Breast CancerPhase 3NCT00014222
Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Colony-stimulating Factors in Treating Women With Breast Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing epoetin alfa, filgrastim and cyclophosphamide in people with Breast Cancer, run by NCIC Clinical Trials Group at 78 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: 1. . To compare the effects on breast cancer of three different combinations of drugs which are commonly used to treat this disease. 2. . It is not yet known which treatment regimen is most effective for breast cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 60 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- epoetin alfa, filgrastim and cyclophosphamide
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 2,104 participants
- Where
- 78 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 4 Dec 2000to 17 Mar 2014
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 60 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the breast that is potentially curable
- T0-4 (dermal involvement on pathology assessment only), N0-2, M0
- No clinical T4 disease
- Previously treated with one of the following:
- Total mastectomy and level II axillary node dissection
- Partial mastectomy and level II axillary node dissection with planned breast radiotherapy after completion of adjuvant chemotherapy regimen*
- Patients with a positive sentinel node biopsy must undergo level II axillary node dissection or sufficient nodal sampling
- If microscopic residual in situ or invasive disease is present at total or partial mastectomy margins, planned radiotherapy must also include a boost to the tumor bed
- No residual tumor in the axilla after dissection
- Axillary node positive
- Negative nodes allowed if the tumor is ≥ 1 cm and 1 or more of the following criteria defining high-risk node-negative disease are met:
- Histological grade III or,
- Estrogen receptor negative or,
- Lymphatic/vascular invasion
- Hormone receptor status:
- Estrogen receptor status known
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Age:
- 60 and under
Sex:
- Female
Menopausal status:
- Pre- or postmenopausal
Performance status:
- ECOG 0-2
Life expectancy:
- At least 5 years
Hematopoietic:
- WBC ≥ 3,000/mm^3
- Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm^3
Hepatic:
- Bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
Renal:
- Creatinine ≤ 1.5 times ULN
Cardiovascular:
- LVEF ≥ limit of normal by MUGA or echocardiogram
- No arrhythmia requiring ongoing treatment
- No congestive heart failure
- No documented coronary artery disease
Other:
- No other malignancy except:
- Adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix
- Ductal or lobular carcinoma in situ that has been curatively treated by surgery alone
- Other prior malignancies (except breast cancer) curatively treated more than 5 years prior to study entry
- No serious underlying medical illness or psychiatric or addictive disorder that would preclude study compliance
- No known hypersensitivity to E. coli-derived products, mammalian-cell derived products, or any study agents
- Not pregnant or nursing
- Negative pregnancy test
- Fertile patients must use effective non-hormonal contraception
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Biologic therapy:
- No prior immunotherapy for breast cancer
- No concurrent pegfilgrastim or darbepoetin alfa (Arm II)
- Allowed on arms 1 and 3 if medically necessary
Chemotherapy:
- No prior chemotherapy for breast cancer
Endocrine therapy:
- No prior hormonal therapy for breast cancer
- No concurrent hormone replacement therapy
- No concurrent selective estrogen-receptor modulators (e.g., raloxifene for the treatment or prevention of osteoporosis)
- No concurrent oral contraceptives (i.e., birth control pills)
- No other concurrent aromatase inhibitors
Radiotherapy:
- See Disease Characteristics
- No prior radiotherapy for breast cancer
Surgery:
- See Disease Characteristics
- No more than 12 weeks since prior total or partial mastectomy (including re-excision of margins)
Other:
- At least 30 days since prior investigational drugs
- No other concurrent investigational drugs
- Concurrent bisphosphonates for the treatment or prevention of osteoporosis allowed
Trial locations and contacts
78 sites in 2 countries.
78 sites in 2 countries
United States44 sites
Arlington-Fairfax Hematology Oncology P.C.
Arlington, Virginia, 22205
Advanced Oncology Associates
Armonk, New York, 10504
University of Colorado Cancer Centre
Aurora, Colorado, 80010-0510
Lone Star Oncology Consultants, PA
Austin, Texas, 78759
Suburban Hospital Cancer Program
Bethesda, Maryland, 20817
Comprehensive Cancer Care Centre at Boca Raton
Boca Raton, Florida, 33428
University Oncology and Hematology Associates
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37404
The University of Chicago Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60637-1470
Oncology/Hematology Care, Inc.
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45242
Center for Oncology Research and Treatment
Dallas, Texas, 75230
St. Luke's Cancer Care Centre
Duluth, Minnesota, 55802
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
Therapy Associates, Inc., Hematology/Oncology
Evansville, Indiana, 47715
Sparks-Arkansas Oklahoma Cancer Treatment Centre
Fort Smith, Arkansas, 72901
Queens Medical Associates, PC
Fresh Meadows, New York, 11366
University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, 32610-0277
ECU School of Medicine, Leo Jenkins Cancer Center
Greenville, North Carolina, 27858
Greenwich Hospital - Bendheim Cancer Center
Greenwich, Connecticut, 06830
Columbia-Capitol Comprehensive Care Clinics
Jefferson City, Missouri, 65109
Scripps Cancer Center
La Jolla, California, 92037
Lexington Oncology Assts./Central Baptist Hospital
Lexington, Kentucky, 40503
Hematology Oncology Services of Arkansas
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205
Consultants in Blood Disorders and Cancer
Louisville, Kentucky, 40207
Winthrop University Hospital Onc/Hem
Mineola, New York, 11501
University of Minnesota Cancer Centre
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455
Hematology Oncol. Associates Rockland
Nyack, New York, 10960
Northern Utah Associates
Ogden, Utah, 84403
Nebraska Methodist Hospital
Omaha, Nebraska, 68114
Creighton University Cancer Centre
Omaha, Nebraska, 68131
Florida Oncology Associates
Orange Park, Florida, 32073
Pottstown Memorial Regional Cancer Centre
Pottstown, Pennsylvania, 19464
University of Rochester
Rochester, New York, 14642
Associates in Oncology/Hematology
Rockville, Maryland, 20850
Maine Center for Cancer Medicine and Blood Disorders
Scarborough, Maine, 04074-9308
CHRISTUS Schumpert Medical Center - Hem/Onc Clinic
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71101
Willis-Knighton Cancer Center
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71103-3
Baystate Regional Cancer Program
Springfield, Massachusetts, 01107
Saint Louis University Hospital
St Louis, Missouri, 63110-0250
Staten Island University Hospital
Staten Island, New York, 10305
Santee Hematology Oncology
Sumter, South Carolina, 29150
Our Lady of Mercy Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, 10466
Saint Joseph Medical Center, Cancer Care Program
Towson, Maryland, 21204
Sibley Memorial Hospital, Oncology Research
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20016
Maine General Medical Center
Waterville, Maine, 04901
Canada34 sites
The Royal Victoria Hospital
Barrie, Ontario, L4M 6M2
Tom Baker Cancer Centre
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N2
PEI Cancer Treatment Centre,Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, C1A 8T5
Northeast Cancer Center Health Sciences
Greater Sudbury, Ontario, P3E 5J1
Hopital Charles LeMoyne
Greenfield Park, Quebec, J4V 2H1
QEII Health Sciences Center
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 1V7
Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences
Hamilton, Ontario, L8V 5C2
BCCA - Cancer Centre for the Southern Interior
Kelowna, British Columbia, V1Y 5L3
Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario at Kingston
Kingston, Ontario, K7L 5P9
Grand River Regional Cancer Centre
Kitchener, Ontario, N2G 1G3
London Regional Cancer Program
London, Ontario, N6A 4L6
The Moncton Hospital
Moncton, New Brunswick, E1C 6Z8
Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Montreal, Quebec, H1T 2M4
CHUM - Hopital Notre-Dame
Montreal, Quebec, H2L 4M1
CHUM - Hotel Dieu du Montreal
Montreal, Quebec, H2W 1T8
Lakeridge Health Oshawa
Oshawa, Ontario, L1G 2B9
Ottawa Health Research Institute - General Division
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6
Allan Blair Cancer Centre
Regina, Saskatchewan, S4T 7T1
Atlantic Health Sciences Corporation
Saint John, New Brunswick, E2L 4L2
Saskatoon Cancer Centre
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 4H4
Algoma District Cancer Program
Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, P6B 0A8
The Scarborough Hospital
Scarborough Village, Ontario, M1P 2V5
Niagara Health System
St. Catharines, Ontario, L2R 7C6
Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, AIB 3V6
BCCA - Fraser Valley Cancer Centre
Surrey, British Columbia, V3V 1Z2
Thunder Bay Regional Health Science Centre
Thunder Bay, Ontario, P7B 6V4
Odette Cancer Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5
St. Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8
Mount Sinai Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X5
Univ. Health Network-Princess Margaret Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9
Trillium Health Centre - West Toronto
Toronto, Ontario, M9C 1A5
BCCA - Vancouver Cancer Centre
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 4E6
Windsor Regional Cancer Centre
Windsor, Ontario, N8W 2X3
CancerCare Manitoba
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 0V9
About this study
Official title: A Phase III Adjuvant Trial Of Sequenced EC + Filgrastim + Epoetin Alfa Followed By Paclitaxel Versus Sequenced AC Followed By Paclitaxel Versus CEF As Therapy For Premenopausal Women And Early Postmenopausal Women Who Have Had Potentially Curative Surgery For Node Positive Or High Risk Node Negative Breast Cancer
RATIONALE:
- . To compare the effects on breast cancer of three different combinations of drugs which are commonly used to treat this disease.
- . It is not yet known which treatment regimen is most effective for breast cancer.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy given with or without epoetin alfa in treating women who have undergone surgery for stage I, stage II, or stage III breast cancer.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- Compare the disease-free survival of premenopausal or early postmenopausal women with previously resected node positive or high-risk node negative stage I-IIIB breast cancer treated with cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil vs cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, filgrastim (G-CSF), and epoetin alfa followed by paclitaxel vs cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin followed by paclitaxel.
Secondary
- Compare the overall survival of patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the rate of toxic effects of these regimens in this patient population.
- Compare the quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to number of positive nodes (0 vs 1-3 vs 4-10 vs more than 10), type of prior surgery (total vs partial mastectomy), and estrogen receptor status (positive vs negative). Patients are randomized to one of three treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive epirubicin IV and fluorouracil IV on days 1 and 8 and oral cyclophosphamide on days 1-14. Treatment repeats every 28 days for 6 courses.
- Arm II: Patients receive epirubicin IV and cyclophosphamide IV on day 1 and filgrastim (G-CSF) subcutaneously (SC) on days 2-13. Patients with a hemoglobin < 13.0 g/dL also receive epoetin alfa SC once weekly beginning within 1 week after the start of therapy and continuing as needed. Treatment repeats every 14 days for 6 courses. Beginning 21 days after completion of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide, patients receive paclitaxel IV over 3 hours on day 1 and G-CSF and epoetin alfa as above. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 4 courses.
- Arm III: Patients receive doxorubicin IV over 15 minutes and cyclophosphamide IV over 15 minutes on day 1. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 4 courses. Beginning 21 days after completion of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, patients receive paclitaxel as in arm II. Treatment in all arms continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
All receptor positive patients receive oral tamoxifen or anastrozole (if tamoxifen is contraindicated) for 5 years after completion of chemotherapy.
Quality of life is assessed at baseline, day 1 of cycles 2, 3 4 and 6 (arm I), days 1 of cycles 3 and and day 1 of cycles 1 and 4 of paclitaxel (arm II), day 1 of cycles 2 and 3, day 1 of cycles 1 and 4 of paclitaxel, (arm III), 9 months, 12 months, and then annually thereafter until 5 years
Patients are followed at 9 months, 12 months, every 4 months for 1 year, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 2,100 patients (700 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study within 4 years.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- epoetin alfa, filgrastim, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin hydrochloride, epirubicin hydrochloride
- Keywords
- stage I breast cancer, stage II breast cancer, stage IIIA breast cancer, stage IIIB breast cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
epoetin alfaBiological
40,000 IU
filgrastimBiological
5 mg/kg/d - days 2-13
cyclophosphamideDrug
75, 600 and 830 mg/m2
60 mg/m2
epirubicin hydrochlorideDrug
60 mg/m2
fluorouracilDrug
500mg/m2
paclitaxelDrug
175 mg/m2
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1: CEF | Active comparator | 6 cycles - q 28 days (6 months) - Cyclophosphamide 75 mg/m2 - po - Days 1-14 - Epirubicin 60 mg/m2 - IV - Days 1 and 8 - 5 Fluorouracil: 500mg/m2 - IV - Days 1 and 8 + Continuous Antibiotic Prophylaxis with Cotrimoxazole 960 mg (i.e.2x480 mg tablets) po-bid or Ciprofloxacin 500 mg - po-bid Receives: Drug: cyclophosphamide; Drug: epirubicin hydrochloride; Drug: fluorouracil |
| Arm 2: EC/T | Active comparator | 6 cycles - q 14 days (3 months) - Epirubicin 120 mg/m2 - IV - Day 1 - Cyclophosphamide 830 mg/m2 - IV - Day 1 - Filgrastim 5μg/kg/d - SC - Days 2 - 13 + Epoetin Alfa 40,000 IU - SC - once weekly (to begin within 1 week after start of protocol therapy as needed) 21 days from last administration of EC (EC/T) 4 cycles - q 21 days (3 months) - Adriamycin 60 mg/m2 - IV - Day 1 - Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 - IV - Day 1 - 21 days from last administration of AC 4 cycles - q 21 days (3 months) - Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 IV 3 hour infusion Receives: Biological: epoetin alfa; Biological: filgrastim; Drug: cyclophosphamide; Drug: doxorubicin hydrochloride; Drug: paclitaxel |
| Arm 3: AC/T | Active comparator | 4 cycles - q 21 days (3 months) - Adriamycin 60 mg/m2 - IV - Day 1 - Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 - IV - Day 1 21 days from last administration of AC 4 cycles - q 21 days (3 months) - Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 IV 3 hour infusion Receives: Drug: cyclophosphamide; Drug: doxorubicin hydrochloride; Drug: paclitaxel |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Disease Free Survival
Disease free survival was defined as the time from randomization to the time of recurrence of the primary disease. Local or nodal recurrence and metastatic disease were considered a recurrence of the primary tumour. Patients who had contralateral breast cancer or a second primary malignancy, or died from some cause other than disease were censored as relapse-free at the time of death. Patients who had not relapsed were censored at longest follow-up or at non-breast cancer death. As required, adjudication was used to assess reports of recurrence.
Measured: 13 years
Secondary outcomes (1)
Overall Survival
Overall survival was defined as the time from randomization to the time of death from any cause, with censoring at longest follow-up.
Measured: 13 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jan 2003 (estimated)
- Study start4 Dec 2000
- Primary completion10 Feb 2014
- Study completion17 Mar 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 2,104 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- NCIC Clinical Trials Group
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Collaborators
- North Central Cancer Treatment Group, SWOG Cancer Research Network, Cancer and Leukemia Group B
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Mark N. Levine, MD, Study chair, Margaret and Charles Juravinski Cancer CentreEdith A. Perez, MD, Study chair, Mayo ClinicKathy S. Albain, MD, Study chair, Loyola UniversityMargot Burnell, Study chair, Atlantic Health Sciences Corporation, Saint John NBHope Rugo, Study chair, Cancer and Leukemia Group B
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00014222
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MA21
- Other IDs
- CAN-NCIC-MA21, AMGEN-CAN-NCIC-MA21, NCCTG-CAN-NCIC-MA21, BMS-CAN-NCIC-MA21, JANSSEN-ORTHO-CAN-NCIC-MA21, PFIZER-CAN-NCIC-MA21, SWOG-CAN-NCIC-MA21, CDR0000068520
- Status last verified
- Mar 2020
- First submitted
- 10 Apr 2001
- Last updated
- 5 Oct 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Burnell MJ, O'Connor EM, Chapman JW, et al.: Triple-negative receptor status and prognosis in the NCIC CTG MA.21 adjuvant breast cancer trial. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 26 (Suppl 15): A-550, 2008.
Burnell MJ, Levine MN, Chapman JA, et al.: A phase III adjuvant trial of sequenced EC + filgrastim + epoetin-alpha followed by paclitaxel compared to sequenced AC followed by paclitaxel compared to CEF in women with node-positive or high-risk node-negative breast cancer (NCIC CTG MA.21). [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 25 (Suppl 18): A-550, 2007.
Burnell M, Levine M, Chapman JA, et al.: A randomized trial of CEF versus dose dense EC followed by paclitaxel versus AC followed by paclitaxel in women with node positive or high risk node negative breast cancer, NCIC CTG MA.21: results of an interim analysis. [Abstract] 29th Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 14-17, 2006, San Antonio, Texas. A-53, 2006.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Oct 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase III Adjuvant Trial Of Sequenced EC + Filgrastim + Epoetin Alfa Followed By Paclitaxel Versus Sequenced AC Followed By Paclitaxel Versus CEF As Therapy For Premenopausal Women And Early Postmenopausal Women Who Have Had Potentially Curative Surgery For Node Positive Or High Risk Node Negative Breast Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00014222
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MA21
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Keywords
- stage I breast cancer, stage II breast cancer, stage IIIA breast cancer, stage IIIB breast cancer
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 2,104 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- NCIC Clinical Trials GroupResearch network
- Collaborators
- North Central Cancer Treatment Group, SWOG Cancer Research Network, Cancer and Leukemia Group B
- Study start
- 4 Dec 2000 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Feb 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- 17 Mar 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jan 2003 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 10 Mar 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE:
- . To compare the effects on breast cancer of three different combinations of drugs which are commonly used to treat this disease.
- . It is not yet known which treatment regimen is most effective for breast cancer.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy given with or without epoetin alfa in treating women who have undergone surgery for stage I, stage II, or stage III breast cancer.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- Compare the disease-free survival of premenopausal or early postmenopausal women with previously resected node positive or high-risk node negative stage I-IIIB breast cancer treated with cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil vs cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, filgrastim (G-CSF), and epoetin alfa followed by paclitaxel vs cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin followed by paclitaxel.
Secondary
- Compare the overall survival of patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the rate of toxic effects of these regimens in this patient population.
- Compare the quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to number of positive nodes (0 vs 1-3 vs 4-10 vs more than 10), type of prior surgery (total vs partial mastectomy), and estrogen receptor status (positive vs negative). Patients are randomized to one of three treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive epirubicin IV and fluorouracil IV on days 1 and 8 and oral cyclophosphamide on days 1-14. Treatment repeats every 28 days for 6 courses.
- Arm II: Patients receive epirubicin IV and cyclophosphamide IV on day 1 and filgrastim (G-CSF) subcutaneously (SC) on days 2-13. Patients with a hemoglobin < 13.0 g/dL also receive epoetin alfa SC once weekly beginning within 1 week after the start of therapy and continuing as needed. Treatment repeats every 14 days for 6 courses. Beginning 21 days after completion of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide, patients receive paclitaxel IV over 3 hours on day 1 and G-CSF and epoetin alfa as above. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 4 courses.
- Arm III: Patients receive doxorubicin IV over 15 minutes and cyclophosphamide IV over 15 minutes on day 1. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 4 courses. Beginning 21 days after completion of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, patients receive paclitaxel as in arm II. Treatment in all arms continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
All receptor positive patients receive oral tamoxifen or anastrozole (if tamoxifen is contraindicated) for 5 years after completion of chemotherapy.
Quality of life is assessed at baseline, day 1 of cycles 2, 3 4 and 6 (arm I), days 1 of cycles 3 and and day 1 of cycles 1 and 4 of paclitaxel (arm II), day 1 of cycles 2 and 3, day 1 of cycles 1 and 4 of paclitaxel, (arm III), 9 months, 12 months, and then annually thereafter until 5 years
Patients are followed at 9 months, 12 months, every 4 months for 1 year, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 2,100 patients (700 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study within 4 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1: CEF | Active comparator | Drug: cyclophosphamide, Drug: epirubicin hydrochloride, Drug: fluorouracil6 cycles - q 28 days (6 months) - Cyclophosphamide 75 mg/m2 - po - Days 1-14 - Epirubicin 60 mg/m2 - IV - Days 1 and 8 - 5 Fluorouracil: 500mg/m2 - IV - Days 1 and 8 + Continuous Antibiotic Prophylaxis with Cotrimoxazole 960 mg (i.e.2x480 mg tablets) po-bid or Ciprofloxacin 500 mg - po-bid |
| Arm 2: EC/T | Active comparator | Biological: epoetin alfa, Biological: filgrastim, Drug: cyclophosphamide, Drug: doxorubicin hydrochloride, Drug: paclitaxel6 cycles - q 14 days (3 months) - Epirubicin 120 mg/m2 - IV - Day 1 - Cyclophosphamide 830 mg/m2 - IV - Day 1 - Filgrastim 5μg/kg/d - SC - Days 2 - 13 + Epoetin Alfa 40,000 IU - SC - once weekly (to begin within 1 week after start of protocol therapy as needed) 21 days from last administration of EC (EC/T) 4 cycles - q 21 days (3 months) - Adriamycin 60 mg/m2 - IV - Day 1 - Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 - IV - Day 1 - 21 days from last administration of AC 4 cycles - q 21 days (3 months) - Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 IV 3 hour infusion |
| Arm 3: AC/T | Active comparator | Drug: cyclophosphamide, Drug: doxorubicin hydrochloride, Drug: paclitaxel4 cycles - q 21 days (3 months) - Adriamycin 60 mg/m2 - IV - Day 1 - Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 - IV - Day 1 21 days from last administration of AC 4 cycles - q 21 days (3 months) - Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 IV 3 hour infusion |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 60 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| epoetin alfa40,000 IU | Biological | Arm 2: EC/T |
| filgrastim5 mg/kg/d - days 2-13 | Biological | Arm 2: EC/T |
| cyclophosphamide75, 600 and 830 mg/m2 | Drug | Arm 1: CEF, Arm 2: EC/T, Arm 3: AC/T |
| doxorubicin hydrochloride60 mg/m2 | Drug | Arm 2: EC/T, Arm 3: AC/T |
| epirubicin hydrochloride60 mg/m2 | Drug | Arm 1: CEF |
| fluorouracil500mg/m2 | Drug | Arm 1: CEF |
| paclitaxel175 mg/m2 | Drug | Arm 2: EC/T, Arm 3: AC/T |
Primary outcome
Disease Free Survival
Time frame: 13 years
Disease free survival was defined as the time from randomization to the time of recurrence of the primary disease. Local or nodal recurrence and metastatic disease were considered a recurrence of the primary tumour. Patients who had contralateral breast cancer or a second primary malignancy, or died from some cause other than disease were censored as relapse-free at the time of death. Patients who had not relapsed were censored at longest follow-up or at non-breast cancer death. As required, adjudication was used to assess reports of recurrence.
1 secondary outcome
Overall Survival
Time frame: 13 years
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Oct 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publicationBurnell MJ, O'Connor EM, Chapman JW, et al.: Triple-negative receptor status and prognosis in the NCIC CTG MA.21 adjuvant breast cancer trial. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 26 (Suppl 15): A-550, 2008.
- Results publicationBurnell MJ, Levine MN, Chapman JA, et al.: A phase III adjuvant trial of sequenced EC + filgrastim + epoetin-alpha followed by paclitaxel compared to sequenced AC followed by paclitaxel compared to CEF in women with node-positive or high-risk node-negative breast cancer (NCIC CTG MA.21). [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 25 (Suppl 18): A-550, 2007.
- Results publicationBurnell M, Levine M, Chapman JA, et al.: A randomized trial of CEF versus dose dense EC followed by paclitaxel versus AC followed by paclitaxel in women with node positive or high risk node negative breast cancer, NCIC CTG MA.21: results of an interim analysis. [Abstract] 29th Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 14-17, 2006, San Antonio, Texas. A-53, 2006.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Whether Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib is as Effective as Chemotherapy Followed by Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib for the Treatment of High Anatomic Stage Breast Cancer With Low Recurrence Risk, The RxFINE-Low Trial
Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mark N. Levine, MD study chair
Margaret and Charles Juravinski Cancer Centre
Edith A. Perez, MD study chair
Mayo Clinic
Kathy S. Albain, MD study chair
Loyola University
78 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing epoetin alfa, filgrastim and cyclophosphamide in people with Breast Cancer, run by NCIC Clinical Trials Group at 78 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Oct 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 78 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Mar 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Disease Free Survival (time frame: 13 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00014222, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Oct 2020.