LeukemiaPhase 2NCT00005962
Comparison of Three Treatment Regimens in Treating Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myelogenous Leukemia
A Phase 2 study testing sargramostim, cyclophosphamide and cytarabine in people with Leukemia, run by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group at 65 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Monoclonal antibodies such as gemtuzumab ozogamicin can locate cancer cells and either kill them or deliver cancer-killing substances to them without harming normal cells. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 120 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Leukemia
- What is being tested?
- sargramostim, cyclophosphamide and cytarabine
- How many people
- Not given
- Where
- 65 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- 4 Oct 2000to Jun 2007
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 120 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Histologically proven acute myelogenous leukemia of one of the following types:
- Acute myeloblastic leukemia (FAB type M0, M1, or M2)
- Acute promyelocytic leukemia (FAB type M3) allowed if ineligible for an ECOG M3 protocol or if no tretinoin or arsenic trioxide therapy is planned
- Acute myelomonocytic leukemia (FAB type M4)
- Acute monocytic leukemia (FAB type M5)
- Acute erythroleukemia (FAB type M6)
- Acute megakaryocytic leukemia (FAB type M7)
- Must meet 1 of the following criteria:
- Relapse less than 6 months after first complete remission (CR)
- Relapse 6-12 months after first CR
- Refractory to conventional initial induction chemotherapy (no more than 2 courses) or first reinduction (no more than 1 course)
- Must have marrow documentation of residual leukemia after chemotherapy (for at least 2 weeks duration)
- Second or greater relapse
- No relapse greater than 1 year after achieving first CR
- Blast cells must be CD33 positive
- Prior CNS leukemia allowed if there is currently documentation of no CNS involvement on CSF examination (i.e., negative CSF by lumbar puncture)
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Age:
- 18 and over
Performance status:
- ECOG 0-2
Life expectancy:
- Not specified
Hematopoietic:
- See Disease Characteristics
Hepatic:
- Bilirubin no greater than 2.0 mg/dL*
- SGOT less than 2 times upper limit of normal* NOTE: *Unless due to leukemia infiltration
Renal:
- Creatinine no greater than 2.0 mg/dL
Cardiovascular:
- See Chemotherapy
- No myocardial infarction within the past 3 months
- No significant congestive heart failure
- No significant cardiac arrhythmia
- Cardiac ejection fraction normal by MUGA scan or echocardiogram
- Resting ejection fraction at least 50% or at least 5% increase with exercise
- Shortening fraction at least 24% or normal by echocardiogram
Other:
- Not pregnant or nursing
- Fertile patients must use effective contraception
- No concurrent organ damage or other medical problems that would precludestudy therapy
- No concurrent evidence (including positive blood or deep tissue cultures or stains) of invasive fungal infection
- No hypersensitivity to ingredients of gemtuzumab ozogamicin or daunorubicin liposomal
- No other active tumor that would interfere with study therapy or increase risk
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Biologic therapy:
- No prior gemtuzumab ozogamicin
Chemotherapy:
- See Disease Characteristics
- See Biologic therapy
- No prior daunorubicin liposomal or topotecan
- Prior doxorubicin (no greater than 300 mg/m2), daunorubicin (no greater than 300 mg/m2), idarubicin (no greater than 100 mg/m2), or mitoxantrone (no greater than 100 mg/m2) allowed if left ventricular function is adequate
- At least 4 weeks since prior chemotherapy except patients who are refractory to conventional initial induction chemotherapy
- Prior hydroxyurea allowed within 4 weeks prior to beginning study
- Hydroxyurea must be discontinued at least 24 hours prior to beginning study
Endocrine therapy:
- Not specified
Radiotherapy:
- At least 4 weeks since prior radiotherapy except patients who are refractory to conventional initial induction chemotherapy
Surgery:
- Not specified
Trial locations and contacts
65 sites in 3 countries.
65 sites in 3 countries
United States62 sites
CCOP - Ann Arbor Regional
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48106
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
Baltimore, Maryland, 21231-2410
New England Medical Center Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02111
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Brooklyn
Brooklyn, New York, 11209
CCOP - Cedar Rapids Oncology Project
Cedar Rapids, Iowa, 52403-1206
Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, 60611-3013
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Lakeside Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Ireland Cancer Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106-5065
Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
CCOP - Columbus
Columbus, Ohio, 43206
CCOP - Central Illinois
Decatur, Illinois, 62526
CCOP - Colorado Cancer Research Program, Inc.
Denver, Colorado, 80209-5031
CCOP - Iowa Oncology Research Association
Des Moines, Iowa, 50309-1016
Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope
Duarte, California, 91010-3000
CCOP - Duluth
Duluth, Minnesota, 55805
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - East Orange
East Orange, New Jersey, 07018-1095
CCOP - Evanston
Evanston, Illinois, 60201
CCOP - Merit Care Hospital
Fargo, North Dakota, 58122
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Gainsville
Gainesville, Florida, 32608-1197
CCOP - Northern New Jersey
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601
Indiana University Cancer Center
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202-5289
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Indianapolis (Roudebush)
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center at The University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242-1009
CCOP - Kalamazoo
Kalamazoo, Michigan, 49007-3731
CCOP - Southern Nevada Cancer Research Foundation
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89106
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Madison
Madison, Wisconsin, 53705
University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792-6164
CCOP - Marshfield Medical Research and Education Foundation
Marshfield, Wisconsin, 54449
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Miami
Miami, Florida, 33125
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Minneapolis
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55417
University of Minnesota Cancer Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455
Cancer Institute of New Jersey
New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08901
MBCCOP - LSU Health Sciences Center
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112
CCOP - Ochsner
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70121
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - New York
New York, New York, 10010
NYU School of Medicine's Kaplan Comprehensive Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10016
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Omaha
Omaha, Nebraska, 68105
CCOP - Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium
Omaha, Nebraska, 68131
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Palo Alto
Palo Alto, California, 94304
CCOP - Illinois Oncology Research Association
Peoria, Illinois, 61602
Hahnemann University Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19102-1192
University of Pennsylvania Cancer Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104-4283
Kimmel Cancer Center of Thomas Jefferson University - Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107-5541
Fox Chase Cancer Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19111
University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213-3489
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15240
Mayo Clinic Cancer Center
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
University of Rochester Cancer Center
Rochester, New York, 14642
CCOP - Metro-Minnesota
Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, 55416
CCOP - Scottsdale Oncology Program
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85259-5404
CCOP - Sioux Community Cancer Consortium
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57104
Stanford University Medical Center
Stanford, California, 94305-5408
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute
Tampa, Florida, 33612-9497
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Tampa (Haley)
Tampa, Florida, 33612
Albert Einstein Comprehensive Cancer Center
The Bronx, New York, 10461
MBCCOP-Our Lady of Mercy Cancer Center
The Bronx, New York, 10466
CCOP - Toledo Community Hospital Oncology Program
Toledo, Ohio, 43623-3456
CCOP - Oklahoma
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74136
CCOP - Carle Cancer Center
Urbana, Illinois, 61801
CCOP - Christiana Care Health Services
Wilmington, Delaware, 19899
CCOP - MainLine Health
Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, 19096
Puerto Rico2 sites
MBCCOP - San Juan
San Juan, 00927-5800
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - San Juan
San Juan, 00927-5800
About this study
Official title: A Phase II Randomized Trial of Immunologic and Chemotherapeutic Agents for Treatment of Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myelogenous Leukemia
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Monoclonal antibodies such as gemtuzumab ozogamicin can locate cancer cells and either kill them or deliver cancer-killing substances to them without harming normal cells. Combining more than one drug or combining monoclonal antibody with chemotherapy may kill more cancer cells. It is not yet known which treatment regimen is more effective for acute myelogenous leukemia.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase II trial to compare the effectiveness of three treatment regimens in treating patients who have relapsed or refractory acute myelogenous leukemia.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- Compare the rates of complete response (CR) and CR without full platelet recovery in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myelogenous leukemia treated with gemtuzumab ozogamicin and cytarabine vs daunorubicin liposomal and cytarabine vs cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, and topotecan.
- Compare the toxicities of these 3 regimens in these patients.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified by disease status (relapse less than 6 months after first complete response (CR) vs relapse 6-12 months after first CR vs refractory to conventional initial induction chemotherapy (no more than 2 courses) or first reinduction (no more than 1 course) vs second or greater relapse).
- Induction: Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms:
- Arm I: Patients receive cytarabine IV over 2 hours on days 1-4 and gemtuzumab ozogamicin IV over 2 hours on day 5.
- Arm II: Patients receive daunorubicin liposomal IV over a minimum of 2 hours on days 1-3 and cytarabine IV over 2 hours (beginning immediately after completion of daunorubicin liposomal infusion) on days 1-4.
- Arm III: Patients receive cyclophosphamide IV over 1 hour every 12 hours on days 1-3, cytarabine IV over 2 hours (beginning immediately after completion of cyclophosphamide infusion) on days 2-6, and topotecan IV continuously on days 2-6.
- Consolidation: Patients who achieve complete remission (CR) receive 1 additional course of induction therapy on the same arm to which they were originally randomized beginning within 4-6 weeks after initial documentation of CR. Patients on arm II receive no additional daunorubicin liposomal if resting ejection fraction is less than 50% preconsolidation. All patients receive sargramostim (GM-CSF) IV over 4 hours or SQ daily beginning 24 hours after completion of consolidation therapy and continuing until blood counts recover.
Patients are followed every 3 months through year 2, every 6 months through year 5, and then annually thereafter until death.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A maximum of 150-165 patients (50-55 per arm) will be accrued for this study within 2 years.
- Conditions
- Leukemia
- Being tested
- sargramostim, cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, liposomal daunorubicin citrate
- Keywords
- recurrent adult acute myeloid leukemia, adult acute erythroid leukemia (M6), adult acute myeloblastic leukemia without maturation (M1), adult acute myeloblastic leukemia with maturation (M2), adult acute promyelocytic leukemia (M3), adult acute myelomonocytic leukemia (M4), adult acute monoblastic leukemia (M5a), adult acute megakaryoblastic leukemia (M7), adult acute monocytic leukemia (M5b), adult acute minimally differentiated myeloid leukemia (M0)
- Medical subject headings
- Leukemia, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, Leukemia, Erythroblastic, Acute, Leukemia, Promyelocytic, Acute, Leukemia, Myelomonocytic, Acute, Leukemia, Monocytic, Acute, Leukemia, Megakaryoblastic, Acute
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
sargramostimBiological
cyclophosphamideDrug
cytarabineDrug
gemtuzumab ozogamicinDrug
liposomal daunorubicin citrateDrug
topotecan hydrochlorideDrug
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Nov 2003 (estimated)
- Study start4 Oct 2000
- Primary completionOct 2005
- Study completionJun 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for LeukemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Investigators
- Mark R. Litzow, MD, Study chair, Mayo Clinic
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00005962
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CDR0000067944
- Other IDs
- E-4999
- Status last verified
- Jun 2023
- First submitted
- 5 Jul 2000
- Last updated
- 22 Jun 2023
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Litzow MR, Othus M, Cripe LD, Gore SD, Lazarus HM, Lee SJ, Bennett JM, Paietta EM, Dewald GW, Rowe JM, Tallman MS; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Leukemia Committee. Failure of three novel regimens to improve outcome for patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia: a report from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Br J Haematol. 2010 Jan;148(2):217-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07917.x. Epub 2009 Oct 5.
PubMed 19804455Litzow MR, Goloubeva O, Rowe J, et al.: A randomized phase II trial of gemtuzumab ozogamicin vs. liposomal daunorubicin vs. cyclophosphamide plus topotecan, each combined with intermediate dose Ara-C for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory acute myelogenous leukemia . [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 22: A-2359, 2003.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Jun 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase II Randomized Trial of Immunologic and Chemotherapeutic Agents for Treatment of Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myelogenous Leukemia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00005962
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CDR0000067944
- Conditions
- Leukemia
- Keywords
- recurrent adult acute myeloid leukemia, adult acute erythroid leukemia (M6), adult acute myeloblastic leukemia without maturation (M1), adult acute myeloblastic leukemia with maturation (M2), adult acute promyelocytic leukemia (M3), adult acute myelomonocytic leukemia (M4), adult acute monoblastic leukemia (M5a), adult acute megakaryoblastic leukemia (M7)
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Lead sponsor
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology GroupResearch network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Study start
- 4 Oct 2000 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Oct 2005 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Nov 2003 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Monoclonal antibodies such as gemtuzumab ozogamicin can locate cancer cells and either kill them or deliver cancer-killing substances to them without harming normal cells. Combining more than one drug or combining monoclonal antibody with chemotherapy may kill more cancer cells. It is not yet known which treatment regimen is more effective for acute myelogenous leukemia.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase II trial to compare the effectiveness of three treatment regimens in treating patients who have relapsed or refractory acute myelogenous leukemia.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- Compare the rates of complete response (CR) and CR without full platelet recovery in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myelogenous leukemia treated with gemtuzumab ozogamicin and cytarabine vs daunorubicin liposomal and cytarabine vs cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, and topotecan.
- Compare the toxicities of these 3 regimens in these patients.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified by disease status (relapse less than 6 months after first complete response (CR) vs relapse 6-12 months after first CR vs refractory to conventional initial induction chemotherapy (no more than 2 courses) or first reinduction (no more than 1 course) vs second or greater relapse).
- Induction: Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms:
- Arm I: Patients receive cytarabine IV over 2 hours on days 1-4 and gemtuzumab ozogamicin IV over 2 hours on day 5.
- Arm II: Patients receive daunorubicin liposomal IV over a minimum of 2 hours on days 1-3 and cytarabine IV over 2 hours (beginning immediately after completion of daunorubicin liposomal infusion) on days 1-4.
- Arm III: Patients receive cyclophosphamide IV over 1 hour every 12 hours on days 1-3, cytarabine IV over 2 hours (beginning immediately after completion of cyclophosphamide infusion) on days 2-6, and topotecan IV continuously on days 2-6.
- Consolidation: Patients who achieve complete remission (CR) receive 1 additional course of induction therapy on the same arm to which they were originally randomized beginning within 4-6 weeks after initial documentation of CR. Patients on arm II receive no additional daunorubicin liposomal if resting ejection fraction is less than 50% preconsolidation. All patients receive sargramostim (GM-CSF) IV over 4 hours or SQ daily beginning 24 hours after completion of consolidation therapy and continuing until blood counts recover.
Patients are followed every 3 months through year 2, every 6 months through year 5, and then annually thereafter until death.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A maximum of 150-165 patients (50-55 per arm) will be accrued for this study within 2 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 120 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| sargramostim | Biological | – |
| cyclophosphamide | Drug | – |
| cytarabine | Drug | – |
| gemtuzumab ozogamicin | Drug | – |
| liposomal daunorubicin citrate | Drug | – |
| topotecan hydrochloride | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Jun 2023.
- Results publication: PubMed 19804455Litzow MR, Othus M, Cripe LD, Gore SD, Lazarus HM, Lee SJ, Bennett JM, Paietta EM, Dewald GW, Rowe JM, Tallman MS; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Leukemia Committee. Failure of three novel regimens to improve outcome for patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia: a report from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Br J Haematol. 2010 Jan;148(2):217-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07917.x. Epub 2009 Oct 5.
- Results publicationLitzow MR, Goloubeva O, Rowe J, et al.: A randomized phase II trial of gemtuzumab ozogamicin vs. liposomal daunorubicin vs. cyclophosphamide plus topotecan, each combined with intermediate dose Ara-C for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory acute myelogenous leukemia . [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 22: A-2359, 2003.
Related trials for Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of CHM-029 in Participants With NPM1 Mutated, KMT2A or NUP98 Rearranged AML
AML (Acute Myeloid Leukemia)
RecruitingPhase 1
Vididencel in CML-CP Patients With MRD
CML (Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia)
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing New Therapies for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Newly Diagnosed and Have Not Yet Started Treatment (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mark R. Litzow, MD study chair
Mayo Clinic
65 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing sargramostim, cyclophosphamide and cytarabine in people with Leukemia, run by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group at 65 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jun 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 65 sites in United States, Puerto Rico, South Africa. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00005962, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jun 2023.