Cardiovascular DiseasesNCT00005241
Myocardial Infarction and Current Oral Contraceptive Use
An observational study of Cardiovascular Diseases and Coronary Disease, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).
Trial summary
To assess whether current oral contraceptive (OC) use (within the previous month) increased the risk of myocardial infarction. Also, to assess the combined effects of cigarette smoking and oral contraceptive use. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 100 years, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Cardiovascular Diseases, Coronary Disease, Myocardial Infarction
- How many people
- Not given
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Apr 1989to Dec 1999
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 100 years
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
No eligibility criteria
About this study
To assess whether current oral contraceptive (OC) use (within the previous month) increased the risk of myocardial infarction. Also, to assess the combined effects of cigarette smoking and oral contraceptive use.
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND:
It has been established that oral contraceptive formulations used in the 1960s and 1970s increased the risks of myocardial infarction, venous thromboembolism, and stroke. Oral contraceptive formulations have changed, as have prescribing practices, and there was a need for information on the effects of the newer formulations in use. Myocardial infarction is the most important cardiovascular disease in terms of the incidence and mortality attributed to use of oral contraceptives; although the overall incidence of myocardial infarction is relatively low in women of childbearing ages, the incidence is not low in smokers.
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
A case-control design was used. The case series consisted of women 18 to 44 years of age admitted for a documented first myocardial infarction to any of 100 collaborating hospitals in Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Pennsylvania. Nurse interviewers administered standard structured questionnaires to cases and controls on drug use, race, religion, medical history and myocardial infarction risk factors. Information was collected on: cigarette smoking; histories of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, angina, abnormal plasma lipids; reproductive and menstrual histories; alcohol and coffee consumption; personality type using the Framingham Type A scale; family history of myocardial infarction; exercise; education and occupation of the patient and her spouse. Information was also obtained on the timing and duration of oral contraceptive use. The effect of oral contraceptive use was considered among nonsmokers, light smokers, and heavy smokers. Individual oral contraceptive formulations were classified according to dosage and type of estrogen, formulation type, and other groupings. Multiple logistic regression analysis with fitting of the regression equations by the method of maximum likelihood was used for simultaneous control of all potential confounding factors.
The study was renewed in 1995 to continue data collection to establish the effect of triphasic OCs on MI risk, with particular attention to the joint effect with heavy smoking. The new data collection also permitted more definitive analysis of the effect of monophasic OCs. Triphasic formulations have become popular and in 1995 accounted for about half of OC use. There were not enough users of triphasic OCs in the present study for informative analysis, nor were there any data from other studies on this issue. The study ended in December, 1999.
The study completion date listed in this record was obtained from the "End Date" entered in the Protocol Registration and Results System (PRS) record.
- Medical subject headings
- Cardiovascular Diseases, Coronary Disease, Myocardial Infarction, Heart Diseases
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 May 2000 (estimated)
- Study startApr 1989
- Study completionDec 1999
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cardiovascular DiseasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- US National Institutes of Health
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00005241
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1122
- Other IDs
- R01HL042483
- Status last verified
- Jun 2001
- First submitted
- 25 May 2000
- Last updated
- 13 May 2016
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Rosenberg L, Palmer JR, Rao RS, Shapiro S. Low-dose oral contraceptive use and the risk of myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med. 2001 Apr 23;161(8):1065-70. doi: 10.1001/archinte.161.8.1065.
PubMed 11322840
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 May 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Myocardial Infarction and Current Oral Contraceptive Use
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00005241
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1122
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Lead sponsor
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)US National Institutes of Health
- Study start
- Apr 1989
- Study completion
- Dec 1999 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 May 2000 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To assess whether current oral contraceptive (OC) use (within the previous month) increased the risk of myocardial infarction. Also, to assess the combined effects of cigarette smoking and oral contraceptive use.
Detailed description
BACKGROUND:
It has been established that oral contraceptive formulations used in the 1960s and 1970s increased the risks of myocardial infarction, venous thromboembolism, and stroke. Oral contraceptive formulations have changed, as have prescribing practices, and there was a need for information on the effects of the newer formulations in use. Myocardial infarction is the most important cardiovascular disease in terms of the incidence and mortality attributed to use of oral contraceptives; although the overall incidence of myocardial infarction is relatively low in women of childbearing ages, the incidence is not low in smokers.
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
A case-control design was used. The case series consisted of women 18 to 44 years of age admitted for a documented first myocardial infarction to any of 100 collaborating hospitals in Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Pennsylvania. Nurse interviewers administered standard structured questionnaires to cases and controls on drug use, race, religion, medical history and myocardial infarction risk factors. Information was collected on: cigarette smoking; histories of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, angina, abnormal plasma lipids; reproductive and menstrual histories; alcohol and coffee consumption; personality type using the Framingham Type A scale; family history of myocardial infarction; exercise; education and occupation of the patient and her spouse. Information was also obtained on the timing and duration of oral contraceptive use. The effect of oral contraceptive use was considered among nonsmokers, light smokers, and heavy smokers. Individual oral contraceptive formulations were classified according to dosage and type of estrogen, formulation type, and other groupings. Multiple logistic regression analysis with fitting of the regression equations by the method of maximum likelihood was used for simultaneous control of all potential confounding factors.
The study was renewed in 1995 to continue data collection to establish the effect of triphasic OCs on MI risk, with particular attention to the joint effect with heavy smoking. The new data collection also permitted more definitive analysis of the effect of monophasic OCs. Triphasic formulations have become popular and in 1995 accounted for about half of OC use. There were not enough users of triphasic OCs in the present study for informative analysis, nor were there any data from other studies on this issue. The study ended in December, 1999.
The study completion date listed in this record was obtained from the "End Date" entered in the Protocol Registration and Results System (PRS) record.
Study design
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 100 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 May 2016.
- Background: PubMed 11322840Rosenberg L, Palmer JR, Rao RS, Shapiro S. Low-dose oral contraceptive use and the risk of myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med. 2001 Apr 23;161(8):1065-70. doi: 10.1001/archinte.161.8.1065.
Related trials for Cardiovascular Diseases
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
ENDOTHELION Study Group: Effect of Bosentan in NAION Patients
Ischemic Optic Neuropathy
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of YKST02 in Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)
RecruitingPhase 2
Engaging T-cells to Eliminate MRD in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Optimizing Response With Talquetmab and Teclistamab (ROTATE)
Multiple Myeloma
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Cardiovascular Diseases and Coronary Disease, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 May 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00005241, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 May 2016.