Mediastinal CancerPhase 3NCT00003941
Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Peripheral Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Men With Previously Untreated Germ Cell Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing bleomycin sulfate, filgrastim and cisplatin in people with Mediastinal Cancer and Metastatic Cancer, run by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC at 37 sites in 12 countries.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more cancer cells. Peripheral stem cell transplant may allow the doctor to give higher doses of chemotherapy and kill more cancer cells. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 to 50 years, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Mediastinal Cancer, Metastatic Cancer, Testicular Germ Cell Tumor
- What is being tested?
- bleomycin sulfate, filgrastim and cisplatin
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 222 participants
- Where
- 37 sitesin 12 countries
- Study dates
- Apr 1999to Jun 2007
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 to 50 years
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Histologically proven germ cell cancer
- Nonseminoma OR
- Combined seminoma and nonseminoma
- Poor prognosis (nonseminoma):
- Testis/retroperitoneal primary AND
- One of the following poor tumor markers
- AFP greater than 10,000 iu/L
- HCG greater than 50,000 iu/L
- LDH greater than 10 times upper limit of normal OR
- Nonpulmonary visceral metastases (i.e., liver, bone, or brain) OR
- Mediastinal primary
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Age:
- 16 to 50
Sex:
- Male
Performance status:
- WHO 0-3
Life expectancy:
- Not specified
Hematopoietic:
- WBC at least 3,000/mm^3
- Platelet count at least 100,000/mm^3
Hepatic:
- Bilirubin no greater than 1.25 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
- AST no greater than 2 times ULN
Renal:
- Creatinine clearance at least 60 mL/min (unless due to obstructive uropathy correctable by nephrostomy)
Other:
- No other malignancy except basal cell skin cancer
- No neuropathy
- No other serious illness or medical condition
- No psychological, familial, sociological, or geographical condition that would prevent compliance
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Biologic therapy:
- Not specified
Chemotherapy:
- No prior chemotherapy
Endocrine therapy:
- Not specified
Radiotherapy:
- Concurrent radiotherapy for brain metastases allowed
Surgery:
- Concurrent surgery for brain metastases allowed
Trial locations and contacts
37 sites in 12 countries.
37 sites in 12 countries
Germany14 sites
Universitaetsklinikum Bonn
Bonn, D-53105
Staedtisches Klinikum Dessau
Dessau, D-06822
St. Johannes Hospital - Medical Klinik II
Duisburg, D-47166
Universitaetsklinikum Essen
Essen, D-45122
Staedtische Kliniken Frankfurt am Main - Hoechst
Frankfurt, D-65929
Klinik Fuer Innere Medizin, Hematology/Oncology, Ernst Moritz Armdt Universitaet
Greifswald, D-17487
Universitaetsklinikum Halle
Halle, DOH-06112
Universitaetsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Hamburg, D-20246
Universitaetsklinikum des Saarlandes
Homburg, D-66421
Knappschaft Krankenhaus
Langendreer, D-44892
Johannes Gutenberg University
Mainz, D-55101
Klinikum Rechts Der Isar - Technische Universitaet Muenchen
Munich (Muenchen), D-81675
Klinikum Nuernberg - Klinikum Nord
Nuremberg, D-90419
Klinikum der Universitaet Regensburg
Regensburg, D-93053
Spain6 sites
Hospital de la Santa Cruz i Sant Pau
Barcelona, 08025
Institut Catala D'Oncologia
Barcelona, 08907
Hospital Donostia
Donostia / San Sebastian, 20014
Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria
Málaga, 29010
Hospital Universitario LA FE
Valencia, 46009
Hospital Clinico Universitario Lozano Blesa
Zaragoza, 50009
Netherlands4 sites
Leiden University Medical Center
Leiden, 2300 CA
Academisch Ziekenhuis Maastricht
Maastricht, 6202 AZ
Universitair Medisch Centrum St. Radboud - Nijmegen
Nijmegen, NL-6500 HB
University Medical Center Rotterdam at Erasmus Medical Center
Rotterdam, 3000 CA
Belgium3 sites
Institut Jules Bordet
Brussels (Bruxelles), 1000
Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen
Edegem, B-2650
U.Z. Gasthuisberg
Leuven, B-3000
Denmark2 sites
Aarhus University Hospital - Aarhus Sygehus - Norrebrogade
Aarhus, DK-8000
Rigshospitalet - Copenhagen University Hospital
Copenhagen, 2100
United Kingdom2 sites
Velindre Cancer Center at Velindre Hospital
Cardiff, Wales, CF4 7XL
Leeds Cancer Centre at St. James's University Hospital
Leeds, England, LS9 7TF
Austria1 site
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Applied Cancer Research at Kaiser Franz Josef Hospital
Vienna (Wien), A-1100
Poland1 site
Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology
Warsaw, 02 781
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Phase III Study of Sequential High-Dose Cisplatinum/Etoposide/Ifosfamide Plus Stem Cell Support Versus BEP in Patients With Poor Prognosis Germ Cell Cancer
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more cancer cells. Peripheral stem cell transplant may allow the doctor to give higher doses of chemotherapy and kill more cancer cells. It is not yet known whether chemotherapy and peripheral stem cell transplant is more effective than chemotherapy alone.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying how well combination chemotherapy works when given with peripheral stem cell transplant and how it compares with combination chemotherapy alone in treating men with previously untreated germ cell cancer.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- Compare the efficacy of standard cisplatin, etoposide, and ifosfamide (VIP) followed by sequential high-dose VIP and stem cell rescue versus bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) in men with previously untreated poor-prognosis germ cell cancer.
- Compare the acute and late toxicities of these treatment regimens in this patient population.
- Compare these regimens in terms of failure-free survival, response rate, and overall survival in these patients.
- Evaluate the quality of life in these patients.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to center, primary mediastinal germ cell tumor (yes vs no), and nonpulmonary visceral metastases (liver vs bone vs brain). Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive etoposide IV over 1 hour followed by cisplatin IV over 1 hour on days 1-5 and bleomycin IV over 30 minutes on days 2, 8, and 15. Treatment repeats every 3 weeks for 4 courses.
- Arm II: Patients receive 1 course of standard dose chemotherapy consisting of etoposide IV over 1 hour followed by cisplatin IV over 1 hour and ifosfamide IV over 1 hour on days 1-5. Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) are harvested around day 12-15. Patients also receive daily filgrastim (G-CSF) subcutaneously beginning on day 6 and continuing until PBSC collection is complete.
After day 21, patients receive high-dose chemotherapy consisting of etoposide IV over 1 hour followed by cisplatin IV over 1 hour, and ifosfamide IV over 1 hour on days -6 through -2. PBSCs are infused on day 0. Patients receive daily G-CSF subcutaneously beginning on day 1 and continuing through day 19 or until blood counts have recovered. Treatment repeats every 3 weeks for 3 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Quality of life is assessed before chemotherapy, at 6 months, and at 2 years after treatment.
Patients are followed monthly for 1 year, every 2 months for 1 year, every 3 months for 1 year, every 6 months for 1 year, and annually thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 222 patients (111 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study within 2 years.
- Being tested
- bleomycin sulfate, filgrastim, cisplatin, etoposide, ifosfamide
- Keywords
- stage III malignant testicular germ cell tumor, mediastinal cancer, testicular embryonal carcinoma, testicular choriocarcinoma, testicular teratoma, testicular yolk sac tumor, testicular embryonal carcinoma and teratoma, testicular embryonal carcinoma and teratoma with seminoma, testicular embryonal carcinoma and yolk sac tumor, testicular embryonal carcinoma and yolk sac tumor with seminoma, testicular embryonal carcinoma and seminoma, testicular yolk sac tumor and teratoma, testicular yolk sac tumor and teratoma with seminoma, testicular choriocarcinoma and yolk sac tumor, testicular choriocarcinoma and embryonal carcinoma, testicular choriocarcinoma and teratoma, testicular choriocarcinoma and seminoma, tumors metastatic to brain, liver metastases, bone metastases
- Medical subject headings
- Mediastinal Neoplasms, Neoplasm Metastasis, Testicular Germ Cell Tumor, Testicular Neoplasms, Teratoma, Testicular, Endodermal Sinus Tumor, Teratoma, Seminoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
bleomycin sulfateBiological
filgrastimBiological
cisplatinDrug
etoposideDrug
ifosfamideDrug
bone marrow ablation with stem cell supportProcedure or surgery
peripheral blood stem cell transplantationProcedure or surgery
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Failure-free survival as measured by Logrank at 1 year
Secondary outcomes (4)
Complete response as measured by negative tumor markers and no residual masses or viable cancer cells at the end of CT scan or debulking surgery
Overall survival as measured by Logrank at 2 years
Quality of life as measured by Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) v3.0 at baseline, at month 6, and at year 2
Toxicity as measured by NCI-CTC v2.0 after each course, every 6 months up to year 5, and yearly
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jan 2003 (estimated)
- Study startApr 1999
- Primary completionJun 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Mediastinal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTCThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Enrolment
- 222 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Gedske Daugaard, MD, DMSc, Study chair, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00003941
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EORTC-30974
- Other IDs
- EORTC-30974
- Status last verified
- Sep 2012
- First submitted
- 1 Nov 1999
- Last updated
- 24 Sep 2012
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Daugaard G, Skoneczna I, Aass N, De Wit R, De Santis M, Dumez H, Marreaud S, Collette L, Lluch JRG, Bokemeyer C, Schmoll HJ. A randomized phase III study comparing standard dose BEP with sequential high-dose cisplatin, etoposide, and ifosfamide (VIP) plus stem-cell support in males with poor-prognosis germ-cell cancer. An intergroup study of EORTC, GTCSG, and Grupo Germinal (EORTC 30974). Ann Oncol. 2011 May;22(5):1054-1061. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq575. Epub 2010 Nov 8.
PubMed 21059637
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Sep 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Phase III Study of Sequential High-Dose Cisplatinum/Etoposide/Ifosfamide Plus Stem Cell Support Versus BEP in Patients With Poor Prognosis Germ Cell Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00003941
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EORTC-30974
- Keywords
- stage III malignant testicular germ cell tumor, mediastinal cancer, testicular embryonal carcinoma, testicular choriocarcinoma, testicular teratoma, testicular yolk sac tumor, testicular embryonal carcinoma and teratoma, testicular embryonal carcinoma and teratoma with seminoma
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 222 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTCResearch network
- Study start
- Apr 1999
- Primary completion
- Jun 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jan 2003 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more cancer cells. Peripheral stem cell transplant may allow the doctor to give higher doses of chemotherapy and kill more cancer cells. It is not yet known whether chemotherapy and peripheral stem cell transplant is more effective than chemotherapy alone.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying how well combination chemotherapy works when given with peripheral stem cell transplant and how it compares with combination chemotherapy alone in treating men with previously untreated germ cell cancer.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- Compare the efficacy of standard cisplatin, etoposide, and ifosfamide (VIP) followed by sequential high-dose VIP and stem cell rescue versus bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) in men with previously untreated poor-prognosis germ cell cancer.
- Compare the acute and late toxicities of these treatment regimens in this patient population.
- Compare these regimens in terms of failure-free survival, response rate, and overall survival in these patients.
- Evaluate the quality of life in these patients.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to center, primary mediastinal germ cell tumor (yes vs no), and nonpulmonary visceral metastases (liver vs bone vs brain). Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive etoposide IV over 1 hour followed by cisplatin IV over 1 hour on days 1-5 and bleomycin IV over 30 minutes on days 2, 8, and 15. Treatment repeats every 3 weeks for 4 courses.
- Arm II: Patients receive 1 course of standard dose chemotherapy consisting of etoposide IV over 1 hour followed by cisplatin IV over 1 hour and ifosfamide IV over 1 hour on days 1-5. Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) are harvested around day 12-15. Patients also receive daily filgrastim (G-CSF) subcutaneously beginning on day 6 and continuing until PBSC collection is complete.
After day 21, patients receive high-dose chemotherapy consisting of etoposide IV over 1 hour followed by cisplatin IV over 1 hour, and ifosfamide IV over 1 hour on days -6 through -2. PBSCs are infused on day 0. Patients receive daily G-CSF subcutaneously beginning on day 1 and continuing through day 19 or until blood counts have recovered. Treatment repeats every 3 weeks for 3 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Quality of life is assessed before chemotherapy, at 6 months, and at 2 years after treatment.
Patients are followed monthly for 1 year, every 2 months for 1 year, every 3 months for 1 year, every 6 months for 1 year, and annually thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 222 patients (111 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study within 2 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 to 50 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| bleomycin sulfate | Biological | – |
| filgrastim | Biological | – |
| cisplatin | Drug | – |
| etoposide | Drug | – |
| ifosfamide | Drug | – |
| bone marrow ablation with stem cell support | Procedure or surgery | – |
| peripheral blood stem cell transplantation | Procedure or surgery | – |
Primary outcome
Failure-free survival as measured by Logrank at 1 year
4 secondary outcomes
Complete response as measured by negative tumor markers and no residual masses or viable cancer cells at the end of CT scan or debulking surgery
Overall survival as measured by Logrank at 2 years
Quality of life as measured by Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) v3.0 at baseline, at month 6, and at year 2
Toxicity as measured by NCI-CTC v2.0 after each course, every 6 months up to year 5, and yearly
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Sep 2012.
- Results publication: PubMed 21059637Daugaard G, Skoneczna I, Aass N, De Wit R, De Santis M, Dumez H, Marreaud S, Collette L, Lluch JRG, Bokemeyer C, Schmoll HJ. A randomized phase III study comparing standard dose BEP with sequential high-dose cisplatin, etoposide, and ifosfamide (VIP) plus stem-cell support in males with poor-prognosis germ-cell cancer. An intergroup study of EORTC, GTCSG, and Grupo Germinal (EORTC 30974). Ann Oncol. 2011 May;22(5):1054-1061. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq575. Epub 2010 Nov 8.
Related trials for Mediastinal Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Nivolumab With or Without Varlilumab in Treating Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Aggressive B-cell Lymphomas
ALK-Positive Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Activated B-Cell Type
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Gene Therapy for CD19-Positive Hematologic Malignancies (SENTRY-CD19)
B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Large B-cell Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 1
Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells for Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, Burkitt Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Obinutuzumab and ICE Chemotherapy in Refractory/Recurrent CD20+ Mature NHL
Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, Burkitt Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Epcoritamab With Dose Adjusted Etoposide, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, Doxorubicin, Prednisone and Rituximab (EPOCH-R) for the Treatment of Aggressive B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, Burkitt Lymphoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Gedske Daugaard, MD, DMSc study chair
Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
37 sites in 12 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing bleomycin sulfate, filgrastim and cisplatin in people with Mediastinal Cancer and Metastatic Cancer, run by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC at 37 sites in 12 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Sep 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 37 sites in Germany, Spain, Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark and 7 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Failure-free survival as measured by Logrank at 1 year. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00003941, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Sep 2012.