AzTrials
AzTrials

Lupus Erythematosus, SystemicPhase 3NCT00005778

High-Dose Intravenous (IV) Cyclophosphamide Versus Monthly IV Cyclophosphamide

A Phase 3 study testing High-dose immunoablative therapy in people with Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, run by National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) at 3 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study compares the effectiveness of high-dose cyclophosphamide treatment with the "gold standard" treatment, monthly intravenous (IV) cyclophosphamide, in people with moderate to severe lupus that does not respond to high-dose corticosteroid therapy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
What is being tested?
High-dose immunoablative therapy
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
How many people
100 participants
Where
3 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Jan 2000to Apr 2006
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

All patients with moderate-to-severe SLE will be considered for this trial, including women and minorities. SLE is too rare a disease in children for it to be feasible to include them. Patients must meet the following criteria to be eligible for participation in this clinical trial:

  • Four or more ACR criteria (90), as revised by Hochberg (91) for the classification of SLE.
  • Involvement of one or more of the following organ systems (renal, neurologic, hematologic, cardiac, pulmonary, cutaneous, gastrointestinal) of moderate-to-severe severity as indicated by an "A" score on the BILAG, a "2" or "3" for severity on SLAM, or severe enough to require hospitalization if the organ involvement was not "captured" on either the BILAG or SLAM instruments.
  • A lack of response to daily corticosteroids in moderate-to-high doses (0.5 -1 mg prednisone/kg/day or equivalent anti-inflammatory dose of methyprednisolone, dexamethasone, or triamicinolone). When cyclophosphamide is the accepted standard of care (renal and neurologic), the maximally tolerated dose of prednisone will be sufficient to meet the corticosteroid criterion. The ideal body weight will be used for this criterion in patients who are morbidly obese. The equivalent dose of triamcinolone (4mg triamcinolone=5mg prednisone) can be used to meet the criterion.

And/or:

  • A lack of response to IV pulse corticosteroids (1 gram methylprednisolone or 180 mg dexamethasone).
  • Duration of treatment to determine lack of response is 3 days or longer for neurologic, renal, hematologic, pulmonary, or cardiac lupus, one month or longer for serositis.

And/or:

  • Equivalent degree of immunosuppression with azathioprine, methotrexate, cyclosporin, or mycophenolate mofetil. Equivalent degrees of immunosuppression are: azathioprine - 100 mg daily or more; methotrexate - 7.5 mg weekly or more; cyclosporin - 150 mg daily or more; mycophenolate mofetil - 1000 mg daily or more. Duration to determine lack of response should be one month or longer.

And/or:

  • Appropriate other treatment (such as intravenous immunoglobulin for hemolytic anemia and thrombocytopenia).
  • SLE patients seeking treatment for neurological complaints will be evaluated by a neurologist to concur that the patient meets eligibility criteria.
  • Appropriate other treatment for cutaneous lupus patients may include combination antimalarial drugs (such as the combination of hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with quinacrine).
  • Patients may enter the trial if they received one dose of IV cyclophosphamide to "temporize" or "stablize" them prior to screening visit or after signing consent or if previous IV cyclophosphamide was for a PAST organ system, and patient presents with NEW organ system requiring IV cyclophosphamide.
  • Insurance or other source of funds to pay for expenses related to this trial.

Exlcusion Criteria:

  • Age less than 18 years and over 70 years.
  • Any risk of pregnancy - ALL female patients must have an effective means of birth control or be infertile due to hysterectomy, fallopian tube surgery, or menopause.
  • Previous completion of the NIH IV cyclophosphamide protocol.
  • Cardiac ejection fraction < 45%.
  • Serum creatinine > 3.0 mg/dL.
  • FVC or FEV < 50% predicted.
  • Bilirubin > 2.0, transaminases > 2x normal.
  • Patients who are preterminal or moribund.
  • SLE patients presenting with arthritis for entry organ system.

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

United States3 sites
  • Johns Hopkins University Division of Rheumatology

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21205

  • Medical College of Wisconsin, Division of Rheumatology

    Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226

  • Drexel University School of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19102

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Randomized Trial of High-Dose IV Cyclophosphamide Versus Monthly IV Cyclophosphamide

This study compares the effectiveness of high-dose cyclophosphamide treatment with the "gold standard" treatment, monthly intravenous (IV) cyclophosphamide, in people with moderate to severe lupus that does not respond to high-dose corticosteroid therapy. We will give patients either IV cyclophosphamide (750 milligrams per square meter of body surface area) monthly for 6 months, followed by quarterly maintenance therapy, or high-dose IV cyclophosphamide (50 milligrams per kilogram body weight per day) for the first four days of the study. Patients will be followed for 24 months after therapy.

Read the detailed description

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE or lupus) remains the prototypic autoimmune disease. Recent data show that its incidence has tripled since 1970 and its prevalence is 1 in 800 in Rochester, Minnesota. The natural history of lupus in our cohort is one of (1) relapsing/ remitting or (2) chronic activity, with only 17 percent of patients having periods of long quiescence. Over 75 percent of our African-American patients and 50 percent of our Caucasian patients have renal (kidney) involvement. Over 50 percent suffer permanent damage in one or more organ systems, and over 15 percent have renal failure.

Researchers at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) have shown that, for patients with severe lupus, especially with renal involvement, monthly IV pulse cyclophosphamide (500 to 1000 mg/m squared BSA) for 6 months followed by quarterly maintenance for 2 years is superior to high-dose corticosteroid treatment. NIH and others have shown that IV pulse cyclophosphamide is also effective for severe lupus in other organs. However, even monthly IV cyclophosphamide is not successful in all cases, and it, too, has associated toxicity, especially premature ovarian failure. For that reason, we have pioneered the use of high-dose immunoablative cyclophosphamide (200 mg/kg) in 10 patients with severe lupus refractory to other treatments.

Because of the initial success of this approach, including 75 percent complete response (on no medications) in renal lupus, we are conducting a controlled trial of high-dose immunoablative cyclophosphamide versus the "gold standard" monthly IV cyclophosphamide in people with moderate to severe lupus refractory to high-dose corticosteroid therapy. We will give patients either 750 mg/m2 of body surface area IV cyclophosphamide monthly for 6 months, followed by quarterly maintenance therapy (we will readmit patients, if necessary, for infections or other complications) or cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg/d intravenously on days 1-4. We will calculate the dose of cyclophosphamide according to ideal body weight. Patients are scheduled to receive only one course of therapy. We will follow patients according to the infective guidelines for BMT.

Being tested
High-dose immunoablative therapy
Keywords
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), Cytoxan, Cyclophosphamide, High-dose immunoablative therapy
Medical subject headings
Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • High-dose immunoablative therapyDrug

    1. High dose cyclophosphamide for 4 days.
    2. NIH monthly IV cytoxan for 6 months followed by quarterly for 2 years.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. RIFLE

    Measured: 2.5 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Jun 2000 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2000
  3. Primary completionApr 2006
  4. Study completionApr 2006

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Factorial
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00005778
Sponsor's protocol ID
N01 AR92243
Other IDs
NIAMS-046
Status last verified
Nov 2008
First submitted
3 Jun 2000
Last updated
6 Nov 2008
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Brodsky RA, Petri M, Smith BD, Seifter EJ, Spivak JL, Styler M, Dang CV, Brodsky I, Jones RJ. Immunoablative high-dose cyclophosphamide without stem-cell rescue for refractory, severe autoimmune disease. Ann Intern Med. 1998 Dec 15;129(12):1031-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-129-12-199812150-00007.

    PubMed 9867758
  • Brodsky RA, Sensenbrenner LL, Jones RJ. Complete remission in severe aplastic anemia after high-dose cyclophosphamide without bone marrow transplantation. Blood. 1996 Jan 15;87(2):491-4.

    PubMed 8555470
  • Brodsky RA, Smith BD. Bone marrow transplantation for autoimmune diseases. Curr Opin Oncol. 1999 Mar;11(2):83-6. doi: 10.1097/00001622-199903000-00002.

    PubMed 10188071
  • Levite M, Zinger H, Zisman E, Reisner Y, Mozes E. Beneficial effects of bone marrow transplantation on the serological manifestations and kidney pathology of experimental systemic lupus erythematosus. Cell Immunol. 1995 Apr 15;162(1):138-45. doi: 10.1006/cimm.1995.1061.

    PubMed 7704902
  • Petri M, Jones RJ, Brodsky RA. High-dose cyclophosphamide without stem cell transplantation in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Jan;48(1):166-73. doi: 10.1002/art.10752.

    PubMed 12528116
  • Petri M. Cyclophosphamide: new approaches for systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2004;13(5):366-71. doi: 10.1191/0961203303lu1028oa.

    PubMed 15230294

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing High-dose immunoablative therapy in people with Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, run by National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) at 3 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Nov 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

RIFLE (time frame: 2.5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00005778, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Nov 2008.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in