Cardiovascular DiseasesNCT00005694
Worksites, Occupational Nurses and Cholesterol Change
An observational study of Cardiovascular Diseases and Heart Diseases, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).
Trial summary
To study the relative effectiveness of teaching occupational nurses to conduct cholesterol screening, counseling and referral events (SCOREs) in their own worksites versus using an external organization to implement these programs. Also. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 100 years, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases, Hypercholesterolemia
- How many people
- Not given
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jul 1992to Jun 1996
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 100 years
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
No eligibility criteria
About this study
To study the relative effectiveness of teaching occupational nurses to conduct cholesterol screening, counseling and referral events (SCOREs) in their own worksites versus using an external organization to implement these programs. Also. to study the relative effectiveness of face-to-face behavior change counseling following the cholesterol measurement versus automated feedback of essentially the same individualized educational material.
Read the detailed description
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
The research design was a 2 x 2 design with repeated measures at six and 12 months after the baseline measurement and treatment application. The investigators tested the relative effectiveness of two major dimensions of blood cholesterol change programming in worksites of 250 - 800 employees with at least one occupational nurse. The overall design was 2 x 2 with 10 of 25 worksites randomly assigned to an Internal Condition and 10 worksites assigned to an External Condition. In the Internal Condition, occupational nurses were trained by project staff to implement the SCOREs and were given Reflotron portable dry chemistry analyzers to measure cholesterol. In the External Condition, the SCORE was conducted by an external organization (project staff). Five (5) worksites from each of the above conditions had the educational session of the SCORE delivered face-to-face [Face-to-Face condition (FF)] by either the nurse or project staff, depending on the condition (Internal + FF or External + FF). The other 10 worksites had this education delivered by a microcomputer/optical scanner (the RT 2000) that read the participant's risk factor and self-reported eating pattern information and delivered a print-out with recommendations that were prioritized and individualized for the participant (RT intervention was delivered by the nurse or project staff depending on the condition (Internal + RT or External + RT). All SCORE participants in the above 20 worksites also received a self-help nutrition change kit. This cross design allowed testing for possible interaction effects.
Another group of five worksites was also included which served as a comparison group for the External Condition. The employees in this group received a screening and education experience similar to the usual type of program offered by external, commercial screeners with minimal written education materials and no individualized feedback (Usual Care External Condition). The primary dependent variables included measured blood cholesterol, weight, other CHD risk factors, and self-reported eating pattern. Change were assessed six and 12 months after the SCOREs were conducted. A wide range of other variables including process, cost and mediating variables were assessed through the project period.
The study completion date listed in this record was obtained from the "End Date" entered in the Protocol Registration and Results System (PRS) record.
- Medical subject headings
- Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases, Hypercholesterolemia
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 May 2000 (estimated)
- Study startJul 1992
- Study completionJun 1996
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Cardiovascular DiseasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- US National Institutes of Health
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00005694
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 4244
- Other IDs
- R01HL048250
- Status last verified
- Jul 2000
- First submitted
- 25 May 2000
- Last updated
- 16 Mar 2016
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Mar 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Worksites, Occupational Nurses and Cholesterol Change
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00005694
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 4244
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Lead sponsor
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)US National Institutes of Health
- Study start
- Jul 1992
- Study completion
- Jun 1996 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 May 2000 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To study the relative effectiveness of teaching occupational nurses to conduct cholesterol screening, counseling and referral events (SCOREs) in their own worksites versus using an external organization to implement these programs. Also. to study the relative effectiveness of face-to-face behavior change counseling following the cholesterol measurement versus automated feedback of essentially the same individualized educational material.
Detailed description
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
The research design was a 2 x 2 design with repeated measures at six and 12 months after the baseline measurement and treatment application. The investigators tested the relative effectiveness of two major dimensions of blood cholesterol change programming in worksites of 250 - 800 employees with at least one occupational nurse. The overall design was 2 x 2 with 10 of 25 worksites randomly assigned to an Internal Condition and 10 worksites assigned to an External Condition. In the Internal Condition, occupational nurses were trained by project staff to implement the SCOREs and were given Reflotron portable dry chemistry analyzers to measure cholesterol. In the External Condition, the SCORE was conducted by an external organization (project staff). Five (5) worksites from each of the above conditions had the educational session of the SCORE delivered face-to-face [Face-to-Face condition (FF)] by either the nurse or project staff, depending on the condition (Internal + FF or External + FF). The other 10 worksites had this education delivered by a microcomputer/optical scanner (the RT 2000) that read the participant's risk factor and self-reported eating pattern information and delivered a print-out with recommendations that were prioritized and individualized for the participant (RT intervention was delivered by the nurse or project staff depending on the condition (Internal + RT or External + RT). All SCORE participants in the above 20 worksites also received a self-help nutrition change kit. This cross design allowed testing for possible interaction effects.
Another group of five worksites was also included which served as a comparison group for the External Condition. The employees in this group received a screening and education experience similar to the usual type of program offered by external, commercial screeners with minimal written education materials and no individualized feedback (Usual Care External Condition). The primary dependent variables included measured blood cholesterol, weight, other CHD risk factors, and self-reported eating pattern. Change were assessed six and 12 months after the SCOREs were conducted. A wide range of other variables including process, cost and mediating variables were assessed through the project period.
The study completion date listed in this record was obtained from the "End Date" entered in the Protocol Registration and Results System (PRS) record.
Study design
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 100 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Mar 2016.
Related trials for Cardiovascular Diseases
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Cemsidomide + Dexamethasone in Participants With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Multiple Myeloma, Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Vericiguat in Pediatric Participants With Heart Failure Due to Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (MK-1242-036)
Heart Failure, Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
RecruitingPhase 4
Efficacy and Safety of a Half-dose Bolus of r-SAK Prior to Primary PCI in ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction
ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Women's IschemiA TRial to Reduce Events In Non-ObstRuctive CAD
Coronary Artery Disease
Active, not recruiting
VOLT CE Mark Study
Atrial Arrhythmia, Atrial Fibrillation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Cardiovascular Diseases and Heart Diseases, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Mar 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Mar 2016.