AzTrials
AzTrials

Lung DiseasesNCT00005432

Impact of Surfactant's Availability on Newborns

An observational study of Lung Diseases and Respiratory Distress Syndrome, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To identify what happened to specific groups of newborns after surfactant was introduced to the market. Were the same benefits with regard to morbidity, mortality, and resource use in evidence post treatment investigational new drug (IND)? Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 100 years, men only
Conditions the study is for
Lung Diseases, Respiratory Distress Syndrome
How many people
Not given
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
May 1995to Dec 1997
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 100 years
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

No eligibility criteria

About this study

To identify what happened to specific groups of newborns after surfactant was introduced to the market. Were the same benefits with regard to morbidity, mortality, and resource use in evidence post treatment investigational new drug (IND)?

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND:

The clinical trial literature on surfactant clearly demonstrated that surfactant therapy resulted in improved early respiratory status and improved mortality rates for premature newborns infants suffering from respiratory ailments due to surfactant insufficiency. However, the clinical trial experience regarding efficacy did not ensure that the same benefits would be conferred on patients outside the clinical trial environment during routine medical care.

DESIGN NARRATIVE:

The investigators had already demonstrated in an epidemiological study published in the New England Journal of Medicine (May 1994) that morbidity, mortality, and resource use among very low birth weight inborn infants declined once surfactant became available. This study broadened the focus to include infants excluded from the original study. The hypotheses for the study centered on the investigators' belief that infants who were in the 1500 to 2500 gram weight group also experienced reduced mortality, morbidity, and resource use post-surfactant, as did those who were mature with severe respiratory disease, and those who were outborn i.e. those who were transferred to a perinatal center. Finally, because of the significant focus on health care reform and quality assurance in clinical care the investigators included a hypothesis focusing on the impact of payer on mortality, morbidity, and resource use. The original study identified that the payer was not a factor differentiating the newborns with regard to any measures of outcome or resource use. The investigators hypothesized that this would remain the case. However, they suspected that there might be some indications in their analysis among patients who were outborn that HMO or managed care was influencing not only where births were occurring, but how well fragile newborns did in the clinical environment. All the analyses used analytic datafiles from the National Perinatal Information Center's Perinatal Center Database. A pre-and post-surfactant period was created using eleven perinatal centers who provided data on all newborns from 1985 and 1992. Infants were divided into two groups according to whether they were born before or after surfactant was introduced into clinical practice. Regression models controlling for race, sex, and birthweight were used to assess morbidity, mortality, and resource use.

The study completion date listed in this record was obtained from the "End Date" entered in the Protocol Registration and Results System (PRS) record.

Medical subject headings
Lung Diseases, Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 May 2000 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 1995
  3. Study completionDec 1997

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00005432
Sponsor's protocol ID
4350
Other IDs
R03HL054331
Status last verified
Nov 2001
First submitted
25 May 2000
Last updated
16 Mar 2016
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Lung Diseases and Respiratory Distress Syndrome, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Mar 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Mar 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in