AzTrials
AzTrials

Melanoma (Skin)Phase 2NCT00019721

Vaccine Therapy With or Without Interleukin-2 in Treating Patients With Metastatic Melanoma

A Phase 2 study testing MART-1 antigen, aldesleukin and gp100 antigen in people with Melanoma (Skin), run by National Cancer Institute (NCI) at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

RATIONALE: Vaccines may make the body build an immune response to kill tumor cells. Interleukin-2 may stimulate a person's white blood cells to kill tumor cells. Combining vaccine therapy with interleukin-2 may be an effective treatment for metastatic melanoma. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Melanoma (Skin)
What is being tested?
MART-1 antigen, aldesleukin and gp100 antigen
How many people
Not given
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Apr 1999to Jun 2003
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Histologically confirmed metastatic melanoma that has failed standard therapy
  • Measurable disease
  • HLA-A0201 positive

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

Age:

  • 16 and over

Performance status:

  • ECOG 0-2

Life expectancy:

  • More than 3 months

Hematopoietic:

  • WBC at least 3,000/mm^3
  • Platelet count at least 90,000/mm^3

Hepatic:

  • Bilirubin no greater than 2.0 mg/dL (less than 3.0 mg/dL for patients with Gilbert's syndrome)
  • AST/ALT less than 3 times normal
  • Hepatitis B surface antigen negative
  • No coagulation disorder

Renal:

  • Creatinine no greater than 2.0 mg/dL

Cardiovascular:

  • No major cardiovascular disease
  • If cardiovascular disease or other debilitating symptoms present, may receive peptide emulsified with Montanide ISA-51 only

Pulmonary:

  • No major respiratory disease

Other:

  • Not pregnant
  • Fertile patients must use effective contraception
  • HIV negative
  • No active systemic infection
  • No autoimmune disease or immunodeficiency disease
  • No primary or secondary immunodeficiency

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

Biologic therapy:

  • At least 3 weeks since prior biologic therapy
  • No prior MART-1 antigen immunization

Chemotherapy:

  • At least 3 weeks since prior chemotherapy

Endocrine therapy:

  • At least 3 weeks since prior endocrine therapy
  • No concurrent steroid therapy

Radiotherapy:

  • At least 3 weeks since prior radiotherapy

Surgery:

  • Prior surgery allowed

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Surgery Branch

    Bethesda, Maryland, 20892

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Immunization of Patients With Metastatic Melanoma Using MART-1 and GP100 Peptides Modified to Increase Binding to HLA-0201

RATIONALE: Vaccines may make the body build an immune response to kill tumor cells. Interleukin-2 may stimulate a person's white blood cells to kill tumor cells. Combining vaccine therapy with interleukin-2 may be an effective treatment for metastatic melanoma.

PURPOSE: Phase II trial to compare the effectiveness of vaccine therapy with or without interleukin-2 in treating patients who have metastatic melanoma that has not responded to previous therapy.

Read the detailed description

OBJECTIVES:

  • Compare the efficacy of gp100:209-217(210M) peptide and MART-1:26-35(27L) peptide administered with or without high-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) in patients with metastatic melanoma who are HLA-A0201 positive.
  • Determine the efficacy of these peptides in patients who cannot receive IL-2.
  • Compare the efficacy of IL-2 with or without these peptides in patients who need immediate treatment with IL-2.
  • Determine the efficacy of MART-1:26-35(27L) peptide in patients who have received prior gp100 antigen.
  • Compare the immunologic response experienced by patients who have received peptide, with or without IL-2, as measured by changes in T-cell precursors from before to after treatment.
  • Compare the toxic effects of these regimens in these patients.

OUTLINE: This is a partially randomized study.

Patients are assigned to 1 of 4 treatment groups based on disease status and prior therapy.

  • Group A (eligible to receive interleukin-2 (IL-2) but not in immediate need; no prior immunization with gp100 or MART-1 antigen): Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
  • Arm I: Patients receive gp100 and MART-1 peptides emulsified in Montanide ISA-51 (ISA-51) subcutaneously (SC) on day 1. (Arm I closed as of 10/30/02).
  • Arm II: Patients receive both peptides as in arm I on day 1 and high-dose IL-2 IV over 15 minutes every 8 hours on days 2-5 (for up to 12 doses). (Arm II closed as of 10/30/02).
  • Group B (ineligible to receive IL-2 due to other debilitating disease): Patients receive treatment as in group A, arm I.
  • Group C (need immediate IL-2 therapy due to extensive and rapid progression of disease): Patients receive treatment as in group A, arm II. (Group C closed as of 10/30/02).
  • Group D (prior immunization with gp100 antigen): Patients receive modified MART-1:26-35(27L) peptide emulsified in ISA-51 SC on day 1.

Treatment in all groups repeats every 3 weeks for 4 courses. Patients who achieve a minor, mixed, or partial response may receive up to 12 additional courses. Patients who achieve complete response receive 2 additional courses.

Patients are followed at 4-6 weeks.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 103 patients (15-25 for group A, arm I; 19-33 for group A, arm II; and 15 each for groups B, C, and D) will be accrued for this study within 1 year.

Conditions
Melanoma (Skin)
Being tested
MART-1 antigen, aldesleukin, gp100 antigen, incomplete Freund's adjuvant
Keywords
stage IV melanoma, recurrent melanoma
Medical subject headings
Melanoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MART-1 antigenBiological

  • aldesleukinBiological

  • gp100 antigenBiological

  • incomplete Freund's adjuvantBiological

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Aug 2003 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 1999
  3. Study completionJun 2003

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00019721
Sponsor's protocol ID
CDR0000067051
Other IDs
NCI-99-C-0092, NCI-T99-0033
Status last verified
Aug 2002
First submitted
11 Jul 2001
Last updated
20 Jun 2013
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing MART-1 antigen, aldesleukin and gp100 antigen in people with Melanoma (Skin), run by National Cancer Institute (NCI) at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jun 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jun 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in