AzTrials
AzTrials

Cardiovascular DiseasesNCT00005256

Coronary Screening in a High Risk Subset

An observational study of Cardiovascular Diseases and Coronary Disease, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To test the hypothesis that the incidence of coronary heart disease and cardiovascular mortality could be accurately predicted by the presence of coronary calcific deposits detected by cardiac fluoroscopy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 100 years, men only
How many people
Not given
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
May 1990to Aug 1996
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 100 years
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

No eligibility criteria

About this study

To test the hypothesis that the incidence of coronary heart disease and cardiovascular mortality could be accurately predicted by the presence of coronary calcific deposits detected by cardiac fluoroscopy.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND:

Because of its low cost and non-invasive nature, fluoroscopy was thought to be a potentially powerful screening tool for coronary heart disease if its efficiency could be demonstrated. The utility of exercise testing for screening had been limited by its relatively low sensitivity since it could only detect atherosclerotic plaque large enough to significantly impede coronary flow.

DESIGN NARRATIVE:

Asymptomatic high risk subjects were screened with cardiac fluoroscopy and exercise testing at baseline and followed for six years with annual visits. The sensitivity and specificity of fluoroscopy in relation to the incidence of coronary heart disease and the incidence of cardiovascular mortality was determined and compared at 3.5 and 6 years of follow-up. The predictive utility of fluoroscopy and exercise testing, in relation to the incidence of coronary events, was assessed by logistic regression analysis. Multivariate analysis was also performed on baseline risk factors.

The study completion date listed in this record was obtained from the "End Date" entered in the Protocol Registration and Results System (PRS) record.

Medical subject headings
Cardiovascular Diseases, Coronary Disease, Heart Diseases

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 May 2000 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 1990
  3. Study completionAug 1996

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00005256
Sponsor's protocol ID
1138
Other IDs
R01HL043277
Status last verified
Apr 2000
First submitted
25 May 2000
Last updated
18 Feb 2016
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Detrano RC, Wong ND, French WJ, Tang W, Georgiou D, Young E, Brezden OS, Doherty T, Brundage BH. Prevalence of fluoroscopic coronary calcific deposits in high-risk asymptomatic persons. Am Heart J. 1994 Jun;127(6):1526-32. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(94)90381-6.

    PubMed 8197979
  • Detrano RC, Wong ND, Tang W, French WJ, Georgiou D, Young E, Brezden OS, Doherty TM, Narahara KA, Brundage BH. Prognostic significance of cardiac cinefluoroscopy for coronary calcific deposits in asymptomatic high risk subjects. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 Aug;24(2):354-8. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90287-9.

    PubMed 8034867
  • Doherty TM, Tang W, Dascalos S, Watson KE, Demer LL, Shavelle RM, Detrano RC. Ethnic origin and serum levels of 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 are independent predictors of coronary calcium mass measured by electron-beam computed tomography. Circulation. 1997 Sep 2;96(5):1477-81. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.96.5.1477.

    PubMed 9315534
  • Secci A, Wong N, Tang W, Wang S, Doherty T, Detrano R. Electron beam computed tomographic coronary calcium as a predictor of coronary events: comparison of two protocols. Circulation. 1997 Aug 19;96(4):1122-9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.96.4.1122.

    PubMed 9286939
  • Detrano RC, Wong ND, Doherty TM, Shavelle R. Prognostic significance of coronary calcific deposits in asymptomatic high-risk subjects. Am J Med. 1997 Apr;102(4):344-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(97)00085-5.

    PubMed 9217615

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Cardiovascular Diseases and Coronary Disease, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Feb 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00005256, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Feb 2016.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in