AzTrials
AzTrials

Cardiovascular DiseasesNCT00005409

Longitudinal Studies of Blood Pressure in the Elderly

An observational study of Cardiovascular Diseases and Heart Diseases, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To study further the association between blood pressure mortality among those who participated in both the Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program (HDFP) screen and the East Boston Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies in the Elderly (EPESE) study. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 100 years, men only
How many people
Not given
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
May 1991to Apr 1993
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 100 years
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

No eligibility criteria

About this study

To study further the association between blood pressure mortality among those who participated in both the Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program (HDFP) screen and the East Boston Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies in the Elderly (EPESE) study.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND:

In middle-age, level of blood pressure (BP) is a strong and independent predictor of both total and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality. However, among the elderly, recent short-term observational studies, including the East Boston Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies in the Elderly (EPESE), have raised the possibility of a J-shaped curve. In a study of short-term mortality, low blood pressures were positively associated with total and cardiovascular disease mortality. However, a further analysis confined to the 2079 (68 percent) of this cohort who were also screened nine years previously for the Hypertension Detection and Follow-Up Program showed the more conventional positive linear relationship between systolic blood pressure, and no association between diastolic blood pressure and mortality. The observations of higher short-term total and cardiovascular disease mortality at lower blood pressure levels among the elderly could have reflected a particular susceptibility to deleterious consequences of drug therapy for high blood pressure. Alternatively, such a finding might have been artifactual, due to survival bias or confounding by co-morbid conditions.

DESIGN NARRATIVE:

Linking data from the HDFP and the EPESE studies, the investigators examined change in blood pressure, antihypertensive medication use, and mortality over a 15-year period. With regard to the association between lower blood pressure and increased mortality, they determined whether the relationship previously observed reflected a fall from normotensive levels as opposed to a consistently low blood pressure. With regard to the upper end of the mortality curve, they assessed the effect of antihypertensive drug treatment on mortality as compared to those with untreated hypertension. The latter question had particular public health significance because questions remained about the risk-to-benefit ratio of antihypertensive drug treatment in this age group. Furthermore, they also described changes in blood pressure in this population and medication usage patterns over time and correlated type of medication and mortality.

The study completion date listed in this record was obtained from the "End Date" entered in the Protocol Registration and Results System (PRS) record.

Medical subject headings
Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases, Hypertension

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 May 2000 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 1991
  3. Study completionApr 1993

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00005409
Sponsor's protocol ID
4327
Other IDs
R03HL046923
Status last verified
Jun 2000
First submitted
25 May 2000
Last updated
16 Mar 2016
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Glynn RJ, Field TS, Satterfield S, Hebert PR, Buring JE, Taylor JO, Hennekens CH. Modification of increasing systolic blood pressure in the elderly during the 1980s. Am J Epidemiol. 1993 Sep 15;138(6):365-79. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116869.

    PubMed 8213742

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Cardiovascular Diseases and Heart Diseases, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Mar 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00005409, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Mar 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in