AzTrials
AzTrials

Cardiovascular DiseasesNCT00005507

Race and the Use of Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures

An observational study of Cardiovascular Diseases and Heart Diseases, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To study the causes of persistent differences in Black-white access to tertiary care cardiovascular surgical services (TCCS). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 100 years, men only
How many people
Not given
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Mar 1998to Mar 2000
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 100 years
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

No eligibility criteria

About this study

To study the causes of persistent differences in Black-white access to tertiary care cardiovascular surgical services (TCCS).

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND:

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death among adults in the United States. Although not long ago it was widely believed that African-Americans had a lower incidence of cardiovascular disease than whites, few now believe this to be the case. However, despite parity in the incidence of cardiovascular disease, there remains a substantial Black-white difference in the utilization of tertiary care cardiovascular services (TCCS), such as coronary angiography (CA), coronary bypass surgery (CABG) and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Race differences have been found with great consistency across studies of varying design.

DESIGN NARRATIVE:

The study used a retrospective quasi-experimental population-based epidemiology design to examine the characteristics of the health care provider and the individual patient that account for utilization of TCCS. The study had four specific aims: 1) to determine the patient and provider characteristics exclusive of symptomatology that predict Black-white differences in referral for coronary angiography; 2) to determine, for patients who are referred for coronary angiography, the patient and provider characteristics that predict Black-white differences in receipt of coronary angiography; 3) to determine the patient and provider characteristics exclusive of symptomatology that predict Black-white difference in referral for CABG and PTCA; 4) to determine, for patients who are referred for CABG or PTCA, the patient and provider characteristics that predict Black-white differences in receipt of CABG and PTCA.

The hospital records of every 1996 cardiac discharge from each of three Baltimore-area hospitals are reviewed to assign each patient to one of three classes. These classes reflect the medical appropriateness of coronary angiography as estimated by the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association. All patients in class 1 (indicating general agreement that coronary angiography is indicated) are interviewed by telephone to ascertain barriers to utilization and other factors that may contribute to the use of services. In addition, a stratified sample of 16 class 1 subjects are interviewed in depth. An estimated 400 referring physicians are surveyed to develop a typology of physician practice patterns. Results from patient surveys, physician surveys, and medical record reviews are merged to form the analytical database.

The study completion date listed in this record was obtained from the "End Date" entered in the Protocol Registration and Results System (PRS) record.

Medical subject headings
Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases, Coronary Disease

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 May 2000 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 1998
  3. Study completionMar 2000

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00005507
Sponsor's protocol ID
5025
Other IDs
R01HL059621
Status last verified
Apr 2002
First submitted
25 May 2000
Last updated
18 Feb 2016
Results posted
No

Publications

  • LaVeist TA, Nickerson KJ, Bowie JV. Attitudes about racism, medical mistrust, and satisfaction with care among African American and white cardiac patients. Med Care Res Rev. 2000;57 Suppl 1:146-61. doi: 10.1177/1077558700057001S07.

    PubMed 11092161

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Cardiovascular Diseases and Heart Diseases, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Feb 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00005507, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Feb 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in