LymphomaPhase 3NCT00012051
Chemotherapy and Peripheral Stem Cell Transplant With or Without Monoclonal Antibody Therapy in Treating Patients With Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
A Phase 3 study testing filgrastim, rituximab and carmustine in people with Lymphoma, run by Commissie Voor Klinisch Toegepast Onderzoek at 17 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Peripheral stem cell transplant may be able to replace immune cells that were destroyed by the chemotherapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Lymphoma
- What is being tested?
- filgrastim, rituximab and carmustine
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 340 participants
- Where
- 17 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Sep 2000to Oct 2007
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Histologically confirmed relapsed B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL)
- Diffuse large cell B-cell lymphoma
- Grade III follicular center-cell lymphoma
- Primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma
- CD20 positive
- First relapse after doxorubicin containing regimen
- Documented remission of at least 3 months after first-line chemotherapy
- No Epstein-Barr virus post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder
- No CNS involvement
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Age:
- 18 to 65
Performance status:
- WHO 0-1
Life expectancy:
- Not specified
Hematopoietic:
- Not specified
Hepatic:
- No hepatic dysfunction
- Bilirubin less than 2.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
- Transaminases less than 2.5 times ULN
Renal:
- No renal dysfunction
- Creatinine less than 2.0 mg/dL OR
- Creatinine clearance greater than 40 mL/min
Cardiovascular:
- No severe cardiac dysfunction
- No New York Heart association class II-IV heart disease
Pulmonary:
- No severe pulmonary dysfunction
- Vital capacity or diffusion capacity at least 70% predicted unless related to NHL involvement
Other:
- No active uncontrolled infection
- HIV negative
- No intolerance to exogenous protein administration
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Biologic therapy:
- At least 1 month since prior immunotherapy
Chemotherapy:
- See Disease Characteristics
- At least 1 month since prior chemotherapy
Endocrine therapy:
- Not specified
Radiotherapy:
- At least 1 month since prior radiotherapy
Surgery:
- Not specified
Trial locations and contacts
17 sites in 2 countries.
17 sites in 2 countries
Netherlands16 sites
Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis
's-Hertogenbosch, 5211 NL
Meander Medisch Centrum
Amersfoort, 3816 CP
Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital
Amsterdam, 1066 BE
Vrije Universiteit Medisch Centrum
Amsterdam, 1081HV
Academisch Medisch Centrum at University of Amsterdam
Amsterdam, 1105 AZ
Medisch Spectrum Twente
Enschede, 7500 KA
University Medical Center Groningen
Groningen, 9713 EZ
Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden - Zuid
Leeuwarden, 8934 AD
Leiden University Medical Center
Leiden, 2300 CA
Academisch Ziekenhuis Maastricht
Maastricht, 6202 AZ
Sint Antonius Ziekenhuis
Nieuwegein, 3435 CM
Universitair Medisch Centrum St. Radboud - Nijmegen
Nijmegen, NL-6500 HB
Daniel Den Hoed Cancer Center at Erasmus Medical Center
Rotterdam, 3008 AE
HagaZiekenhuis - Locatie Leyenburg
The Hague, 2545 CH
University Medical Center Utrecht
Utrecht, 3584 CX
Isala Klinieken - locatie Sophia
Zwolle, 8000 GK
About this study
Official title: A Randomised Phase III Study On The Effect Of The Chimeric Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibody (Mabthera) During Sequential Chemotherapy Followed By Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation In Patients With Relapse B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma(HOVON 44 STUDY)
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Peripheral stem cell transplant may be able to replace immune cells that were destroyed by the chemotherapy. Monoclonal antibodies, such as rituximab, can block tumor growth in different ways. Some block the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Others find tumor cells and help kill them or carry tumor-killing substances to them. It is not yet known if giving more than one drug (combination chemotherapy) plus peripheral stem cell transplant is more effective with or without monoclonal antibody therapy in treating non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying how well chemotherapy plus peripheral stem cell transplant with or without monoclonal antibody therapy works in treating patients with relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- Compare the partial and complete response rates in patients with relapsed, CD20 positive, aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with dexamethasone, cisplatin, and cytarabine in combination with etoposide, ifosfamide, and methotrexate with or without rituximab followed by carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan, and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (APBSCT).
- Compare the effect of APBSCT with or without rituximab on the overall and event-free survival of these patients.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to participating center. Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive DHAP induction chemotherapy comprising dexamethasone orally or IV on days 1-4, cisplatin IV continuously over 24 hours on day 1, and cytarabine IV over 3 hours every 12 hours on day 2. Beginning 3-4 weeks after DHAP, patients receive VIM induction chemotherapy comprising etoposide IV over 2 hours on days 1, 3, and 5; ifosfamide IV over 1 hour on days 1-5; and methotrexate IV on days 1 and 5. Beginning 3-4 weeks after VIM, patients with partial or complete response after DHAP and VIM receive a second course of DHAP (patients with progressive or unresponsive disease after DHAP but responsive disease after VIM receive a second course of VIM) followed by filgrastim (G-CSF) subcutaneously beginning on day 10 and continuing until a target number of cells are collected.
- Arm II: Patients receive induction chemotherapy and G-CSF as in arm I. At 1 day after the last dose of each chemotherapy course, patients also receive rituximab IV once for a maximum of 3 courses.
At 4-5 weeks after the completion of the last induction chemotherapy course, responsive patients in both arms receive BEAM conditioning chemotherapy comprising carmustine IV over 60 minutes on day -6, etoposide IV over 60 minutes and cytarabine IV over 30 minutes on days -5 to -2, and melphalan IV over 15 minutes on day -1. Patients undergo autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation on day 0. After transplantation, patients in partial remission may undergo radiotherapy to nodal sites with residual tumor mass.
Patients are followed every 6 months for 3 years and then annually thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 296-340 patients (148-170 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study within 4-5 years.
- Conditions
- Lymphoma
- Being tested
- filgrastim, rituximab, carmustine, cisplatin, cytarabine
- Keywords
- recurrent grade 3 follicular lymphoma, recurrent adult diffuse large cell lymphoma
- Medical subject headings
- Lymphoma, Lymphoma, Follicular, Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
filgrastimBiological
rituximabBiological
carmustineDrug
cisplatinDrug
cytarabineDrug
dexamethasoneDrug
etoposideDrug
ifosfamideDrug
melphalanDrug
methotrexateDrug
bone marrow ablation with stem cell supportProcedure or surgery
peripheral blood stem cell transplantationProcedure or surgery
radiation therapyRadiation
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall survival
Secondary outcomes (2)
Response rate
Event-free survival
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jan 2003 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2000
- Study completionOct 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for LymphomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Enrolment
- 340 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Commissie Voor Klinisch Toegepast Onderzoek
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Edo Vellenga, MD, Study chair, University Medical Center Groningen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00012051
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CKTO-2000-06
- Other IDs
- CDR0000068476, HOVON-44, HOVON-44/CKVO-2000-06, EU-20042, ISRCTN95614846
- Status last verified
- Mar 2007
- First submitted
- 3 Mar 2001
- Last updated
- 12 Aug 2013
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Vellenga E, van Putten WL, van 't Veer MB, Zijlstra JM, Fibbe WE, van Oers MH, Verdonck LF, Wijermans PW, van Imhoff GW, Lugtenburg PJ, Huijgens PC. Rituximab improves the treatment results of DHAP-VIM-DHAP and ASCT in relapsed/progressive aggressive CD20+ NHL: a prospective randomized HOVON trial. Blood. 2008 Jan 15;111(2):537-43. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-08-108415. Epub 2007 Oct 30.
PubMed 17971487
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Aug 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomised Phase III Study On The Effect Of The Chimeric Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibody (Mabthera) During Sequential Chemotherapy Followed By Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation In Patients With Relapse B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma(HOVON 44 STUDY)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00012051
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CKTO-2000-06
- Conditions
- Lymphoma
- Keywords
- recurrent grade 3 follicular lymphoma, recurrent adult diffuse large cell lymphoma
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 340 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Commissie Voor Klinisch Toegepast OnderzoekUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2000
- Study completion
- Oct 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jan 2003 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Peripheral stem cell transplant may be able to replace immune cells that were destroyed by the chemotherapy. Monoclonal antibodies, such as rituximab, can block tumor growth in different ways. Some block the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Others find tumor cells and help kill them or carry tumor-killing substances to them. It is not yet known if giving more than one drug (combination chemotherapy) plus peripheral stem cell transplant is more effective with or without monoclonal antibody therapy in treating non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying how well chemotherapy plus peripheral stem cell transplant with or without monoclonal antibody therapy works in treating patients with relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- Compare the partial and complete response rates in patients with relapsed, CD20 positive, aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with dexamethasone, cisplatin, and cytarabine in combination with etoposide, ifosfamide, and methotrexate with or without rituximab followed by carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan, and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (APBSCT).
- Compare the effect of APBSCT with or without rituximab on the overall and event-free survival of these patients.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to participating center. Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive DHAP induction chemotherapy comprising dexamethasone orally or IV on days 1-4, cisplatin IV continuously over 24 hours on day 1, and cytarabine IV over 3 hours every 12 hours on day 2. Beginning 3-4 weeks after DHAP, patients receive VIM induction chemotherapy comprising etoposide IV over 2 hours on days 1, 3, and 5; ifosfamide IV over 1 hour on days 1-5; and methotrexate IV on days 1 and 5. Beginning 3-4 weeks after VIM, patients with partial or complete response after DHAP and VIM receive a second course of DHAP (patients with progressive or unresponsive disease after DHAP but responsive disease after VIM receive a second course of VIM) followed by filgrastim (G-CSF) subcutaneously beginning on day 10 and continuing until a target number of cells are collected.
- Arm II: Patients receive induction chemotherapy and G-CSF as in arm I. At 1 day after the last dose of each chemotherapy course, patients also receive rituximab IV once for a maximum of 3 courses.
At 4-5 weeks after the completion of the last induction chemotherapy course, responsive patients in both arms receive BEAM conditioning chemotherapy comprising carmustine IV over 60 minutes on day -6, etoposide IV over 60 minutes and cytarabine IV over 30 minutes on days -5 to -2, and melphalan IV over 15 minutes on day -1. Patients undergo autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation on day 0. After transplantation, patients in partial remission may undergo radiotherapy to nodal sites with residual tumor mass.
Patients are followed every 6 months for 3 years and then annually thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 296-340 patients (148-170 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study within 4-5 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| filgrastim | Biological | – |
| rituximab | Biological | – |
| carmustine | Drug | – |
| cisplatin | Drug | – |
| cytarabine | Drug | – |
| dexamethasone | Drug | – |
| etoposide | Drug | – |
| ifosfamide | Drug | – |
| melphalan | Drug | – |
| methotrexate | Drug | – |
| bone marrow ablation with stem cell support | Procedure or surgery | – |
| peripheral blood stem cell transplantation | Procedure or surgery | – |
| radiation therapy | Radiation | – |
Primary outcome
Overall survival
2 secondary outcomes
Response rate
Event-free survival
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Aug 2013.
- Results publication: PubMed 17971487Vellenga E, van Putten WL, van 't Veer MB, Zijlstra JM, Fibbe WE, van Oers MH, Verdonck LF, Wijermans PW, van Imhoff GW, Lugtenburg PJ, Huijgens PC. Rituximab improves the treatment results of DHAP-VIM-DHAP and ASCT in relapsed/progressive aggressive CD20+ NHL: a prospective randomized HOVON trial. Blood. 2008 Jan 15;111(2):537-43. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-08-108415. Epub 2007 Oct 30.
Related trials for Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Ibrutinib Combination Therapy in Transplant Ineligible Individuals With Newly Diagnosed Primary CNS Lymphoma
Non-hodgkin Lymphoma
RecruitingObservational study
Blood, Urine, and Tissue Collection for Cutaneous Lymphoma, Eczema, and Atopic Dermatitis Research
Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma, Sezary Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Testing the Addition of an Anti-Cancer Drug, Glofitamab, to the Usual Chemotherapy Treatment (Alternating R-CHOP/R-DHAP) for Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Ann Arbor Stage II Mantle Cell Lymphoma, Ann Arbor Stage III Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Brentuximab Vedotin and Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With CD30-Positive Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma
Adult T-Cell Leukemia/Lymphoma, Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma, ALK-Negative
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Edo Vellenga, MD study chair
University Medical Center Groningen
17 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing filgrastim, rituximab and carmustine in people with Lymphoma, run by Commissie Voor Klinisch Toegepast Onderzoek at 17 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Aug 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 17 sites in Netherlands, Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall survival. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00012051, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Aug 2013.