Blood DiseaseNCT00006312
Hemochromatosis--Genetic Prevalence and Penetrance
An observational study of Blood Disease and Hemochromatosis, run by University of Rochester.
Trial summary
To examine the cost effectiveness of hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) screening in primary care. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 100 years, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Blood Disease, Hemochromatosis
- How many people
- Not given
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jul 1999to May 2003
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 100 years
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
No eligibility criteria
About this study
To examine the cost effectiveness of hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) screening in primary care.
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND:
Hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) is the most common inherited disorder among Caucasians with an estimated frequency as high as 8 per 1000. Affected individuals absorb excessive amounts of dietary iron and develop progressive accumulation of tissue iron stores with consequent organ dysfunction including hepatic cirrhosis, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, arthropathy and impotence. Early diagnosis and institution of phlebotomy treatments will prevent disease manifestations and normalize life expectancy. In 1996, HFE, the gene for HHC was mapped on the short arm of chromosome 6 (6p21.3). HH is therefore a natural target for the development of a routine screening strategy.
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
The investigators have demonstrated the favorable cost-effectiveness ratio of adopting a screening strategy for HH and have screened 16,031 primary care patients using serum transferrin saturation (TS) levels to confirm the prevalence of undiagnosed HH in this setting and to demonstrate the feasibility of screening. The recent description of HFE gene mutations in individuals with HH has made genetic testing for HH possible and may increase the attractiveness of general screening. However, several important questions about genetic prevalence and penetrance remain to be addressed before such a recommendation can be made. The large screened sample provides a unique opportunity to address several of these important issues. First, they will obtain population-based estimates of the prevalence of HFE gene mutations. Second, they will determine the sensitivity of serum TS testing for detecting these mutations. Third, the comparison of genotype and phenotype will allow them to draw useful inferences about disease penetrance. The results will enable them to propose an optimal screening strategy for HH and to determine the place of genetic testing in the diagnostic algorithm. This strategy may vary depending on age, sex and race. The answers to these questions will enable them to determine with greater confidence the relative effectiveness of a screening strategy for HH and will clarify for primary care practitioners which of their patients should be screened for this disorder. These questions have recently been identified as a priority by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
- Conditions
- Blood Disease, Hemochromatosis
- Medical subject headings
- Hematologic Diseases, Hemochromatosis
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Sep 2000 (estimated)
- Study startJul 1999
- Study completionMay 2003
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Blood DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of RochesterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Rochester
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
- Investigators
- Pradyumna Phatak, University of Rochester
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00006312
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 920
- Other IDs
- R01HL061428
- Status last verified
- Jan 2016
- First submitted
- 28 Sep 2000
- Last updated
- 15 Jan 2016
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Sham RL, Raubertas RF, Braggins C, Cappuccio J, Gallagher M, Phatak PD. Asymptomatic hemochromatosis subjects: genotypic and phenotypic profiles. Blood. 2000 Dec 1;96(12):3707-11.
PubMed 11090050Phatak PD, Ryan DH, Cappuccio J, Oakes D, Braggins C, Provenzano K, Eberly S, Sham RL. Prevalence and penetrance of HFE mutations in 4865 unselected primary care patients. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2002 Jul-Aug;29(1):41-7. doi: 10.1006/bcmd.2002.0536.
PubMed 12482402
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Jan 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Hemochromatosis--Genetic Prevalence and Penetrance
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00006312
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 920
- Conditions
- Blood Disease, Hemochromatosis
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Lead sponsor
- University of RochesterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
- Study start
- Jul 1999
- Study completion
- May 2003
- First posted
- 29 Sep 2000 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To examine the cost effectiveness of hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) screening in primary care.
Detailed description
BACKGROUND:
Hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) is the most common inherited disorder among Caucasians with an estimated frequency as high as 8 per 1000. Affected individuals absorb excessive amounts of dietary iron and develop progressive accumulation of tissue iron stores with consequent organ dysfunction including hepatic cirrhosis, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, arthropathy and impotence. Early diagnosis and institution of phlebotomy treatments will prevent disease manifestations and normalize life expectancy. In 1996, HFE, the gene for HHC was mapped on the short arm of chromosome 6 (6p21.3). HH is therefore a natural target for the development of a routine screening strategy.
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
The investigators have demonstrated the favorable cost-effectiveness ratio of adopting a screening strategy for HH and have screened 16,031 primary care patients using serum transferrin saturation (TS) levels to confirm the prevalence of undiagnosed HH in this setting and to demonstrate the feasibility of screening. The recent description of HFE gene mutations in individuals with HH has made genetic testing for HH possible and may increase the attractiveness of general screening. However, several important questions about genetic prevalence and penetrance remain to be addressed before such a recommendation can be made. The large screened sample provides a unique opportunity to address several of these important issues. First, they will obtain population-based estimates of the prevalence of HFE gene mutations. Second, they will determine the sensitivity of serum TS testing for detecting these mutations. Third, the comparison of genotype and phenotype will allow them to draw useful inferences about disease penetrance. The results will enable them to propose an optimal screening strategy for HH and to determine the place of genetic testing in the diagnostic algorithm. This strategy may vary depending on age, sex and race. The answers to these questions will enable them to determine with greater confidence the relative effectiveness of a screening strategy for HH and will clarify for primary care practitioners which of their patients should be screened for this disorder. These questions have recently been identified as a priority by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
Study design
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 100 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Jan 2016.
- Background: PubMed 11090050Sham RL, Raubertas RF, Braggins C, Cappuccio J, Gallagher M, Phatak PD. Asymptomatic hemochromatosis subjects: genotypic and phenotypic profiles. Blood. 2000 Dec 1;96(12):3707-11.
- Background: PubMed 12482402Phatak PD, Ryan DH, Cappuccio J, Oakes D, Braggins C, Provenzano K, Eberly S, Sham RL. Prevalence and penetrance of HFE mutations in 4865 unselected primary care patients. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2002 Jul-Aug;29(1):41-7. doi: 10.1006/bcmd.2002.0536.
Related trials for Blood Disease
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of YKST02 in Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)
RecruitingPhase 2
Engaging T-cells to Eliminate MRD in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Optimizing Response With Talquetmab and Teclistamab (ROTATE)
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Phase III Study of Eque-cel in Subjects With Len-refractory RRMM (FUMANBA-03)
Multiple Myeloma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pradyumna Phatak
University of Rochester
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Blood Disease and Hemochromatosis, run by University of Rochester.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jan 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00006312, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jan 2016.