Anemia, Sickle CellNCT00005300
Investigation of Selected Patient Groups From The Cooperative Study of Sickle Cell Disease
An observational study of Anemia, Sickle Cell and Blood Disease, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).
Trial summary
To continue to follow the newborn cohort and the over-35 years of age cohort from the Cooperative Study of Sickle Cell Disease (CSSCD), a study of the natural history of sickle cell disease. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 100 years, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Anemia, Sickle Cell, Blood Disease
- How many people
- Not given
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Oct 1988to Jun 1995
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 100 years
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
No eligibility criteria
About this study
To continue to follow the newborn cohort and the over-35 years of age cohort from the Cooperative Study of Sickle Cell Disease (CSSCD), a study of the natural history of sickle cell disease.
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND:
The Cooperative Study of Sickle Cell Disease was initiated in 1977 to determine the natural history of sickle cell disease from birth to death in order to identify those factors contributing to the morbidity and mortality of the disease. Patients in the study had been followed previously in CSSCD.
Follow-up of the newborn cohort provided data demonstrating that life-threatening septicemia can occur as early as four months of age, and that the incidence of septicemia in children with sickle cell disease is higher than previously reported. Serial measurements of pocked or vesiculated red blood cells determined the onset of splenic dysfunction. The loss of splenic function has been characterized by genotype and the observed patterns of loss of splenic function were different developmentally depending on the sickle hemoglobinopathy syndrome.
Growth retardation, which becomes obvious around seven years of age, has no relationship to reported family income. Prophylactic oral penicillin can decrease morbidity and mortality associate with pneumococcal septicemia. The newborn infant cohort was unique in determining issues related to the natural history of the disease because the information was prospective and has been captured in the database. The complex database permitted an opportunity to determine outcomes, risk factors, and the application of the severity index to determine the spectrum of severity.
Follow-up of the over-35 cohort is important because it was not so long ago that it was estimated that 50 percent of patients with sickle cell anemia in the United States died before their twentieth birthday. However, data accumulated over the past eight years by the CSSCD demonstrates that this is incorrect. Survival beyond the age of forty suggests that surviving patients are somehow different from other patients with a high mortality in the earlier years. Therefore, they constitute a cohort of special interest, and the reasons for prolonged survival in this disease remain to be well documented prospectively. Technology is now available to identify genetic differences which may influence survival.
Based on the findings of the earlier CSSCD, the Blood Diseases and Resources Advisory Committee Red Cell Working Group recommended this initiative which was approved by the May 1987 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Advisory Council. The Request for Proposals was released in February 1988 and awards made in October 1988.
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
Follow-up of the newborn cohort continued in order to better understand the severity, onset of early organ damage, and risk factors. Patients were given an entry evaluation consisting of interim history, complete physical examination, complete blood count, urinalysis, blood drawn for haplotype determination and for the serum bank, magnetic resonance imaging of the brain, pulmonary function tests with arterial blood gas, and psychomotor tests. Patients had interim assessments at six months and annual assessments as well as an exit assessment in the fourth or fifth years. The exit assessment was the same as the entry assessment.
Follow-up of the over-35 cohort continued in order to better understand factors that contribute to longevity. Entry evaluation consisted of interim history, complete physical examination, complete blood count, urinalysis, blood drawn for haplotype determination and for the serum bank, cardiac MUGA, and renal and pulmonary function tests. Follow-up was yearly with an exit evaluation in the fourth or fifth years.
- Conditions
- Anemia, Sickle Cell, Blood Disease
- Medical subject headings
- Anemia, Sickle Cell, Hematologic Diseases
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 May 2000 (estimated)
- Study startOct 1988
- Study completionJun 1995
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Anemia, Sickle CellStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- US National Institutes of Health
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00005300
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 3001
- Status last verified
- May 2000
- First submitted
- 25 May 2000
- Last updated
- 14 Apr 2016
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Gill FM, Brown A, Gallagher D, Diamond S, Goins E, Grover R, Lubin B, Moore G, Gaston MH. Newborn experience in the Cooperative Study of Sickle Cell Disease. Pediatrics. 1989 May;83(5 Pt 2):827-9. No abstract available.
PubMed 2654872
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Apr 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Investigation of Selected Patient Groups From The Cooperative Study of Sickle Cell Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00005300
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 3001
- Conditions
- Anemia, Sickle Cell, Blood Disease
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Lead sponsor
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)US National Institutes of Health
- Study start
- Oct 1988
- Study completion
- Jun 1995
- First posted
- 26 May 2000 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To continue to follow the newborn cohort and the over-35 years of age cohort from the Cooperative Study of Sickle Cell Disease (CSSCD), a study of the natural history of sickle cell disease.
Detailed description
BACKGROUND:
The Cooperative Study of Sickle Cell Disease was initiated in 1977 to determine the natural history of sickle cell disease from birth to death in order to identify those factors contributing to the morbidity and mortality of the disease. Patients in the study had been followed previously in CSSCD.
Follow-up of the newborn cohort provided data demonstrating that life-threatening septicemia can occur as early as four months of age, and that the incidence of septicemia in children with sickle cell disease is higher than previously reported. Serial measurements of pocked or vesiculated red blood cells determined the onset of splenic dysfunction. The loss of splenic function has been characterized by genotype and the observed patterns of loss of splenic function were different developmentally depending on the sickle hemoglobinopathy syndrome.
Growth retardation, which becomes obvious around seven years of age, has no relationship to reported family income. Prophylactic oral penicillin can decrease morbidity and mortality associate with pneumococcal septicemia. The newborn infant cohort was unique in determining issues related to the natural history of the disease because the information was prospective and has been captured in the database. The complex database permitted an opportunity to determine outcomes, risk factors, and the application of the severity index to determine the spectrum of severity.
Follow-up of the over-35 cohort is important because it was not so long ago that it was estimated that 50 percent of patients with sickle cell anemia in the United States died before their twentieth birthday. However, data accumulated over the past eight years by the CSSCD demonstrates that this is incorrect. Survival beyond the age of forty suggests that surviving patients are somehow different from other patients with a high mortality in the earlier years. Therefore, they constitute a cohort of special interest, and the reasons for prolonged survival in this disease remain to be well documented prospectively. Technology is now available to identify genetic differences which may influence survival.
Based on the findings of the earlier CSSCD, the Blood Diseases and Resources Advisory Committee Red Cell Working Group recommended this initiative which was approved by the May 1987 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Advisory Council. The Request for Proposals was released in February 1988 and awards made in October 1988.
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
Follow-up of the newborn cohort continued in order to better understand the severity, onset of early organ damage, and risk factors. Patients were given an entry evaluation consisting of interim history, complete physical examination, complete blood count, urinalysis, blood drawn for haplotype determination and for the serum bank, magnetic resonance imaging of the brain, pulmonary function tests with arterial blood gas, and psychomotor tests. Patients had interim assessments at six months and annual assessments as well as an exit assessment in the fourth or fifth years. The exit assessment was the same as the entry assessment.
Follow-up of the over-35 cohort continued in order to better understand factors that contribute to longevity. Entry evaluation consisted of interim history, complete physical examination, complete blood count, urinalysis, blood drawn for haplotype determination and for the serum bank, cardiac MUGA, and renal and pulmonary function tests. Follow-up was yearly with an exit evaluation in the fourth or fifth years.
Study design
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 100 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Apr 2016.
- Background: PubMed 2654872Gill FM, Brown A, Gallagher D, Diamond S, Goins E, Grover R, Lubin B, Moore G, Gaston MH. Newborn experience in the Cooperative Study of Sickle Cell Disease. Pediatrics. 1989 May;83(5 Pt 2):827-9. No abstract available.
Related trials for Anemia, Sickle Cell
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Long-term Mitapivat Dosing in Subjects With Stable Sickle Cell Disease: An Extension of a Phase I Pilot Study of Mitapivat
Sickle Cell Disease, Hemolytic Anemia
RecruitingObservational study
HPC Offered for PRESERVE Expansion
Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT)
RecruitingPhase 1
Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Escalating Doses of Fostamatinib in Subjects With Stable Sickle Cell Disease
Sickle Cell Disorders, Sickle Cell Disease
RecruitingPhase 4
Clinical and Biomarker Effects of Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate in Females With Sickle Cell Disease
Sickle Cell Disease (SCD), Vaso-Occlusive Pain Episode in Sickle Cell Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Buprenorphine for the Management of Pain in Children With Sickle Cell Disease
Sickle Cell Disease (SCD), Sickle Cell Disease Vaso-occlusive Crisis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Anemia, Sickle Cell and Blood Disease, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Apr 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00005300, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Apr 2016.