AzTrials
AzTrials

Blood DiseaseNCT00005302

Drug Etiology of Aplastic Anemia and Related Dyscrasias

An observational study of Blood Disease and Anemia, Aplastic, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To determine the role of drugs in the etiology of aplastic anemia, agranulocytosis, and thrombocytopenic purpura. Drugs used in chemotherapy and immunotherapy were excluded. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 100 years, men only
Conditions the study is for
Blood Disease, Anemia, Aplastic, Agranulocytosis
How many people
Not given
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Apr 1985to Jun 1992
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 100 years
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

About this study

To determine the role of drugs in the etiology of aplastic anemia, agranulocytosis, and thrombocytopenic purpura. Drugs used in chemotherapy and immunotherapy were excluded.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND:

It was well established that drugs played a role in the etiology of aplastic anemia, agranulocytosis, and thrombocytopenic purpura. In 1985, much of the evidence concerning the relation of exposure to drugs to the risk of the three dyscrasias was based on case reports. Such reports could sometimes be appropriate for raising hypotheses, but they rarely served to establish associations firmly. They could also be subject to selection bias due to a tendency to publish reports only when a dyscrasia followed the use of a drug already under suspicion, and could result in spurious and non-causal associations. Moreover, since denominator populations were not known, case reports could never provide quantitative estimates of associations, either in terms of their magnitude or of the incidence rates attributable to the specific exposures The sparse quantitative information that did exist was of variable quality because of methodological and other difficulties. And while overall incidence rates, within orders of magnitude, could be estimated for the three dyscrasias, there was virtually no acceptably reliable information available on the incidence rates due to specific drugs. Even for well known associations such as aplastic anemia with chloramphenicol, estimates of incidence, if given at all, were imprecise.

The list of drugs incriminated at one time or another in the etiology of each dyscrasia was as long as the pharmacopoeia itself. Based on the clinical evidence, however, there were patterns for each dyscrasia, some of which overlapped. Drugs commonly linked to aplastic anemia included chloramphenicol, phenylbutazone, oxyphenbutazone, sulfonamides, and antithyroid drugs; all of them, except chloramphenicol, were also implicated in the etiology of agranulocytosis, together with phenothiazine derivatives. The same drugs were commonly linked to thrombocytopenia, which had also frequently been linked to the use of quinidine. The exact listing of drugs related to each disorder varied between reports and, presumably, between patterns of drug use in different populations. One major concern in 1985 was with all of the newer nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs currently on the market in the United States. There were numerous case reports implicating these drugs in the etiology of all three dyscrasias.

DESIGN NARRATIVE:

The design was that of a case-control study. All hospitals with at least 100 beds in geographically defined areas of eastern Massachusetts and Rhode Island were enrolled. All cases of aplastic anemia and agranulocytosis were identified prospectively for the purpose of estimating incidence rates. A proportion of cases of thrombocytopenic purpura were identified but incidence rates were not estimated. The eligibility of cases was determined by a committee of hematologists, according to strict diagnostic criteria. All identified cases of the dyscrasias, suitable hospital controls, and, in Massachusetts, neighbor controls were interviewed. Information was obtained on drug use, occupational and chemical exposure, personal data, and relevant medical history. The data were used to quantify known associations between the three dyscrasias and drug use, to identify and quantify previously unsuspected associations, and to document absence of associations for commonly used drugs. Incidence rates of aplastic anemia and agranulocytosis attributable to specific drugs and classes of drugs were estimated.

The study completion date listed in this record was obtained from the "End Date" entered in the Protocol Registration and Results System (PRS) record.

Medical subject headings
Hematologic Diseases, Anemia, Aplastic, Agranulocytosis, Purpura, Thrombocytopenic

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 May 2000 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 1985
  3. Study completionJun 1992

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00005302
Sponsor's protocol ID
3003
Other IDs
R01HL031768
Status last verified
May 2000
First submitted
25 May 2000
Last updated
13 May 2016
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Kaufman DW, Kelly JP, Johannes CB, Sandler A, Harmon D, Stolley PD, Shapiro S. Acute thrombocytopenic purpura in relation to the use of drugs. Blood. 1993 Nov 1;82(9):2714-8.

    PubMed 8219224

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Blood Disease and Anemia, Aplastic, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 May 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00005302, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 May 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in