AzTrials
AzTrials

Cardiovascular DiseasesNCT00005351

Incidence and Outcomes of Venous Thromboembolism

An observational study of Cardiovascular Diseases and Lung Diseases, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To identify the incidence cohort of Olmsted County Minnesota residents with deep venous thrombosis (DVT)/pulmonary embolism (PE) from 1966 through 1990. Episodes of DVT or PE acquired during hospitalization or in the community were identified for future studies. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 100 years, men only
How many people
Not given
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Aug 1991to Jul 1994
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 100 years
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

No eligibility criteria

About this study

To identify the incidence cohort of Olmsted County Minnesota residents with deep venous thrombosis (DVT)/pulmonary embolism (PE) from 1966 through 1990. Episodes of DVT or PE acquired during hospitalization or in the community were identified for future studies.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND:

Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism most often occur during hospitalization for surgery or chronic medical conditions. Consequently information on deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism is derived from large referral hospitals, and there are substantial gaps in our understanding of the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism in the community. This was one of the first studies to compare hospital acquired deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism with deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism among ambulatory residents in a community.

DESIGN NARRATIVE:

The five part study: 1. identified the incidence cohort and tested the hypotheses that over the 25 year study period the incidence of deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism had decreased, the extent of testing for suspected deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism had increased, and the number of tests obtained for patients with deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism had increased. 2. determined the independent risk factors for deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism and estimated the population attribute risk due to each independent risk factor for deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism in a case-control study of the incidence cohort and community controls. 3. tested the hypothesis that deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism were independent risk factors for death after adjusting for age, sex and co-morbid conditions. 4. described the occurrence of the post-phlebitic syndrome, pulmonary hypertension, and recurrent deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism over the 25 year study period and identified the independent risk factors for lower extremity venous ulceration. 5. evaluated the accuracy of national pulmonary embolism mortality rates by comparing pulmonary embolism mortality rates calculated from a review of all the inpatient and outpatient medical records of Olmsted County deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism patients with death certificate pulmonary embolism mortality rates for Olmsted County from the National Center for Health Statistics. The study provided the most complete and comprehensive population based estimates of the incidence, risk factors, survival and outcomes of deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism available to date.

The study completion date listed in this record was obtained from the "End Date" entered in the Protocol Registration and Results System (PRS) record.

Medical subject headings
Cardiovascular Diseases, Lung Diseases, Pulmonary Embolism, Venous Thromboembolism

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 May 2000 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 1991
  3. Study completionJul 1994

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00005351
Sponsor's protocol ID
4226
Other IDs
R01HL046974
Status last verified
Sep 2002
First submitted
25 May 2000
Last updated
13 May 2016
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Silverstein MD, Heit JA, Mohr DN, Petterson TM, O'Fallon WM, Melton LJ 3rd. Trends in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a 25-year population-based study. Arch Intern Med. 1998 Mar 23;158(6):585-93. doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.6.585.

    PubMed 9521222
  • Gitter MJ, Jaeger TM, Petterson TM, Gersh BJ, Silverstein MD. Bleeding and thromboembolism during anticoagulant therapy: a population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota. Mayo Clin Proc. 1995 Aug;70(8):725-33. doi: 10.4065/70.8.725.

    PubMed 7630209

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Cardiovascular Diseases and Lung Diseases, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 May 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00005351, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 May 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in