HA1 3UJ

  • Huddersfield Royal Infirmary

    Huddersfield, West Yorks, England, HD3 3EA

  • King George Hospital

    Ilford, Essex, IG3 8YB

  • Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust

    Ipswich, England, IP4 5PD

  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital

    Kings Lynn, PE30 4ET

  • Leeds Teaching Hospital Trust

    Leeds, England, LS1 3EX

  • University Hospitals of Leicester

    Leicester, England, LE1 5WW

  • Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen Hospitals

    Liverpool, England, L7 8XP

  • Walton General Hospital

    Liverpool, L9 1AE

  • Whipps Cross Hospital

    London, England, E11 1NR

  • Saint Bartholomew's Hospital

    London, England, EC1A 7BE

  • St. Bartholomew's Hospital

    London, England, EC1A 7BE

  • St. Georges Hospital Medical School

    London, England, SW17 ORE

  • University College London Medical School

    London, England, W1N 8AA

  • University College London

    London, England, W1W 7EJ

  • Charing Cross Hospital

    London, England, W6 8RF

  • Middlesex Hospital- Meyerstein Institute

    London, England, WIT 3AA

  • Newham General Hospital

    London, E13 8RU

  • St. Mary's Hospital

    London, W2 1NY

  • Altnagelvin Area Hospital

    Londonderry, Northern Ireland, BT47 1SB

  • Maidstone Hospital

    Maidstone, England, ME16 9QQ

  • Christie Hospital N.H.S. Trust

    Manchester, England, M20 4BX

  • Clatterbridge Centre for Oncology NHS Trust

    Merseyside, England, L63 4JY

  • Southport and Formby District General Hospital

    Merseyside, England, PR8 6NJ

  • West Middlesex Hospital

    Middlesex, N18 1QZ

  • Milton Keynes General Hospital

    Milton Keynes, England, MK6 5LD

  • Mount Vernon Hospital

    Northwood, England, HA6 2RN

  • Nottingham City Hospital NHS Trust

    Nottingham, England, NG5 1PB

  • Oxford Radcliffe Hospital

    Oxford, England, 0X3 9DU

  • Derriford Hospital

    Plymouth, England, PL6 8DH

  • East Surrey Hospital

    Redhill, RH1 5RH

  • Oldchurch Hospital

    Romford, England, RM7 OBE

  • Rotherham District General Hospital-NHS Trust

    Rotherham, S60 2UD

  • Pembury Hospital

    Royal Tunbridge Wells, Kent, England, TN2 4QJ

  • Scunthorpe General Hospital

    Scunthorpe, DN15 7BH

  • Sheffield Teaching Hospitals

    Sheffield, England, S1O 2JF

  • Weston Park Hospital

    Sheffield, England, S1O 2SJ

  • Royal South Hants Hospital

    Southampton, England, SO14 0YG

  • Staffordshire General Hospital

    Stafford, ST16 3SA

  • Royal Marsden Hospital

    Sutton, England, SM2 5PT

  • Torbay Hospital

    Torquay Devon, England, TQ2 7AA

  • Hillingdon Hospital

    Uxbridge, England, UB8 3NN

  • Sandwell District General Hospital

    West Bromwich, England

  • Good Hope Hospital Trust

    West Midlands, England, B75 7RR

  • Pontefract General Infirmary

    West Yorks, England, WF8 1PL

  • New Cross Hospital

    Wolverhampton, England, WV10 0QP

Other trials in United Kingdom

Norway3 sites
  • Norwegian Radium Hospital

    Oslo, N-0310

  • Ullevall Hospital

    Oslo, N-0407 4

  • University of Tromso

    Tromsø, N-9037

Other trials in Norway

Denmark2 sites
  • Aarhus Amtssygehus

    Aarhus, DK 8000

  • Rigshospitalet

    Copenhagen, 2100

Other trials in Denmark

Czechia1 site
  • Charles University Hospital

    Prague (Praha), 128 08

Other trials in Czechia

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Trial to Evaluate Early High Dose Therapy and Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation as Part of Planned Initial Therapy for Poor Risk Intermediate/High Grade NHL

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Bone marrow transplantation may allow doctors to give higher doses of chemotherapy drugs and kill more cancer cells. It is not yet known whether high dose chemotherapy plus bone marrow transplantation is more effective than high dose chemotherapy alone for intermediate- or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of high dose chemotherapy with or without bone marrow transplantation in treating patients who have intermediate- or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Read the detailed description

OBJECTIVES: I. Assess the value of early intensification with autologous bone marrow transplantation or stem cell support in patients with poor prognosis intermediate or high grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified by age (under 50 vs 50 and over), bone marrow involvement (yes vs no), and country. All patients receive cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine on day 1 and prednisone on days 1-5. Courses repeat every 21 days. Patients receive a minimum of 6 courses of treatment in the absence of disease progression and unacceptable toxicity. Arm I: Patients receive carmustine IV over 2 hours on day 1 in week 9 or 10. Etoposide and cytarabine IV are administered over 30 minutes on days 2-5. Melphalan IV is administered over 5 minutes on day 6. Patients receive cryopreserved bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cells on day 7. Arm II: Patients continue conventional therapy. Patients are followed at 8-9 weeks and 6 months.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: This study will accrue 500 patients.

Conditions
Lymphoma
Being tested
CHOP regimen, carmustine, cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, doxorubicin hydrochloride
Keywords
stage III grade 3 follicular lymphoma, stage III adult diffuse mixed cell lymphoma, stage III adult diffuse large cell lymphoma, stage III adult immunoblastic large cell lymphoma, stage IV grade 3 follicular lymphoma, stage IV adult diffuse mixed cell lymphoma, stage IV adult diffuse large cell lymphoma, stage IV adult immunoblastic large cell lymphoma
Medical subject headings
Lymphoma, Lymphoma, Follicular, Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin, Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse, Lymphoma, Large-Cell, Immunoblastic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Jan 2004 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 1993

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Enrolment
500 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00003578
Sponsor's protocol ID
CDR0000066645
Other IDs
BNLI-LY02, EU-98039
Status last verified
May 2007
First submitted
1 Nov 1999
Last updated
20 Sep 2013
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing CHOP regimen, carmustine and cyclophosphamide in people with Lymphoma, run by Lymphoma Trials Office at 72 sites in 4 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Sep 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 72 sites in United Kingdom, Norway, Denmark, Czechia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Sep 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in