Cervical CancerPhase 3NCT00003945
Comparison of Three Chemotherapy Regimens in Treating Patients With Stage IVB, Recurrent, or Persistent Cervical Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing cisplatin and topotecan hydrochloride in people with Cervical Cancer, run by Gynecologic Oncology Group at 11 sites in 4 countries.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known which chemotherapy regimen is more effective for cervical cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Cervical Cancer
- What is being tested?
- cisplatin and topotecan hydrochloride
- How many people
- 400 participants
- Where
- 11 sitesin 4 countries
- Study dates
- Jun 1999to Jan 2007
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Histologically confirmed stage IVB, recurrent, or persistent carcinoma of the cervix that is not amenable to curative treatment with surgery and/or radiotherapy
- Eligible subtypes:
- Squamous cell carcinoma
- Adenosquamous carcinoma
- Adenocarcinoma
- Measurable disease by physical examination, radiography, CT scan, or MRI
- Measurable disease by CT scan/MRI without biopsy confirmation allowed if lesions are at least 3 cm and well defined
- No craniospinal metastases
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Age:
- 18 and over
Performance status:
- GOG 0-2
Life expectancy:
- Not specified
Hematopoietic:
- Absolute neutrophil count at least 1,500/mm^3
- Platelet count at least 100,000/mm^3
Hepatic:
- Bilirubin no greater than 1.5 times normal
- SGOT no greater than 3 times normal
- Alkaline phosphatase no greater than 3 times normal
Renal:
- Creatinine no greater than 1.5 mg/dL
- No bilateral hydronephrosis that cannot be alleviated by ureteral stents or percutaneous drainage
Other:
- Not pregnant or nursing
- Fertile patients must use effective contraception
- No clinically significant infection
- No other prior invasive malignancy within the past 5 years except nonmelanoma skin cancer
- Body surface area no greater than 2.0 m^2
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Biologic therapy:
- Not specified
Chemotherapy:
- At least 6 weeks since prior chemoradiotherapy and recovered
- No prior chemotherapy except when used concurrently with radiotherapy
Endocrine therapy:
- Not specified
Radiotherapy:
- See Disease Characteristics
- See Chemotherapy
- At least 3 weeks since prior radiotherapy only and recovered
Surgery:
- Recovered from prior surgery
Other:
- No prior anticancer treatment that would preclude study therapy
Trial locations and contacts
11 sites in 4 countries.
11 sites in 4 countries
United States8 sites
MBCCOP - University of New Mexico HSC
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87131
John Stoddard Cancer Center at Iowa Methodist Medical Center
Des Moines, Iowa, 50309
Mercy Cancer Center at Mercy Medical Center-Des Moines
Des Moines, Iowa, 50314
Iowa Lutheran Hospital
Des Moines, Iowa, 50316-2301
CCOP - St. Vincent Hospital Cancer Center, Green Bay
Green Bay, Wisconsin, 54307-3453
Penn State Cancer Institute at Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033-0850
Indiana University Cancer Center
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202-5289
Midlands Cancer Center at Midlands Community Hospital
Papillion, Nebraska, 68128-4157
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Phase III Study of Cisplatin Versus Cisplatin Plus Topotecan Versus MVAC in Stage IVB, Recurrent or Persistent Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known which chemotherapy regimen is more effective for cervical cancer.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of three different chemotherapy regimens in treating patients with stage IVB, recurrent, or persistent cervical cancer.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- Compare the response rate and survival of patients with stage IVB, recurrent, or persistent carcinoma of the cervix treated with cisplatin only vs cisplatin plus topotecan vs methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC). (Arm III (MVAC) closed to accrual effective 07/23/2001.)
- Compare the toxic effects of these regimens in this patient population.
- Compare health-related quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to GOG performance status. Patients are randomized to one of three treatment arms. (Arm III closed to accrual effective 07/23/2001.)
- Arm I: Patients receive cisplatin IV once every 21 days.
- Arm II:Patients receive topotecan IV over 30 minutes on days 1-3 and cisplatin IV (beginning after topotecan infusion) on day 1. Courses repeat every 21 days.
- Arm III:Patients receive methotrexate IV on days 1, 15, and 22, vinblastine IV on days 2, 15, and 22, and doxorubicin IV and cisplatin IV on day 2. Courses repeat every 28 days. (Arm III closed to accrual effective 07/23/2001.) Treatment in all arms continues for a maximum of 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. (Arm III closed to accrual effective 07/23/2001.)
Quality of life is assessed before randomization, before course 2, before course 5 (arms I and II), before course 4 (arm III), and at 9 months. (Arm III closed to accrual effective 07/23/2001.)
Patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 400 patients (133 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study within 2 years. (Arm III closed to accrual effective 07/23/2001.)
- Conditions
- Cervical Cancer
- Being tested
- cisplatin, topotecan hydrochloride
- Keywords
- recurrent cervical cancer, stage IVB cervical cancer, cervical squamous cell carcinoma, cervical adenocarcinoma, cervical adenosquamous cell carcinoma
- Medical subject headings
- Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
cisplatinDrug
topotecan hydrochlorideDrug
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jan 2003 (estimated)
- Study startJun 1999
- Primary completionJan 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cervical CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Enrolment
- 400 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Gynecologic Oncology Group
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
- Investigators
- Harry J. Long, MD, Study chair, Mayo ClinicHiginia R. Cardenes, MD, PhD, Study chair, Indiana University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00003945
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CDR0000067138
- Other IDs
- GOG-0179, ECOG-G0179
- Status last verified
- Sep 2004
- First submitted
- 1 Nov 1999
- Last updated
- 27 May 2013
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Chase DM, Huang HQ, Wenzel L, Cella D, McQuellon R, Long HJ, Moore DH, Monk BJ. Quality of life and survival in advanced cervical cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 May;125(2):315-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.01.047. Epub 2012 Feb 1.
PubMed 22307062Moore DH, Tian C, Monk BJ, Long HJ, Omura GA, Bloss JD. Prognostic factors for response to cisplatin-based chemotherapy in advanced cervical carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol. 2010 Jan;116(1):44-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.09.006. Epub 2009 Oct 22.
PubMed 19853287Paton F, Paulden M, Saramago P, Manca A, Misso K, Palmer S, Eastwood A. Topotecan for the treatment of recurrent and stage IVB carcinoma of the cervix. Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14 Suppl 1:55-62. doi: 10.3310/hta14Suppl1/08.
PubMed 20507804Plaxe SC, Brooks SE, Tian C, Bloss JD, Moore DH, Long HJ. Influence of race on tolerance of platinum-based chemotherapy and clinical outcomes in women with advanced and recurrent cervical cancer: a pooled analysis of 3 Gynecologic Oncology Group studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Nov;199(5):539.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.04.038. Epub 2008 Jun 20.
PubMed 18565487Moore DH, Tian C, Monk BJ, et al.: Factors predictive of response to cisplatin-based chemotherapy in stage IVB persistent or recurrent cervical carcinoma: a multivariate analysis of three Gynecologic Oncology Group trials. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 25 (Suppl 18): A-5534, 282s, 2007.
Tewari KS, Monk BJ. Gynecologic oncology group trials of chemotherapy for metastatic and recurrent cervical cancer. Curr Oncol Rep. 2005 Nov;7(6):419-34. doi: 10.1007/s11912-005-0007-z.
PubMed 16221379Long HJ 3rd, Monk BJ, Huang HQ, Grendys EC Jr, McMeekin DS, Sorosky J, Miller DS, Eaton LA, Fiorica JV; Gynecologic Oncology Group. Clinical results and quality of life analysis for the MVAC combination (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin) in carcinoma of the uterine cervix: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2006 Mar;100(3):537-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.09.023. Epub 2005 Oct 10.
PubMed 16216315Long HJ 3rd, Bundy BN, Grendys EC Jr, Benda JA, McMeekin DS, Sorosky J, Miller DS, Eaton LA, Fiorica JV; Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Randomized phase III trial of cisplatin with or without topotecan in carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jul 20;23(21):4626-33. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.10.021. Epub 2005 May 23.
PubMed 15911865Monk BJ, Huang HQ, Cella D, Long HJ 3rd; Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Quality of life outcomes from a randomized phase III trial of cisplatin with or without topotecan in advanced carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jul 20;23(21):4617-25. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.10.522. Epub 2005 May 23.
PubMed 15911864Grendys EC Jr, Long HJ, Bundy BN, et al.: Randomized phase III trial of cisplatin vs cisplatin plus topotecan vs the combination of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) in stage IVB, recurrent or persistent carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. [Abstract] Int J Gynecol Cancer 14 (Suppl 1): A-039, 12, 2004.
Monk BJ, Huang H, Cella D, et al.: Quality of life outcomes from GOG 179: a phase III trial of cisplatin vs cisplatin/topotecan in recurrent or persistent carcinoma of the cervix. [Abstract] Int J Gynecol Cancer 14 (Suppl 1): A-142, 42, 2004.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 May 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Phase III Study of Cisplatin Versus Cisplatin Plus Topotecan Versus MVAC in Stage IVB, Recurrent or Persistent Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00003945
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CDR0000067138
- Conditions
- Cervical Cancer
- Keywords
- recurrent cervical cancer, stage IVB cervical cancer, cervical squamous cell carcinoma, cervical adenocarcinoma, cervical adenosquamous cell carcinoma
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 400 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Gynecologic Oncology GroupResearch network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
- Study start
- Jun 1999
- Primary completion
- Jan 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jan 2003 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known which chemotherapy regimen is more effective for cervical cancer.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of three different chemotherapy regimens in treating patients with stage IVB, recurrent, or persistent cervical cancer.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- Compare the response rate and survival of patients with stage IVB, recurrent, or persistent carcinoma of the cervix treated with cisplatin only vs cisplatin plus topotecan vs methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC). (Arm III (MVAC) closed to accrual effective 07/23/2001.)
- Compare the toxic effects of these regimens in this patient population.
- Compare health-related quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to GOG performance status. Patients are randomized to one of three treatment arms. (Arm III closed to accrual effective 07/23/2001.)
- Arm I: Patients receive cisplatin IV once every 21 days.
- Arm II:Patients receive topotecan IV over 30 minutes on days 1-3 and cisplatin IV (beginning after topotecan infusion) on day 1. Courses repeat every 21 days.
- Arm III:Patients receive methotrexate IV on days 1, 15, and 22, vinblastine IV on days 2, 15, and 22, and doxorubicin IV and cisplatin IV on day 2. Courses repeat every 28 days. (Arm III closed to accrual effective 07/23/2001.) Treatment in all arms continues for a maximum of 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. (Arm III closed to accrual effective 07/23/2001.)
Quality of life is assessed before randomization, before course 2, before course 5 (arms I and II), before course 4 (arm III), and at 9 months. (Arm III closed to accrual effective 07/23/2001.)
Patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 400 patients (133 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study within 2 years. (Arm III closed to accrual effective 07/23/2001.)
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| cisplatin | Drug | – |
| topotecan hydrochloride | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 May 2013.
- Background: PubMed 22307062Chase DM, Huang HQ, Wenzel L, Cella D, McQuellon R, Long HJ, Moore DH, Monk BJ. Quality of life and survival in advanced cervical cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 May;125(2):315-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.01.047. Epub 2012 Feb 1.
- Background: PubMed 19853287Moore DH, Tian C, Monk BJ, Long HJ, Omura GA, Bloss JD. Prognostic factors for response to cisplatin-based chemotherapy in advanced cervical carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol. 2010 Jan;116(1):44-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.09.006. Epub 2009 Oct 22.
- Background: PubMed 20507804Paton F, Paulden M, Saramago P, Manca A, Misso K, Palmer S, Eastwood A. Topotecan for the treatment of recurrent and stage IVB carcinoma of the cervix. Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14 Suppl 1:55-62. doi: 10.3310/hta14Suppl1/08.
- Background: PubMed 18565487Plaxe SC, Brooks SE, Tian C, Bloss JD, Moore DH, Long HJ. Influence of race on tolerance of platinum-based chemotherapy and clinical outcomes in women with advanced and recurrent cervical cancer: a pooled analysis of 3 Gynecologic Oncology Group studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Nov;199(5):539.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.04.038. Epub 2008 Jun 20.
- BackgroundMoore DH, Tian C, Monk BJ, et al.: Factors predictive of response to cisplatin-based chemotherapy in stage IVB persistent or recurrent cervical carcinoma: a multivariate analysis of three Gynecologic Oncology Group trials. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 25 (Suppl 18): A-5534, 282s, 2007.
- Background: PubMed 16221379Tewari KS, Monk BJ. Gynecologic oncology group trials of chemotherapy for metastatic and recurrent cervical cancer. Curr Oncol Rep. 2005 Nov;7(6):419-34. doi: 10.1007/s11912-005-0007-z.
- Results publication: PubMed 16216315Long HJ 3rd, Monk BJ, Huang HQ, Grendys EC Jr, McMeekin DS, Sorosky J, Miller DS, Eaton LA, Fiorica JV; Gynecologic Oncology Group. Clinical results and quality of life analysis for the MVAC combination (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin) in carcinoma of the uterine cervix: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2006 Mar;100(3):537-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.09.023. Epub 2005 Oct 10.
- Results publication: PubMed 15911865Long HJ 3rd, Bundy BN, Grendys EC Jr, Benda JA, McMeekin DS, Sorosky J, Miller DS, Eaton LA, Fiorica JV; Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Randomized phase III trial of cisplatin with or without topotecan in carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jul 20;23(21):4626-33. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.10.021. Epub 2005 May 23.
- Results publication: PubMed 15911864Monk BJ, Huang HQ, Cella D, Long HJ 3rd; Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Quality of life outcomes from a randomized phase III trial of cisplatin with or without topotecan in advanced carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jul 20;23(21):4617-25. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.10.522. Epub 2005 May 23.
- Results publicationGrendys EC Jr, Long HJ, Bundy BN, et al.: Randomized phase III trial of cisplatin vs cisplatin plus topotecan vs the combination of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) in stage IVB, recurrent or persistent carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. [Abstract] Int J Gynecol Cancer 14 (Suppl 1): A-039, 12, 2004.
- Results publicationMonk BJ, Huang H, Cella D, et al.: Quality of life outcomes from GOG 179: a phase III trial of cisplatin vs cisplatin/topotecan in recurrent or persistent carcinoma of the cervix. [Abstract] Int J Gynecol Cancer 14 (Suppl 1): A-142, 42, 2004.
Related trials for Cervical Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Proton Re-irradiation in Patients With Recurrent or Second Primary Head and Neck Cancer , a Multicentre Phase II Single Arm Trial
Head & Neck Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Proton Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy or Photon Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Combination With Pembrolizumab Before Surgery for the Treatment of Locally Advanced and Radiation-Naive Locoregionally Recurrent Oral Cavity Cancer, OSPRI Trial
Locally Advanced Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Locally Recurrent Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 4
Lidocaine Infiltration and Neuroimmunomodulation in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery
Head and Neck Cancer (H&N)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Harry J. Long, MD study chair
Mayo Clinic
Higinia R. Cardenes, MD, PhD study chair
Indiana University
11 sites in 4 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing cisplatin and topotecan hydrochloride in people with Cervical Cancer, run by Gynecologic Oncology Group at 11 sites in 4 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 May 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 11 sites in United States, Australia, Peru, Puerto Rico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00003945, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 May 2013.