AzTrials
AzTrials

Cardiovascular DiseasesNCT00005389

Effect of Drug Therapy on Reinfarction Risk in Women

An observational study of Cardiovascular Diseases and Myocardial Infarction, run by University of Washington.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To evaluate the safety of calcium-channel blockers in the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction in women. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 100 years, men only
How many people
Not given
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Sep 1995to Aug 1998
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 100 years
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

No eligibility criteria

About this study

To evaluate the safety of calcium-channel blockers in the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction in women.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND:

Research on heart disease in the 196Os and 197Os was primarily concerned with risk factors for 'premature' atherosclerosis, which was most dramatically apparent in working middle-aged men who suffered heart attacks or died suddenly. This focus on 'premature' disease was an important initial step, but it resulted in a relative neglect of studies in older adults and in all women. Coronary heart disease remains nonetheless a major cause of morbidity and mortality among women.

Given the consistent findings from clinical trials that calcium-channel blockers administered following myocardial infarction do not decrease the risk of death or reinfarction, and that some drugs of this class may actually increase the risk, it is unlikely that future trials of this therapy in women will be conducted. Yet the calcium-channel blockers are used with increasing frequency in women following myocardial infarction. The only ethical method of conducting studies of the safety of these drugs in women is through observational studies. Data from the study can help to guide clinical practice and can assist in the design of appropriate secondary prevention trials in women.

DESIGN NARRATIVE:

On-going studies of hormone-replacement therapy in women at Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound (GHC) identified all female enrollees who suffered a first heart attack since 1986; the study expanded this inception cohort through 1996. Information from medical record review and GHC databases were used to assess risk factors and co-morbid conditions, both at entry into the cohort and up to ten years of follow-up, and to identify recurrent cardiovascular events and deaths. A complete record of prescription drug exposure during the follow-up period was obtained for each subject from the GHC computerized pharmacy database. Although the main hypothesis related to reinfarction risk in women, men were studied as well to facilitate comparison of the results of this observational study with those of the clinical trials. According to conservative estimates of the available sample size, the investigators had 86 percent power to detect a relative risk of 1.45 in women alone, and 85 percent power to detect a relative risk of 1.25 in men and women combined, for the association of calcium-channel blocker use with fatal or non-fatal reinfarction. The study also examined the safety and efficacy of other cardiovascular drugs commonly used in women after myocardial infarction, including angiotensin converting-enzyme inhibitors, lipid-lowering drugs, and estrogen replacement therapy.

Medical subject headings
Cardiovascular Diseases, Myocardial Infarction, Heart Diseases

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 May 2000 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 1995
  3. Study completionAug 1998

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00005389
Sponsor's protocol ID
4295
Other IDs
R01HL053375
Status last verified
Apr 2001
First submitted
25 May 2000
Last updated
10 Feb 2016
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Heckbert SR, Weiss NS, Koepsell TD, Lemaitre RN, Smith NL, Siscovick DS, Lin D, Psaty BM. Duration of estrogen replacement therapy in relation to the risk of incident myocardial infarction in postmenopausal women. Arch Intern Med. 1997 Jun 23;157(12):1330-6.

    PubMed 9201007
  • Kaplan RC, Heckbert SR, Weiss NS, Wahl PW, Smith NL, Newton KM, Psaty BM. Postmenopausal estrogens and risk of myocardial infarction in diabetic women. Diabetes Care. 1998 Jul;21(7):1117-21. doi: 10.2337/diacare.21.7.1117.

    PubMed 9653605

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Cardiovascular Diseases and Myocardial Infarction, run by University of Washington.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Feb 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00005389, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Feb 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in