AzTrials
AzTrials

Cardiovascular DiseasesNCT00005192

Psychophysiology of Cardiovascular Reactivity

An observational study of Cardiovascular Diseases and Heart Diseases, run by University of Miami.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To determine why Black Americans have a higher prevalence of hypertension than whites by examining the interactions of psychosocial stressors and suppressed hostility with genetic or constitutional factors. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 25 to 54 years, men only
How many people
Not given
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jul 1986to Jun 2006
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 25 to 54 years
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

No eligibility criteria

About this study

To determine why Black Americans have a higher prevalence of hypertension than whites by examining the interactions of psychosocial stressors and suppressed hostility with genetic or constitutional factors.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND:

Blacks in the United States have a much greater prevalence of essential hypertension than whites. The prevalence of hypertension for adults aged 18-74 has been estimated at 15.7 percent for white women, 18.5 percent for white men, 27.8 percent for Black men and 28.6 percent for Black women. Among adults who underwent screening for the Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program, 36.2 percent of Black males and 38.2 percent of Black females either had diastolic blood pressures at least as high as 95 mmHg or were taking antihypertensive medications. The Black-white ratio for the prevalence of hypertension in this survey was approximately 2. Reportedly, the prevalence of hypertension among inner city Blacks may be as high as 50 percent. The exact causes of the disparity in hypertension prevalence between Blacks and whites are unknown, but genetic predisposition, psychosocial stress, and life-style factors such as high sodium ingestion and obesity have been implicated. None of these factors alone appears sufficient to account for the difference in the prevalence of hypertension between Blacks and whites, suggesting that multiple factors and/or interactions between factors may be involved.

DESIGN NARRATIVE:

The study is supported by a program project grant and thus includes many subprojects. Projects 1A through 1C were supported beginning in 1986. Project 1A examined the effects of cardiovascular and hormonal responses to standardized laboratory challenges as a function of race, sex, age, and normal blood pressure versus borderline hypertension. The subjects were classified according to four categories: Black or white race; male or female sex; normal or raised blood pressure; and ages 25-39 or 40-54, giving a total of 16 cells with 15 subjects in each. The subjects were given a physical examination, electrocardiogram, blood screening test as well as a battery of special tests including a Structured Interview for Type A behavior pattern, playing a video game, a test designed to elicit anger, and exercise on a bicycle ergometer. During these tasks subjects were monitored for heart rate and blood pressure, and blood was sampled for plasma catecholamines, renin, cortisol, aldosterone, and vasopressin. Various psychological tests were administered including the Cook-Medley hostility scale, the Life Orientation test, a job stress scale, the John Henryism Active Coping Scale and others. Urine samples were collected for electrolyte and catecholamine excretion and ambulatory blood pressure was monitored on a work day and on a non-work day.

Project IB examined the effects of acute sodium loading and depletion on cardiovascular and hormonal reactivity as a function of race and sex. Normotensive subjects were classified according to two categories: Black or white race; male or female sex, with four cells of 15 subjects each. After the initial medical examination, subjects were seen three times at intervals of two weeks. Before each visit three overnight urine collections were made for electrolyte excretion evaluation. On these three visits subjects were randomized to either a control day, a sodium loading day, or sodium depletion day. On each of these days subjects were given three reactivity tests including the video game, exercise test, and speech-stressor task. The same psychological tests as in Project 1A were given on the mornings of the three testing days.

Project 1C was a five-year follow-up of 80 subjects in the Study of Biobehavioral Factors Affecting Hypertension in Blacks. Subjects had a routine history and physical exam and were then given the Type A Interview, a video game, and an exercise task. Subjects also provided three overnight urine samples.

Two substudies were also conducted. The goal of substudy 1 was to determine what psychosocial factors predicted cardiovascular responding at work in Black and white women. Black and white normotensive nurses between the ages of 20-45 years served as subjects. Substudy 2 examined the affective and physiological responses of Black and white college students during challenge. Normotensive Black and white men and women were monitored for blood pressure and heart rate during rest and during three tasks including mirror star tracing, hand immersion cold pressor, and speech stressor.

The program project was renewed in 1996. Subproject 7 addresses the the problem of modifying risk in youth with high blood pressure. The subproject compares adolescents with high versus normal blood pressure in terms of fasting insulin, oral glucose tolerance, adiposity, aerobic fitness, diet, cardiac mass, autonomic reactivity, psychosocial characteristics and family medical history. Subproject 7 renewed as Subproject 1 in FY 2001 examines the long-term effects of three intervention conditions: a three month self-management intervention; a six month augmented self-management skill acquisition intervention program; and usual care. Subproject 8 renewed as Subproject 2 in FY 2001 involves behavioral intervention in post-myocardial infarction patients receiving standard pharmacological treatment or standard pharmacological treatment plus behavioral treatment including stress management, dietary supervision, and self-directed exercise.

Medical subject headings
Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases, Hypertension

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 May 2000 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 1986
  3. Primary completionJun 2006
  4. Study completionJun 2006

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00005192
Sponsor's protocol ID
1071
Other IDs
P01HL036588
Status last verified
Jan 2016
First submitted
25 May 2000
Last updated
15 Jan 2016
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Gellman MD, Ironson GH, Spitzer SB, Keenan M, Schneiderman N, Weidler DJ: Ambulatory Blood Pressure as a Function of Race, Gender, Place, and Mood. Circulation, 74(Suppl.)2, 319, 1986

  • Spitzer SB, Carver CS, Gerace TA, Tischenkel N, Gellman M, Schneiderman N: Locus of Control, John Henryism, Monitoring-Blunting, and Reactivity in the Miami Minority Hypertension Project. Society of Behavioral Medicine, 1986

  • Tischenkel N, Schneiderman N, Nelesen R, Vorp R, Gellman M, Gerace T, McCabe PM: Cardiovascular and Neurohumoral Baselines and Reactivity in the Miami Minority Hypertension Project. Society of Behavioral Medicine, 1986

  • Weintraub JK, Carver CS, McCabe PM, Spitzer S, Schneiderman J: Anger, Hostility, and Reactivity in the Miami Minority Hypertension Project. Society of Behavioral Medicine, 1986

  • Tishenkel N, Gellman M, Nelesen R, Schneiderman N: Behavioral Factors Affecting Blood Pressure in Blacks. Cardiovascular Disease Epidemiology Newsletter, 315, 1986

  • Larsen P, Schneiderman N, Pasin RD: Physiological Bases of Cardiovascular Psychophysiology. In: Coles M, Donchin E, Porges S (Eds), Psychophysiology: Systems, Processes and Applications. Guilford, 1986

  • Kaufman MP, Schneiderman N: Physiological Bases of Respiratory Psychophysiology. In: Coles M, Donchin E, Porges S (Eds), Psychophysiology: Systems, Processes and Applications. Guilford, 1986

  • Dimsdale J, Alpert B, Schneiderman N: Exercise as a Modulator of Cardiovascular Reactivity. In: Matthews K et al (Ed), Handbook of Stress, Reactivity, and Cardiovascular Disease. Wiley, 1986

  • Schneiderman N, Pickering T: Cardiovascular Measures of Physiologic Reactivity. In: Matthews K et al (Ed), Handbook of Stress, Reactivity, and Cardiovascular Disease. Wiley, 1986

  • Schneiderman N, Tischenkel N, Nelesen R: Anger, Aerobics, and Autonomic Reactivity. In: Schmidt T, Dembroski T, Blumchen C (Eds), Biological and Psychological Factors in Cardiovascular Disease. Springer, 1986

  • Schneiderman N. Psychophysiologic factors in atherogenesis and coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1987 Jul;76(1 Pt 2):I41-7.

    PubMed 3297408
  • Ironson G, Gellman M, Spitzer S, Llabre M, Schneiderman N: Prediction of Ambulatory Blood Pressure as a Function of Laboratory Reactivity, Race, and Gender. Society of Behavioral Medicine, 1987

  • Laperriere AR, VanDercar DH, Shyu LY, Ward MF, McCabe PM, Perry AC, Mosher PE, Schneiderman N. Microcomputer servo-controlled bicycle ergometer system for psychophysiological research. Psychophysiology. 1989 Mar;26(2):201-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1989.tb03157.x.

    PubMed 2727222
  • Llabre MM, Ironson GH, Spitzer SB, Gellman MD, Weidler DJ, Schneiderman N. How many blood pressure measurements are enough? An application of generalizability theory to the study of blood pressure reliability. Psychophysiology. 1988 Jan;25(1):97-106. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1988.tb00967.x. No abstract available.

    PubMed 3353490
  • Schneiderman N, McCabe, PM: Psychophysiologic Strategies in Laboratory Research. In: Schneiderman N, Kaufmann P, Weiss SM (Eds), Handbook of Research Methods in Cardiovascular Behavioral Medicine. Plenum Press, New York, 1988

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Cardiovascular Diseases and Heart Diseases, run by University of Miami.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jan 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00005192, which also lists 44 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jan 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in