LeukemiaPhase 3NCT00006343
STI571 Compared With Interferon Alfa Plus Cytarabine in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia
A Phase 3 study testing recombinant interferon alfa, cytarabine and imatinib mesylate in people with Leukemia, run by Novartis at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Biological therapies such as interferon-alfa and STI571 may interfere with the growth of cancer cells. It is not yet known if STI571 is more effective than interferon alfa plus cytarabine for chronic myelogenous leukemia. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Leukemia
- What is being tested?
- recombinant interferon alfa, cytarabine and imatinib mesylate
- How many people
- Not given
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jun 2000to Mar 2007
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Cytogenetically proven Philadelphia chromosome positive chronic phase chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) Initial diagnosis within the past 6 months No prior chemotherapy, including regimens used in peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) mobilization for PBPC transplantation, for CML except hydroxyurea Must meet the following criteria: Blasts in peripheral blood and bone marrow less than 15% Blasts plus promyelocytes in peripheral blood and bone marrow less than 30% Basophils in peripheral blood less than 20% Platelet count at least 100,000/mm3 No extramedullary leukemic involvement except spleen or liver No patient for which a sibling bone marrow donor is available and allogeneic bone marrow transplantation is elected as first line therapy
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: 18 to 70 Performance status: ECOG 0-2 Life expectancy: Not specified Hematopoietic: See Disease Characteristics Hepatic: Bilirubin no greater than 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN) SGOT and SGPT no greater than 1.5 times (ULN) INR and PTT no greater than 1.5 times ULN Renal: Creatinine no greater than 1.5 times ULN Cardiovascular: No angina No New York Heart Association class III or IV heart disease Other: No uncontrolled medical disease, such as diabetes mellitus, thyroid dysfunction, neuropsychiatric disorders, or infection HIV negative Not pregnant or nursing Negative pregnancy test Fertile patients must use effective barrier contraception No other malignancy within the past 5 years except basal cell skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix No history of noncompliance with medical regimens or potential for noncompliance
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: Biologic therapy: Concurrent leukapheresis allowed during the first month of study No concurrent allogeneic bone marrow transplantation Concurrent anagrelide allowed during the first 3 months of study Chemotherapy: See Disease Characteristics Concurrent hydroxyurea allowed only during the first 3 months of study Endocrine therapy: No concurrent systemic steroids for more than 2 weeks Radiotherapy: Not specified Surgery: Greater than 4 weeks since prior major surgery and recovered Other: No other prior investigational agents No other concurrent investigational drugs
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
East Hanover, New Jersey, 07936
About this study
Official title: A Phase III Study of STI571 Versus Interferon-a (IFN-a) Combined With Cytarabine (Ara-C) in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Previously Untreated Philadelphia Chromosome Positive (Ph+) Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP)
RATIONALE: Biological therapies such as interferon-alfa and STI571 may interfere with the growth of cancer cells. It is not yet known if STI571 is more effective than interferon alfa plus cytarabine for chronic myelogenous leukemia.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of STI571 with that of interferon alfa plus cytarabine in treating patients who have newly diagnosed chronic myelogenous leukemia.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES: I. Compare the time to treatment failure and overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed, previously untreated, Philadelphia chromosome positive, chronic phase chronic myelogenous leukemia treated with STI571 vs interferon alfa combined with cytarabine. II. Compare the quality of life and disease and treatment related toxicities in patients treated with these 2 regimens. III. Compare the rate and duration of complete hematologic response (CHR) and major cytogenetic response (MCR) in patients treated with these 2 regimens. IV. Compare the rate and duration of MCR and CHR attributable to crossover therapy in patients who crossover to receive STI571 OR interferon alfa combined with cytarabine. V. Compare the tolerability and safety of these regimens in these patients. VI. Determine the population pharmacokinetics of STI571 in these patients.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, open label, crossover, multicenter study. Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms: Arm I: Patients receive oral STI571 once daily. Arm II: Patients receive interferon alfa (IFN-A) subcutaneously (SQ) daily. Gradual intrapatient dose escalation is performed until the target dose of IFN-A is achieved. Patients then also receive cytarabine SQ daily for 10 days every month. Cytarabine is discontinued when a complete cytogenetic response is achieved and confirmed on two consecutive occasions not more than 3 months apart. Both arms: Courses repeat monthly in the absence of progression to accelerated phase or blast crisis, or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with no complete hematologic response at 6 months, no major cytogenetic response at year 2, or loss of complete hematologic response (without progression to accelerated or blastic phase) discontinue treatment on the arm to which they were originally randomized and begin treatment on the other arm. Crossover courses repeat monthly in the absence of progression to accelerated phase or blast crisis, or unacceptable toxicity. Quality of life is assessed prior to study; monthly for the first 6 months of study; at 9, 12, 18, and 24 months; at time of crossover (if applicable); and at treatment discontinuation before year 2 (if applicable). All patients are followed every 3 months for up to 8 years.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 850 patients (425 per arm) will be accrued for this study.
- Conditions
- Leukemia
- Being tested
- recombinant interferon alfa, cytarabine, imatinib mesylate
- Keywords
- chronic phase chronic myelogenous leukemia, chronic myelogenous leukemia, BCR-ABL1 positive
- Medical subject headings
- Leukemia, Leukemia, Myeloid, Chronic-Phase, Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
recombinant interferon alfaBiological
cytarabineDrug
imatinib mesylateDrug
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 May 2004 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2000
- Primary completionMar 2007
- Study completionMar 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for LeukemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ilana Monteleone, Study chair, Novartis Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00006343
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CDR0000068089
- Other IDs
- NOVARTIS-CSTI5710106, FHCRC-1556.00
- Status last verified
- Dec 2012
- First submitted
- 4 Oct 2000
- Last updated
- 3 Jan 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Hughes TP, Hochhaus A, Branford S, Muller MC, Kaeda JS, Foroni L, Druker BJ, Guilhot F, Larson RA, O'Brien SG, Rudoltz MS, Mone M, Wehrle E, Modur V, Goldman JM, Radich JP; IRIS investigators. Long-term prognostic significance of early molecular response to imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia: an analysis from the International Randomized Study of Interferon and STI571 (IRIS). Blood. 2010 Nov 11;116(19):3758-65. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-03-273979. Epub 2010 Aug 2.
PubMed 20679528Guilhot F, Druker B, Larson RA, Gathmann I, So C, Waltzman R, O'Brien SG. High rates of durable response are achieved with imatinib after treatment with interferon alpha plus cytarabine: results from the International Randomized Study of Interferon and STI571 (IRIS) trial. Haematologica. 2009 Dec;94(12):1669-75. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2009.010629. Epub 2009 Jul 31.
PubMed 19648168Kantarjian HM, Larson RA, Guilhot F, O'Brien SG, Mone M, Rudoltz M, Krahnke T, Cortes J, Druker BJ; International Randomized Study of Interferon and STI571 (IRIS) Investigators. Efficacy of imatinib dose escalation in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. Cancer. 2009 Feb 1;115(3):551-60. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24066.
PubMed 19117345Druker BJ, Guilhot F, O'Brien SG, Gathmann I, Kantarjian H, Gattermann N, Deininger MW, Silver RT, Goldman JM, Stone RM, Cervantes F, Hochhaus A, Powell BL, Gabrilove JL, Rousselot P, Reiffers J, Cornelissen JJ, Hughes T, Agis H, Fischer T, Verhoef G, Shepherd J, Saglio G, Gratwohl A, Nielsen JL, Radich JP, Simonsson B, Taylor K, Baccarani M, So C, Letvak L, Larson RA; IRIS Investigators. Five-year follow-up of patients receiving imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2006 Dec 7;355(23):2408-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa062867.
PubMed 17151364O'Brien SG, Guilhot F, Larson RA, Gathmann I, Baccarani M, Cervantes F, Cornelissen JJ, Fischer T, Hochhaus A, Hughes T, Lechner K, Nielsen JL, Rousselot P, Reiffers J, Saglio G, Shepherd J, Simonsson B, Gratwohl A, Goldman JM, Kantarjian H, Taylor K, Verhoef G, Bolton AE, Capdeville R, Druker BJ; IRIS Investigators. Imatinib compared with interferon and low-dose cytarabine for newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2003 Mar 13;348(11):994-1004. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022457.
PubMed 12637609Hochhaus A, Larson RA, Guilhot F, Radich JP, Branford S, Hughes TP, Baccarani M, Deininger MW, Cervantes F, Fujihara S, Ortmann CE, Menssen HD, Kantarjian H, O'Brien SG, Druker BJ; IRIS Investigators. Long-Term Outcomes of Imatinib Treatment for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2017 Mar 9;376(10):917-927. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1609324.
PubMed 28273028Branford S, Yeung DT, Parker WT, Roberts ND, Purins L, Braley JA, Altamura HK, Yeoman AL, Georgievski J, Jamison BA, Phillis S, Donaldson Z, Leong M, Fletcher L, Seymour JF, Grigg AP, Ross DM, Hughes TP. Prognosis for patients with CML and >10% BCR-ABL1 after 3 months of imatinib depends on the rate of BCR-ABL1 decline. Blood. 2014 Jul 24;124(4):511-8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-03-566323. Epub 2014 May 23.
PubMed 24859364Branford S, Yeung DT, Ross DM, Prime JA, Field CR, Altamura HK, Yeoman AL, Georgievski J, Jamison BA, Phillis S, Sullivan B, Briggs NE, Hertzberg M, Seymour JF, Reynolds J, Hughes TP. Early molecular response and female sex strongly predict stable undetectable BCR-ABL1, the criteria for imatinib discontinuation in patients with CML. Blood. 2013 May 9;121(19):3818-24. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-10-462291. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
PubMed 23515925
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Jan 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase III Study of STI571 Versus Interferon-a (IFN-a) Combined With Cytarabine (Ara-C) in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Previously Untreated Philadelphia Chromosome Positive (Ph+) Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00006343
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CDR0000068089
- Conditions
- Leukemia
- Keywords
- chronic phase chronic myelogenous leukemia, chronic myelogenous leukemia, BCR-ABL1 positive
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Lead sponsor
- NovartisIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Study start
- Jun 2000
- Primary completion
- Mar 2007 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 May 2004 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Biological therapies such as interferon-alfa and STI571 may interfere with the growth of cancer cells. It is not yet known if STI571 is more effective than interferon alfa plus cytarabine for chronic myelogenous leukemia.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of STI571 with that of interferon alfa plus cytarabine in treating patients who have newly diagnosed chronic myelogenous leukemia.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES: I. Compare the time to treatment failure and overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed, previously untreated, Philadelphia chromosome positive, chronic phase chronic myelogenous leukemia treated with STI571 vs interferon alfa combined with cytarabine. II. Compare the quality of life and disease and treatment related toxicities in patients treated with these 2 regimens. III. Compare the rate and duration of complete hematologic response (CHR) and major cytogenetic response (MCR) in patients treated with these 2 regimens. IV. Compare the rate and duration of MCR and CHR attributable to crossover therapy in patients who crossover to receive STI571 OR interferon alfa combined with cytarabine. V. Compare the tolerability and safety of these regimens in these patients. VI. Determine the population pharmacokinetics of STI571 in these patients.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, open label, crossover, multicenter study. Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms: Arm I: Patients receive oral STI571 once daily. Arm II: Patients receive interferon alfa (IFN-A) subcutaneously (SQ) daily. Gradual intrapatient dose escalation is performed until the target dose of IFN-A is achieved. Patients then also receive cytarabine SQ daily for 10 days every month. Cytarabine is discontinued when a complete cytogenetic response is achieved and confirmed on two consecutive occasions not more than 3 months apart. Both arms: Courses repeat monthly in the absence of progression to accelerated phase or blast crisis, or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with no complete hematologic response at 6 months, no major cytogenetic response at year 2, or loss of complete hematologic response (without progression to accelerated or blastic phase) discontinue treatment on the arm to which they were originally randomized and begin treatment on the other arm. Crossover courses repeat monthly in the absence of progression to accelerated phase or blast crisis, or unacceptable toxicity. Quality of life is assessed prior to study; monthly for the first 6 months of study; at 9, 12, 18, and 24 months; at time of crossover (if applicable); and at treatment discontinuation before year 2 (if applicable). All patients are followed every 3 months for up to 8 years.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 850 patients (425 per arm) will be accrued for this study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| recombinant interferon alfa | Biological | – |
| cytarabine | Drug | – |
| imatinib mesylate | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Jan 2013.
- Results publication: PubMed 20679528Hughes TP, Hochhaus A, Branford S, Muller MC, Kaeda JS, Foroni L, Druker BJ, Guilhot F, Larson RA, O'Brien SG, Rudoltz MS, Mone M, Wehrle E, Modur V, Goldman JM, Radich JP; IRIS investigators. Long-term prognostic significance of early molecular response to imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia: an analysis from the International Randomized Study of Interferon and STI571 (IRIS). Blood. 2010 Nov 11;116(19):3758-65. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-03-273979. Epub 2010 Aug 2.
- Results publication: PubMed 19648168Guilhot F, Druker B, Larson RA, Gathmann I, So C, Waltzman R, O'Brien SG. High rates of durable response are achieved with imatinib after treatment with interferon alpha plus cytarabine: results from the International Randomized Study of Interferon and STI571 (IRIS) trial. Haematologica. 2009 Dec;94(12):1669-75. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2009.010629. Epub 2009 Jul 31.
- Results publication: PubMed 19117345Kantarjian HM, Larson RA, Guilhot F, O'Brien SG, Mone M, Rudoltz M, Krahnke T, Cortes J, Druker BJ; International Randomized Study of Interferon and STI571 (IRIS) Investigators. Efficacy of imatinib dose escalation in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. Cancer. 2009 Feb 1;115(3):551-60. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24066.
- Results publication: PubMed 17151364Druker BJ, Guilhot F, O'Brien SG, Gathmann I, Kantarjian H, Gattermann N, Deininger MW, Silver RT, Goldman JM, Stone RM, Cervantes F, Hochhaus A, Powell BL, Gabrilove JL, Rousselot P, Reiffers J, Cornelissen JJ, Hughes T, Agis H, Fischer T, Verhoef G, Shepherd J, Saglio G, Gratwohl A, Nielsen JL, Radich JP, Simonsson B, Taylor K, Baccarani M, So C, Letvak L, Larson RA; IRIS Investigators. Five-year follow-up of patients receiving imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2006 Dec 7;355(23):2408-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa062867.
- Results publication: PubMed 12637609O'Brien SG, Guilhot F, Larson RA, Gathmann I, Baccarani M, Cervantes F, Cornelissen JJ, Fischer T, Hochhaus A, Hughes T, Lechner K, Nielsen JL, Rousselot P, Reiffers J, Saglio G, Shepherd J, Simonsson B, Gratwohl A, Goldman JM, Kantarjian H, Taylor K, Verhoef G, Bolton AE, Capdeville R, Druker BJ; IRIS Investigators. Imatinib compared with interferon and low-dose cytarabine for newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2003 Mar 13;348(11):994-1004. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022457.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28273028Hochhaus A, Larson RA, Guilhot F, Radich JP, Branford S, Hughes TP, Baccarani M, Deininger MW, Cervantes F, Fujihara S, Ortmann CE, Menssen HD, Kantarjian H, O'Brien SG, Druker BJ; IRIS Investigators. Long-Term Outcomes of Imatinib Treatment for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2017 Mar 9;376(10):917-927. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1609324.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24859364Branford S, Yeung DT, Parker WT, Roberts ND, Purins L, Braley JA, Altamura HK, Yeoman AL, Georgievski J, Jamison BA, Phillis S, Donaldson Z, Leong M, Fletcher L, Seymour JF, Grigg AP, Ross DM, Hughes TP. Prognosis for patients with CML and >10% BCR-ABL1 after 3 months of imatinib depends on the rate of BCR-ABL1 decline. Blood. 2014 Jul 24;124(4):511-8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-03-566323. Epub 2014 May 23.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23515925Branford S, Yeung DT, Ross DM, Prime JA, Field CR, Altamura HK, Yeoman AL, Georgievski J, Jamison BA, Phillis S, Sullivan B, Briggs NE, Hertzberg M, Seymour JF, Reynolds J, Hughes TP. Early molecular response and female sex strongly predict stable undetectable BCR-ABL1, the criteria for imatinib discontinuation in patients with CML. Blood. 2013 May 9;121(19):3818-24. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-10-462291. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
Related trials for Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of CHM-029 in Participants With NPM1 Mutated, KMT2A or NUP98 Rearranged AML
AML (Acute Myeloid Leukemia)
RecruitingPhase 1
Vididencel in CML-CP Patients With MRD
CML (Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia)
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing New Therapies for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Newly Diagnosed and Have Not Yet Started Treatment (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ilana Monteleone study chair
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing recombinant interferon alfa, cytarabine and imatinib mesylate in people with Leukemia, run by Novartis at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Jan 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00006343, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Jan 2013.