AtherosclerosisNCT00005247
Nutritional Determinants of Cardiovascular Disease
An observational study of Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).
Trial summary
To define the role of nutritional and dietary variables in determining atherogenic traits and morbidity and mortality due to coronary heart disease as observed in the Framingham Heart Study cohort and the Framingham Offspring Study cohort. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 100 years, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Atherosclerosis, Cardiovascular Diseases, Coronary Disease
- How many people
- Not given
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Aug 1989to Jul 1992
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 100 years
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
No eligibility criteria
About this study
To define the role of nutritional and dietary variables in determining atherogenic traits and morbidity and mortality due to coronary heart disease as observed in the Framingham Heart Study cohort and the Framingham Offspring Study cohort.
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND:
A major component of the prevention and treatment of coronary heart disease is the attenuation of its major underlying process, atherosclerosis, which brings about myocardial ischemia. In exploring the determinants of atherosclerosis, a diet-heart hypothesis has emerged. Simply stated, the hypothesis is that the excessive ingestion of dietary fat, notably total fat, saturated fat and cholesterol and lowered intakes of other nutrients including unsaturated fatty acids and possibly soluble fiber lead to the elevation of serum LDL-cholesterol which causes atherosclerosis. Support of the diet-heart hypothesis is available from epidemiologic, laboratory, and clinical research.
In spite of a broad range of data supporting the diet-heart hypothesis, the importance of diet is often challenged. Cited in this controversy are population-based, cross-sectional studies which have provided conflicting data. Several studies including an early report from Framingham and the Tecumseh Study have failed on cross-sectional analysis to link dietary variables to serum cholesterol, lipoproteins or coronary heart disease rates. The genetic and possible dietary homogeneity in these populations and methodological weaknesses inherent in singe serum cholesterol and dietary assessments have been posed as possible explanations for these differing results.
Difficulties in confirming the diet-heart hypothesis across existing literature may arise for several reasons: methodological problems inherent in estimating nutrient intake; difficulties associated with characterizing a behavior as complex as food purchasing; wide intraindividual variation in nutrient intake that make single day estimates of nutrient intake difficult to interpret; dissimilarities among dietary data collection techniques; varying lengths of followup for the observation of outcome variables in longitudinal epidemiologic studies; differing methods of lipid measurement or the lack of lipoprotein subfractionation. The Framingham data provide a unique opportunity to test the diet-heart hypothesis both cross-sectionally and longitudinally, to develop models for studying diet and heart disease relationships, and to establish the importance of dietary variables in atherogenesis and the morbidity and mortality of heart disease.
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
The associations between nutritional variables and major atherogenic risk factors including dyslipidemia, elevated blood pressure, impaired glucose tolerance, and overweight were investigated cross-sectionally in the total Framingham Offspring Study cohort of 3,800. The independent, quantitative effects of dietary factors on the prediction of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality were explored longitudinally in two samples of the original Framingham cohort at 20 and 30 years of follow-up. Six major steps were followed in each set of analyses: dimension reduction using cluster and factor analysis; zero order independent nutrition variable analyses; stepwise multiple regression of independent variables; specification of overall regression models; stability and validity testing; the addition of intervening variables using multiple regression techniques. Multivariate analyses of the dependent variables were conducted to determine associations and interactions among these variables.
The study completion date listed in this record was obtained from the "End Date" entered in the Protocol Registration and Results System (PRS) record.
- Medical subject headings
- Atherosclerosis, Cardiovascular Diseases, Coronary Disease, Heart Diseases
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 May 2000 (estimated)
- Study startAug 1989
- Study completionJul 1992
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AtherosclerosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- US National Institutes of Health
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00005247
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1129
- Other IDs
- R01HL039144
- Status last verified
- May 2000
- First submitted
- 25 May 2000
- Last updated
- 13 May 2016
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Campos H, Willett WC, Peterson RM, Siles X, Bailey SM, Wilson PW, Posner BM, Ordovas JM, Schaefer EJ. Nutrient intake comparisons between Framingham and rural and Urban Puriscal, Costa Rica. Associations with lipoproteins, apolipoproteins, and low density lipoprotein particle size. Arterioscler Thromb. 1991 Jul-Aug;11(4):1089-99. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.11.4.1089.
PubMed 2065030Posner BM, Franz MM, Quatromoni PA, Gagnon DR, Sytkowski PA, D'Agostino RB, Cupples LA. Secular trends in diet and risk factors for cardiovascular disease: the Framingham Study. J Am Diet Assoc. 1995 Feb;95(2):171-9. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(95)00043-7.
PubMed 7852683
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 May 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Nutritional Determinants of Cardiovascular Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00005247
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1129
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Lead sponsor
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)US National Institutes of Health
- Study start
- Aug 1989
- Study completion
- Jul 1992 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 May 2000 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To define the role of nutritional and dietary variables in determining atherogenic traits and morbidity and mortality due to coronary heart disease as observed in the Framingham Heart Study cohort and the Framingham Offspring Study cohort.
Detailed description
BACKGROUND:
A major component of the prevention and treatment of coronary heart disease is the attenuation of its major underlying process, atherosclerosis, which brings about myocardial ischemia. In exploring the determinants of atherosclerosis, a diet-heart hypothesis has emerged. Simply stated, the hypothesis is that the excessive ingestion of dietary fat, notably total fat, saturated fat and cholesterol and lowered intakes of other nutrients including unsaturated fatty acids and possibly soluble fiber lead to the elevation of serum LDL-cholesterol which causes atherosclerosis. Support of the diet-heart hypothesis is available from epidemiologic, laboratory, and clinical research.
In spite of a broad range of data supporting the diet-heart hypothesis, the importance of diet is often challenged. Cited in this controversy are population-based, cross-sectional studies which have provided conflicting data. Several studies including an early report from Framingham and the Tecumseh Study have failed on cross-sectional analysis to link dietary variables to serum cholesterol, lipoproteins or coronary heart disease rates. The genetic and possible dietary homogeneity in these populations and methodological weaknesses inherent in singe serum cholesterol and dietary assessments have been posed as possible explanations for these differing results.
Difficulties in confirming the diet-heart hypothesis across existing literature may arise for several reasons: methodological problems inherent in estimating nutrient intake; difficulties associated with characterizing a behavior as complex as food purchasing; wide intraindividual variation in nutrient intake that make single day estimates of nutrient intake difficult to interpret; dissimilarities among dietary data collection techniques; varying lengths of followup for the observation of outcome variables in longitudinal epidemiologic studies; differing methods of lipid measurement or the lack of lipoprotein subfractionation. The Framingham data provide a unique opportunity to test the diet-heart hypothesis both cross-sectionally and longitudinally, to develop models for studying diet and heart disease relationships, and to establish the importance of dietary variables in atherogenesis and the morbidity and mortality of heart disease.
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
The associations between nutritional variables and major atherogenic risk factors including dyslipidemia, elevated blood pressure, impaired glucose tolerance, and overweight were investigated cross-sectionally in the total Framingham Offspring Study cohort of 3,800. The independent, quantitative effects of dietary factors on the prediction of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality were explored longitudinally in two samples of the original Framingham cohort at 20 and 30 years of follow-up. Six major steps were followed in each set of analyses: dimension reduction using cluster and factor analysis; zero order independent nutrition variable analyses; stepwise multiple regression of independent variables; specification of overall regression models; stability and validity testing; the addition of intervening variables using multiple regression techniques. Multivariate analyses of the dependent variables were conducted to determine associations and interactions among these variables.
The study completion date listed in this record was obtained from the "End Date" entered in the Protocol Registration and Results System (PRS) record.
Study design
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 100 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 May 2016.
- Background: PubMed 2065030Campos H, Willett WC, Peterson RM, Siles X, Bailey SM, Wilson PW, Posner BM, Ordovas JM, Schaefer EJ. Nutrient intake comparisons between Framingham and rural and Urban Puriscal, Costa Rica. Associations with lipoproteins, apolipoproteins, and low density lipoprotein particle size. Arterioscler Thromb. 1991 Jul-Aug;11(4):1089-99. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.11.4.1089.
- Background: PubMed 7852683Posner BM, Franz MM, Quatromoni PA, Gagnon DR, Sytkowski PA, D'Agostino RB, Cupples LA. Secular trends in diet and risk factors for cardiovascular disease: the Framingham Study. J Am Diet Assoc. 1995 Feb;95(2):171-9. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(95)00043-7.
Related trials for Atherosclerosis
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Effects of Sequential Therapy With Mexidol® (Intravenous) and Mexidol® FORTE 250 (Oral) on Functional Brain Activity Assessed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biochemical Parameters in Patients With Chronic Cerebral Ischemia: A Comparison of Patients With and Without Metabolic Disorders
Metabolic Abnormalities, Obesity & Overweight
Active, not recruiting
SUCCESS (SelUtion, Safety, effiCaCy, hEalth economicS and promS) PTA Study
Peripheral Artery Disease
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Inclisiran to Prevent Cardiovascular Events in High-risk Primary Prevention Patients.
Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
Reducing Adverse Vascular Outcomes With Factor XI Inhibition in Adult Participants With Peripheral Artery Disease
Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD)
Recruiting
The THOR IDE Study
Peripheral Artery Disease, Peripheral Artery Stenosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 May 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00005247, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 May 2016.