HIV InfectionsPhase 3NCT00011128
Salvage Treatment, Resistance Testing, and Withdrawal of Anti-HIV Drugs for HIV Patients Failing Current Anti-HIV Treatment
A Phase 3 study testing Antiretroviral Treatment Interruption in people with HIV Infections, run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at 30 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to test another way to control the amount of HIV in the blood (viral load). Studies show that stopping all anti-HIV drugs for a time before switching to new anti-HIV drugs may improve the response in some individuals who are failing treatment. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- HIV Infections
- What is being tested?
- Antiretroviral Treatment Interruption
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 30 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Start not givento not given
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients may be eligible for this study if they:
- Are HIV-infected.
- Are likely to have drug-resistant HIV from having taken all types of anti-HIV drugs (protease inhibitors [PIs], nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors [NRTIs], and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors [NNRTIs]), and having failed treatment prior to the current treatment for reasons other than toxicity.
- Are currently receiving anti-HIV treatment with at least 3 drugs. Low doses of ritonavir (100 to 200 mg twice daily) taken with 1 other PI is counted as a single PI.
- Are currently failing treatment due to a high viral load (amount of HIV in the blood).
- Have had a new anti-HIV drug combination selected.
- Are at least 18 years old.
- This study has been changed to remove CD4 counts as an inclusion criterion. In the previous version of the protocol, patients were required to have a CD4 count of 150 cells/ml or more within 42 days prior to study entry.
Who cannot join
- Patients will not be eligible for this study if they:
- Have stopped treatment for more than 4 weeks in the past 6 months.
- Are pregnant or breast-feeding.
- Have cancer that requires systemic treatment or radiation.
- Have received the following medications affecting the immune system within 14 days before entry: erythropoietin; Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF), including Granulocyte Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factors (GM-CSF); interleukins; or therapeutic HIV vaccines.
Trial locations and contacts
30 sites in 2 countries.
30 sites in 2 countries
United States29 sites
Univ of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
Beth Israel Deaconess - West Campus
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
SUNY / Erie County Med Ctr at Buffalo
Buffalo, New York, 14215
Rush Presbyterian - Saint Luke's Med Ctr
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
The CORE Ctr
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
Univ of Cincinnati
Cincinnati, Ohio, 452670405
Children's Med Ctr of Dallas
Dallas, Texas, 75235
Univ of Colorado Health Sciences Ctr
Denver, Colorado, 80262
Duke Univ Med Ctr
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
Univ of Hawaii
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96816
Indiana Univ Hosp
Indianapolis, Indiana, 462025250
Methodist Hosp of Indiana / Life Care Clinic
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
Wishard Hosp
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
UCLA CARE Ctr
Los Angeles, California, 90095
Willow Clinic
Menlo Park, California, 94025
Univ of Miami School of Medicine
Miami, Florida, 331361013
Vanderbilt Univ Med Ctr
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
Beth Israel Med Ctr
New York, New York, 10003
Cornell Clinical Trials Unit - Chelsea Clinic
New York, New York, 10011
Bellevue Hosp / New York Univ Med Ctr
New York, New York, 10016
Cornell Univ Med Ctr
New York, New York, 10021
Columbia Presbyterian Med Ctr
New York, New York, 10032
Univ of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Univ of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
Community Health Network Inc
Rochester, New York, 14642
Univ of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, New York, 14642
Univ of California, San Diego
San Diego, California, 92103
San Mateo AIDS Program / Stanford Univ
Stanford, California, 943055107
Stanford Univ Med Ctr
Stanford, California, 943055107
About this study
Official title: Phase III Evaluation of the Role of Temporary Cessation of Antiretroviral Treatment and Resistance Testing-Based Selection of Antiretroviral Drugs in the Virologic Response to Salvage Therapy for Heavily Treatment-Experienced HIV-Infected Individuals Failing Current Antiretroviral Therapy
The purpose of this study is to test another way to control the amount of HIV in the blood (viral load).
Studies show that stopping all anti-HIV drugs for a time before switching to new anti-HIV drugs may improve the response in some individuals who are failing treatment. Other studies suggest a benefit if drug-resistance tests are used in selecting a new anti-HIV drug treatment. This study tests the effect of stopping anti-HIV drugs for a time before switching to anti-HIV drugs selected using drug-resistance test results.
Read the detailed description
Virologic failure occurs in a large proportion of individuals receiving treatment with combination antiretroviral therapy. Studies suggest that treatment interruption prior to initiation of a multiple-drug rescue regimen may improve virologic response in individuals who have failed several prior antiretroviral regimens. Other studies suggest there is a virologic benefit derived from using genotypic or phenotypic resistance testing in selecting salvage therapy regimens for patients failing antiretroviral therapy. This study tests the hypothesis that salvage regimens selected on the basis of HIV-1 resistance genotype, phenotype [AS PER AMENDMENT 02/19/02: virtual phenotype], and treatment history will be more effective if there is a period of treatment interruption before initiating that regimen.
Patients continue their antiretroviral therapy until randomization. Based on the results of the pre-entry genotype and phenotype [AS PER AMENDMENT 02/19/02: virtual phenotype] tests and treatment history, an individualized salvage therapy regimen (not provided by the study) is selected by the site investigator(s). Additionally, patients start or continue maintenance therapy (not provided by the study) for opportunistic infections (OIs). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. In Arm A, patients have antiretroviral treatment interruption for a period of 16 weeks (Step 1), followed by initiation of the [AS PER AMENDMENT 02/19/02: best available] salvage therapy regimen (Step 2). [AS PER AMENDMENT 02/19/02: Patients in Arm A will be placed immediately on their individualized salvage regimen before the end of the 16-week period of treatment interruption if their CD4 count falls below a defined threshold, or if they develop a new OI]. In Arm B, patients switch immediately to the salvage therapy regimen. [AS PER AMENDMENT 02/15/01: Patients who become pregnant during Step 1 of Arm A must be advised to begin their selected, individualized salvage therapy regimen or a modified salvage regimen. Patients who become pregnant during Step 2 of Arm A or Arm B have therapy evaluated and undergo any changes required by their pregnancy.] Patients in both arms are monitored for plasma HIV-1 RNA levels, CD4+ and CD8+ cell counts, and HIV drug resistance genotypes and phenotypes for a duration of 64 weeks from randomization. Patients in Arm A are also monitored for immune reactivation by measurement of T-cell subsets and plasma cytokines during treatment interruption. Patients may participate in a virology substudy (A5100s) and an immunology substudy (A5104s). [AS PER AMENDMENT 02/19/02: Patients who volunteer to participate in the substudies must be registered to the main study at the same time they are registered to a substudy.]
- Conditions
- HIV Infections
- Being tested
- Antiretroviral Treatment Interruption
- Keywords
- HIV-1, Drug Resistance, Microbial, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Salvage Therapy, Anti-HIV Agents, Viral Load, Treatment Experienced
- Medical subject headings
- HIV Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Antiretroviral Treatment InterruptionBehavioural
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Aug 2001 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HIV InfectionsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- US National Institutes of Health
- Investigators
- Constance A Benson, MD, Study chair, University of Colorado, DenverJohn Mellors, MD, Study chair, University of PittsburghDiane Havlir, MD, Study chair, University of California, San Francisco
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00011128
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ACTG A5086
- Other IDs
- AACTG A5086, Substudy AACTG A5100s, Substudy AACTG A5104s
- Status last verified
- May 2004
- First submitted
- 10 Feb 2001
- Last updated
- 18 May 2015
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Montaner JS, Harrigan PR, Jahnke N, Raboud J, Castillo E, Hogg RS, Yip B, Harris M, Montessori V, O'Shaughnessy MV. Multiple drug rescue therapy for HIV-infected individuals with prior virologic failure to multiple regimens. AIDS. 2001 Jan 5;15(1):61-9. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200101050-00010.
PubMed 11192869Lorenzi P, Opravil M, Hirschel B, Chave JP, Furrer HJ, Sax H, Perneger TV, Perrin L, Kaiser L, Yerly S. Impact of drug resistance mutations on virologic response to salvage therapy. Swiss HIV Cohort Study. AIDS. 1999 Feb 4;13(2):F17-21. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199902040-00001.
PubMed 10202819Hance AJ, Lemiale V, Izopet J, Lecossier D, Joly V, Massip P, Mammano F, Descamps D, Brun-Vezinet F, Clavel F. Changes in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 populations after treatment interruption in patients failing antiretroviral therapy. J Virol. 2001 Jul;75(14):6410-7. doi: 10.1128/JVI.75.14.6410-6417.2001.
PubMed 11413308Clevenbergh P, Durant J, Halfon P, del Giudice P, Mondain V, Montagne N, Schapiro JM, Boucher CA, Dellamonica P. Persisting long-term benefit of genotype-guided treatment for HIV-infected patients failing HAART. The Viradapt Study: week 48 follow-up. Antivir Ther. 2000 Mar;5(1):65-70.
PubMed 10846595Delaugerre C, Valantin MA, Mouroux M, Bonmarchand M, Carcelain G, Duvivier C, Tubiana R, Simon A, Bricaire F, Agut H, Autran B, Katlama C, Calvez V. Re-occurrence of HIV-1 drug mutations after treatment re-initiation following interruption in patients with multiple treatment failure. AIDS. 2001 Nov 9;15(16):2189-91. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200111090-00016.
PubMed 11684940Benson CA, Vaida F, Havlir DV, Downey GF, Lederman MM, Gulick RM, Glesby MJ, Wantman M, Bixby CJ, Rinehart AR, Snyder S, Wang R, Patel S, Mellors JW; ACTG A5086 Study Team. A randomized trial of treatment interruption before optimized antiretroviral therapy for persons with drug-resistant HIV: 48-week virologic results of ACTG A5086. J Infect Dis. 2006 Nov 1;194(9):1309-18. doi: 10.1086/508289. Epub 2006 Sep 22.
PubMed 17041858Wang R, Bosch RJ, Benson CA, Lederman MM. Drug-resistant virus has reduced ability to induce immune activation. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012 Dec 1;61(4):e60-3. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31827171d7. No abstract available.
PubMed 23138731
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 May 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase III Evaluation of the Role of Temporary Cessation of Antiretroviral Treatment and Resistance Testing-Based Selection of Antiretroviral Drugs in the Virologic Response to Salvage Therapy for Heavily Treatment-Experienced HIV-Infected Individuals Failing Current Antiretroviral Therapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00011128
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ACTG A5086
- Conditions
- HIV Infections
- Keywords
- HIV-1, Drug Resistance, Microbial, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Salvage Therapy, Anti-HIV Agents, Viral Load, Treatment Experienced
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Withdrawn
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)US National Institutes of Health
- First posted
- 31 Aug 2001 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to test another way to control the amount of HIV in the blood (viral load).
Studies show that stopping all anti-HIV drugs for a time before switching to new anti-HIV drugs may improve the response in some individuals who are failing treatment. Other studies suggest a benefit if drug-resistance tests are used in selecting a new anti-HIV drug treatment. This study tests the effect of stopping anti-HIV drugs for a time before switching to anti-HIV drugs selected using drug-resistance test results.
Detailed description
Virologic failure occurs in a large proportion of individuals receiving treatment with combination antiretroviral therapy. Studies suggest that treatment interruption prior to initiation of a multiple-drug rescue regimen may improve virologic response in individuals who have failed several prior antiretroviral regimens. Other studies suggest there is a virologic benefit derived from using genotypic or phenotypic resistance testing in selecting salvage therapy regimens for patients failing antiretroviral therapy. This study tests the hypothesis that salvage regimens selected on the basis of HIV-1 resistance genotype, phenotype [AS PER AMENDMENT 02/19/02: virtual phenotype], and treatment history will be more effective if there is a period of treatment interruption before initiating that regimen.
Patients continue their antiretroviral therapy until randomization. Based on the results of the pre-entry genotype and phenotype [AS PER AMENDMENT 02/19/02: virtual phenotype] tests and treatment history, an individualized salvage therapy regimen (not provided by the study) is selected by the site investigator(s). Additionally, patients start or continue maintenance therapy (not provided by the study) for opportunistic infections (OIs). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. In Arm A, patients have antiretroviral treatment interruption for a period of 16 weeks (Step 1), followed by initiation of the [AS PER AMENDMENT 02/19/02: best available] salvage therapy regimen (Step 2). [AS PER AMENDMENT 02/19/02: Patients in Arm A will be placed immediately on their individualized salvage regimen before the end of the 16-week period of treatment interruption if their CD4 count falls below a defined threshold, or if they develop a new OI]. In Arm B, patients switch immediately to the salvage therapy regimen. [AS PER AMENDMENT 02/15/01: Patients who become pregnant during Step 1 of Arm A must be advised to begin their selected, individualized salvage therapy regimen or a modified salvage regimen. Patients who become pregnant during Step 2 of Arm A or Arm B have therapy evaluated and undergo any changes required by their pregnancy.] Patients in both arms are monitored for plasma HIV-1 RNA levels, CD4+ and CD8+ cell counts, and HIV drug resistance genotypes and phenotypes for a duration of 64 weeks from randomization. Patients in Arm A are also monitored for immune reactivation by measurement of T-cell subsets and plasma cytokines during treatment interruption. Patients may participate in a virology substudy (A5100s) and an immunology substudy (A5104s). [AS PER AMENDMENT 02/19/02: Patients who volunteer to participate in the substudies must be registered to the main study at the same time they are registered to a substudy.]
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Are HIV-infected.
- Are likely to have drug-resistant HIV from having taken all types of anti-HIV drugs (protease inhibitors [PIs], nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors [NRTIs], and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors [NNRTIs]), and having failed treatment prior to the current treatment for reasons other than toxicity.
- Are currently receiving anti-HIV treatment with at least 3 drugs. Low doses of ritonavir (100 to 200 mg twice daily) taken with 1 other PI is counted as a single PI.
- Are currently failing treatment due to a high viral load (amount of HIV in the blood).
- Have had a new anti-HIV drug combination selected.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Have stopped treatment for more than 4 weeks in the past 6 months.
- Are pregnant or breast-feeding.
- Have cancer that requires systemic treatment or radiation.
- Have received the following medications affecting the immune system within 14 days before entry: erythropoietin; Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF), including Granulocyte Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factors (GM-CSF); interleukins; or therapeutic HIV vaccines.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Antiretroviral Treatment Interruption | Behavioural | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 May 2015.
- Background: PubMed 11192869Montaner JS, Harrigan PR, Jahnke N, Raboud J, Castillo E, Hogg RS, Yip B, Harris M, Montessori V, O'Shaughnessy MV. Multiple drug rescue therapy for HIV-infected individuals with prior virologic failure to multiple regimens. AIDS. 2001 Jan 5;15(1):61-9. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200101050-00010.
- Background: PubMed 10202819Lorenzi P, Opravil M, Hirschel B, Chave JP, Furrer HJ, Sax H, Perneger TV, Perrin L, Kaiser L, Yerly S. Impact of drug resistance mutations on virologic response to salvage therapy. Swiss HIV Cohort Study. AIDS. 1999 Feb 4;13(2):F17-21. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199902040-00001.
- Background: PubMed 11413308Hance AJ, Lemiale V, Izopet J, Lecossier D, Joly V, Massip P, Mammano F, Descamps D, Brun-Vezinet F, Clavel F. Changes in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 populations after treatment interruption in patients failing antiretroviral therapy. J Virol. 2001 Jul;75(14):6410-7. doi: 10.1128/JVI.75.14.6410-6417.2001.
- Background: PubMed 10846595Clevenbergh P, Durant J, Halfon P, del Giudice P, Mondain V, Montagne N, Schapiro JM, Boucher CA, Dellamonica P. Persisting long-term benefit of genotype-guided treatment for HIV-infected patients failing HAART. The Viradapt Study: week 48 follow-up. Antivir Ther. 2000 Mar;5(1):65-70.
- Background: PubMed 11684940Delaugerre C, Valantin MA, Mouroux M, Bonmarchand M, Carcelain G, Duvivier C, Tubiana R, Simon A, Bricaire F, Agut H, Autran B, Katlama C, Calvez V. Re-occurrence of HIV-1 drug mutations after treatment re-initiation following interruption in patients with multiple treatment failure. AIDS. 2001 Nov 9;15(16):2189-91. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200111090-00016.
- Results publication: PubMed 17041858Benson CA, Vaida F, Havlir DV, Downey GF, Lederman MM, Gulick RM, Glesby MJ, Wantman M, Bixby CJ, Rinehart AR, Snyder S, Wang R, Patel S, Mellors JW; ACTG A5086 Study Team. A randomized trial of treatment interruption before optimized antiretroviral therapy for persons with drug-resistant HIV: 48-week virologic results of ACTG A5086. J Infect Dis. 2006 Nov 1;194(9):1309-18. doi: 10.1086/508289. Epub 2006 Sep 22.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23138731Wang R, Bosch RJ, Benson CA, Lederman MM. Drug-resistant virus has reduced ability to induce immune activation. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012 Dec 1;61(4):e60-3. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31827171d7. No abstract available.
Related trials for HIV Infections
Not yet recruiting
HealthMpowerment Korea: Pilot Testing the Cultural Adaptation of a Digital HIV Intervention for Men Who Have Sex With Men in South Korea
HIV Infections, HIV Prevention and Care
Not yet recruiting
Prescribe to Prevent HIV: A Hybrid Trial Helping Addiction Clinics Prevent HIV & Infections Through Safer Drug Use Support
People Who Use Opioids/People With Opioid Use Disorder (OUD)
Recruiting
Evaluating the Impact of Using the B-OK Bottles for HIV and ART Literacy in South Africa
HIV, HIV Treatment
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
RecruitingObservational study
Olfactory Function and Model-Based Behavior in People Living With HIV and SUD
HIV, Substance Use Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Constance A Benson, MD study chair
University of Colorado, Denver
John Mellors, MD study chair
University of Pittsburgh
Diane Havlir, MD study chair
University of California, San Francisco
30 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Antiretroviral Treatment Interruption in people with HIV Infections, run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at 30 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 May 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 30 sites in United States, Puerto Rico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00011128, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 May 2015.